Use information computed while inferring new register classes to emit
accurate, table-driven implementations of getMatchingSuperRegClass().
Delete the old manual, error-prone implementations in the targets.
llvm-svn: 146873
Teach TableGen to create the missing register classes needed for
getMatchingSuperRegClass() to return maximal results. The function is
still not auto-generated, so it still returns inexact results.
This produces these new register classes:
ARM:
QQPR_with_dsub_0_in_DPR_8
QQQQPR_with_dsub_0_in_DPR_8
X86:
GR64_with_sub_32bit_in_GR32_NOAX
GR64_with_sub_32bit_in_GR32_NOAX_and_GR32_NOSP
GR64_with_sub_16bit_in_GR16_NOREX
GR64_with_sub_32bit_in_GR32_NOAX_and_GR32_NOREX
GR64_TC_and_GR64_with_sub_32bit_in_GR32_NOAX
GR64_with_sub_32bit_in_GR32_NOAX_and_GR32_NOREX_NOSP
GR64_TCW64_and_GR64_with_sub_32bit_in_GR32_NOAX
GR64_TC_and_GR64_with_sub_32bit_in_GR32_NOAX_and_GR32_NOREX
GR64_with_sub_32bit_in_GR32_TC
GR64_with_sub_32bit_in_GR32_ABCD_and_GR32_NOAX
GR64_with_sub_32bit_in_GR32_NOAX_and_GR32_TC
GR64_with_sub_32bit_in_GR32_AD
GR64_with_sub_32bit_in_GR32_AD_and_GR32_NOAX
The other targets in the tree are not weird enough to be affected.
llvm-svn: 146872
The function TRI::getCommonSubClass(A, B) returns the largest common
sub-class of the register classes A and B. This patch teaches TableGen
to synthesize sub-classes such that the answer is always maximal.
In other words, every register that is in both A and B will also be
present in getCommonSubClass(A, B).
This introduces these synthetic register classes:
ARM:
GPRnopc_and_hGPR
GPRnopc_and_hGPR
hGPR_and_rGPR
GPRnopc_and_hGPR
GPRnopc_and_hGPR
hGPR_and_rGPR
tGPR_and_tcGPR
hGPR_and_tcGPR
X86:
GR32_NOAX_and_GR32_NOSP
GR32_NOAX_and_GR32_NOREX
GR64_NOSP_and_GR64_TC
GR64_NOSP_and_GR64_TC
GR64_NOREX_and_GR64_TC
GR32_NOAX_and_GR32_NOSP
GR32_NOAX_and_GR32_NOREX
GR32_NOAX_and_GR32_NOREX_NOSP
GR64_NOSP_and_GR64_TC
GR64_NOREX_and_GR64_TC
GR64_NOREX_NOSP_and_GR64_TC
GR32_NOAX_and_GR32_NOSP
GR32_NOAX_and_GR32_NOREX
GR32_NOAX_and_GR32_NOREX_NOSP
GR32_ABCD_and_GR32_NOAX
GR32_NOAX_and_GR32_NOSP
GR32_NOAX_and_GR32_NOREX
GR32_NOAX_and_GR32_NOREX_NOSP
GR32_ABCD_and_GR32_NOAX
GR32_NOAX_and_GR32_TC
GR32_NOAX_and_GR32_NOSP
GR64_NOSP_and_GR64_TC
GR32_NOAX_and_GR32_NOREX
GR32_NOAX_and_GR32_NOREX_NOSP
GR64_NOREX_and_GR64_TC
GR64_NOREX_NOSP_and_GR64_TC
GR32_ABCD_and_GR32_NOAX
GR64_ABCD_and_GR64_TC
GR32_NOAX_and_GR32_TC
GR32_AD_and_GR32_NOAX
Other targets are unaffected.
llvm-svn: 146657
This function is used to constrain a register class to a sub-class that
supports the given sub-register index.
For example, getSubClassWithSubReg(GR32, sub_8bit) -> GR32_ABCD.
The function will be used to compute register classes when emitting
INSERT_SUBREG and EXTRACT_SUBREG nodes and for register class inflation
of sub-register operations.
The version provided by TableGen is usually adequate, but targets can
override.
llvm-svn: 141142
The set of register classes should be closed under sub-register
operations and intersections. That will allow the register allocator to
model combinations of constraints accurately.
This patch implements the easiest form of register class inference: For
every register class, and for every sub-register SubIdx, the subset of
registers in RC that have a SubIdx sub-register should also be a register
class.
This does create some new register classes for the targets in the tree:
ARM gets a new QQQQPR_with_ssub_0. This class was omitted from the .td
file on purpose because it only has two registers. InstrEmitter and
RegisterCoalescer have safeguards against selecting too small register
classes, so it is harmless.
PowerPC gets a G8RC_with_sub_32 class because LR is not a sub_32
sub-register of LR8. I think that might be an omission?
