compensating for super classes). This was making the reported class
sizes for empty classes very, very wrong.
- Also, we now report the size info for an empty class like gcc (as
the offset of the start, not as 0, 0).
- Add a few more test cases we were mishandling before (padding bit
field at end of struct, for example).
llvm-svn: 70938
- This implements gcc style Objective-C interface layout (I
think). Currently it is always off, there is no functionality
change unless this is passed.
For the curious, the deal is that gcc lays out the fields of a
subclass as if they were part of the superclass. That is, the
subclass fields immediately follow the super class fields instead
of being padded to the alignment of the superclass structure.
- Currently gcc uses the tight layout in 32-bit and 64-bit modes, and
llvm-gcc uses it in 32-bit only, for reasons which aren't clear
yet. We probably want to switch to matching gcc, once this makes it
through testing... my hope is that we can also fix llvm-gcc in
order to maintain compatibility between the compilers.
llvm-svn: 70827
via CollectObjCIvars.
- In places where we need them, we should have the implementation and
access the properties through it.
This is a fairly substantial functionality change:
1. @encode no longer encodes synthesized ivars, ever.
2. The ivar layout bitmap no longer encodes information for
synthesized ivars in superclasses. Well, actually I had already
broken that, but it is intentional now.
We are now differing substantially from llvm-gcc and gcc
here. However, in my opinion this fundamentally *must* work if
non-fragile classes are to work. Without this change, the result of
@encode and the ivar layout depend on the order that the
implementation is seen in a file (if it is in the same file with its
superclass). Since both scenarios should work the same, our behavior
is now consistent with gcc behavior as if an implementation is never
seen following an implementation of its superclass.
Note that #2 is only a functionality change when (A) an
implementation appears in the same translation unit with the
implementation of its superclass, and (B) the superclass has
synthesized ivars. My belief is that this situation does not occur in
practice.
I am not yet sure of the role/semantics of @encode when synthesized
ivars are present... it's use is fairly unsound in a non-fragile world.
llvm-svn: 70822
struct.
- We still need to do more lookup than necessary because ivars don't
live in a reasonable DeclContext.
- The only remaining client of the interface shadow struct is the
ivar layout bitmap.
llvm-svn: 70756
- These routines should now be independent of the Sema state.
- This is nearly zero functionality change, the distinction only
matters in the non-fragile ABI, and the consumers that care about
this distinction should be using getASTObjCImplementationLayout.
llvm-svn: 70692
- The difference from getASTObjCInterfaceLayout is that the computes
the layout including synthesized ivars.
- No functionality change, they currently both compute the same thing
-- whether that includes synthesized ivars or not depends on when
they get called!!!
llvm-svn: 70690
into the left-hand side of an assignment expression. This completes
most of PR3500; the only remaining part is to deal with the
GCC-specific implementation-defined behavior for "unsigned long" (and
other) bit-fields.
llvm-svn: 70623
expressions not yet properly handled by the CFGBuilder. This failure resulted in
a null CFGBlock* being used in rare cases (causing a crash).
llvm-svn: 70612
"aligned" attribute. Previously, we were skipping over these
attributes when we jumped directly to the canonical type. Now,
ASTContext::getTypeInfo walks through typedefs and other
"non-canonical" types manually, looking for "aligned" attributes on
typedefs.
As part of this change, I moved the GNU-specific logic (such as
determining the alignment of void or of a function pointer) out of the
expression evaluator and into ASTContext::getTypeInfo.
llvm-svn: 70497
compatible with VC++ and GCC. The codegen/mangling angle hasn't
been fully ironed out yet. Note that we accept int128_t even in
32-bit mode, unlike gcc.
llvm-svn: 70464
mode and in the presence of __gnu_inline__ attributes. This should fix
both PR3989 and PR4069.
As part of this, we now keep track of all of the attributes attached
to each declaration even after we've performed declaration
merging. This fixes PR3264.
llvm-svn: 70292
- Add 'LoopTarget' pointer field to CFGBlock. This records if the block is used
as the 'loop back' path back to the head of a loop.
- For ForStmt, encode the loop back target as the increment code.
llvm-svn: 70274
parameters in a functiondecl, even if the decl is invalid and has a confusing
Declarator. On the testcase, we now emit one beautiful diagnostic:
t.c:2:1: error: unknown type name 'unknown_type'
unknown_type f(void*)
^
GCC 4.0 produces:
t.c:2: error: syntax error before ‘f’
t.c: In function ‘f’:
t.c:2: error: parameter name omitted
and GCC 4.2:
t.c:2: error: expected ‘=’, ‘,’, ‘;’, ‘asm’ or ‘__attribute__’ before ‘f’
llvm-svn: 70016
remove a special case that was apparently for typeof() and
generalize the code in SemaDecl that handles typedefs to
handle any sugar type (including typedef, typeof, etc).
Improve comment to make it more clear what is going on.
llvm-svn: 70015
Daniel Dunbar