Summary:
Fixes http://llvm.org/PR33947.
https://godbolt.org/g/54XRMT
void f(int a) {
struct A {
void g(int a) {}
A() { int a; }
};
}
3 : <source>:3:16: warning: declaration shadows a local variable [-Wshadow]
void g(int a) {}
^
1 : <source>:1:12: note: previous declaration is here
void f(int a) {
^
4 : <source>:4:15: warning: declaration shadows a local variable [-Wshadow]
A() { int a; }
^
1 : <source>:1:12: note: previous declaration is here
void f(int a) {
^
2 warnings generated.
The local variable `a` of the function `f` can't be accessed from a method of
the function-local class A, thus no shadowing occurs and no diagnostic is
needed.
Reviewers: rnk, rsmith, arphaman, Quuxplusone
Reviewed By: rnk, Quuxplusone
Subscribers: Quuxplusone, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35941
llvm-svn: 309569
In C mode clang fails to merge the textually included definition with the one imported from a module. The C lookup rules fail to find the imported definition because its linkage is internal in non C++ mode.
This patch reinstates some of the ODR merging rules for typedefs of anonymous tags for languages other than C++.
Patch by Raphael Isemann and me (D34510).
llvm-svn: 306964
Allow ODR for ObjC/C in the sense that we won't keep more that
one definition around (merge them). However, ensure the decl
pass the structural compatibility check in C11 6.2.7/1, for that,
reuse the structural equivalence checks used by the ASTImporter.
Few other considerations:
- Create error diagnostics for tag types mismatches and thread
them into the structural equivalence checks.
- Note that by doing this we only support redefinition between types
that are considered "compatible types" by C.
This is mixed approach of the suggestions discussed in
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2017-March/053257.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31778
rdar://problem/31909368
llvm-svn: 306918
This patch extends the `overloadable` attribute to allow for one
function with a given name to not be marked with the `overloadable`
attribute. The overload without the `overloadable` attribute will not
have its name mangled.
So, the following code is now legal:
void foo(void) __attribute__((overloadable));
void foo(int);
void foo(float) __attribute__((overloadable));
In addition, this patch fixes a bug where we'd accept code with
`__attribute__((overloadable))` inconsistently applied. In other words,
we used to accept:
void foo(void);
void foo(void) __attribute__((overloadable));
But we will do this no longer, since it defeats the original purpose of
requiring `__attribute__((overloadable))` on all redeclarations of a
function.
This breakage seems to not be an issue in practice, since the only code
I could find that had this pattern often looked like:
void foo(void);
void foo(void) __attribute__((overloadable)) __asm__("foo");
void foo(int) __attribute__((overloadable));
...Which can now be simplified by simply removing the asm label and
overloadable attribute from the redeclaration of `void foo(void);`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32332
llvm-svn: 306467
definition or non-reference class type.
The crash occurs when there is a template parameter list in a class that
is missing the closing angle bracket followed by a definition of a
struct. For example:
class C0 {
public:
template<typename T, typename T1 = T // missing closing angle bracket
struct S0 {};
C0() : m(new S0<int>) {}
S0<int> *m;
};
This happens because the parsed struct is added to the scope of the
enclosing class without having its access specifier set, which results
in an assertion failure in SemaAccess.cpp later.
This commit fixes the crash by adding the parsed struct to the enclosing
file scope and marking structs as invalid if they are defined in
template parameter lists.
rdar://problem/31783961
rdar://problem/19570630
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33606
llvm-svn: 306317
declarations that are owned but unconditionally visible.
This allows us to set declarations as visible even if they have a local owning
module, without losing information. In turn, that means that our Objective-C
support can keep on incorrectly assuming the "hidden" bit on the declaration is
the whole story with regard to name visibility. This will also be useful once
we support the C++ Modules TS export semantics.
