This change compresses the context string by removing cycles due to recursive function for CS profile generation. Removing recursion cycles is a way to normalize the calling context which will be better for the sample aggregation and also make the context promoting deterministic.
Specifically for implementation, we recognize adjacent repeated frames as cycles and deduplicated them through multiple round of iteration.
For example:
Considering a input context string stack:
[“a”, “a”, “b”, “c”, “a”, “b”, “c”, “b”, “c”, “d”]
For first iteration,, it removed all adjacent repeated frames of size 1:
[“a”, “b”, “c”, “a”, “b”, “c”, “b”, “c”, “d”]
For second iteration, it removed all adjacent repeated frames of size 2:
[“a”, “b”, “c”, “a”, “b”, “c”, “d”]
So in the end, we get compressed output:
[“a”, “b”, “c”, “d”]
Compression will be called in two place: one for sample's context key right after unwinding, one is for the eventual context string id in the ProfileGenerator.
Added a switch `compress-recursion` to control the size of duplicated frames, default -1 means no size limit.
Added unit tests and regression test for this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93556
This change compresses the context string by removing cycles due to recursive function for CS profile generation. Removing recursion cycles is a way to normalize the calling context which will be better for the sample aggregation and also make the context promoting deterministic.
Specifically for implementation, we recognize adjacent repeated frames as cycles and deduplicated them through multiple round of iteration.
For example:
Considering a input context string stack:
[“a”, “a”, “b”, “c”, “a”, “b”, “c”, “b”, “c”, “d”]
For first iteration,, it removed all adjacent repeated frames of size 1:
[“a”, “b”, “c”, “a”, “b”, “c”, “b”, “c”, “d”]
For second iteration, it removed all adjacent repeated frames of size 2:
[“a”, “b”, “c”, “a”, “b”, “c”, “d”]
So in the end, we get compressed output:
[“a”, “b”, “c”, “d”]
Compression will be called in two place: one for sample's context key right after unwinding, one is for the eventual context string id in the ProfileGenerator.
Added a switch `compress-recursion` to control the size of duplicated frames, default -1 means no size limit.
Added unit tests and regression test for this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93556
This change implements profile generation infra for pseudo probe in llvm-profgen. During virtual unwinding, the raw profile is extracted into range counter and branch counter and aggregated to sample counter map indexed by the call stack context. This change introduces the last step and produces the eventual profile. Specifically, the body of function sample is recorded by going through each probe among the range and callsite target sample is recorded by extracting the callsite probe from branch's source.
Please refer https://groups.google.com/g/llvm-dev/c/1p1rdYbL93s and https://reviews.llvm.org/D89707 for more context about CSSPGO and llvm-profgen.
**Implementation**
- Extended `PseudoProbeProfileGenerator` for pseudo probe based profile generation.
- `populateBodySamplesWithProbes` reading range counter is responsible for recording function body samples and inferring caller's body samples.
- `populateBoundarySamplesWithProbes` reading branch counter is responsible for recording call site target samples.
- Each sample is recorded with its calling context(named `ContextId`). Remind that the probe based context key doesn't include the leaf frame probe info, so the `ContextId` string is created from two part: one from the probe stack strings' concatenation and other one from the leaf frame probe.
- Added regression test
Test Plan:
ninja & ninja check-llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92998
This change extends virtual unwinder to support pseudo probe in llvm-profgen. Please refer https://groups.google.com/g/llvm-dev/c/1p1rdYbL93s and https://reviews.llvm.org/D89707 for more context about CSSPGO and llvm-profgen.
**Implementation**
- Added `ProbeBasedCtxKey` derived from `ContextKey` for sample counter aggregation. As we need string splitting to infer the profile for callee function, string based context introduces more string handling overhead, here we just use probe pointer based context.
- For linear unwinding, as inline context is encoded in each pseudo probe, we don't need to go through each instruction to extract range sharing same inliner. So just record the range for the context.
- For probe based context, we should ignore the top frame probe since it will be extracted from the address range. we defer the extraction in `ProfileGeneration`.
- Added `PseudoProbeProfileGenerator` for pseudo probe based profile generation.
- Some helper function to get pseduo probe info(call probe, inline context) from profiled binary.
