Now that in the new TBAA format we allow access types to be of
any object types, including aggregate ones, it becomes critical
to specify types of all sub-objects such aggregates comprise as
their members. In order to meet this requirement, this patch
enables generation of field descriptors for members of array
types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41399
llvm-svn: 321352
Now that the MDBuilder helpers generating TBAA type and access
descriptors in the new format are in place, we can teach clang to
use them when requested.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41394
llvm-svn: 321351
When a function taking transparent union is declared as taking one of
union members earlier in the translation unit, clang would hit an
"Invalid cast" assertion during EmitFunctionProlog. This case
corresponds to function f1 in test/CodeGen/transparent-union-redecl.c.
We decided to cast i32 to union because after merging function
declarations function parameter type becomes int,
CGFunctionInfo::ArgInfo type matches with ABIArgInfo type, so we decide
it is a trivial case. But these types should also be castable to
parameter declaration type which is not the case here.
The fix is in checking for the trivial case if ABIArgInfo type matches with
parameter declaration type. It exposed inconsistency that we check
hasScalarEvaluationKind for different types in EmitParmDecl and
EmitFunctionProlog, and comment says they should match.
Additional tests in Sema/transparent-union.c capture current behavior and make
sure there are no regressions.
rdar://problem/34949329
Reviewers: rjmccall, rafael
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: aemerson, cfe-commits, kristof.beyls
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41311
llvm-svn: 321296
The new format requires to specify both the type of the access
and its size. This patch fixes setting access sizes for TBAA tags
that denote accesses to structure members. This fix affects all
future TBAA metadata tests for the new format, so I guess we
don't need any special tests for this fix.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41452
llvm-svn: 321250
Diagnose 'unreachable' UB when a noreturn function returns.
1. Insert a check at the end of functions marked noreturn.
2. A decl may be marked noreturn in the caller TU, but not marked in
the TU where it's defined. To diagnose this scenario, strip away the
noreturn attribute on the callee and insert check after calls to it.
Testing: check-clang, check-ubsan, check-ubsan-minimal, D40700
rdar://33660464
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40698
llvm-svn: 321231
Summary: Very similar to AddressSanitizer, with the exception of the error type encoding.
Reviewers: kcc, alekseyshl
Subscribers: cfe-commits, kubamracek, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41417
llvm-svn: 321203
Summary: Plant an inline version of "((ac+bd)/(cc+dd)) + i((bc-ad)/(cc+dd))" instead.
Patch by Paul Walker.
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40299
llvm-svn: 321183
Fixes regression from r320533.
This fixes the undefined behavior, but I'm not sure it's really right...
I think we end up with missing coverage for code in modules.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41374
llvm-svn: 321052
At least <http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-android/
builds/6013/steps/annotate/logs/stdio> complains about
__ubsan::__ubsan_handle_function_type_mismatch_abort (compiler-rt
lib/ubsan/ubsan_handlers.cc) returning now despite being declared 'noreturn', so
looks like a different approach is needed for the function_type_mismatch check
to be called also in cases that may ultimately succeed.
llvm-svn: 320982
As discussed in the mail thread <https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/forum/
#!topic/std-discussion/T64_dW3WKUk> "Calling noexcept function throug non-
noexcept pointer is undefined behavior?", such a call should not be UB.
However, Clang currently warns about it.
There is no cheap check whether two function type_infos only differ in noexcept,
so pass those two type_infos as additional data to the function_type_mismatch
handler (with the optimization of passing a null "static callee type" info when
that is already noexcept, so the additional check can be avoided anyway). For
the Itanium ABI (which appears to be the only one that happens to be used on
platforms that support -fsanitize=function, and which appears to only record
noexcept information for pointer-to-function type_infos, not for function
type_infos themselves), we then need to check the mangled names for occurrence
of "Do" representing "noexcept".
This is the cfe part of a patch covering both cfe and compiler-rt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40720
llvm-svn: 320978
There are 2 parts to getting the -fassociative-math command-line flag translated to LLVM FMF:
1. In the driver/frontend, we accept the flag and its 'no' inverse and deal with the
interactions with other flags like -ffast-math -fno-signed-zeros -fno-trapping-math.