Objective-C name visibility is still incorrect in any case where the "hidden"
bit is not the complete story: for instance, in Objective-C++ the set of
visible categories will be wrong during template instantiation, and with local
submodule visibility enabled it will be wrong when building modules. Fixing that
will require a major overhaul of how visibility is handled for Objective-C (and
particularly for categories).
llvm-svn: 306075
While a function body is being parsed, the function declaration is not considered
as a definition because it does not have a body yet. In some cases it leads to
incorrect interpretation, the case is presented in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14785:
```
template<typename T> struct Somewhat {
void internal() const {}
friend void operator+(int const &, Somewhat<T> const &) {}
};
void operator+(int const &, Somewhat<char> const &x) { x.internal(); }
```
When statement `x.internal()` in the body of global `operator+` is parsed, the type
of `x` must be completed, so the instantiation of `Somewhat<char>` is started. It
instantiates the declaration of `operator+` defined inline, and makes a check for
redefinition. The check does not detect another definition because the declaration
of `operator+` is still not defining as does not have a body yet.
To solves this problem the function `isThisDeclarationADefinition` considers
a function declaration as a definition if it has flag `WillHaveBody` set.
This change fixes PR14785.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30375
This is a recommit of 305379, reverted in 305381, with small changes.
llvm-svn: 305903
Produce an error if variables qualified with a local or
a constant address space are not declared in the outermost
scope of a kernel.
Patch by Simon Perretta.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34024
llvm-svn: 305798
While a function body is being parsed, the function declaration is not considered
as a definition because it does not have a body yet. In some cases it leads to
incorrect interpretation, the case is presented in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14785:
```
template<typename T> struct Somewhat {
void internal() const {}
friend void operator+(int const &, Somewhat<T> const &) {}
};
void operator+(int const &, Somewhat<char> const &x) { x.internal(); }
```
When statement `x.internal()` in the body of global `operator+` is parsed, the type
of `x` must be completed, so the instantiation of `Somewhat<char>` is started. It
instantiates the declaration of `operator+` defined inline, and makes a check for
redefinition. The check does not detect another definition because the declaration
of `operator+` is still not defining as does not have a body yet.
To solves this problem the function `isThisDeclarationADefinition` considers
a function declaration as a definition if it has flag `WillHaveBody` set.
This change fixes PR14785.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30375
llvm-svn: 305379
This patch provides a means to specify section-names for global variables,
functions and static variables, using #pragma directives.
This feature is only defined to work sensibly for ELF targets.
One can specify section names as:
#pragma clang section bss="myBSS" data="myData" rodata="myRodata" text="myText"
One can "unspecify" a section name with empty string e.g.
#pragma clang section bss="" data="" text="" rodata=""
Reviewers: Roger Ferrer, Jonathan Roelofs, Reid Kleckner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33412
llvm-svn: 304705
Print "this block declaration is not a prototype" for non-prototype
declarations of blocks instead of "this function declaration ...".
rdar://problem/32461723
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33739
llvm-svn: 304507
Summary:
This hooks up the detailed diagnostics of why constant initialization was
not possible if require_constant_initialization reports an error.
I have updated the test to account for the new notes.
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24371
llvm-svn: 304451
Summary:
This patch fixes a number of issues with the analysis warnings emitted when a coroutine may reach the end of the function w/o returning.
* Fix bug where coroutines with `return_value` are incorrectly diagnosed as missing `co_return`'s.
* Rework diagnostic message to no longer say "non-void coroutine", because that implies the coroutine doesn't have a void return type, which it might. In this case a non-void coroutine is one who's promise type does not contain `return_void()`
As a side-effect of this patch, coroutine bodies that contain an invalid coroutine promise objects are marked as invalid.
Reviewers: GorNishanov, rsmith, aaron.ballman, majnemer
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33532
llvm-svn: 303831
If the variable is marked as TLS variable and target device does not
support TLS, the error is emitted for the variable even if it is not
used in target regions. Patch fixes this and allows to use the values of
the TLS variables in target regions.
llvm-svn: 303768
We currenltly assert when want to diagnose a missing import and the decl
in question is already visible. It turns out that the decl in question
might be visible because another decl from the same module actually made
the module visible in a previous error diagnostic.
