template argument (described by an expression, of course). For
example:
template<int...> struct int_tuple { };
template<int ...Values>
struct square {
typedef int_tuple<(Values*Values)...> type;
};
It also lays the foundation for pack expansions in an initializer-list.
llvm-svn: 122751
whether the expression contains an unexpanded parameter pack, in the
same vein as the changes to the Type hierarchy. Compute this bit
within all of the Expr subclasses.
This change required a bunch of reshuffling of dependency
calculations, mainly to consolidate them inside the constructors and
to fuse multiple loops that iterate over arguments to determine type
dependence, value dependence, and (now) containment of unexpanded
parameter packs.
Again, testing is painfully sparse, because all of the diagnostics
will change and it is more important to test the to-be-written visitor
that collects unexpanded parameter packs.
llvm-svn: 121831
class to be passed around. The line between argument and return types and
everything else is kindof vague, but I think it's justifiable.
llvm-svn: 121752
store it on the expression node. Also store an "object kind",
which distinguishes ordinary "addressed" l-values (like
variable references and pointer dereferences) and bitfield,
@property, and vector-component l-values.
Currently we're not using these for much, but I aim to switch
pretty much everything calculating l-valueness over to them.
For now they shouldn't necessarily be trusted.
llvm-svn: 119685
in more situations. In particular, for code like
template<class T> void Fn() { T* x; delete x; }
getDestroyedType() will now return T rather than T*, as it would
before this change. On the other hand, for code like this:
template<class T> void Fn() { T x; delete x; }
getDestroyedType() will return an empty QualType(), since it doesn't
know what the actual destroyed type would be. Previously, it would
return T.
OKed by rjmccall
llvm-svn: 119334
ensuring that they cover all of their child nodes. There's still a
clang_getCursor()-related issue with CXXFunctionalCastExprs with
CXXConstructExprs as children (see FIXME in the test case); I'll look
at that separately.
llvm-svn: 118132
This adds them where missing, and traces them through PCH. We fix at least one
bug in the extents found by the Index library, and make a lot of refactoring
tools which care about the exact formulation of a constructor call easier to
write. Also some minor cleanups to more consistently follow the friend pattern
instead of the setter pattern when rebuilding a serialized AST.
Patch originally by Samuel Benzaquen.
llvm-svn: 117254
Here's example code:
---
template<class T> class MyClass {
struct S { };
S* NewS() { return new S; }
void DeleteS() { delete NewS(); }
};
---
CXXDeleteExpr::getDestroyedType() on the 'delete NewS()' expression
would crash before this change. Now it returns a dependent type
object. Solution suggested by dgregor.
llvm-svn: 116891
"used", at the time that the default argument itself is used, also
mark destructors that will be called by this expression. This fixes a
regression that I introduced in r113700, which broke WebKit, and fixes
<rdar://problem/8427926>.
llvm-svn: 113883
This takes some trickery since CastExpr has subclasses (and indeed,
is abstract).
Also, smoosh the CastKind into the bitfield from Expr.
Drops two words of storage from Expr in the common case of expressions
which don't need inheritance paths. Avoids a separate allocation and
another word of overhead in cases needing inheritance paths. Also has
the advantage of not leaking memory, since destructors for AST nodes are
never run.
llvm-svn: 110507
size" error for code like
new (int [size])
to a warning, add a Fix-It to remove the parentheses, and make this
diagnostic work properly when it occurs in a template
instantiation. <rdar://problem/8018245>.
llvm-svn: 108242
Douglas Gregor