a member template, and you try to call the member template with an explicit
template argument. See PR7247
For example, this downgrades the error to a warning in:
template<typename T> struct set{};
struct Value {
template<typename T>
void set(T value) {
}
};
void foo() {
Value v;
v.set<double>(3.2); // Warning here.
}
llvm-svn: 105518
VLA restrictions so that one can use VLAs in templates (even
accidentally), but not as part of a non-type template parameter (which
would be very bad).
llvm-svn: 104471
in several important ways:
- VLAs of non-POD types are not permitted.
- VLAs cannot be used in conjunction with C++ templates.
These restrictions are intended to keep VLAs out of the parts of the
C++ type system where they cause the most trouble. Fixes PR5678 and
<rdar://problem/8013618>.
llvm-svn: 104443
the required "template" keyword, using the same heuristics we do for
dependent template names in member access expressions, e.g.,
test/SemaTemplate/dependent-template-recover.cpp:11:8: error: use 'template'
keyword to treat 'getAs' as a dependent template name
T::getAs<U>();
^
template
Fixes PR5404.
llvm-svn: 104409
that is missing the 'template' keyword, e.g.,
t->getAs<T>()
where getAs is a member of an unknown specialization. C++ requires
that we treat "getAs" as a value, but that would fail to parse since T
is the name of a type. We would then fail at the '>', since a type
cannot be followed by a '>'.
This is a very common error for C++ programmers to make, especially
since GCC occasionally allows it when it shouldn't (as does Visual
C++). So, when we are in this case, we use tentative parsing to see if
the tokens starting at "<" can only be parsed as a template argument
list. If so, we produce a diagnostic with a fix-it that states that
the 'template' keyword is needed:
test/SemaTemplate/dependent-template-recover.cpp:5:8: error: 'template' keyword
is required to treat 'getAs' as a dependent template name
t->getAs<T>();
^
template
This is just a start of this patch; I'd like to apply the same
approach to everywhere that a template-id with dependent template name
can be parsed.
llvm-svn: 104406
"used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and
when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function
definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential
definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting
vtables for classes without key functions.
The new scheme:
- For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate
the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member
function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type,
dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting
to/through a virtual base class, etc.
- For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to
indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation
unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can
delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also
occur with explicit template instantiation definitions.
- For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member
functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key
function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual
member functions when needed.
- At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the
ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define
them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the
vtables lazily).
From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are
permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions
whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers
were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance
issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke
Boost test cases, which now pass).
Notes:
(1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which
vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of
the larger tests from these issues.
(2) Some diagnostics related to
implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions
have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this
way.
(3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to
see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a
vtable.
Fixes PR7114 and PR6564.
llvm-svn: 103718
explicit instantiations of template. C++0x clarifies the intent
(they're ill-formed in some cases; see [temp.explicit] for
details). However, one could squint at the C++98/03 standard and
conclude they are permitted, so reduce the error to a warning
(controlled by -Wc++0x-compat) in C++98/03 mode.
llvm-svn: 103482
different tag kind ("struct" vs. "class") than the primary template,
which has an affect on access control.
Should fix the last remaining Boost.Accumulors failure.
llvm-svn: 103144
ParseOptionalCXXScopeSpecifier() only annotates the subset of
template-ids which are not subject to lexical ambiguity. Add support
for the more general case in ParseUnqualifiedId() to handle cases
such as A::template B().
Also improve some diagnostic locations.
Fixes PR7030, from Alp Toker!
llvm-svn: 103081
parameter with pointer-to-member type, we may have to perform a
qualification conversion, since the pointee type of the parameter
might be more qualified than the pointee type of the argument we form
from the declaration. Fixes PR6986.
llvm-svn: 102777
of the mapping from local declarations to their instantiated
counterparts during template instantiation. Previously, we tried to do
some unholy merging of local instantiation scopes that involved
storing a single hash table along with an "undo" list on the
side... which was ugly, and never handled function parameters
properly.
Now, we just keep separate hash tables for each local instantiation
scope, and "combining" two scopes means that we'll look in each of the
combined hash tables. The combined scope stack is rarely deep, and
this makes it easy to avoid the "undo" issues we were hitting. Also,
I've simplified the logic for function parameters: if we're declaring
a function and we need the function parameters to live longer, we just
push them back into the local instantiation scope where we need them.