Remove the assertion and avoid re-exporting the module if it's already
visible.
rdar://problem/27975402
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32828
llvm-svn: 303705
specification and the TU to the new module.
This is necessary to get the module ownership correct for entities that we
temporarily hang off the TranslationUnitDecl, such as template parameters and
function parameters.
llvm-svn: 303373
Alloca always returns a pointer in alloca address space, which may
be different from the type defined by the language. For example,
in C++ the auto variables are in the default address space. Therefore
cast alloca to the expected address space when necessary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32248
llvm-svn: 303370
inferring based on the current module at the point of creation.
This should result in no functional change except when building a preprocessed
module (or more generally when using #pragma clang module begin/end to switch
module in the middle of a file), in which case it allows us to correctly track
the owning module for declarations. We can't map from FileID to module in the
preprocessed module case, since all modules would have the same FileID.
There are still a couple of remaining places that try to infer a module from a
source location; I'll clean those up in follow-up changes.
llvm-svn: 303322
rather than waiting until it's queried.
Currently this is only applied to local submodule visibility mode, as we don't
yet allocate storage for the owning module in non-local-visibility modules
compilations.
This reinstates r302965, reverted in r303037, with a fix for the reported
crash, which occurred when reparenting a local declaration to be a child of
a hidden imported declaration (specifically during template instantiation).
llvm-svn: 303224
module immediately
Also revert dependent r302969. This is leading to crashes.
Will provide more details reproduction instructions to Richard.
llvm-svn: 303037
rather than waiting until it's queried.
Currently this is only applied to local submodule visibility mode, as we don't
yet allocate storage for the owning module in non-local-visibility modules
compilations.
llvm-svn: 302965
When we parse a redefinition of an entity for which we have a hidden existing
declaration, make it visible in the current module instead of mapping the
current source location to its containing module.
llvm-svn: 302842
Diagnostics related to redefinition errors that point to the same header
file do not provide much information that helps users fixing the issue.
- In the modules context, it usually happens because of non modular
includes.
- When modules aren't involved it might happen because of the lack of
header guards.
Enhance diagnostics in these scenarios.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28832
rdar://problem/31669175
llvm-svn: 302765
When an undeclared identifier in a context that requires a type is followed by
'<', only look for type templates when typo-correcting, tweak the diagnostic
text to say that a template name (not a type name) was undeclared, and parse
the template arguments when recovering from the error.
llvm-svn: 302732
This improves our behavior in a few ways:
* We now guarantee that if a member is marked as being a member
specialization, there will actually be a member specialization declaration
somewhere on its redeclaration chain. This fixes a crash in modules builds
where we would try to check that there was a visible declaration of the
member specialization and be surprised to not find any declaration of it at
all.
* We don't set the source location of the in-class declaration of the member
specialization to the out-of-line declaration's location until we have
actually finished merging them. This fixes some very silly looking
diagnostics, where we'd point a "previous declaration is here" note at the
same declaration we're complaining about. Ideally we wouldn't mess with the
prior declaration's location at all, but too much code assumes that the
first declaration of an entity is a reasonable thing to use as an indication
of where it was declared, and that's not really true for a member
specialization unless we fake it like this.
llvm-svn: 302596
To support this, an optional marker "#pragma clang module contents" is
recognized in module map files, and the rest of the module map file from that
point onwards is treated as the source of the module. Preprocessing a module
map produces the input module followed by the marker and then the preprocessed
contents of the module.
Ignoring line markers, a preprocessed module might look like this:
module A {
header "a.h"
}
#pragma clang module contents
#pragma clang module begin A
// ... a.h ...
#pragma clang module end
The preprocessed output generates line markers, which are not accepted by the
module map parser, so -x c++-module-map-cpp-output should be used to compile
such outputs.
