removeInvalidation is a very problematic API, as it makes suppression
order-dependent.
Moreover, it was used only once, and could be rewritten in a much
cleaner way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48045
llvm-svn: 334542
BugReporter.cpp is already severely overloaded, and those dump methods
are on PathDiagnostics and should belong in the corresponding
implementation file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48035
llvm-svn: 334541
getEndPath is a problematic API, because it's not clear when it's called
(hint: not always at the end of the path), it crashes at runtime with
more than one non-nullptr returning implementation, and diagnostics
internal depend on it being called at some exact place.
However, most visitors don't actually need that: all they want is a
function consistently called after all nodes are traversed, to perform
finalization and to decide whether invalidation is needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48042
llvm-svn: 334540
Once we removed AlternateExtensive, I've looked closer into the
difference between Minimal and Extensive, and turns out, the difference
was not that large.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47756
llvm-svn: 334525
Rename AlternateExtensive to Extensive.
In 2013, five years ago, we have switched to AlternateExtensive
diagnostics by default, and Extensive was available under unused,
undocumented flag.
This change remove the flag, renames the Alternate
diagnostic to Extensive (as it's no longer Alternate), and ports the
test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47670
llvm-svn: 334524
This breaks the OpenFlags enumeration into two separate
enumerations: OpenFlags and CreationDisposition. The first
controls the behavior of the API depending on whether or not
the target file already exists, and is not a flags-based
enum. The second controls more flags-like values.
This yields a more easy to understand API, while also allowing
flags to be passed to the openForRead api, where most of the
values didn't make sense before. This also makes the apis more
testable as it becomes easy to enumerate all the configurations
which make sense, so I've added many new tests to exercise all
the different values.
llvm-svn: 334221
Temporary object constructor inlining was disabled in r326240 for code like
const int &x = A().x;
because automatic destructor for the lifetime-extended object A() was not
working correctly in CFG.
CFG was fixed in r333941, so inlining can be re-enabled. CFG for lifetime
extension through aggregates still needs to be fixed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44239
llvm-svn: 333946
Summary: This is a prototype of a bug reporter visitor that invalidates bug reports by re-checking constraints of certain states on the bug path using the Z3 constraint manager backend. The functionality is available under the `crosscheck-with-z3` analyzer config flag.
Reviewers: george.karpenkov, NoQ, dcoughlin, rnkovacs
Reviewed By: george.karpenkov
Subscribers: rnkovacs, NoQ, george.karpenkov, dcoughlin, xbolva00, ddcc, mikhail.ramalho, MTC, fhahn, whisperity, baloghadamsoftware, szepet, a.sidorin, gsd, dkrupp, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45517
llvm-svn: 333903
Summary:
This patch implements a simple SMTConstraintManager API, and requires the implementation of two methods for now: `addRangeConstraints` and `isModelFeasible`.
Update Z3ConstraintManager to inherit it and implement required methods.
I also moved the method to dump the SMT formula from D45517 to this patch.
This patch was created based on the reviews from D47640.
Reviewers: george.karpenkov, NoQ, ddcc, dcoughlin
Reviewed By: george.karpenkov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47689
llvm-svn: 333899
Summary:
Moved `RangedConstraintManager` header from `lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/` to `clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/`. No changes to the code.
Reviewers: NoQ, george.karpenkov, dcoughlin
Reviewed By: george.karpenkov
Subscribers: NoQ, george.karpenkov, dcoughlin, ddcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47640
llvm-svn: 333862
ExprEngine already maintains three internal program state traits to track
path-sensitive information related to object construction: pointer returned by
operator new, and pointer to temporary object for two different purposes - for
destruction and for lifetime extension. We'll need to add 2-3 more in a few
follow-up commits.
Merge these traits into one because they all essentially serve one purpose and
work similarly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47303
llvm-svn: 333719
Summary: Clang does not have a corresponding QualType for a 1-bit APSInt, so use the BoolTy and extend the APSInt. Split from D35450. Fixes PR37622.
Reviewers: george.karpenkov, NoQ
Subscribers: mikhail.ramalho, xazax.hun, szepet, rnkovacs, cfe-commits, a.sidorin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47603
llvm-svn: 333704
Memoize simplification so that we didn't need to simplify the same symbolic
expression twice within the same program state.
Gives ~25% performance boost on the artificial test in test/Analysis/hangs.c.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47402
llvm-svn: 333671
When neither LHS nor RHS of a binary operator expression can be simplified,
return the original expression instead of re-evaluating the binary operator.
Such re-evaluation was causing recusrive re-simplification which caused
the algorithmic complexity to explode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47155
llvm-svn: 333670
Summary: If the access is out of bounds, return UndefinedVal. If it is missing an explicit init, return the implicit zero value it must have.
Reviewers: NoQ, xazax.hun, george.karpenkov
Reviewed By: NoQ
Subscribers: szepet, rnkovacs, a.sidorin, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46823
llvm-svn: 333417
Because template parameter lists were not displayed
in the plist output, it was difficult to decide in
some cases whether a given checker found a true or a
false positive. This patch aims to correct this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46933
llvm-svn: 333275
Summary: I could also move `RangedConstraintManager.h` under `include/` if you agree as it seems slightly out of place under `lib/`.
