capability was given by the client
After r339738 Clangd started sending categories with each diagnostic, but that
broke the eglot client. This commit puts the categories behind a capability to
fix that breakage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51077
llvm-svn: 340449
This patch adds a 'category' extension field to the LSP diagnostic that's sent
by Clangd. This extension is always on by default.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50571
llvm-svn: 339738
The diagnostic messages that are sent to the client from Clangd are now always
capitalized.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50154
llvm-svn: 338919
Summary:
The new implementation attaches notes to diagnostic message and shows
the original diagnostics in the message of the note.
Reviewers: hokein, ioeric, sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: klimek, mgorny, cfe-commits, jkorous-apple
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44142
llvm-svn: 327282
Summary:
Instead of content-length, we delimit messages with ---.
This also removes the need for (most) dos-formatted test files.
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: klimek, ilya-biryukov, jkorous-apple, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42919
llvm-svn: 324333
Summary:
- when the diagnostic has an explicit range, we prefer that
- if the diagnostic has a fixit, its RemoveRange is our next choice
- otherwise we try to expand the diagnostic location into a whole token.
(inspired by VSCode, which does this client-side when given an empty range)
- if all else fails, we return the zero-width range as now.
(clients react in different ways to this, highlighting a token or a char)
- this includes the off-by-one fix from D40860, and borrows heavily from it
Reviewers: rwols, hokein
Subscribers: klimek, ilya-biryukov, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41118
llvm-svn: 320555
Summary:
This form can be created with a nice clang-format-friendly literal syntax,
and gets escaping right. It knows how to call unparse() on our Protocol types.
All the places where we pass around JSON internally now use this type.
Object properties are sorted (stored as std::map) and so serialization is
canonicalized, with optional prettyprinting (triggered by a -pretty flag).
This makes the lit tests much nicer to read and somewhat nicer to debug.
(Unfortunately the completion tests use CHECK-DAG, which only has
line-granularity, so pretty-printing is disabled there. In future we
could make completion ordering deterministic, or switch to unittests).
Compared to the current approach, it has some efficiencies like avoiding copies
of string literals used as object keys, but is probably slower overall.
I think the code/test quality benefits are worth it.
This patch doesn't attempt to do anything about JSON *parsing*.
It takes direction from the proposal in this doc[1], but is limited in scope
and visibility, for now.
I am of half a mind just to use Expr as the target of a parser, and maybe do a
little string deduplication, but not bother with clever memory allocation.
That would be simple, and fast enough for clangd...
[1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OEF9IauWwNuSigZzvvbjc1cVS1uGHRyGTXaoy3DjqM4/edit
+cc d0k so he can tell me not to use std::map.
Reviewers: ioeric, malaperle
Subscribers: bkramer, ilya-biryukov, mgorny, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39435
llvm-svn: 317486
Summary:
When the user selects a fix-it (or any code action with commands), it is
possible to let the client forward the selected command to the server.
When the clangd.applyFix command is handled on the server, it can send a
workspace/applyEdit request to the client. This has the advantage that
the client doesn't explicitly have to know how to handle
clangd.applyFix. Therefore, the code to handle clangd.applyFix in the VS
Code extension (and any other Clangd client) is not required anymore.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, sammccall, Nebiroth, hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: ioeric, hokein, rwols, puremourning, bkramer, ilya-biryukov
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39276
llvm-svn: 317322