Fixes PR6990.
llvm-svn: 102732
specializations, which keeps track of the order in which they were
originally declared. We use this number so that we can always walk the
list of partial specializations in a predictable order during matching
or template instantiation. This also fixes a failure in Boost.Proto,
where SourceManager::isBeforeInTranslationUnit was behaving
poorly in inconsistent ways.
llvm-svn: 102693
entering the current instantiation. Set up a little to preserve type location
information for typename types while we're in there.
Fixes a Boost failure.
llvm-svn: 102673
bindings when the template argument is still an expression; it happens
while checking the template arguments of a class template partial
specializations. Fixes PR6964.
llvm-svn: 102595
of a class template or class template partial specialization. That is to
say, in
template <class T> class A { ... };
or
template <class T> class B<const T*> { ... };
make 'A<T>' and 'B<const T*>' sugar for the corresponding InjectedClassNameType
when written inside the appropriate context. This allows us to track the
current instantiation appropriately even inside AST routines. It also allows
us to compute a DeclContext for a type much more efficiently, at some extra
cost every time we write a template specialization (which can be optimized,
but I've left it simple in this patch).
llvm-svn: 102407
when they are not complete (since we could not match them up to
anything) and ensuring that enum parsing can cope with dependent
elaborated-type-specifiers. Fixes PR6915 and PR6649.
llvm-svn: 102247
(e.g., no typename, enum, class, etc.), e.g., because the context is
one that is known to refer to a type. Patch from Enea Zaffanella!
llvm-svn: 102243
a qualified name. We weren't checking for an empty
nested-name-specifier when dealing with friend class templates
(although we were checking in the other places where we deal with this
paragraph). Fixes a Boost.Serialization showstopper.
llvm-svn: 101724
intended for redeclarations, fixing those that need it. Fixes PR6831.
This uncovered an issue where the C++ type-specifier-seq parsing logic
would try to perform name lookup on an identifier after it already had
a type-specifier, which could also lead to spurious ambiguity errors
(as in PR6831, but with a different test case).
llvm-svn: 101419
in case it ends up doing something that might trigger diagnostics
(template instantiation, ambiguity reporting, access
reporting). Noticed while working on PR6831.
llvm-svn: 101412
ResolveAddressOfOverloadedFunction when asked to complain. Previously,
we had some weird handshake where ResolveAddressOfOverloadedFunction
expected its caller to handle some of the diagnostics but not others,
and yet there was no way for the caller to know which case we were
in. Eliminate this madness, fixing <rdar://problem/7765884>.
llvm-svn: 101312
generally recover from typos in keywords (since we would effectively
have to mangle the token stream). However, there are still benefits to
typo-correcting with keywords:
- We don't make stupid suggestions when the user typed something
that is similar to a keyword.
- We can suggest the keyword in a diagnostic (did you mean
"static_cast"?), even if we can't recover and therefore don't have
a fix-it.
llvm-svn: 101274
name-lookup ambiguities when there are multiple base classes that are
all specializations of the same class template. This is part of a
general cleanup for ambiguities in template-name lookup. Fixes
PR6717.
llvm-svn: 101065
specializations when the explicit instantiation was... explicitly
written, i.e., not the product of an explicit instantiation of an
enclosing class. Fixes this spurious warning when Clang builds LLVM:
/Volumes/Data/dgregor/Projects/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineDominators.cpp:22:1:
warning: explicit instantiation of 'addRoot' that occurs after an
explicit specialization will be ignored (C++0x extension) [-pedantic]
llvm-svn: 100900
parameter, explicitly ask the user to give it arguments. We used to
complain that it wasn't a type and expect the user to figure it out.
llvm-svn: 100729
an object or function. Our previous checking was too lax, and ended up
allowing missing or extraneous address-of operators, among other
evils. The new checking provides better diagnostics and adheres more
closely to the standard.
Fixes PR6563 and PR6749.
llvm-svn: 100125
(such as "class T::foo") from an ElaboratedType of a TypenameType to a
DependentNameType, which more accurately models the underlying
concept.
