There was a top level "let Predicates =" in the .td file that was overriding the Requires on each instruction.
I've added an assert to the code emitter to catch more cases like this. I'm sure this isn't the only place where the right predicates aren't being applied. This assert already found that we don't block btq/btsq/btrq in 32-bit mode.
llvm-svn: 320830
Summary:
Intel documentation shows the memory operand as the first operand. But we currently treat it as the second operand. Conceptually the order doesn't matter since it doesn't write memory. We have aliases to parse with the operands in either order and the isel matching is commutable.
For the register®ister form order does matter for the assembly parser. PR22995 was previously filed and fixed by changing the register®ister form from MRMSrcReg to MRMDestReg to match gas. Ideally the memory form should match by using MRMDestMem.
I believe this supercedes D38025 which was trying to switch the register®ister form back to pre-PR22995.
Reviewers: aymanmus, RKSimon, zvi
Reviewed By: aymanmus
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38120
llvm-svn: 314639
We were producing R_X86_64_GOTPCRELX for invalid instructions and
sometimes producing R_X86_64_GOTPCRELX instead of
R_X86_64_REX_GOTPCRELX.
llvm-svn: 271118
For some instructions the register is not the last operand and the immediate handling had to detect this and hardcode the index to find it. It also required CurOp to be pointing at the last operand handled in the Form switch whereas for any instruction it would be pointing at the next operand.
Now we just capture the value in the Form switch when we know exactly where it is and the CurOp pointer can behave normally.
llvm-svn: 262462
Summary:
Enables eip-based addressing, e.g.,
lea constant(%eip), %rax
lea constant(%eip), %eax
in MC, (used for the x32 ABI). EIP-base addressing is also valid in x86_64,
it is left enabled for that architecture as well.
Patch by João Porto
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16581
llvm-svn: 259528
Previously, subtarget features were a bitfield with the underlying type being uint64_t.
Since several targets (X86 and ARM, in particular) have hit or were very close to hitting this bound, switching the features to use a bitset.
No functional change.
The first several times this was committed (e.g. r229831, r233055), it caused several buildbot failures.
Apparently the reason for most failures was both clang and gcc's inability to deal with large numbers (> 10K) of bitset constructor calls in tablegen-generated initializers of instruction info tables.
This should now be fixed.
llvm-svn: 238192
Previously, subtarget features were a bitfield with the underlying type being uint64_t.
Since several targets (X86 and ARM, in particular) have hit or were very close to hitting this bound, switching the features to use a bitset.
No functional change.
The first two times this was committed (r229831, r233055), it caused several buildbot failures.
At least some of the ARM and MIPS ones were due to gcc/binutils issues, and should now be fixed.
llvm-svn: 237234
The patch is generated using clang-tidy misc-use-override check.
This command was used:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py \
-checks='-*,misc-use-override' -header-filter='llvm|clang' \
-j=32 -fix -format
http://reviews.llvm.org/D8925
llvm-svn: 234679
This reverts commit r233055.
It still causes buildbot failures (gcc running out of memory on several platforms, and a self-host failure on arm), although less than the previous time.
llvm-svn: 233068
Previously, subtarget features were a bitfield with the underlying type being uint64_t.
Since several targets (X86 and ARM, in particular) have hit or were very close to hitting this bound, switching the features to use a bitset.
No functional change.
The first time this was committed (r229831), it caused several buildbot failures.
At least some of the ARM ones were due to gcc/binutils issues, and should now be fixed.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8542
llvm-svn: 233055
Previously, subtarget features were a bitfield with the underlying type being uint64_t.
Since several targets (X86 and ARM, in particular) have hit or were very close to hitting this bound, switching the features to use a bitset.
No functional change.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7065
llvm-svn: 229831
This removes a hardcoded list of instructions in the CodeEmitter. Eventually I intend to remove the predicates on the affected instructions since in any given mode two of them are valid if we supported addr32/addr16 prefixes in the assembler.
llvm-svn: 224809
Summary: x86 allows either ordering for the LOCK and DATA16 prefixes, but using GCC+GAS leads to different code generation than using LLVM. This change matches the order that GAS emits the x86 prefixes when a semicolon isn't used in inline assembly (see tc-i386.c comment before define LOCK_PREFIX), and helps simplify tooling that operates on the instruction's byte sequence (such as NaCl's validator). This change shouldn't have any performance impact.
Test Plan: ninja check
Reviewers: craig.topper, jvoung
Subscribers: jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6630
llvm-svn: 224283
This allows assembling the two new instructions, encls and enclu for the
SKX processor model.
Note the diffs are a bigger than what might think, but to fit the new
MRM_CF and MRM_D7 in things in the right places things had to be
renumbered and shuffled down causing a bit more diffs.
rdar://16228228
llvm-svn: 214460
Passes the computed scaling factor in TSFlags rather than the old attributes.
Also removes the C++ version of computing the scaling factor (MemObjSize)
along with the asserts added by the previous patch.
No functional change.
llvm-svn: 213279
Craig Topper