Patch by Réka Kovács
Reviewers: NoQ, george.karpenkov, dcoughlin, rnkovacs
Reviewed By: NoQ
Subscribers: mikhail.ramalho, whisperity, xazax.hun, baloghadamsoftware, szepet, a.sidorin, dkrupp, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45920
llvm-svn: 333179
The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/LLVM_DEBUG(/g'
- git diff -U0 master | ../clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py -i -p1 -style LLVM
Explicitly avoided changing the strings in the clang-format tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44975
llvm-svn: 332350
This is similar to the LLVM change https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290.
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\@brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\@brief //g' $i & done
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46320
llvm-svn: 331834
We weren't invalidating our unions correctly. The previous behavior in
invalidateRegionsWorker::VisitCluster() was to direct-bind an UnknownVal
to the union (at offset 0).
For that reason we were never actually loading default bindings from our unions,
because there never was any default binding to load, and the value
that is presumed when there's no default binding to load
is usually completely incorrect (eg. UndefinedVal for stack unions).
The new behavior is to default-bind a conjured symbol (of irrelevant type)
to the union that's being invalidated, similarly to what we do for structures
and classes. Then it becomes safe to load the value properly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45241
llvm-svn: 331563
C allows us to write any bytes into any memory region. When loading weird bytes
from memory regions of known types, the analyzer is required to make sure that
the loaded value makes sense by casting it to an appropriate type.
Fix such cast for loading values that represent void pointers from non-void
pointer type places.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46415
llvm-svn: 331562
The bindDefault() API of the ProgramState allows setting a default value
for reads from memory regions that were not preceded by writes.
It was used for implementing C++ zeroing constructors (i.e. default constructors
that boil down to setting all fields of the object to 0).
Because differences between zeroing consturctors and other forms of default
initialization have been piling up (in particular, zeroing constructors can be
called multiple times over the same object, probably even at the same offset,
requiring a careful and potentially slow cleanup of previous bindings in the
RegionStore), we split the API in two: bindDefaultInitial() for modeling
initial values and bindDefaultZero() for modeling zeroing constructors.
This fixes a few assertion failures from which the investigation originated.
The imperfect protection from both inability of the RegionStore to support
binding extents and lack of information in ASTRecordLayout has been loosened
because it's, well, imperfect, and it is unclear if it fixing more than it
was breaking.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46368
llvm-svn: 331561
Many glvalue expressions aren't of their respective reference type -
they are simply glvalues of their value type.
This was causing problems when we were trying to obtain type of the original
expression while evaluating certain glvalue bit-casts.
Fixed by artificially forging a reference type to provide to the casting
procedure.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46224
llvm-svn: 331558
When loading from a variable or a field that is declared as constant,
the analyzer will try to inspect its initializer and constant-fold it.
Upon success, the analyzer would skip normal load and return the respective
constant.
The new behavior also applies to fields/elements of brace-initialized structures
and arrays.
Patch by Rafael Stahl!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45774
llvm-svn: 331556
FunctionProtoType.
We previously re-evaluated the expression each time we wanted to know whether
the type is noexcept or not. We now evaluate the expression exactly once.
This is not quite "no functional change": it fixes a crasher bug during AST
deserialization where we would try to evaluate the noexcept specification in a
situation where we have not deserialized sufficient portions of the AST to
permit such evaluation.
llvm-svn: 331428
Summary:
The filename is currently taken from the start of the path, while the
line and column are taken from the end of the path.
This didn't matter until cross-file path reporting was added.
Reviewers: george.karpenkov, dcoughlin, vlad.tsyrklevich
Reviewed By: george.karpenkov, vlad.tsyrklevich
Subscribers: xazax.hun, szepet, a.sidorin, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45611
llvm-svn: 331361
When a '>>' token is split into two '>' tokens (in C++11 onwards), or (as an
extension) when we do the same for other tokens starting with a '>', we can't
just use a location pointing to the first '>' as the location of the split
token, because that would result in our miscomputing the length and spelling
for the token. As a consequence, for example, a refactoring replacing 'A<X>'
with something else would sometimes replace one character too many, and
similarly diagnostics highlighting a template-id source range would highlight
one character too many.
Fix this by creating an expansion range covering the first character of the
'>>' token, whose spelling is '>'. For this to work, we generalize the
expansion range of a macro FileID to be either a token range (the common case)
or a character range (used in this new case).
llvm-svn: 331155
Avoid crash when the sub-expression of operator delete[] is of array type.
This is not the same as simply using a delete[] syntax.
We're still not properly calling destructors in this case in the analyzer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46146
llvm-svn: 331014
If 'A' is a C++ aggregate with a reference field of type 'C', in code like
A a = { C() };
C() is lifetime-extended by 'a'. The analyzer wasn't expecting this pattern and
crashing. Additionally, destructors aren't added in the CFG for this case,
so for now we shouldn't be inlining the constructor for C().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46037
llvm-svn: 330882
Normally the analyzer begins path-sensitive analysis from functions within
the main file, even though the path is allowed to go through any functions
within the translation unit.
When a recent version of WebKit is compiled, the "unified sources" technique
is used, that assumes #including multiple code files into a single main file.
Such file would have no functions defined in it, so the analyzer wouldn't be
able to find any entry points for path-sensitive analysis.