Improve template instantiation for DependentNameType nodes that
represent nested-name-specifiers, by performing tag name lookup and
checking the resulting tag appropriately. Fixes PR5681.
There is still much testing and cleanup to do in this area.
llvm-svn: 100054
the underlying/instantiated decl) through a lot of API, including "intermediate"
MemberExprs required for (e.g.) template instantiation. This is necessary
because of the access semantics of member accesses to using declarations:
only the base class *containing the using decl* need be accessible from the
naming class.
This allows us to complete an access-controlled selfhost, if there are no
recent regressions.
llvm-svn: 99936
cache of PartialDiagnostic::Storage objects into an allocator within
the ASTContext. This eliminates a significant amount of malloc
traffic, for a 10% performance improvement in -fsyntax-only wall-clock
time with 403.gcc's combine.c.
Also, eliminate the RequireNonAbstractType hack I put in earlier,
which was but a symptom of this larger problem.
Fixes <rdar://problem/7806091>.
llvm-svn: 99849
check deduced non-type template arguments and template template
arguments against the template parameters for which they were deduced,
performing conversions as appropriate so that deduced template
arguments get the same treatment as explicitly-specified template
arguments. This is the bulk of PR6723.
Also keep track of whether deduction of a non-type template argument
came from an array bound (vs. anywhere else). With this information,
we enforce C++ [temp.deduct.type]p17, which requires exact type
matches when deduction deduces a non-type template argument from
something that is not an array bound.
Finally, when in a SFINAE context, translate the "zero sized
arrays are an extension" extension diagnostic into a hard error (for
better standard conformance), which was a minor part of PR6723.
llvm-svn: 99734
that we extend/truncate then correct the sign to convert the non-type
template argument to the template parameter's type. Previously, we
reported an error when the non-type template argument was out of
range; now we just warn.
llvm-svn: 99600
the type of its corresponding non-type template parameter changes the
value. Previously, we were diagnosing this as an error, which was
wrong. We give reasonably nice warnings like:
test/SemaTemplate/temp_arg_nontype.cpp💯10: warning: non-type template
argument value '256' truncated to '0' for template parameter of type
'unsigned char'
Overflow<256> *overflow3; // expected-warning{{non-type template ...
^~~
test/SemaTemplate/temp_arg_nontype.cpp:96:24: note: template parameter is
declared here
template<unsigned char C> struct Overflow;
^
llvm-svn: 99561
TSK_ExplicitInstantiationDeclaration make sure we call
MaybeMarkVirtualMembersReferenced with a method attached to the definition.
Remove the hack that forced vtable emition with declarations.
llvm-svn: 99174
on unqualified declarations.
Patch by Enea Zaffanella! Minimal adjustments: allocate the ExtInfo nodes
with the ASTContext and delete them during Destroy(). I audited a bunch of
Destroy methods at the same time, to ensure that the correct teardown was
being done.
llvm-svn: 98540
I'm expecting this portion of the AST to grow and change, and I'd like to
be able to do that with minimal recompilation. If this proves unnecessary
when access control is fully-implemented, I'll fold the classes back into
DeclCXX.h.
llvm-svn: 98249
injected class name of a class template or class template partial specialization.
This is a non-canonical type; the canonical type is still a template
specialization type. This becomes the TypeForDecl of the pattern declaration,
which cleans up some amount of code (and complicates some other parts, but
whatever).
Fixes PR6326 and probably a few others, primarily by re-establishing a few
invariants about TypeLoc sizes.
llvm-svn: 98134
declarations after the member has been explicitly specialized. We already
did this after explicit instantiation definitions; not doing it for
declarations meant that subsequent definitions would see a previous
member declaration with specialization kind "explicit instantiation decl",
which would then happily get overridden.
