The standard correctly forbids various decl-specifiers that dont make sense on non-type template parameters - such as the extern in:
template<extern int> struct X;
This patch implements those restrictions (in a fashion similar to the corresponding checks on function parameters within ActOnParamDeclarator).
Credit goes to miyuki (Mikhail Maltsev) for drawing attention to this issue, authoring the initial versions of this patch, and supporting the effort to re-engineer it slightly. Thank you!
For details of how this patch evolved please see: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40705
llvm-svn: 321339
This is a slightly odd construct (it's more common to see "A (::B)()") but can
happen in friend declarations, and the parens are not redundant as they prevent
the :: binding to the left.
llvm-svn: 321318
Looking through the code, I saw a FIXME on IFunc to switch it
to a target specific attribute. In looking through it, i saw that
the no-longer-appropriately-named TargetArch didn't support ObjectFormat
checking.
This patch changes the name of TargetArch to TargetSpecific
(since it checks much more than just Arch), makes "Arch" optional, adds
support for ObjectFormat, better documents the TargetSpecific type, and
changes IFunc over to a TargetSpecificAttr.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41303
llvm-svn: 321201
Summary:
- Fixed an assert in Sema::InstantiateFunctionDefinition and added
support for instantiating a function template with skipped body.
- Properly call setHasSkippedBody for FunctionTemplateDecl passed to
Sema::ActOnSkippedFunctionBody.
Reviewers: sepavloff, bkramer
Reviewed By: sepavloff
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41237
llvm-svn: 321174
Summary:
In D41064, I proposed adding `#pragma clang diagnostic ignored
"-Wuser-defined-literals"` to some of libc++'s headers, since these
warnings are now triggered by clang's new `-std=gnu++14` default:
```
$ cat test.cpp
#include <string>
$ clang -std=c++14 -Wsystem-headers -Wall -Wextra -c test.cpp
In file included from test.cpp:1:
In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/string:470:
/usr/include/c++/v1/string_view:763:29: warning: user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved [-Wuser-defined-literals]
basic_string_view<char> operator "" sv(const char *__str, size_t __len)
^
/usr/include/c++/v1/string_view:769:32: warning: user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved [-Wuser-defined-literals]
basic_string_view<wchar_t> operator "" sv(const wchar_t *__str, size_t __len)
^
/usr/include/c++/v1/string_view:775:33: warning: user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved [-Wuser-defined-literals]
basic_string_view<char16_t> operator "" sv(const char16_t *__str, size_t __len)
^
/usr/include/c++/v1/string_view:781:33: warning: user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved [-Wuser-defined-literals]
basic_string_view<char32_t> operator "" sv(const char32_t *__str, size_t __len)
^
In file included from test.cpp:1:
/usr/include/c++/v1/string:4012:24: warning: user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved [-Wuser-defined-literals]
basic_string<char> operator "" s( const char *__str, size_t __len )
^
/usr/include/c++/v1/string:4018:27: warning: user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved [-Wuser-defined-literals]
basic_string<wchar_t> operator "" s( const wchar_t *__str, size_t __len )
^
/usr/include/c++/v1/string:4024:28: warning: user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved [-Wuser-defined-literals]
basic_string<char16_t> operator "" s( const char16_t *__str, size_t __len )
^
/usr/include/c++/v1/string:4030:28: warning: user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved [-Wuser-defined-literals]
basic_string<char32_t> operator "" s( const char32_t *__str, size_t __len )
^
8 warnings generated.
```
Both @aaron.ballman and @mclow.lists felt that adding this workaround to
the libc++ headers was the wrong way, and it should be fixed in clang
instead.
Here is a proposal to do just that. I verified that this suppresses the
warning, even when -Wsystem-headers is used, and that the warning is
still emitted for a declaration outside of system headers.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, mclow.lists, rsmith
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: mclow.lists, aaron.ballman, andrew, emaste, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41080
llvm-svn: 320755
There are many more expr types that can be a capability expr, like
CXXThisExpr, CallExpr, MemberExpr. Instead of enumerating all of them,
just check typeHasCapability for any type given.
Also add & and * operators to allowed unary operators.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41224
llvm-svn: 320753
update the type from the definition even if we didn't instantiate a definition.
We may have instantiated the definition in an earlier stage of semantic
analysis, after creating the DeclRefExpr but before we reach a point where a
complete expression type is required.
llvm-svn: 320709
Adding the new enumerator forced a bunch more changes into this patch than I
would have liked. The -Wtautological-compare warning was extended to properly
check the new comparison operator, clang-format needed updating because it uses
precedence levels as weights for determining where to break lines (and several
operators increased their precedence levels with this change), thread-safety
analysis needed changes to build its own IL properly for the new operator.
All "real" semantic checking for this operator has been deferred to a future
patch. For now, we use the relational comparison rules and arbitrarily give
the builtin form of the operator a return type of 'void'.
llvm-svn: 320707
This patch is to add diagnose when a function name is
specified on the link clause. According to the OpenMP
spec, only the list items that exclude the function
name are allowed on the link clause.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40968
llvm-svn: 320521
The two asserts are too aggressive. In C++ mode, an
enum is NOT considered an integral type, but an enum value
is allowed to be an enum. This patch relaxes the two asserts
to allow the enum value as well (as typechecking does).
llvm-svn: 320411
Summary:
This is a side-effect brought in by p0620r0, which allows other placeholder types (derived from `auto` and `decltype(auto)`) to be usable in a `new` expression with a single-clause //braced-init-list// as its initializer (8.3.4 [expr.new]/2). N3922 defined its semantics.