This patch pattern-matches unified file names that are similar to those
used by WebKit and allows the analyzer to find entry points in the included
code files. A more aggressive/generic approach is being planned as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45839
llvm-svn: 330876
Note diagnostic pieces are an additional way of highlighting code sections to
the user. They aren't part of the normal path diagnostic sequence. They can
also be attached to path-insensitive reports.
Notes are already supported by the text output and scan-build.
Expanding our machine-readable plist output format to be able to represent notes
opens up the possibility for various analyzer GUIs to pick them up.
Patch by Umann Kristóf!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45407
llvm-svn: 330766
Printing of ConcreteInts with size >64 bits resulted in assertion failure
in get[Z|S]ExtValue() because these methods are only allowed to be used
with integers of 64 max bit width. This patch fixes the issue.
llvm-svn: 330605
Summary: `TaintBugVisitor` is a universal visitor, and many checkers rely on it, such as `ArrayBoundCheckerV2.cpp`, `DivZeroChecker.cpp` and `VLASizeChecker.cpp`. Moving `TaintBugVisitor` to `BugReporterVisitors.h` enables other checker can also track where `tainted` value came from.
Reviewers: NoQ, george.karpenkov, xazax.hun
Reviewed By: george.karpenkov
Subscribers: szepet, rnkovacs, a.sidorin, cfe-commits, MTC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45682
llvm-svn: 330596
If a pointer cast fails (evaluates to an UnknownVal, i.e. not implemented in the
analyzer) and such cast is in fact the last use of the pointer, the pointer
symbol is no longer referenced by the program state and a leak is
(mis-)diagnosed.
"Escape" the pointer upon a failed cast, i.e. inform the checker that we can no
longer reliably track it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45698
llvm-svn: 330380
Summary:
`this` pointer is not an l-value, although we have modeled `CXXThisRegion` for `this` pointer, we can only bind it once, which is when we start to inline method. And this patch fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35506.
In addition, I didn't find any other cases other than loop-widen that could invalidate `this` pointer.
Reviewers: NoQ, george.karpenkov, a.sidorin, seaneveson, szepet
Reviewed By: NoQ
Subscribers: xazax.hun, rnkovacs, cfe-commits, MTC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45491
llvm-svn: 330095
Expression rearrangement in SValBuilder (see rL329780) crashes with an assert if the type of the integer is different from the type of the symbol. This fix adds a check that prevents rearrangement in such cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45557
llvm-svn: 330064
Since the range-based constraint manager (default) is weak in handling comparisons where symbols are on both sides it is wise to rearrange them to have symbols only on the left side. Thus e.g. A + n >= B + m becomes A - B >= m - n which enables the constraint manager to store a range m - n .. MAX_VALUE for the symbolic expression A - B. This can be used later to check whether e.g. A + k == B + l can be true, which is also rearranged to A - B == l - k so the constraint manager can check whether l - k is in the range (thus greater than or equal to m - n).
The restriction in this version is the the rearrangement happens only if both the symbols and the concrete integers are within the range [min/4 .. max/4] where min and max are the minimal and maximal values of their type.
The rearrangement is not enabled by default. It has to be enabled by using -analyzer-config aggressive-relational-comparison-simplification=true.
Co-author of this patch is Artem Dergachev (NoQ).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41938
llvm-svn: 329780
Found via codespell -q 3 -I ../clang-whitelist.txt
Where whitelist consists of:
archtype
cas
classs
checkk
compres
definit
frome
iff
inteval
ith
lod
methode
nd
optin
ot
pres
statics
te
thru
Patch by luzpaz! (This is a subset of D44188 that applies cleanly with a few
files that have dubious fixes reverted.)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44188
llvm-svn: 329399
removeUnneededCalls() is responsible for removing path diagnostic pieces within
functions that don't contain "interesting" events. It makes bug reports
much tidier.
When a stack frame is known to be interesting, the function doesn't descend
into it to prune anything within it, even other callees that are totally boring.
Fix the function to prune boring callees in interesting stack frames.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45117
llvm-svn: 329102
Summary:
The original implementation in the `LoopUnrolling.cpp` didn't consider the case where the counter is unsigned. This case is only handled in `simpleCondition()`, but this is not enough, we also need to deal with the unsinged counter with the counter initialization.
Since `IntegerLiteral` is `signed`, there is a `ImplicitCastExpr<IntegralCast>` in `unsigned counter = IntergerLiteral`. This patch add the `ignoringParenImpCasts()` in the `IntegerLiteral` matcher.
Reviewers: szepet, a.sidorin, NoQ, george.karpenkov
Reviewed By: szepet, george.karpenkov
Subscribers: xazax.hun, rnkovacs, cfe-commits, MTC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45086
llvm-svn: 328919
Achieves almost a 200% speedup on the example where the performance of
visitors was problematic.
Performance on sqlite3 is unaffected.
rdar://38818362
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45113
llvm-svn: 328911
Pointer arithmetic on null or undefined pointers results in null or undefined
pointers. This is obvious for undefined pointers; for null pointers it follows
from our incorrect-but-somehow-working approach that declares that 0 (Loc)
doesn't necessarily represent a pointer of numeric address value 0, but instead
it represents any pointer that will cause a valid "null pointer dereference"
issue when dereferenced.
For now we've been seeing through pointer arithmetic at the original dereference
expression, i.e. in bugreporter::getDerefExpr(), but not during further
investigation of the value's origins in bugreporter::trackNullOrUndefValue().