Fixes PR 6458.
llvm-svn: 97605
class types, dependent types, and namespaces. I had previously
weakened this invariant while working on parsing pseudo-destructor
expressions, but recent work in that area has made these changes
unnecessary.
llvm-svn: 97112
typedef int Int;
int *p;
p->Int::~Int();
This weakens the invariant that the only types in nested-name-specifiers are tag types (restricted to class types in C++98/03). However, we weaken this invariant as little as possible, accepting arbitrary types in nested-name-specifiers only when we're in a member access expression that looks like a pseudo-destructor expression.
llvm-svn: 96743
now cope with the destruction of types named as dependent templates,
e.g.,
y->template Y<T>::~Y()
Nominally, we implement C++0x [basic.lookup.qual]p6. However, we don't
follow the letter of the standard here because that would fail to
parse
template<typename T, typename U>
X0<T, U>::~X0() { }
properly. The problem is captured in core issue 339, which gives some
(but not enough!) guidance. I expect to revisit this code when the
resolution of 339 is clear, and/or we start capturing better source
information for DeclarationNames.
Fixes PR6152.
llvm-svn: 96367
that is in an anonymous namespace, give that function or variable
internal linkage.
This change models an oddity of the C++ standard, where names declared
in an anonymous namespace have external linkage but, because anonymous
namespace are really "uniquely-named" namespaces, the names cannot be
referenced from other translation units. That means that they have
external linkage for semantic analysis, but the only sensible
implementation for code generation is to give them internal
linkage. We now model this notion via the UniqueExternalLinkage
linkage type. There are several changes here:
- Extended NamedDecl::getLinkage() to produce UniqueExternalLinkage
when the declaration is in an anonymous namespace.
- Added Type::getLinkage() to determine the linkage of a type, which
is defined as the minimum linkage of the types (when we're dealing
with a compound type that is not a struct/class/union).
- Extended NamedDecl::getLinkage() to consider the linkage of the
template arguments and template parameters of function template
specializations and class template specializations.
- Taught code generation to rely on NamedDecl::getLinkage() when
determining the linkage of variables and functions, also
considering the linkage of the types of those variables and
functions (C++ only). Map UniqueExternalLinkage to internal
linkage, taking out the explicit checks for
isInAnonymousNamespace().
This fixes much of PR5792, which, as discovered by Anders Carlsson, is
actually the reason behind the pass-manager assertion that causes the
majority of clang-on-clang regression test failures. With this fix,
Clang-built-Clang+LLVM passes 88% of its regression tests (up from
67%). The specific numbers are:
LLVM:
Expected Passes : 4006
Expected Failures : 32
Unsupported Tests : 40
Unexpected Failures: 736
Clang:
Expected Passes : 1903
Expected Failures : 14
Unexpected Failures: 75
Overall:
Expected Passes : 5909
Expected Failures : 46
Unsupported Tests : 40
Unexpected Failures: 811
Still to do:
- Improve testing
- Check whether we should allow the presence of types with
InternalLinkage (in addition to UniqueExternalLinkage) given
variables/functions internal linkage in C++, as mentioned in
PR5792.
- Determine how expensive the getLinkage() calls are in practice;
consider caching the result in NamedDecl.
- Assess the feasibility of Chris's idea in comment #1 of PR5792.
llvm-svn: 95216
arguments. This both prevents meaningless checks on these arguments and ensures
that they are represented as an expression by the instantiation.
Cleaned up and added standard text to the relevant test case. Also started
adding tests for *rejected* cases. At least one FIXME here where (I think) we
allow something we shouldn't. More to come in the area of rejecting crazy
arguments with decent diagnostics. Suggestions welcome for still better
diagnostics on these errors!
llvm-svn: 94953
translation unit. This is temporary for function and block parameters;
template parameters can just stay this way, since Templates aren't
DeclContexts. This gives us the nice property that everything created
in a record DC should have access in C++.
llvm-svn: 94122
in a member access expression referring into the current instantiation
need not be resolved at template definition *if* the current
instantiation has any dependent base classes. Fixes PR6081.
llvm-svn: 93877
do not look into base classes if there are any dependent base
classes. Instead, note in the lookup result that we couldn't look into
any dependent bases. Use that new result kind to detect when this case
occurs, so that we can fall back to treating the type/value/etc. as a
member of an unknown specialization.
