Summary: Several tests exist in both lit and lldbsuite. This removes the lit version of the duplicated tests.
Reviewers: asmith, zturner
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49450
llvm-svn: 337393
Change the syntax of the malloc and free commands in lldb-test's
ir-memory-map subcommand to:
<malloc> ::= <label> = malloc <size> <alignment>
<free> ::= free <label>
This should make it easier to read and extend tests in the future, e.g
to test IRMemoryMap::WriteMemory or double-free behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47646
llvm-svn: 333930
This adds a new command to the ir-memory-map tester:
free <allocation-index>
The argument to free is an index which identifies which live allocation
to free. Index 0 identifies the first live allocation in the address
space, index 1 identifies the second, etc. where the allocations are
sorted in increasing order.
For illustrative purposes, assume malloc returns monotonically
increasing addresses. Here are some examples of how free would work:
Example 1
---------
malloc 16 1
malloc 32 1
free 1 //< Free the 32-byte allocation.
free 0 //< Next, free the 16-byte allocation.
Example 2
---------
malloc 16 1
malloc 32 1
free 0 //< Free the 16-byte allocation.
free 0 //< Next, free the 32-byte allocation.
llvm-svn: 333700
This prevents Malloc from allocating the same chunk of memory twice, as
a byproduct of an alignment adjustment which gave the client access to
unallocated memory.
Prior to this patch, the newly-added test failed with:
$ lldb-test ir-memory-map ... ir-memory-map-overlap1.test
...
Command: malloc(size=64, alignment=32)
Malloc: address = 0x1000cd080
Command: malloc(size=64, alignment=8)
Malloc: address = 0x1000cd0b0
Malloc error: overlapping allocation detected, previous allocation at [0x1000cd080, 0x1000cd0c0)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47551
llvm-svn: 333697
Instead of applying the sledgehammer of refusing to insert any
C++ symbol in the ASTContext, try to validate the decl if what
we have is an operator. There was other code in lldb which was
responsible for this, just not really exposed (or used) in this
codepath. Also, add a better/more comprehensive test.
<rdar://problem/35645893>
llvm-svn: 328025
Typical example, illformed comparisons (operator== where LHS and
RHS are not compatible). If a symbol matched `operator==` in any
of the object files lldb inserted a generic function declaration
in the ASTContext on which Sema operates. Maintaining the AST
context invariants is fairly tricky and sometimes resulted in
crashes inside clang (or assertions hit).
The real reason why this feature exists in the first place is
that of allowing users to do something like:
(lldb) call printf("patatino")
even if the debug informations for printf() is not available.
Eventually, we might reconsider this feature in its
entirety, but for now we can't remove it as it would break
a bunch of users. Instead, try to limit it to non-C++ symbols,
where getting the invariants right is hopefully easier.
Now you can't do in lldb anymore
(lldb) call _Zsomethingsomething(1,2,3)
but that doesn't seem to be such a big loss.
<rdar://problem/35645893>
llvm-svn: 327356
Summary:
This patch supplies basic infrastructure for LLDB to use LIT, and ports a few basic test cases from the LLDB test suite into LIT.
With this patch the LLDB lit system is not capable or intended to fully replace the existing LLDB test suite, but this first patch enables people to write lit tests for LLDB.
The lit substitution for %cc and %cxx default to the host compiler unless the CMake option LLDB_TEST_CLANG is On, in which case the in-tree clang will be used.
The target check-lldb-lit will run all lit tests including the lit-based executor for the unit tests. Alternatively there is a target generated for each subdirectory under the lit directory, so check-lldb-unit and check-lldb-expr will run just the tests under their respective directories.
The ported tests are not removed from the existing suite, and should not be until such a time when the lit runner is mature and in use by bots and workflows.
Reviewers: zturner, labath, jingham, tfiala
Subscribers: beanz, mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24591
llvm-svn: 281651
Stella Stamenova