The patch fixes it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45071
llvm-svn: 328896
Not enough work has been done so far to ensure correctness of construction
contexts in the CFG when C++17 copy elision is in effect, so for now we
should drop construction contexts in the CFG and in the analyzer when
they seem different from what we support anyway.
This includes initializations with conditional operators and return values
across multiple stack frames.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44854
llvm-svn: 328893
r327219 added wrappers to std::sort which randomly shuffle the container before
sorting. This will help in uncovering non-determinism caused due to undefined
sorting order of objects having the same key.
To make use of that infrastructure we need to invoke llvm::sort instead of
std::sort.
llvm-svn: 328636
Extended the matched assignment operators when checking for bound changes in a body of the loop by using the freshly added isAssignmentOperator matcher.
This covers all the (current) possible assignments, tests added as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38921
llvm-svn: 328619
Changes the analyzer to believe that methods annotated with _Nonnull
from system frameworks indeed return non null objects.
Local methods with such annotation are still distrusted.
rdar://24291919
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44341
llvm-svn: 328282
Current location is very confusing, especially because there is already
WorkList.h, and other code in CoreEngine.cpp is not related to work list
implementation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44759
llvm-svn: 328280
When a temporary is constructed with a proper construction context, it should
be safe to inline the destructor. We have added suppressions for some of the
common false positives caused by such inlining, so there should be - and from my
observations there indeed is - more benefit than harm from enabling destructor
inlining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44721
llvm-svn: 328258
CXXCtorInitializer-based constructors are also affected by the C++17 mandatory
copy elision, like variable constructors and return value constructors.
Extend r328248 to support those.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44763
llvm-svn: 328255
Function return values can be constructed directly in variables or passed
directly into return statements, without even an elidable copy in between.
This is how the C++17 mandatory copy elision AST behaves. The behavior we'll
have in such cases is the "old" behavior that we've had before we've
implemented destructor inlining and proper lifetime extension support.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44755
llvm-svn: 328253
In C++17 copy elision is mandatory for variable and return value constructors
(as long as it doesn't involve type conversion) which results in AST that does
not contain elidable constructors in their usual places. In order to provide
construction contexts in this scenario we need to cover more AST patterns.
This patch makes the CFG prepared for these scenarios by:
- Fork VariableConstructionContext and ReturnedValueConstructionContext into
two different sub-classes (each) one of which indicates the C++17 case and
contains a reference to an extra CXXBindTemporaryExpr.
- Allow CFGCXXRecordTypedCall element to accept VariableConstructionContext and
ReturnedValueConstructionContext as its context.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44597
llvm-svn: 328248
Also use the opportunity to clean up the code and remove unnecessary duplication.
rdar://37625895
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44594
llvm-svn: 327926
My compiler (clang-3.8) complains that the RCC variable is unused.
That's not really true, as it's checked by the if-declaration, but it's
also kinda true, because we don't need to declaration if we only check
it in the if statement.
In reality, all this means that the dyn_cast<> can be replaced by isa<>,
so that's what I do here.
llvm-svn: 327491
Properly perform destruction and lifetime extension of such temporaries.
C++ object-type return values of conservatively evaluated functions are now
represented as compound values of well-defined temporary object regions. The
function creates a region that represents the temporary object and will later
be used for destruction or materialization, invalidates it, and returns the
invalidated compound value of the object.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44131
llvm-svn: 327348
This patch uses the newly added CFGCXXRecordTypedCall element at the call site
of the caller to construct the return value within the callee directly into the
caller's stack frame. This way it is also capable of populating the temporary
destructor and lifetime extension maps for the temporary, which allows
temporary destructors and lifetime extension to work correctly.
This patch does not affect temporaries that were returned from conservatively
evaluated functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44124
llvm-svn: 327345
This patch adds a new CFGStmt sub-class, CFGCXXRecordTypedCall, which replaces
the regular CFGStmt for the respective CallExpr whenever the CFG has additional
information to provide regarding the lifetime of the returned value.
This additional call site information is represented by a ConstructionContext
(which was previously used for CFGConstructor elements) that provides references
to CXXBindTemporaryExpr and MaterializeTemporaryExpr that surround the call.
This corresponds to the common C++ calling convention solution of providing
the target address for constructing the return value as an auxiliary implicit
argument during function call.
One of the use cases for such extra context at the call site would be to perform
any sort of inter-procedural analysis over the CFG that involves functions
returning objects by value. In this case the elidable constructor at the return
site would construct the object explained by the context at the call site, and
its lifetime would also be managed by the caller, not the callee.
The extra context would also be useful for properly handling the return-value
temporary at the call site, even if the callee is not being analyzed
inter-procedurally.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44120
llvm-svn: 327343
This patch adds two new CFG elements CFGScopeBegin and CFGScopeEnd that indicate
when a local scope begins and ends respectively. We use first VarDecl declared
in a scope to uniquely identify it and add CFGScopeBegin and CFGScopeEnd elements
into corresponding basic blocks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D16403
llvm-svn: 327258
Previously, iteration through nil objects which resulted from
objc-messages being set to nil were modeled incorrectly.
There are a couple of notes about this patch:
In principle, ExprEngineObjC might be left untouched IFF osx.loops
checker is enabled.