A couple of major parts do not work yet:
1) The files that are listed in the module map must exist on disk, in order to
build the on-disk header -> module lookup table in the PCM file. To fix
this, we need the preprocessed output to track the file size and other stat
information we might use to build the lookup table.
2) Declaration ownership semantics don't work properly yet, since mapping from
a source location to a module relies on mapping from FileIDs to modules,
which we can't do if module transitions can occur in the middle of a file.
llvm-svn: 302309
In a previous patch, a new generic error diagnostic for inconsistent attributes was added.
In this commit I reuse this diagnostic for ns_returns_retained attribute check.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32697
llvm-svn: 302024
isMicrosoftMissingTypename() uses a Type pointer without first checking
that it's non-null. PR32750 reports a case where the pointer is in fact
null. This patch adds in a defensive check and a regression test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32519
llvm-svn: 301420
This switches from the prototype syntax in P0273R0 ('module' and 'module
implementation') to the consensus syntax 'export module' and 'module'.
In passing, drop the "module declaration must be first" enforcement, since EWG
seems to have changed its mind on that.
llvm-svn: 301056
clang-cl sets MicrosoftCompat. In that mode, we always give enums a fixed
underlying type, and for enums with fixed underlying type we never enter the
block that tries to emit ext_ms_forward_ref_enum. Fix this by requiring an
explicit underlying type when we're skipping this diagnostic.
We had a test for this warning, but it only ran in C++98 mode. clang-cl always
enables -std=c++14, so MicrosoftCompatibiliy-cxx98.cpp is a fairly useless
test. Fold it into MicrosoftCompatibility.cpp -- that way, the test checks if
-Wmicrosoft-enum-forward-reference can fire in clang-cl builds.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D32369
llvm-svn: 301032
This commit teaches Clang to recognize editor placeholders that are produced
when an IDE like Xcode inserts a code-completion result that includes a
placeholder. Now when the lexer sees a placeholder token, it emits an
'editor placeholder in source file' error and creates an identifier token
that represents the placeholder. The parser/sema can now recognize the
placeholders and can suppress the diagnostics related to the placeholders. This
ensures that live issues in an IDE like Xcode won't get spurious diagnostics
related to placeholders.
This commit also adds a new compiler option named '-fallow-editor-placeholders'
that silences the 'editor placeholder in source file' error. This is useful
for an IDE like Xcode as we don't want to display those errors in live issues.
rdar://31581400
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32081
llvm-svn: 300667
This is a recommit of r300539 that was reverted in r300543 due to test failures.
The original commit message is displayed below:
The new '#pragma clang attribute' directive can be used to apply attributes to
multiple declarations. An attribute must satisfy the following conditions to
be supported by the pragma:
- It must have a subject list that's defined in the TableGen file.
- It must be documented.
- It must not be late parsed.
- It must have a GNU/C++11 spelling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30009
llvm-svn: 300556
The new '#pragma clang attribute' directive can be used to apply attributes to
multiple declarations. An attribute must satisfy the following conditions to
be supported by the pragma:
- It must have a subject list that's defined in the TableGen file.
- It must be documented.
- It must not be late parsed.
- It must have a GNU/C++11 spelling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30009
llvm-svn: 300539
Calculating the hash in Sema::ActOnTagFinishDefinition could happen before
all sub-Decls were parsed or processed, which would produce the wrong hash
value. Change to calculating the hash on the first use and storing the value
instead. Also, avoid using the macros that were only for Boolean fields and
use an explicit checker during the DefintionData merge. No functional change,
but was this blocking other ODRHash patches.
llvm-svn: 299989
We need to address cases (breaking libc++) such as
template <class _Up> static int __test(...);
template<typename _Tp>
auto v = __test<_Tp>(0);
llvm-svn: 299956
Two simplifications:
- We check `!Previous.empty()` above and only use `Previous` in const
contexts after that check, so the `!Previous.empty()` check seems
redundant.