This was mostly already done - we just need to translate the flag as a codegen option.
The test file is complicated because there are many potential combinations of flags here.
Note that we are matching gcc's behavior that requires 'nsz' and no-trapping-math.
2. In codegen, we map the codegen option to FMF in the IR builder. This is simple code and
corresponding test.
For the motivating example from PR27372:
float foo(float a, float x) { return ((a + x) - x); }
$ ./clang -O2 27372.c -S -o - -ffast-math -fno-associative-math -emit-llvm | egrep 'fadd|fsub'
%add = fadd nnan ninf nsz arcp contract float %0, %1
%sub = fsub nnan ninf nsz arcp contract float %add, %2
So 'reassoc' is off as expected (and so is the new 'afn' but that's a different patch).
This case now works as expected end-to-end although the underlying logic is still wrong:
$ ./clang -O2 27372.c -S -o - -ffast-math -fno-associative-math | grep xmm
addss %xmm1, %xmm0
subss %xmm1, %xmm0
We're not done because the case where 'reassoc' is set is ignored by optimizer passes. Example:
$ ./clang -O2 27372.c -S -o - -fassociative-math -fno-signed-zeros -fno-trapping-math -emit-llvm | grep fadd
%add = fadd reassoc float %0, %1
$ ./clang -O2 27372.c -S -o - -fassociative-math -fno-signed-zeros -fno-trapping-math | grep xmm
addss %xmm1, %xmm0
subss %xmm1, %xmm0
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39812
llvm-svn: 320920
This patch introduces a specialized way to lower overflow-checked
multiplications with mixed-sign operands. This fixes link failures and
ICEs on code like this:
void mul(int64_t a, uint64_t b) {
int64_t res;
__builtin_mul_overflow(a, b, &res);
}
The generic checked-binop irgen would use a 65-bit multiplication
intrinsic here, which requires runtime support for _muloti4 (128-bit
multiplication), and therefore fails to link on i386. To get an ICE
on x86_64, change the example to use __int128_t / __uint128_t.
Adding runtime and backend support for 65-bit or 129-bit checked
multiplication on all of our supported targets is infeasible.
This patch solves the problem by using simpler, specialized irgen for
the mixed-sign case.
llvm.org/PR34920, rdar://34963321
Testing: Apart from check-clang, I compared the output from this fairly
comprehensive test driver using unpatched & patched clangs:
https://gist.github.com/vedantk/3eb9c88f82e5c32f2e590555b4af5081
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41149
llvm-svn: 320902
Previously the attributes were emitted only for function definitions.
Patch adds emission of the attributes for function declarations.
llvm-svn: 320826
Most of the -Wsign-compare warnings are due to the fact that
enums are signed by default in the MS ABI, while the
tautological comparison warnings trigger on x86 builds where
sizeof(size_t) is 4 bytes, so N > numeric_limits<unsigned>::max()
is always false.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41256
llvm-svn: 320750
Summary:
InterlockedCompareExchange128 is a bit more complicated than the other
InterlockedCompareExchange functions, so it requires a bit more work. It
doesn't directly refer to 128bit ints, instead it takes pointers to
64bit ints for Destination and ComparandResult, and exchange is taken as
two 64bit ints (high & low). The previous value is written to
ComparandResult, and success is returned. This implementation does the
following in order to produce a cmpxchg instruction:
1. Cast everything to 128bit ints or int pointers, and glues together
the Exchange values
2. Reads from CompareandResult to get the comparand
3. Calls cmpxchg volatile (on X86 this will produce a lock cmpxchg16b
instruction)
1. Result 0 (previous value) is written back to ComparandResult
2. Result 1 (success bool) is zext'ed to a uchar and returned
Resolves bug https://llvm.org/PR35251
Patch by Colden Cullen!
Reviewers: rnk, agutowski
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: majnemer, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41032
llvm-svn: 320730
Adding the new enumerator forced a bunch more changes into this patch than I
would have liked. The -Wtautological-compare warning was extended to properly
check the new comparison operator, clang-format needed updating because it uses
precedence levels as weights for determining where to break lines (and several
operators increased their precedence levels with this change), thread-safety
analysis needed changes to build its own IL properly for the new operator.
