nodes to indicate when ha16/lo16 modifiers should be used. This lets
us pass PowerPC/indirectbr.ll.
The one annoying thing about this patch is that the MCSymbolExpr isn't
expressive enough to represent ha16(label1-label2) which we need on
PowerPC. I have a terrible hack in the meantime, but this will have
to be revisited at some point.
Last major conversion item left is global variable references.
llvm-svn: 119105
and have isel apply to to call operands as required. This allows
us to get $stub suffixes on label references on ppc/tiger with the
new instprinter, fixing two tests. Only 2 to go.
llvm-svn: 119093
value type, so there is no point in passing it around using
an EVT. Use the simpler MVT everywhere. Rather than trying
to propagate this information maximally in all the code that
using the calling convention stuff, I chose to do a mainly
low impact change instead.
llvm-svn: 118167
alignment for PPC32/64, avoiding some masking operations.
llvm-gcc expands vaarg inline instead of using the instruction
so it has never hit this.
llvm-svn: 116168
passed the root of the match, even though only a few patterns
actually needed this (one in X86, several in ARM [which should
be refactored anyway], and some in CellSPU that I don't feel
like detangling). Instead of requiring all ComplexPatterns to
take the dead root, have targets opt into getting the root by
putting SDNPWantRoot on the ComplexPattern.
llvm-svn: 114471
take multiple cycles to decode.
For the current if-converter clients (actually only ARM), the instructions that
are predicated on false are not nops. They would still take machine cycles to
decode. Micro-coded instructions such as LDM / STM can potentially take multiple
cycles to decode. If-converter should take treat them as non-micro-coded
simple instructions.
llvm-svn: 113570
See PR5201. There is no way to know if direct calls will be within the allowed
range for BL. Hence emit all calls as indirect when in JIT mode.
Without this long-running applications will fail to JIT on PowerPC with a
relocation failure.
llvm-svn: 110246
formerly rejected by the FE, so asserted in the BE; now the FE only
warns, so we treat it as a legitimate fatal error in PPC BE.
This means the test for the feature won't pass, so it's xfail'd.
llvm-svn: 109892
ARM/PPC/MSP430-specific code (which are the only targets that
implement the hook) can directly reference their target-specific
instrinfo classes.
llvm-svn: 109171
operands.
Hopefully this fixes the llvm-gcc-powerpc-darwin9 buildbot. It really shouldn't
since missing memoperands should not affect correctness.
llvm-svn: 108540
The only folding these load/store architectures can do is converting COPY into a
load or store, and the target independent part of foldMemoryOperand already
knows how to do that.
llvm-svn: 108099
for an "i" constraint should get lowered; PR 6309. While
this argument was passed around a lot, this is the only
place it was used, so it goes away from a lot of other
places.
llvm-svn: 106893
addresses a longstanding deficiency noted in many FIXMEs scattered
across all the targets.
This effectively moves the problem up one level, replacing eleven
FIXMEs in the targets with eight FIXMEs in CodeGen, plus one path
through FastISel where we actually supply a DebugLoc, fixing Radar
7421831.
llvm-svn: 106243
In file included from X86InstrInfo.cpp:16:
X86GenInstrInfo.inc:2789: error: integer constant is too large for 'long' type
X86GenInstrInfo.inc:2790: error: integer constant is too large for 'long' type
X86GenInstrInfo.inc:2792: error: integer constant is too large for 'long' type
X86GenInstrInfo.inc:2793: error: integer constant is too large for 'long' type
X86GenInstrInfo.inc:2808: error: integer constant is too large for 'long' type
X86GenInstrInfo.inc:2809: error: integer constant is too large for 'long' type
X86GenInstrInfo.inc:2816: error: integer constant is too large for 'long' type
X86GenInstrInfo.inc:2817: error: integer constant is too large for 'long' type
llvm-svn: 105524
A Register with subregisters must also provide SubRegIndices for adressing the
subregisters. TableGen automatically inherits indices for sub-subregisters to
minimize typing.
CompositeIndices may be specified for the weirder cases such as the XMM sub_sd
index that returns the same register, and ARM NEON Q registers where both D
subregs have ssub_0 and ssub_1 sub-subregs.
It is now required that all subregisters are named by an index, and a future
patch will also require inherited subregisters to be named. This is necessary to
allow composite subregister indices to be reduced to a single index.
llvm-svn: 104704
A Register with subregisters must also provide SubRegIndices for adressing the
subregisters. TableGen automatically inherits indices for sub-subregisters to
minimize typing.
CompositeIndices may be specified for the weirder cases such as the XMM sub_sd
index that returns the same register, and ARM NEON Q registers where both D
subregs have ssub_0 and ssub_1 sub-subregs.
It is now required that all subregisters are named by an index, and a future
patch will also require inherited subregisters to be named. This is necessary to
allow composite subregister indices to be reduced to a single index.
llvm-svn: 104654
structure that represents a mapping without any dependencies on SubRegIndex
numbering.
This brings us closer to being able to remove the explicit SubRegIndex
numbering, and it is now possible to specify any mapping without inventing
*_INVALID register classes.
llvm-svn: 104563
registers. Currently it is not so marked, which leads to
VCMPEQ instructions that feed into it getting deleted.
If it is so marked, local RA complains about this sequence:
vreg = MCRF CR0
MFCR <kill of whatever preg got assigned to vreg>
All current uses of this instruction are only interested in
one of the 8 CR registers, so redefine MFCR to be a normal
unary instruction with a CR input (which is emitted only as
a comment). That avoids all problems. 7739628.
llvm-svn: 104238
the variable actually tracks.
N.B., several back-ends are using "HasCalls" as being synonymous for something
that adjusts the stack. This isn't 100% correct and should be looked into.
llvm-svn: 103802
Move EmitTargetCodeForMemcpy, EmitTargetCodeForMemset, and
EmitTargetCodeForMemmove out of TargetLowering and into
SelectionDAGInfo to exercise this.
llvm-svn: 103481
Chris Lattner