- The null check looks pointless, as well: AFAICT, `LookupResults`
should never contain null entries, and `OldDecl` should always be
non-null if `Redeclaration` is true.
llvm-svn: 299601
Follow-up to r299363 "Enhance -Wshadow to warn when shadowing typedefs or type
aliases".
Patch by Ahmed Asadi.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31235
llvm-svn: 299522
Fixed the assertion due to absence of source location for
implicitly defined types (using addImplicitTypedef()).
During Sema checks the source location is being expected
and therefore an assertion is triggered.
The change is not specific to OpenCL. But it is particularly
common for OpenCL types to be declared implicitly in Clang
to support the mode without the standard header.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31397
llvm-svn: 299447
- also replace direct equality checks against the ConstantEvaluated enumerator with isConstantEvaluted(), in anticipation of adding finer granularity to the various ConstantEvaluated contexts and reinstating certain restrictions on where lambda expressions can occur in C++17.
- update the clang tablegen backend that uses these Enumerators, and add the relevant scope where needed.
llvm-svn: 299316
Summary: After examining the remaining uses of LangOptions.ObjCAutoRefCount, found a some additional places to also check for ObjCWeak not covered by previous test cases. Added a test file to verify all the code paths that were changed.
Reviewers: rsmith, doug.gregor, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31007
llvm-svn: 299015
Summary: -Warc-repeated-use-of-weak should produce the same warnings with -fobjc-weak as it does with -objc-arc. Also check for ObjCWeak along with ObjCAutoRefCount when recording the use of an evaluated weak variable. Add a -fobjc-weak run to the existing arc-repeated-weak test case and adapt it slightly to work in both modes.
Reviewers: rsmith, doug.gregor, jordan_rose, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: arphaman, rjmccall, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31005
llvm-svn: 299011
This change fixes a crash on initialization of a reference from ({}) during
template instantiation and incidentally improves diagnostics.
This reverts a prior attempt to handle this in r286721. Instead, we teach the
initialization code that initialization cannot be performed if a source type
is required and the initializer is an initializer list (which is not an
expression and does not have a type), and likewise for function-style cast
expressions.
llvm-svn: 298676
This commit adds support for a new attribute that will be used to
distinguish between extensible and inextensible enums. There are three
main purposes of this attribute:
1. Give better control over when enum-related warnings are issued.
For example, in the code below, clang will not issue a -Wassign-enum
warning if the enum is marked "open":
enum __attribute__((enum_extensibility(closed))) EnumClosed {
B0 = 1, B1 = 10
};
enum __attribute__((enum_extensibility(open))) EnumOpen {
C0 = 1, C1 = 10
};
enum EnumClosed ec = 100; // warning issued
enum EnumOpen eo = 100; // no warning
2. Enable code-completion and debugging tools to offer better
suggestions.
3. Make it easier for swift's clang importer to determine which swift
type an enum should be mapped to.
For more details, see the discussion I started on cfe-dev:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2017-February/052748.html
rdar://problem/12764379
rdar://problem/23145650
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30766
llvm-svn: 298332
Summary:
The changes contained in this patch are:
1. Defines a new AST node `CoawaitDependentExpr` for representing co_await expressions while the promise type is still dependent.
2. Correctly detect and transform the 'co_await' operand to `p.await_transform(<expr>)` when possible.
3. Change the initial/final suspend points to build during the initial parse, so they have the correct operator co_await lookup results.
4. Fix transformation of the CoroutineBodyStmt so that it doesn't re-build the final/initial suspends.
@rsmith: This change is a little big, but it's not trivial for me to split it up. Please let me know if you would prefer this submitted as multiple patches.
Reviewers: rsmith, GorNishanov
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: ABataev, rsmith, mehdi_amini, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26057
llvm-svn: 297093
Rather than attempting to compare whether the previous and current top of
context stack are "equal" (which fails for a number of reasons, such as the
context stack entries containing pointers to objects on the stack, or reaching
the same "top of stack" entry through two different paths), track the depth of
context stack at which we last emitted a note and invalidate it when we pop the
context stack to less than that depth.