I however think that we should not do something
completely incorrect depending on what checkers are left on.
We should evaluate and potentially remove altogether the isConsumedExpr
performance heuristic, as it seems very fragile.
rdar://22205149
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44178
llvm-svn: 326982
Proper modeling still remains to be done.
Note that BindingDecl#getHoldingVar() is almost always null, and this
should probably be handled by dealing with DecompositionDecl beforehand.
rdar://36852163
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44183
llvm-svn: 326951
Summary:
There is a problem with analyzer that a wrong value is given when modeling the increment operator of the operand with type bool. After `rL307604` is applied, a unsigned overflow may occur.
Example:
```
void func() {
bool b = true;
// unsigned overflow occur, 2 -> 0 U1b
b++;
}
```
The use of an operand of type bool with the ++ operators is deprecated but valid untill C++17. And if the operand of the increment operator is of type bool, it is set to true.
This patch includes two parts:
- If the operand of the increment operator is of type bool or type _Bool, set to true.
- Modify `BasicValueFactory::getTruthValue()`, use `getIntWidth()` instead `getTypeSize()` and use `unsigned` instead `signed`.
Reviewers: alexshap, NoQ, dcoughlin, george.karpenkov
Reviewed By: NoQ
Subscribers: xazax.hun, szepet, a.sidorin, cfe-commits, MTC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43741
llvm-svn: 326776
Don't enable c++-temp-dtor-inlining by default yet, due to this reference
counting pointe problem.
Otherwise the new mode seems stable and allows us to incrementally fix C++
problems in much less hacky ways.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43804
llvm-svn: 326461
Originally submitted as r326323 and r326324.
Reverted in r326432.
Reverting the commit was a mistake.
The breakage was due to invalid build files in our internal buildsystem,
CMakeLists did not have any cyclic dependencies.
llvm-svn: 326439
Also revert "[analyzer] Fix a compiler warning"
This reverts commits r326323 and r326324.
Reason: the commits introduced a cyclic dependency in the build graph.
This happens to work with cmake, but breaks out internal integrate.
llvm-svn: 326432
So I wrote a clang-tidy check to lint out redundant `isa`, `cast`, and
`dyn_cast`s for fun. This is a portion of what it found for clang; I
plan to do similar cleanups in LLVM and other subprojects when I find
time.
Because of the volume of changes, I explicitly avoided making any change
that wasn't highly local and obviously correct to me (e.g. we still have
a number of foo(cast<Bar>(baz)) that I didn't touch, since overloading
is a thing and the cast<Bar> did actually change the type -- just up the
class hierarchy).
I also tried to leave the types we were cast<>ing to somewhere nearby,
in cases where it wasn't locally obvious what we were dealing with
before.
llvm-svn: 326416
The aim of this patch is to be minimal to enable incremental development of
the feature on the top of the tree. This patch should be an NFC when the
feature is turned off. It is turned off by default and still considered as
experimental.
Technical details are available in the EuroLLVM Talk:
http://llvm.org/devmtg/2017-03//2017/02/20/accepted-sessions.html#7
Note that the initial prototype was done by A. Sidorin et al.: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2015-October/045730.html
Contributions to the measurements and the new version of the code: Peter Szecsi, Zoltan Gera, Daniel Krupp, Kareem Khazem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30691
llvm-svn: 326323
The SVal for any empty C++ object is an UnknownVal. Because RegionStore does
not have binding extents, binding an empty object to an UnknownVal may
potentially overwrite existing bindings at the same offset.
Therefore, when performing a trivial copy of an empty object, don't try to
take the value of the object and bind it to the copy. Doing nothing is accurate
enough, and it doesn't screw any existing bindings.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43714
llvm-svn: 326247
Sometimes it is not known at compile time which temporary objects will be
constructed, eg. 'x ? A() : B()' or 'C() || D()'. In this case we track which
temporary was constructed to know how to properly call the destructor.
Once the construction context for temporaries was introduced, we moved the
tracking code to the code that investigates the construction context.
Bring back the old mechanism because construction contexts are not always
available yet - eg. in the case where a temporary is constructed without a
constructor expression, eg. returned from a function by value. The mechanism
should still go away eventually.
Additionally, fix a bug in the temporary cleanup code for the case when
construction contexts are not available, which could lead to temporaries
staying in the program state and increasing memory consumption.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43666
llvm-svn: 326246
If a variable or an otherwise a concrete typed-value region is being
placement-new'ed into, its dynamic type may change in arbitrary manners. And
when the region is used, there may be a third type that's different from both
the static and the dynamic type. It cannot be *completely* different from the
dynamic type, but it may be a base class of the dynamic type - and in this case
there isn't (and shouldn't be) any indication anywhere in the AST that there is
a derived-to-base cast from the dynamic type to the third type.