Fixes an issue where we were resolving lookup at template definition
time and then missing an ambiguity at template instantiation time.
llvm-svn: 93497
finds nothing), and the current instantiation has dependent base
classes, treat the qualified lookup as if it referred to an unknown
specialization. Fixes PR6031.
llvm-svn: 93433
name a template, when they occur in a base-specifier. This is one of
the (few) places where we know for sure that an identifier followed by
a '<' must be a template name, so we can diagnose and recover well:
test/SemaTemplate/dependent-base-classes.cpp:9:16: error: missing
'template'
keyword prior to dependent template name 'T::apply'
struct X1 : T::apply<U> { }; // expected-error{{missing 'template' ...
^
template
test/SemaTemplate/dependent-base-classes.cpp:12:13: error: unknown
template name
'vector'
struct X2 : vector<T> { }; // expected-error{{unknown template name
'vector'}}
^
2 diagnostics generated.
llvm-svn: 93257
context, do not attempt typo correction. This harms performance (as
Abramo noted) and can cause some amusing errors, as in this new
testcase.
llvm-svn: 93240
were performing name lookup for template names in C/ObjC and always
finding nothing. Turn off such lookup unless we're in C++ mode, along
with the check that determines whether the given identifier is a
"current class name", and assert that we don't make this mistake
again.
llvm-svn: 93207
(C++ [temp.mem]p5-6), which involves template argument deduction based
on the type named, e.g., given
struct X { template<typename T> operator T*(); } x;
when we call
x.operator int*();
we perform template argument deduction to determine that T=int. This
template argument deduction is needed for template specialization and
explicit instantiation, e.g.,
template<> X::operator float*() { /* ... */ }
and when calling or otherwise naming a conversion function (as in the
first example).
This fixes PR5742 and PR5762, although there's some remaining ugliness
that's causing out-of-line definitions of conversion function
templates to fail. I'll look into that separately.
llvm-svn: 93162
typo.cpp:27:8: error: no template named 'basic_sting' in namespace 'std';
did you mean 'basic_string'?
std::basic_sting<char> b2;
~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~
basic_string
llvm-svn: 92348
explicitly-specified template arguments are enough to determine the
instantiation, and either template argument deduction fails or is not
performed in that context, we can resolve the template-id down to a
function template specialization (so sayeth C++0x
[temp.arg.explicit]p3). Fixes PR5811.
llvm-svn: 91852
there's nothing interesting we can say now that we're correctly not requiring
the qualifier to name a known base class in dependent contexts.
Require scope specifiers on member access expressions to name complete types
if they're not dependent; delay lookup when they are dependent.
Use more appropriate diagnostics when qualified implicit member access
expressions find declarations from unrelated classes.
llvm-svn: 90289
implicit member access to a specific declaration, go ahead and create
it as a DeclRefExpr or a MemberExpr (with implicit CXXThisExpr base) as
appropriate. Otherwise, create an UnresolvedMemberExpr or
DependentScopeMemberExpr with a null base expression.
By representing implicit accesses directly in the AST, we get the ability
to correctly delay the decision about whether it's actually an instance
member access or not until resolution is complete. This permits us
to correctly avoid diagnosing the 'problem' of 'MyType::foo()'
where the relationship to the type isn't really known until instantiation.
llvm-svn: 90266
the linkage of a declaration. Switch the lame (and completely wrong)
NamedDecl::hasLinkage() over to using the new NamedDecl::getLinkage(),
along with the "can this declaration be a template argument?" check
that started all of this.
Fixes -fsyntax-only for PR5597.
llvm-svn: 89891
function templates (in C++98), friend function templates, and
out-of-line definitions of members of class templates.
Also handles merging of default template arguments from previous
declarations of function templates, for C++0x. However, we don't yet
make use of those default template arguments.
llvm-svn: 89872
DependentScopeDeclRefExpr support storing templateids. Unite the common
code paths between ActOnDeclarationNameExpr and ActOnTemplateIdExpr.
This gets us to a point where we don't need to store function templates in
the AST using TemplateNames, which is critical to ripping out OverloadedFunction.