X86 puts RIP in the GR64 class, and since that register doesn't have
8-bit sub-registers, we get:
GR64_with_sub_8bit
GR64_TC_with_sub_8bit
GR64_NOREX_with_sub_8bit
GR64_TC_with_sub_8bit_hi
The various CodeGen classes have already been fixed so adding new
register classes should not affect compile time.
llvm-svn: 141084
When TableGen starts creating its own register classes, the synthesized
classes won't have a Record reference. All register classes must have a
name, though.
llvm-svn: 141081
All register classes are given a lower ID than their sub-classes.
Cliques are ordered alphabetically.
This will be used to simplify some sub-class operations.
llvm-svn: 140826
Make all of the RecTy constructors private, and use get() factory
methods instead. Return singleton instances when it makes sense.
ListTy instance pointers are stored in the element RecTy instance.
BitsRecTy instance pointers, one per length, are stored in a static vector.
Also unique DefInit instances. A Record has a unique DefInit which
has a unique RecordRecTy instance.
This saves some 200k-300k RecTy allocations when parsing ARM.td. It
reduces TableGen's heap usage by almost 50%.
llvm-svn: 135399
Manage Inits in a FoldingSet. This provides several benefits:
- Memory for Inits is properly managed
- Duplicate Inits are folded into Flyweights, saving memory
- It enforces const-correctness, protecting against certain classes
of bugs
The above benefits allow Inits to be used in more contexts, which in
turn provides more dynamism to TableGen. This enhanced capability
will be used by the AVX code generator to a fold common patterns
together.
llvm-svn: 134907
A RegisterTuples instance is used to synthesize super-registers by
zipping together lists of sub-registers. This is useful for generating
pseudo-registers representing register sequence constraints like 'two
consecutive GPRs', or 'an even-odd pair of floating point registers'.
The RegisterTuples def can be used in register set operations when
building register classes. That is the only way of accessing the
synthesized super-registers.
For example, the ARM QQ register class of pseudo-registers could have
been formed like this:
// Form pairs Q0_Q1, Q2_Q3, ...
def QQPairs : RegisterTuples<[qsub_0, qsub_1],
[(decimate QPR, 2),
(decimate (shl QPR, 1), 2)]>;
def QQ : RegisterClass<..., (add QQPairs)>;
Similarly, pseudo-registers representing '3 consecutive D-regs with
wraparound' look like:
// Form D0_D1_D2, D1_D2_D3, ..., D30_D31_D0, D31_D0_D1.
def DSeqTriples : RegisterTuples<[dsub_0, dsub_1, dsub_2],
[(rotl DPR, 0),
(rotl DPR, 1),
(rotl DPR, 2)]>;
TableGen automatically computes aliasing information for the synthesized
registers.
Register tuples are still somewhat experimental. We still need to see
how they interact with MC.
llvm-svn: 133407
Targets that need to change the default allocation order should use the
AltOrders mechanism instead. See the X86 and ARM targets for examples.
The allocation_order_begin() and allocation_order_end() methods have been
replaced with getRawAllocationOrder(), and there is further support
functions in RegisterClassInfo.
It is no longer possible to insert arbitrary code into generated
register classes. This is a feature.
llvm-svn: 133332
A register class can define AltOrders and AltOrderSelect instead of
defining method protos and bodies. The AltOrders lists can be defined
with set operations, and TableGen can verify that the alternative
allocation orders only contain valid registers.
This is currently an opt-in feature, and it is still possible to
override allocation_order_begin/end. That will not be true for long.
llvm-svn: 133320
This prepares tablegen to compute register lists from set theoretic dag
expressions. This doesn't really make any difference as long as
Target.td still declares RegisterClass::MemberList as [Register].
llvm-svn: 133043
Make the Elements vector private and expose an ArrayRef through
getOrder() instead. getOrder will eventually provide multiple
user-specified allocation orders.
Use the sorted member set for member and subclass tests. Clean up a lot
of ad hoc searches.
llvm-svn: 133040
Besides moving structural computations to CodeGenRegisters.cpp, this
also well-defines the order of these lists:
- Sub-register lists come from a pre-order traversal of the graph
defined by the SubRegs lists in the .td files.
- Super-register lists are topologically ordered so no register comes
before any of its sub-registers. When the sub-register graph is not a
tree, independent super-registers appear in numerical order.
- Lists of overlapping registers are ordered according to register
number.
This reverses the order of the super-regs lists, but nobody was
depending on that. The previous order of the overlaps lists was odd, and
it may have depended on the precise behavior of std::stable_sort.
The old computations are still there, but will be removed shortly.
llvm-svn: 132881
I'll be moving some more code there to gather all of the
register-specific stuff in one place. Currently it is shared between
CodeGenTarget and RegisterInfoEmitter.
The plan is that CodeGenRegisters can compute the full register bank
structure while RegisterInfoEmitter only will handle the printing part.
llvm-svn: 132788
Jakob Stoklund Olesen