Perform a generic cast (evalCast()) from the third type to the dynamic type
in this case. From the point of view of the SVal hierarchy, this would have
produced non-canonical SVals if we used such generic cast in the normal case,
but in this case there doesn't seem to be a better option.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43659
llvm-svn: 326245
Automatic destructors are missing in the CFG in situations like
const int &x = C().x;
For now it's better to disable construction inlining, because inlining
constructors while doing nothing on destructors is very bad.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43689
llvm-svn: 326240
ConstructionContext is moved into a separate translation unit and is separated
into multiple classes. The "old" "raw" ConstructionContext is renamed into
ConstructionContextLayer - which corresponds to the idea of building the context
gradually layer-by-layer, but it isn't easy to use in the clients. Once
CXXConstructExpr is reached, layers that we've gathered so far are transformed
into the actual, "new-style" "flat" ConstructionContext, which is put into the
CFGConstructor element and has no layers whatsoever (until it actually needs
them, eg. aggregate initialization). The new-style ConstructionContext is
instead presented as a variety of sub-classes that enumerate different ways of
constructing an object in C++. There are 5 of these supported for now,
which is around a half of what needs to be supported.
The layer-by-layer buildup process is still a little bit weird, but it hides
all the weirdness in one place, that sounds like a good thing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43533
llvm-svn: 326238
This patch uses the reference to MaterializeTemporaryExpr stored in the
construction context since r326014 in order to model that expression correctly.
When modeling MaterializeTemporaryExpr, instead of copying the raw memory
contents from the sub-expression's rvalue to a completely new temporary region,
that we conjure up for the lack of better options, we now have the better
option to recall the region into which the object was originally constructed
and declare that region to be the value of the expression, which is semantically
correct.
This only works when the construction context is available, which is worked on
independently.
The temporary region's liveness (in the sense of removeDeadBindings) is extended
until the MaterializeTemporaryExpr is resolved, in order to keep the store
bindings around, because it wouldn't be referenced from anywhere else in the
program state.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43497
llvm-svn: 326236
See D42775 for discussion. Turns out, just exploring nodes which
weren't explored first is not quite enough, as e.g. the first quick
traversal resulting in a report can mark everything as "visited", and
then subsequent traversals of the same region will get all the pitfalls
of DFS.
Priority queue-based approach in comparison shows much greater
increase in coverage and even performance, without sacrificing memory.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43354
llvm-svn: 326136
Addresses https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36206
rdar://37159026
A proper fix would be much harder, and would involve changing the
appropriate code in ExprEngine to be aware of the size limitations of
the type used for addressing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43218
llvm-svn: 326122
The assertion gets exposed when changing the exploration order.
This is a quick hacky fix, but the intention is that if the nodes do
merge, it should not matter which predecessor should be traverse.
A proper fix would be not to traverse predecessors at all, as all
information relevant for any decision should be avilable locally.
rdar://37540480
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42773
llvm-svn: 325977
In the wild, many cases of null pointer dereference, or uninitialized
value read occur because the value was meant to be initialized by the
inlined function, but did not, most often due to error condition in the
inlined function.
This change highlights the return branch taken by the inlined function,
in order to help user understand the error report and see why the value
was uninitialized.
rdar://36287652
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41848
llvm-svn: 325976
When viewing the report in the collapsed mode the label signifying where
did the execution go is often necessary for properly understanding the
context.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43145
llvm-svn: 325975
Array destructors, like constructors, need to be called for each element of the
array separately. We do not have any mechanisms to do this in the analyzer,
so for now all we do is evaluate a single constructor or destructor
conservatively and give up. It automatically causes the necessary invalidation
and pointer escape for the whole array, because this is how RegionStore works.
Implement this conservative behavior for temporary destructors. This fixes the
crash on the provided test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43149
llvm-svn: 325286
Temporary destructors fire at the end of the full-expression. It is reasonable
to attach the path note for entering/leaving the temporary destructor to its
CXXBindTemporaryExpr. This would not affect lifetime-extended temporaries with
their automatic destructors which aren't temporary destructors.
The path note may be confusing in the case of destructors after elidable copy
constructors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43144
llvm-svn: 325284
Inline them if possible - a separate flag is added to control this.
The whole thing is under the cfg-temporary-dtors flag, off by default so far.
Temporary destructors are called at the end of full-expression. If the
temporary is lifetime-extended, automatic destructors kick in instead,
which are not addressed in this patch, and normally already work well
modulo the overally broken support for lifetime extension.
The patch operates by attaching the this-region to the CXXBindTemporaryExpr in
the program state, and then recalling it during destruction that was triggered
by that CXXBindTemporaryExpr. It has become possible because
CXXBindTemporaryExpr is part of the construction context since r325210.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43104
llvm-svn: 325282
Don't look at the parent statement to figure out if the cxx-allocator-inlining
flag should kick in and prevent us from inlining the constructor within
a new-expression. We now have construction contexts for that purpose.
llvm-svn: 325278
Since r325210, in cfg-temporary-dtors mode, we can rely on the CFG to tell us
that we're indeed constructing a temporary, so we can trivially construct a
temporary region and inline the constructor.
Much like r325202, this is only done under the off-by-default
cfg-temporary-dtors flag because the temporary destructor, even if available,
will not be inlined and won't have the correct object value (target region).
Unless this is fixed, it is quite unsafe to inline the constructor.
If the temporary is lifetime-extended, the destructor would be an automatic
destructor, which would be evaluated with a "correct" target region - modulo
the series of incorrect relocations performed during the lifetime extension.
It means that at least, values within the object are guaranteed to be properly
escaped or invalidated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43062
llvm-svn: 325211
EvalCallOptions were introduced in r324018 for allowing various parts of
ExprEngine to notify the inlining mechanism, while preparing for evaluating a
function call, of possible difficulties with evaluating the call that they
foresee. Then mayInlineCall() would still be a single place for making the
decision.