Also resolves a few FIXMEs.
llvm-svn: 89785
complaint to a warning and providing a helpful node in the case where
the "template<>" header is redundant because the corresponding
template-id refers to an explicit specialization. C++0x might still
change this behavior, and existing practice is all over the place on
the number of "template<>" headers actually needed.
llvm-svn: 89651
appropriate lookup and simply can't resolve the referrent yet, and
"dependent scope" expressions, where we can't do the lookup yet because the
entity we need to look into is a dependent type.
llvm-svn: 89402
two classes, one for typenames and one for values; this seems to have some
support from Doug if not necessarily from the extremely-vague-on-this-point
standard. Track the location of the 'typename' keyword in a using-typename
decl. Make a new lookup result for unresolved values and deal with it in
most places.
llvm-svn: 89184
LookupResult RAII powers to diagnose ambiguity in the results. Other diagnostics
(e.g. access control and deprecation) will be moved to automatically trigger
during lookup as part of this same mechanism.
This abstraction makes it much easier to encapsulate aliasing declarations
(e.g. using declarations) inside the lookup system: eventually, lookup will
just produce the aliases in the LookupResult, and the standard access methods
will naturally strip the aliases off.
llvm-svn: 89027
non-type template parameters or constants of pointer-to-member
type. Once checked, be sure to retain those pointer-to-member
constants as expressions if they are dependent, or as declarations if
they are not dependent.
llvm-svn: 87010
- Comparing template parameter lists to determine if we have a redeclaration
- Comparing template parameter lists to determine if we have equivalent
template template parameters
- Comparing template parameter lists to determine whether a template
template argument is valid for a given template template parameter.
Previously, we did not distinguish between the last two cases, which
got us into trouble when we were looking for exact type matches
between the types of non-type template parameters that were dependent
types. Now we do, so we properly delay checking of template template
arguments until instantiation time.
Also, fix an accidental fall-through in a case statement that was
causing crashes.
llvm-svn: 86992
template template parameter.
When building a template-id type, check whether the template-name
itself is dependent (even if the template arguments are not!) and
handle it as a template-id type.
llvm-svn: 86913
permits, among other things, ripping apart and reconstructing
templates via partial specialization:
template<typename T>
struct DeepRemoveConst { typedef T type; };
template<typename T>
struct DeepRemoveConst<const T> {
typedef typename DeepRemoveConst<T>::type type;
};
template<template<typename> class TT, typename T>
struct DeepRemoveConst<TT<T> > {
typedef TT<typename DeepRemoveConst<T>::type> type;
};
Also, fix a longstanding thinko in the code handling partial ordering
of class template partial specializations. We were performing the
second deduction without clearing out the results of the first
deduction. It's amazing we got through so much code with such a
horrendous error :(
llvm-svn: 86893
with its corresponding template parameter. This can happen when we
performed some substitution into the default template argument and
what we had doesn't match any more, e.g.,
template<int> struct A;
template<typename T, template<T> class X = A> class B;
B<long> b;
Previously, we'd emit a pretty but disembodied diagnostic showing how
the default argument didn't match the template parameter. The
diagnostic was good, but nothing tied it to the *use* of the default
argument in "B<long>". This commit fixes that.
Also, tweak the counting of active template instantiations to avoid
counting non-instantiation records, such as those we create for
(surprise!) checking default arguments, instantiating default
arguments, and performing substitutions as part of template argument
deduction.
llvm-svn: 86884
template-type-parameter specific template argument checking code and
up to the template argument checking loop. In theory, this should make
variadic templates work better; in practice, they don't well enough
for us to care anyway (YET!), so this is mostly a re-organization to
simplify CheckTemplateArgument.
llvm-svn: 86868
template template parameter, substitute any prior template arguments
into the template template parameter. This, for example, allows us to
properly check the template template argument for a class such as:
template<typename T, template<T Value> class X> struct Foo;
The actual implementation of this feature was trivial; most of the
change is dedicated to giving decent diagnostics when this
substitution goes horribly wrong. We now get a note like:
note: while substituting prior template arguments into template
template parameter 'X' [with T = float]
As part of this change, enabled some very pedantic checking when
comparing template template parameter lists, which shook out a bug in
our overly-eager checking of default arguments of template template
parameters. We now perform only minimal checking of such default
arguments when they are initially parsed.
llvm-svn: 86864
parameters. Rather than storing them as either declarations (for the
non-dependent case) or expressions (for the dependent case), we now
(always) store them as TemplateNames.