All "real" semantic checking for this operator has been deferred to a future
patch. For now, we use the relational comparison rules and arbitrarily give
the builtin form of the operator a return type of 'void'.
llvm-svn: 320707
Under the Microsoft ABI, it is possible for an object not to have
a virtual table pointer of its own if all of its virtual functions
were introduced by virtual bases. In that case, we need to load the
vtable pointer from one of the virtual bases and perform the type
check using its type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41036
llvm-svn: 320638
Summary:
The backend should only emit data sharing code for the cases where it is needed.
A new function attribute is used by Clang to enable data sharing only for the cases where OpenMP semantics require it and there are variables that need to be shared.
Reviewers: hfinkel, Hahnfeld, ABataev, carlo.bertolli, caomhin
Reviewed By: ABataev
Subscribers: cfe-commits, jholewinski
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41123
llvm-svn: 320527
This adds a new command line option -mprefer-vector-width to specify a preferred vector width for the vectorizers. Valid values are 'none' and unsigned integers. The driver will check that it meets those constraints. Specific supported integers will be managed by the targets in the backend.
Clang will take the value and add it as a new function attribute during CodeGen.
This represents the alternate direction proposed by Sanjay in this RFC: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-November/118734.html
The syntax here matches gcc, though gcc treats it as an x86 specific command line argument. gcc only allows values of 128, 256, and 512. I'm not having clang check any values.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40230
llvm-svn: 320419
This commit fixes a bug in IRGen where it generates completely broken
code for __fp16 vectors on X86. For example when the following code is
compiled:
half4 hv0, hv1, hv2; // these are vectors of __fp16.
void foo221() {
hv0 = hv1 + hv2;
}
clang generates the following IR, in which two i16 vectors are added:
@hv1 = common global <4 x i16> zeroinitializer, align 8
@hv2 = common global <4 x i16> zeroinitializer, align 8
@hv0 = common global <4 x i16> zeroinitializer, align 8
define void @foo221() {
%0 = load <4 x i16>, <4 x i16>* @hv1, align 8
%1 = load <4 x i16>, <4 x i16>* @hv2, align 8
%add = add <4 x i16> %0, %1
store <4 x i16> %add, <4 x i16>* @hv0, align 8
ret void
}
To fix the bug, this commit uses the code committed in r314056, which
modified clang to promote and truncate __fp16 vectors to and from float
vectors in the AST. It also fixes another IRGen bug where a short value
is assigned to an __fp16 variable without any integer-to-floating-point
conversion, as shown in the following example:
__fp16 a;
short b;
void foo1() {
a = b;
}
@b = common global i16 0, align 2
@a = common global i16 0, align 2
define void @foo1() #0 {
%0 = load i16, i16* @b, align 2
store i16 %0, i16* @a, align 2
ret void
}
rdar://problem/20625184
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40112
llvm-svn: 320215
This is a follow-up to r320128. Eli pointed out that there is some gray
area in the language standard about whether the constant size is exact,
or a lower bound.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D40940
llvm-svn: 320185
There is no way to apply sanitizer suppressions to ObjC blocks. A
reasonable default is to have blocks inherit their parent's sanitizer
options.
rdar://32769634
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40668
llvm-svn: 320132
CreateCoercedLoad/CreateCoercedStore assumes pointer argument of
memcpy is in addr space 0, which is not correct and causes invalid
bitcasts for triple amdgcn---amdgiz.
It is fixed by using alloca addr space instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40806
llvm-svn: 320000
The adjustment is calculated with CreatePtrDiff() which returns
the difference in (base) elements. This is passed to CreateGEP()
so make sure that the GEP base has the correct pointer type:
It needs to be a pointer to the base type, not a pointer to a
constant sized array.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40911
llvm-svn: 319931
Commit 7ac28eb0a5 / r310911 ("[OpenCL] Allow targets to select address
space per type", 2017-08-15) made Basic depend on AST, introducing a
circular dependency. Break this dependency by adding the
OpenCLTypeKind enum in Basic and map from AST types to this enum in
ASTContext.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40838
llvm-svn: 319883
Ivan A. Kosarev