Use that mechanism for destructors as well - pass the necessary flags from the
CFG-element-specific destructor handlers.
Part of this patch accidentally leaked into r324018, which led into a change in
tests; this change is reverted now, because even though the change looked
correct, the underlying behavior wasn't. Both of these commits were not intended
to introduce any function changes otherwise.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42991
llvm-svn: 325209
This only affects the cfg-temporary-dtors mode - in this mode we begin inlining
constructors that are constructing function return values. These constructors
have a correct construction context since r324952.
Because temporary destructors are not only never inlined, but also don't have
the correct target region yet, this change is not entirely safe. But this
will be fixed in the subsequent commits, while this stays off behind the
cfg-temporary-dtors flag.
Lifetime extension for return values is still not modeled correctly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42875
llvm-svn: 325202
In CFG, every DeclStmt has exactly one decl, which is always a variable.
It is also pointless to check that the initializer is the constructor because
that's how construction contexts work now.
llvm-svn: 325201
See reviews.llvm.org/M1 for evaluation, and
lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2018-January/056718.html for
discussion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42775
llvm-svn: 324956
Massive false positives were known to be caused by continuing the analysis
after a destructor with a noreturn attribute has been executed in the program
but not modeled in the analyzer due to being missing in the CFG.
Now that work is being done on enabling the modeling of temporary constructors
and destructors in the CFG, we need to make sure that the heuristic that
suppresses these false positives keeps working when such modeling is disabled.
In particular, different code paths open up when the corresponding constructor
is being inlined during analysis.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42779
llvm-svn: 324802
The analyzer was relying on peeking the next CFG element during analysis
whenever it was trying to figure out what object is being constructed
by a given constructor. This information is now available in the current CFG
element in all cases that were previously supported by the analyzer,
so no complicated lookahead is necessary anymore.
No functional change intended - the context in the CFG should for now be
available if and only if it was previously discoverable via CFG lookahead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42721
llvm-svn: 324800
This expression may or may not be evaluated in compile time, so tracking the
result symbol is of potential interest. However, run-time offsetof is not yet
supported by the analyzer, so for now this callback is only there to assist
future implementation.
Patch by Henry Wong!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42300
llvm-svn: 324790
This patch adds a new CFGStmt sub-class, CFGConstructor, which replaces
the regular CFGStmt with CXXConstructExpr in it whenever the CFG has additional
information to provide regarding what sort of object is being constructed.
It is useful for figuring out what memory is initialized in client of the
CFG such as the Static Analyzer, which do not operate by recursive AST
traversal, but instead rely on the CFG to provide all the information when they
need it. Otherwise, the statement that triggers the construction and defines
what memory is being initialized would normally occur after the
construct-expression, and the client would need to peek to the next CFG element
or use statement parent map to understand the necessary facts about
the construct-expression.
As a proof of concept, CFGConstructors are added for new-expressions
and the respective test cases are provided to demonstrate how it works.
For now, the only additional data contained in the CFGConstructor element is
the "trigger statement", such as new-expression, which is the parent of the
constructor. It will be significantly expanded in later commits. The additional
data is organized as an auxiliary structure - the "construction context",
which is allocated separately from the CFGElement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42672
llvm-svn: 324668
It makes it easier to discriminate between values of similar expressions
in different stack frames.
It also makes the separate backtrace section in ExplodedGraph dumps redundant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42552
llvm-svn: 324660
We already suppress such reports for inlined functions, we should then
get the same behavior for macros.
The underlying reason is that the same macro, can be called from many
different contexts, and nullability can only be expected in _some_ of
them.
Assuming that the macro can return null in _all_ of them sometimes leads
to a large number of false positives.
E.g. consider the test case for the dynamic cast implementation in
macro: in such cases, the bug report is unwanted.
Tracked in rdar://36304776
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42404
llvm-svn: 324161
No in-tree checkers use this callback so far, hence no tests. But better fix
this now than remember to fix this when the checkers actually appear.
Patch by Henry Wong!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42785
llvm-svn: 324053
If the return statement is stored, we might as well allow querying
against it.
Also fix the bug where the return statement is not stored
if there is no return value.
This change un-merges two ExplodedNodes during call exit when the state
is otherwise identical - the CallExitBegin node itself and the "Bind
Return Value"-tagged node.
And expose the return statement through
getStatement helper function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42130
llvm-svn: 324052
We use CXXTempObjectRegion exclusively as a bailout value for construction
targets when we are unable to find the correct construction region.
Sometimes it works correctly, but rather accidentally than intentionally.
Now that we want to increase the amount of situations where it works correctly,
the first step is to introduce a different way of communicating our failure
to find the correct construction region. EvalCallOptions are introduced
for this purpose.
For now EvalCallOptions are communicating two kinds of problems:
- We have been completely unable to find the correct construction site.
- We have found the construction site correctly, and there's more than one of
them (i.e. array construction which we currently don't support).
Accidentally find and fix a test in which the new approach to communicating
failures produces better results.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42457
llvm-svn: 324018
Do not attempt to get the pointee of void* while generating a bug report
(otherwise it will trigger an assert inside RegionStoreManager::getBinding
assert(!T->isVoidType() && "Attempting to dereference a void pointer!")).
