When branching to a block that immediately tail calls, it is possible to fold
the call directly into the branch if the call is direct and there is no stack
adjustment, saving one byte.
Example:
define void @f(i32 %x, i32 %y) {
entry:
%p = icmp eq i32 %x, %y
br i1 %p, label %bb1, label %bb2
bb1:
tail call void @foo()
ret void
bb2:
tail call void @bar()
ret void
}
before:
f:
movl 4(%esp), %eax
cmpl 8(%esp), %eax
jne .LBB0_2
jmp foo
.LBB0_2:
jmp bar
after:
f:
movl 4(%esp), %eax
cmpl 8(%esp), %eax
jne bar
.LBB0_1:
jmp foo
I don't expect any significant size savings from this (on a Clang bootstrap I
saw 288 bytes), but it does make the code a little tighter.
This patch only does 32-bit, but 64-bit would work similarly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24108
llvm-svn: 280832
The code is now written in terms of source and dest classes with feature checks inside each type of copy instead of having separate functions for each feature set.
llvm-svn: 280673
Previously we were extending to copying the whole ZMM register. The register allocator shouldn't use XMM16-31 or YMM16-31 in this configuration as the instructions to spill them aren't available.
llvm-svn: 280648
The only way to select them was in AVX512 mode because EVEX VMOVSS/SD was below them and the patterns weren't qualified properly for AVX only. So if you happened to have an aligned FR32/FR64 load in AVX512 you could get a VEX encoded VMOVAPS/VMOVAPD.
I tried to search back through history and it seems like these instructions were probably unselectable for at least 5 years, at least to the time the VEX versions were added. But I can't prove they ever were.
llvm-svn: 280644
According to spec cvtdq2pd and cvtps2pd instructions don't require memory operand to be aligned
to 16 bytes. This patch removes this requirement from the memory folding table.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23919
llvm-svn: 280402
These are no different in load behaviour to the existing ADD/SUB/MUL/DIV scalar ops but were missing from isNonFoldablePartialRegisterLoad
llvm-svn: 279652
This helped to improved memory-folding and register coalescing optimizations.
Also, this patch fixed the tracker #17229.
Reviewer: Craig Topper.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23108
llvm-svn: 278431
This patch helps avoid false dependencies on undef registers by updating the machine instructions' undef operand to use a register that the instruction is truly dependent on, or use a register with clearance higher than Pref.
Pseudo example:
loop:
xmm0 = ...
xmm1 = vcvtsi2sdl eax, xmm0<undef>
... = inst xmm0
jmp loop
In this example, selecting xmm0 as the undef register creates false dependency between loop iterations.
This false dependency cannot be solved by inserting an xor before vcvtsi2sdl because xmm0 is alive at the point of the vcvtsi2sdl instruction.
Selecting a different register instead of xmm0, especially a register that is not used in the loop, will eliminate this problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22466
llvm-svn: 278321
We only had partial memory folding support for the intrinsic definitions, and (as noted on PR27481) was causing FR32/FR64/VR128 mismatch errors with the machine verifier.
This patch adds missing memory folding support for both intrinsics and the ffloor/fnearbyint/fceil/frint/ftrunc patterns and in doing so fixes the failing machine verifier stack folding tests from PR27481.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23276
llvm-svn: 278106
Assuming SSE2 is available then we can safely commute between these, removing some unnecessary register moves and improving memory folding opportunities.
VEX encoded versions don't benefit so I haven't added support to them.
llvm-svn: 277930
This places the 132/213/231 form number in front of the SS/SD/PS/PD. Move the Y for 256-bit versions to be after the PS/PD. Change the AVX512 scalar forms to include a Z in the their name. This new format should be consistent with the general naming of instructions.
llvm-svn: 276559
Hans Wennborg