This causes us to emit some missing "in instantiation of" notes and to stop
emitting redundant "in instantiation of" stacks matching the previous stack in
rare cases.
llvm-svn: 295921
instantiation.
In preparation for converting the template stack to a more general context
stack (so we can include context notes for other kinds of context).
llvm-svn: 295686
These attributes effectively turn a non-defining declaration into a
definition, so the case when the declaration already has a body must
be diagnosed properly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30032
llvm-svn: 295541
Reserve a spot for ODR hash in CXXRecordDecl and in its modules storage.
Default the hash value to 0 for all classes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21675
llvm-svn: 295533
A slightly weaker form of ODR checking than previous attempts, but hopefully
won't break the modules build bot. Future work will be needed to catch all
cases.
When objects are imported for modules, there is a chance that a name collision
will cause an ODR violation. Previously, only a small number of such
violations were detected. This patch provides a stronger check based on
AST nodes.
The information needed to uniquely identify an object is taken from the AST and
put into a one-dimensional byte stream. This stream is then hashed to give
a value to represent the object, which is stored with the other object data
in the module.
When modules are loaded, and Decl's are merged, the hash values of the two
Decl's are compared. Only Decl's with matched hash values will be merged.
Mismatch hashes will generate a module error, and if possible, point to the
first difference between the two objects.
The transform from AST to byte stream is a modified depth first algorithm.
Due to references between some AST nodes, a pure depth first algorithm could
generate loops. For Stmt nodes, a straight depth first processing occurs.
For Type and Decl nodes, they are replaced with an index number and only on
first visit will these nodes be processed. As an optimization, boolean
values are saved and stored together in reverse order at the end of the
byte stream to lower the ammount of data that needs to be hashed.
Compile time impact was measured at 1.5-2.0% during module building, and
negligible during builds without module building.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21675
llvm-svn: 295421
Recommit r293585 that was reverted in r293611 with new fixes. The previous
issue was determined to be an overly aggressive AST visitor from forward
declared objects. The visitor will now only deeply visit certain Decl's and
only do a shallow information extraction from all other Decl's.
When objects are imported for modules, there is a chance that a name collision
will cause an ODR violation. Previously, only a small number of such
violations were detected. This patch provides a stronger check based on
AST nodes.
The information needed to uniquely identify an object is taken from the AST and
put into a one-dimensional byte stream. This stream is then hashed to give
a value to represent the object, which is stored with the other object data
in the module.
When modules are loaded, and Decl's are merged, the hash values of the two
Decl's are compared. Only Decl's with matched hash values will be merged.
Mismatch hashes will generate a module error, and if possible, point to the
first difference between the two objects.
The transform from AST to byte stream is a modified depth first algorithm.
Due to references between some AST nodes, a pure depth first algorithm could
generate loops. For Stmt nodes, a straight depth first processing occurs.
For Type and Decl nodes, they are replaced with an index number and only on
first visit will these nodes be processed. As an optimization, boolean
values are saved and stored together in reverse order at the end of the
byte stream to lower the ammount of data that needs to be hashed.
Compile time impact was measured at 1.5-2.0% during module building, and
negligible during builds without module building.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21675
llvm-svn: 295284
...function type with a redeclaration having the same attribute. Fixing this
introduced a secondary problem where we were assuming that K&R functions
could not be attributed types when reporting old-style function definitions
that are not preceded by a prototype."
Also Revert "Hopefully fixes a compile error introduced by r294861."
This reverts commit r294862, r294861, as they bork the ARM builds and
haven't fix it back.
Also, please, short commit titles, long commit decsriptions...
llvm-svn: 294910
It's actually meaningful and useful to allow such variables to have no
initializer, but we are strictly following the standard here until the C++
committee reaches consensus on allowing this.
llvm-svn: 294785
We model deduction-guides as functions with a new kind of name that identifies
the template whose deduction they guide; the bulk of this patch is adding the
new name kind. This gives us a clean way to attach an extensible list of guides
to a class template in a way that doesn't require any special handling in AST
files etc (and we're going to need these functions we come to performing
deduction).
llvm-svn: 294266
For non-template dllimport functions, MSVC allows providing an inline
definition without spelling out the attribute again. In the example below, f
remains a dllimport function.