The primary change here is to add a new kind of TemplateArgument,
which stores a TemplateName. However, making that change ripples to
every switch on a TemplateArgument's kind, also affecting
TemplateArgumentLocInfo/TemplateArgumentLoc, default template
arguments for template template parameters, type-checking of template
template arguments, etc.
This change is light on testing. It should fix several pre-existing
problems with template template parameters, such as:
- the inability to use dependent template names as template template
arguments
- template template parameter default arguments cannot be
instantiation
However, there are enough pieces missing that more implementation is
required before we can adequately test template template parameters.
llvm-svn: 86777
handling template template parameters properly. This refactoring:
- Parses template template arguments as id-expressions, representing
the result of the parse as a template name (Action::TemplateTy)
rather than as an expression (lame!).
- Represents all parsed template arguments via a new parser-specific
type, ParsedTemplateArgument, which stores the kind of template
argument (type, non-type, template) along with all of the source
information about the template argument. This replaces an ad hoc
set of 3 vectors (one for a void*, which was either a type or an
expression; one for a bit telling whether the first was a type or
an expression; and one for a single source location pointing at
the template argument).
- Moves TemplateIdAnnotation into the new Parse/Template.h. It never
belonged in the Basic library anyway.
llvm-svn: 86708
templates. The instantiation of these default arguments must be (and
now, is) delayed until the template argument is actually used, at
which point we substitute all levels of template arguments
concurrently.
llvm-svn: 86578
operators, e.g.,
operator+<int>
which now works in declarators, id-expressions, and member access
expressions. This commit only implements the non-dependent case, where
we can resolve the template-id to an actual declaration.
llvm-svn: 85966
"->" with a use of ParseUnqualifiedId. Collapse
ActOnMemberReferenceExpr, ActOnDestructorReferenceExpr (both of them),
ActOnOverloadedOperatorReferenceExpr,
ActOnConversionOperatorReferenceExpr, and
ActOnMemberTemplateIdReferenceExpr into a single, new action
ActOnMemberAccessExpr that does the same thing more cleanly (and can
keep more source-location information).
llvm-svn: 85930
representation of a C++ unqualified-id, along with a single parsing
function (Parser::ParseUnqualifiedId) that will parse all of the
various forms of unqualified-id in C++.
Replace the representation of the declarator name in Declarator with
the new UnqualifiedId class, simplifying declarator-id parsing
considerably and providing more source-location information to
Sema. In the future, I hope to migrate all of the other
unqualified-id-parsing code over to this single representation, then
begin to merge actions that are currently only different because we
didn't have a unqualified notion of the name in the parser.
llvm-svn: 85851
types. Preserve it through template instantiation. Preserve it through PCH,
although TSTs themselves aren't serializable, so that's pretty much meaningless.
llvm-svn: 85500
class template partial specializations of member templates. Also,
fixes a silly little bug in the marking of "used" template parameters
in member templates. Fixes PR5236.
llvm-svn: 85447
members that have a definition. Also, use
CheckSpecializationInstantiationRedecl as part of this instantiation
to make sure that we diagnose the various kinds of problems that can
occur with explicit instantiations.
llvm-svn: 85270
instantiation once we have committed to performing the
instantiation. As part of this, make our makeshift
template-instantiation location information suck slightly less.
Fixes PR5264.
llvm-svn: 85209
qualified reference to a declaration that is not a non-static data
member or non-static member function, e.g.,
namespace N { int i; }
int j = N::i;
Instead, extend DeclRefExpr to optionally store the qualifier. Most
clients won't see or care about the difference (since
QualifierDeclRefExpr inherited DeclRefExpr). However, this reduces the
number of top-level expression types that clients need to cope with,
brings the implementation of DeclRefExpr into line with MemberExpr,
and simplifies and unifies our handling of declaration references.
Extended DeclRefExpr to (optionally) store explicitly-specified
template arguments. This occurs when naming a declaration via a
template-id (which will be stored in a TemplateIdRefExpr) that,
following template argument deduction and (possibly) overload
resolution, is replaced with a DeclRefExpr that refers to a template
specialization but maintains the template arguments as written.
llvm-svn: 84962
Jeffrey Yasskin