- Added regression test for unwinder's output
The pseudo probe based profile generation will be in the upcoming patch.
Test Plan:
ninja & ninja check-llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92896
This change implements pseudo probe decoding and disassembling for llvm-profgen/CSSPGO. Please see https://groups.google.com/g/llvm-dev/c/1p1rdYbL93s and https://reviews.llvm.org/D89707 for more context about CSSPGO and llvm-profgen.
**ELF section format**
Please see the encoding patch(https://reviews.llvm.org/D91878) for more details of the format, just copy the example here:
Two section(`.pseudo_probe_desc` and `.pseudoprobe` ) is emitted in ELF to support pseudo probe.
The format of `.pseudo_probe_desc` section looks like:
```
.section .pseudo_probe_desc,"",@progbits
.quad 6309742469962978389 // Func GUID
.quad 4294967295 // Func Hash
.byte 9 // Length of func name
.ascii "_Z5funcAi" // Func name
.quad 7102633082150537521
.quad 138828622701
.byte 12
.ascii "_Z8funcLeafi"
.quad 446061515086924981
.quad 4294967295
.byte 9
.ascii "_Z5funcBi"
.quad -2016976694713209516
.quad 72617220756
.byte 7
.ascii "_Z3fibi"
```
For each `.pseudoprobe` section, the encoded binary data consists of a single function record corresponding to an outlined function (i.e, a function with a code entry in the `.text` section). A function record has the following format :
```
FUNCTION BODY (one for each outlined function present in the text section)
GUID (uint64)
GUID of the function
NPROBES (ULEB128)
Number of probes originating from this function.
NUM_INLINED_FUNCTIONS (ULEB128)
Number of callees inlined into this function, aka number of
first-level inlinees
PROBE RECORDS
A list of NPROBES entries. Each entry contains:
INDEX (ULEB128)
TYPE (uint4)
0 - block probe, 1 - indirect call, 2 - direct call
ATTRIBUTE (uint3)
reserved
ADDRESS_TYPE (uint1)
0 - code address, 1 - address delta
CODE_ADDRESS (uint64 or ULEB128)
code address or address delta, depending on ADDRESS_TYPE
INLINED FUNCTION RECORDS
A list of NUM_INLINED_FUNCTIONS entries describing each of the inlined
callees. Each record contains:
INLINE SITE
GUID of the inlinee (uint64)
ID of the callsite probe (ULEB128)
FUNCTION BODY
A FUNCTION BODY entry describing the inlined function.
```
**Disassembling**
A switch `--show-pseudo-probe` is added to use along with `--show-disassembly` to print disassembly code with pseudo probe directives.
For example:
```
00000000002011a0 <foo2>:
2011a0: 50 push rax
2011a1: 85 ff test edi,edi
[Probe]: FUNC: foo2 Index: 1 Type: Block
2011a3: 74 02 je 2011a7 <foo2+0x7>
[Probe]: FUNC: foo2 Index: 3 Type: Block
[Probe]: FUNC: foo2 Index: 4 Type: Block
[Probe]: FUNC: foo Index: 1 Type: Block Inlined: @ foo2:6
2011a5: 58 pop rax
2011a6: c3 ret
[Probe]: FUNC: foo2 Index: 2 Type: Block
2011a7: bf 01 00 00 00 mov edi,0x1
[Probe]: FUNC: foo2 Index: 5 Type: IndirectCall
2011ac: ff d6 call rsi
[Probe]: FUNC: foo2 Index: 4 Type: Block
2011ae: 58 pop rax
2011af: c3 ret
```
**Implementation**
- `PseudoProbeDecoder` is added in ProfiledBinary as an infra for the decoding. It decoded the two section and generate two map: `GUIDProbeFunctionMap` stores all the `PseudoProbeFunction` which is the abstraction of a general function. `AddressProbesMap` stores all the pseudo probe info indexed by its address.
- All the inline info is encoded into binary as a trie(`PseudoProbeInlineTree`) and will be constructed from the decoding. Each pseudo probe can get its inline context(`getInlineContext`) by traversing its inline tree node backwards.
Test Plan:
ninja & ninja check-llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92334
wlei