__declspec(dllimport) int f();
inline int f() { return 42; }
int useit() {
return f();
}
However, for a function template, not putting dllimport on the redeclaration
causes it to be dropped. In the example below, f is not dllimport.
template <typename> __declspec(dllimport) int f();
template <typename> inline int f() { return 42; }
int useit() {
return f<int>();
}
This patch makes Clang match MSVC for the second example.
MSVC does not warn about the attribute being dropped in the example above, but
I think we should. (MSVC does warn if the inline keyword isn't used.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29152
llvm-svn: 293800
We're seeing what we believe are false positives. (It's hard to tell with the
available diagnostics, and I'm not sure how to reduce them yet).
I'll send Richard reproduction details offline.
djasper/chandlerc suggested this should be a warning for now, to make rolling it
out feasible.
llvm-svn: 293611
When objects are imported for modules, there is a chance that a name collision
will cause an ODR violation. Previously, only a small number of such
violations were detected. This patch provides a stronger check based on
AST nodes.
The information needed to uniquely identify an object is taked from the AST and
put into a one-dimensional byte stream. This stream is then hashed to give
a value to represent the object, which is stored with the other object data
in the module.
When modules are loaded, and Decl's are merged, the hash values of the two
Decl's are compared. Only Decl's with matched hash values will be merged.
Mismatch hashes will generate a module error, and if possible, point to the
first difference between the two objects.
The transform from AST to byte stream is a modified depth first algorithm.
Due to references between some AST nodes, a pure depth first algorithm could
generate loops. For Stmt nodes, a straight depth first processing occurs.
For Type and Decl nodes, they are replaced with an index number and only on
first visit will these nodes be processed. As an optimization, boolean
values are saved and stored together in reverse order at the end of the
byte stream to lower the ammount of data that needs to be hashed.
Compile time impact was measured at 1.5-2.0% during module building, and
negligible during builds without module building.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21675
llvm-svn: 293585
This change adds a new type node, DeducedTemplateSpecializationType, to
represent a type template name that has been used as a type. This is modeled
around AutoType, and shares a common base class for representing a deduced
placeholder type.
We allow deduced class template types in a few more places than the standard
does: in conditions and for-range-declarators, and in new-type-ids. This is
consistent with GCC and with discussion on the core reflector. This patch
does not yet support deduced class template types being named in typename
specifiers.
llvm-svn: 293207
Under this defect resolution, the injected-class-name of a class or class
template cannot be used except in very limited circumstances (when declaring a
constructor, in a nested-name-specifier, in a base-specifier, or in an
elaborated-type-specifier). This is apparently done to make parsing easier, but
it's a pain for us since we don't know whether a template-id using the
injected-class-name is valid at the point when we annotate it (we don't yet
know whether the template-id will become part of an elaborated-type-specifier).
As a tentative resolution to a perceived language defect, mem-initializer-ids
are added to the list of exceptions here (they generally follow the same rules
as base-specifiers).
When the reference to the injected-class-name uses the 'typename' or 'template'
keywords, we permit it to be used to name a type or template as an extension;
other compilers also accept some cases in this area. There are also a couple of
corner cases with dependent template names that we do not yet diagnose, but
which will also get this treatment.
llvm-svn: 292518
Diasllow a declaration using the 'auto' type specifier from using two different
meanings of it at once, or from declaring multiple functions with deduced
return types or introducing multiple trailing return types.
The standard does not technically disallow the multiple trailing return types
case if all the declarators declare variables (such as function pointers with
trailing return types), but we disallow that too, following the clear intent.
llvm-svn: 291880
Alexander Kornienko