References:
http://wg21.link/p0620r0http://wg21.link/n3922
Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39451
llvm-svn: 320401
Summary:
Clang was crashing when diagnosing an unused-lambda-capture for a VLA because
From.getVariable() is null for the capture of a VLA bound.
Warning about the VLA bound capture is not helpful, so only warn for the VLA
itself.
Fixes: PR35555
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, dim, rsmith
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, dim
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41016
llvm-svn: 320396
This commit fixes a bug in IRGen where it generates completely broken
code for __fp16 vectors on X86. For example when the following code is
compiled:
half4 hv0, hv1, hv2; // these are vectors of __fp16.
void foo221() {
hv0 = hv1 + hv2;
}
clang generates the following IR, in which two i16 vectors are added:
@hv1 = common global <4 x i16> zeroinitializer, align 8
@hv2 = common global <4 x i16> zeroinitializer, align 8
@hv0 = common global <4 x i16> zeroinitializer, align 8
define void @foo221() {
%0 = load <4 x i16>, <4 x i16>* @hv1, align 8
%1 = load <4 x i16>, <4 x i16>* @hv2, align 8
%add = add <4 x i16> %0, %1
store <4 x i16> %add, <4 x i16>* @hv0, align 8
ret void
}
To fix the bug, this commit uses the code committed in r314056, which
modified clang to promote and truncate __fp16 vectors to and from float
vectors in the AST. It also fixes another IRGen bug where a short value
is assigned to an __fp16 variable without any integer-to-floating-point
conversion, as shown in the following example:
__fp16 a;
short b;
void foo1() {
a = b;
}
@b = common global i16 0, align 2
@a = common global i16 0, align 2
define void @foo1() #0 {
%0 = load i16, i16* @b, align 2
store i16 %0, i16* @a, align 2
ret void
}
rdar://problem/20625184
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40112
llvm-svn: 320215
and fold together into a single function.
In so doing, fix a handful of remaining bugs where we would report false
positives or false negatives if we promote a signed value to an unsigned type
for the comparison.
This re-commits r320122 and r320124, minus two changes:
* Comparisons between a constant and a non-constant expression of enumeration
type never warn, not even if the constant is out of range. We should be
warning about the creation of such a constant, not about its use.
* We do not use more precise bit-widths for comparisons against bit-fields.
The more precise diagnostics probably are the right thing, but we should
consider moving them under their own warning flag.
Other than the refactoring, this patch should only change the behavior for the
buggy cases (where the warnings didn't take into account that promotion from
signed to unsigned can leave a range of inaccessible values in the middle of
the promoted type).
llvm-svn: 320211
> Unify implementation of our two different flavours of -Wtautological-compare.
>
> In so doing, fix a handful of remaining bugs where we would report false
> positives or false negatives if we promote a signed value to an unsigned type
> for the comparison.
This caused a new warning in Chromium:
../../base/trace_event/trace_log.cc:1545:29: error: comparison of constant 64
with expression of type 'unsigned int' is always true
[-Werror,-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare]
DCHECK(handle.event_index < TraceBufferChunk::kTraceBufferChunkSize);
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The 'unsigned int' is really a 6-bit bitfield, which is why it's always
less than 64.
I thought we didn't use to warn (with out-of-range-compare) when comparing
against the boundaries of a type?
llvm-svn: 320162
This broke Chromium:
../../base/trace_event/trace_log.cc:1545:29: error: comparison of constant 64
with expression of type 'unsigned int' is always true
[-Werror,-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare]
DCHECK(handle.event_index < TraceBufferChunk::kTraceBufferChunkSize);
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The 'unsigned int' is really a 6-bit bitfield, which is why it's always
less than 63.
Did this use to fall under the "in-range" case before? I thought we
didn't use to warn when comparing against the boundaries of a type.
llvm-svn: 320133
In so doing, fix a handful of remaining bugs where we would report false
positives or false negatives if we promote a signed value to an unsigned type
for the comparison.
llvm-svn: 320122
Private variables are completely redefined in the outlined regions, so
we don't need to capture them. Patch adds this behavior to the
target-based regions.
llvm-svn: 320078
This is a follow up of r302131, in which we forgot to add SemaChecking
tests. Adding these tests revealed two problems which have been fixed:
- added missing intrinsic __qdbl,
- properly range checking ssat16 and usat16.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40888
llvm-svn: 320019
This is a fix for PR35509 in which we crash because we attempt to compute the
alignment of an incomplete type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40895
llvm-svn: 320017
Summary:
This feature was discussed but not yet proposed. It allows a structured binding to appear as a //condition//
if (auto [ok, val] = f(...))
So the user can save an extra //condition// if the statement can test the value to-be-decomposed instead. Formally, it makes the value of the underlying object of the structured binding declaration also the value of a //condition// that is an initialized declaration.
Considering its logicality which is entirely evident from its trivial implementation, I think it might be acceptable to land it as an extension for now before I write the paper.
Reviewers: rsmith, faisalv, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39284
llvm-svn: 320011
Summary:
This is so we can implement concepts per P0734R0. Relevant failing test
cases are disabled.
Reviewers: hubert.reinterpretcast, rsmith, saar.raz, nwilson
Reviewed By: saar.raz
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40380
Patch by Changyu Li!
llvm-svn: 319992
codepath plus the new "minimum / maximum value of type" diagnostic to get the
same effect.
Move the warning for an in-range but tautological comparison of a constant (0
or 1) against a bool out of -Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare into
the more-appropriate -Wtautological-constant-compare.
llvm-svn: 319942
An enumeration with a fixed underlying type can have any value in its
underlying type, not just those spanned by the values of its enumerators.
llvm-svn: 319875
If the error is generated during analysis of implicitly or explicitly
mapped variables, it may cause compiler crash because of incorrect
analysis.
llvm-svn: 319774
Sam McCall