In the current implementation, we run visitors until the fixed point is
reached.
That is, if a visitor adds another visitor, the currently processed path
is destroyed, all diagnostics is discarded, and it is regenerated again,
until it's no longer modified.
This pattern has a few negative implications:
- This loop does not even guarantee to terminate.
E.g. just imagine two visitors bouncing a diagnostics around.
- Performance-wise, e.g. for sqlite3 all visitors are being re-run at
least 10 times for some bugs.
We have already seen a few reports where it leads to timeouts.
- If we want to add more computationally intense visitors, this will
become worse.
- From architectural standpoint, the current layout requires copying
visitors, which is conceptually wrong, and can be annoying (e.g. no
unique_ptr on visitors allowed).
The proposed change is a much simpler architecture: the outer loop
processes nodes upwards, and whenever the visitor is added it only
processes current nodes and above, thus guaranteeing termination.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47856
llvm-svn: 335666
All usages of isSubRegionOf separately check for reflexive case, and in
any case, set theory tells us that each set is a subset of itself.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42140
llvm-svn: 322752
Added new enum in order to differentiate the warning messages on "misusing" into
3 categories: function calls, moving an object, copying an object. (At the
moment the checker gives the same message in case of copying and moving.)
Additional test cases added as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38674
llvm-svn: 316852
An earlier solution from Artem r315301 solves the reset problem, however, the
reports should be handled the same way in case of method calls. We should not
just report the base class of the object where the method was defined but the
whole object.
Fixed false positive which came from not removing the subobjects in case of a
state-resetting function. (Just replaced the State->remove(...) call to
removeFromState(..) which was defined exactly for that purpose.)
Some minor typos fixed in this patch as well which did not worth a whole new
patch in my opinion, so included them here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31538
llvm-svn: 316850
If a method is resetting the state of an object that was moved from, it should
be safe to use this object again. However if the method was defined in a parent
class, but used in a child class, the reset didn't happen from the checker's
perspective.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31538
llvm-svn: 315301
This method injects additional information into program state dumps,
describing which objects have been moved from.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31541
llvm-svn: 315300
The checker currently warns on copying, moving, or calling methods on an object
that was recently std::move'd from. It understands a set of "state reset"
methods that bring a moved-from object back to a well-specified state.
Patch by Peter Szecsi!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24246
llvm-svn: 298698
Reka Kovacs