Previously prefetch was only considered legal if sse was enabled, but it should be supported with 3dnow as well.
The prfchw flag now imply at least some form of prefetch without the write hint is available, either the sse or 3dnow version. This is true even if 3dnow and sse are explicitly disabled.
Similarly prefetchwt1 feature implies availability of prefetchw and the the prefetcht0/1/2/nta instructions. This way we can support _MM_HINT_ET0 using prefetchw and _MM_HINT_ET1 with prefetchwt1. And its assumed that if we have levels for the write hint we would have levels for the non-write hint, thus why we enable the sse prefetch instructions.
I believe this behavior is consistent with gcc. I've updated the prefetch.ll to test all of these combinations.
llvm-svn: 321335
This should only affect what we do for v8i16. Previously we went to v8i64, but if we have VLX we only need v8i32. This prevents an unnecessary zmm usage.
llvm-svn: 321303
We should have equally good shuffle options for v8i32 with VLX. This was spotted during my attempts to remove 512-bit vectors from SKX.
We still use 512-bits for v16i1, v32i1, and v64i1. I'm less sure we can handle those well with narrower vectors. i32 and i64 element sizes get the best shuffle support.
llvm-svn: 321291
Gather/scatter can implicitly sign extend from i32->i64 on indices. So if we know the sign bit of the input to a zext is 0 we can use the implicit extension.
llvm-svn: 321209
This patch turns shuffles of fadd/fsub with fmul into fmsubadd.
Patch by Dmitry Venikov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40335
llvm-svn: 321200
The gather instruction will implicitly sign extend to the pointer width, we don't need to further extend it. This can prevent unnecessary splitting in some cases.
There's still an issue that lowering on non-VLX can introduce another sign extend that doesn't get combined with shifts from a lowered sign_extend_inreg.
llvm-svn: 321152
Not sure how to test this cause I think the worst that happens is that we don't revisit the node a second time to look for additional combines. We used UpdateNodeOperands so the updating the DAG work was already done.
llvm-svn: 321148
We try to prevent shuffle combining to value types that would stop the folding of masked operations, but by just returning early, we were failing to try different shuffle types.
The TODOs are all still relevant here to improve codegen but we're lacking test examples.
llvm-svn: 321085
As mentioned in D38318 and D40865, modern Intel processors prefer to combine multiple shuffles to a variable shuffle mask (PSHUFB/VPERMPS etc.) instead of having multiple stage 'fixed' shuffles which put more pressure on Port 5 (at the expense of extra shuffle mask loads).
This patch provides a FeatureFastVariableShuffle target flag for Haswell+ CPUs that prefers combining 2 or more fixed shuffles to a single variable shuffle (default is 3 shuffles).
The long term aim is to drive more of this from schedule data (probably via the MC) but we're not close to being ready for that yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41323
llvm-svn: 321074
Extension to D39729 which performed this for vXi16, with the same bit flipping to handle SMAX/SMIN/UMAX cases, vXi8 UMIN horizontal reductions can be performed.
This makes use of the fact that by performing a pair-wise i8 SHUFFLE/UMIN before PHMINPOSUW, we both get the UMIN of each pair but also zero-extend the upper bits ready for v8i16.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41294
llvm-svn: 321070
BWI supports shifting by word amounts. Even if VLX isn't support we can still widen to v32i16 and extract the lower half. For SKX its preferrable to not use 512-bit vector if we can.
llvm-svn: 321059
Previously, we were checking for MVTs with sizes betwen 8 and 64 which only includes i8, i16, i32, and i64 today. But I don't think we should assume that and should list the types that are legal for x86. I also don't think we need i64 since type legalization is guaranteed to split those up.
llvm-svn: 321058
My reading of the SDM says that all bits of the shift amount are used. If the value of the element is larger than the number of bits the result the shift result is zero. So I think we need to zero_extend here to avoid garbage in the upper bits.