Test plan: make check-all
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42396
llvm-svn: 323382
This allows the analyzer to analyze ("inline") custom operator new() calls and,
even more importantly, inline constructors of objects that were allocated
by any operator new() - not necessarily a custom one.
All changes in the tests in the current commit are intended improvements,
even if they didn't carry any explicit FIXME flag.
It is possible to restore the old behavior via
-analyzer-config c++-allocator-inlining=false
(this flag is supported by scan-build as well, and it can be into a clang
--analyze invocation via -Xclang .. -Xclang ..). There is no intention to
remove the old behavior for now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42219
rdar://problem/12180598
llvm-svn: 323373
I.e. not after. In the c++-allocator-inlining=true mode, we need to make the
assumption that the conservatively evaluated operator new() has returned a
non-null value. Previously we did this on CXXNewExpr, but now we have to do that
before calling the constructor, because some clever constructors are sometimes
assuming that their "this" is null and doing weird stuff. We would also crash
upon evaluating CXXNewExpr when the allocator was inlined and returned null and
had a throw specification; this is UB even for custom allocators, but we still
need not to crash.
Added more FIXME tests to ensure that eventually we fix calling the constructor
for null return values.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42192
llvm-svn: 323370
Analyzing problems which appear in scan-build results can be very
difficult, as after the launch no exact invocation is stored, and it's
super-hard to launch the debugger.
With this patch, the exact analyzer invocation appears in the footer,
and can be copied to debug/check reproducibility/etc.
rdar://35980230
llvm-svn: 323245
The check (inside StackHintGeneratorForSymbol::getMessage)
if (!N)
return getMessageForSymbolNotFound()
is moved to the beginning of the function.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42388
Test plan: make check-all
llvm-svn: 323146
PreStmt<CXXNewExpr> was never called.
Additionally, under c++-allocator-inlining=true, PostStmt<CXXNewExpr> was
called twice when the allocator was inlined: once after evaluating the
new-expression itself, once after evaluating the allocator call which, for the
lack of better options, uses the new-expression as the call site.
This patch fixes both problems.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41934
rdar://problem/12180598
llvm-svn: 322797
Add PostAllocatorCall program point to represent the moment in the analysis
between the operator new() call and the constructor call. Pointer cast from
"void *" to the correct object pointer type has already happened by this point.
The new program point, unlike the previously used PostImplicitCall, contains a
reference to the new-expression, which allows adding path diagnostics over it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41800
rdar://problem/12180598
llvm-svn: 322796
Pointer escape event notifies checkers that a pointer can no longer be reliably
tracked by the analyzer. For example, if a pointer is passed into a function
that has no body available, or written into a global, MallocChecker would
no longer report memory leaks for such pointer.
In case of operator new() under -analyzer-config c++-allocator-inlining=true,
MallocChecker would start tracking the pointer allocated by operator new()
only to immediately meet a pointer escape event notifying the checker that the
pointer has escaped into a constructor (assuming that the body of the
constructor is not available) and immediately stop tracking it. Even though
it is theoretically possible for such constructor to put "this" into
a global container that would later be freed, we prefer to preserve the old
behavior of MallocChecker, i.e. a memory leak warning, in order to
be able to find any memory leaks in C++ at all. In fact, c++-allocator-inlining
*reduces* the amount of false positives coming from this-pointers escaping in
constructors, because it'd be able to inline constructors in some cases.
With other checkers working similarly, we simply suppress the escape event for
this-value of the constructor, regardless of analyzer options.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41797
rdar://problem/12180598
llvm-svn: 322795
Implements finding appropriate source locations for intermediate diagnostic
pieces in path-sensitive bug reports that need to descend into an inlined
operator new() call that was called via new-expression. The diagnostics have
worked correctly when operator new() was called "directly".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41409
rdar://problem/12180598
llvm-svn: 322791
The callback runs after operator new() and before the construction and allows
the checker to access the casted return value of operator new() (in the
sense of r322780) which is not available in the PostCall callback for the
allocator call.
Update MallocChecker to use the new callback instead of PostStmt<CXXNewExpr>,
which gets called after the constructor.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41406
rdar://problem/12180598
llvm-svn: 322787
Make sure that with c++-allocator-inlining=true we have the return value of
conservatively evaluated operator new() in the correct memory space (heap).
This is a regression/omission that worked well in c++-allocator-inlining=false.
Heap regions are superior to regular symbolic regions because they have
stricter aliasing constraints: heap regions do not alias each other or global
variables.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41266
rdar://problem/12180598
llvm-svn: 322780
According to [basic.stc.dynamic.allocation], the return type of any C++
overloaded operator new() is "void *". However, type of the new-expression
"new T()" and the type of "this" during construction of "T" are both "T *".
Hence an implicit cast, which is not present in the AST, needs to be performed
before the construction. This patch adds such cast in the case when the
allocator was indeed inlined. For now, in the case where the allocator was *not*
inlined we still use the same symbolic value (which is a pure SymbolicRegion of
type "T *") because it is consistent with how we represent the casts and causes
less surprise in the checkers after switching to the new behavior.
The better approach would be to represent that value as a cast over a
SymbolicRegion of type "void *", however we have technical difficulties
conjuring such region without any actual expression of type "void *" present in
the AST.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41250
rdar://problem/12180598
llvm-svn: 322777
George Karpenkov