In reality we lower any_extend as zero_extend so in most cases it would be hard to hit this.
llvm-svn: 321055
Note:
- X86ISelLowering: setLibcallName(SINCOS) was superfluous as
InitLibcalls() already does it.
- ARMISelLowering: Setting libcallnames for sincos/sincosf seemed
superfluous as in the darwin case it wouldn't be used while for all
other cases InitLibcalls already does it.
llvm-svn: 321036
The block I moved things that need BWI and 512-bit or VLX is incorrectly qualified with just hasBWI || hasVLX. Here I've qualified it with hasBWI && (hasAVX512 || hasVLX) where the hasAVX512 will be replaced with allowing 512-bit vectors in an upcoming patch.
llvm-svn: 320957
Summary:
We had no tests for this and we couldn't do the optimization because of a bad use count check. We need to know how many non-undef pieces of the build vector were filled in and ensure our use count is equal to that. But on the shuffle combine version we need the use count to be 2.
The missing coverage was noticed during the review of D40335.
Reviewers: RKSimon, zvi, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41133
llvm-svn: 320950
Assuming we can safely adjust the broadcast index for the new type to keep it suitably aligned, then peek through BITCASTs when looking for the broadcast source.
Fixes PR32007
llvm-svn: 320933
In those cases, the pass thru operand of the methods isn't used. The calls to the scalar version were passing a MVT::i1 zero, which is an illegal type at the stage this code runs.
llvm-svn: 320928
Previously we promoted to v8i64, but we don't need to go all the way to 512-bits. If we have VLX we can use the 256-bit instruction. And even if we don't have VLX we can widen v8i32 to v16i32 and drop the upper half.
llvm-svn: 320926
The target independent nodes will get legalized to the target specific nodes by their own legalization process. Someday I'd like to stop using a target specific for zero extends and truncates of legal types so the less places we reference the target specific opcode the better.
llvm-svn: 320863
When I wrote it I thought we were missing a potential optimization for KNL. But investigating further shows that for KNL we still do the optimal thing by widening to v4f32 and then using special isel patterns to widen again to zmm a register.
llvm-svn: 320862
Summary:
Currently we don't handle v32i1/v64i1 insert_vector_elt correctly as we fail to look at the number of elements closely and assume it can only be v16i1 or v8i1.
We also can't type legalize v64i1 insert_vector_elt correctly on KNL due to the type not being byte addressable as required by the legalizing through memory accesses path requires.
For the first issue, the patch now tries to pick a 512-bit register with the correct number of elements and promotes to that.
For the second issue, we now extend the vector to a byte addressable type, do the stores to memory, load the two halves, and then truncate the halves back to the original type. Technically since we changed the type, we may not need two loads, but actually checking that is more work and for the v64i1 case we do need them.
Reviewers: RKSimon, delena, spatel, zvi
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40942
llvm-svn: 320849
A couple places didn't use the same SDValue variables to connect everything all the way through.
I don't have a test case for a bug in insert into the lower bits of a non-zero, non-undef vector. Not sure the best way to create that. We don't create the case when lowering concat_vectors which is the main way to get insert_subvectors.
llvm-svn: 320790
We have several instructions that were introduced in AVX512F that are only available in 512-bit form on KNL. We still make use of them for 128/256 by artificially widening and extracting during isel.
This commit separates these operations from the true 512-bit operations. This way we can qualify the normal 512-bit operations with needing 512-bit register support. And these special operations will get qualified with needing 512-bit registers OR VLX.
The 512-bit register qualification will be introduced in a future patch this just gets everything grouped to minimize deltas on that patch.
llvm-svn: 320782
Previously they were sort of interleaved in with XMM/YMM/ZMM action related code.
Trying to separate things so its easier to split 512-bit vectors later.
llvm-svn: 320781
Move it into the separate hasVLX block later in the constructor.
I'm trying to separate 128/256 and 512-bit related code so we can eventually qualify the hasAVX512 block with support for 512-bit vectors required by the prefer-vector-width feature support being talked about in D41096.
llvm-svn: 320779
Craig Topper