Summary:
We currently allow any completion handler to read and manipulate the list of matches we
calculated so far. This leads to a few problems:
Firstly, a completion handler's logic can now depend on previously calculated results
by another handlers. No completion handler should have such an implicit dependency,
but the current API makes it likely that this could happen (or already happens). Especially
the fact that some completion handler deleted all previously calculated results can mess
things up right now.
Secondly, all completion handlers have knowledge about our internal data structures with
this API. This makes refactoring this internal data structure much harder than it should be.
Especially planned changes like the support of descriptions for completions are currently
giant patches because we have to refactor every single completion handler.
This patch narrows the contract the CompletionRequest has with the different handlers to:
1. A handler can suggest a completion.
2. A handler can ask how many suggestions we already have.
Point 2 obviously means we still have a dependency left between the different handlers, but
getting rid of this is too large to just append it to this patch.
Otherwise this patch just completely hides the internal StringList to the different handlers.
The CompletionRequest API now also ensures that the list of completions is unique and we
don't suggest the same value multiple times to the user. This property has been so far only
been ensured by the `Option` handler, but is now applied globally. This is part of this patch
as the OptionHandler is no longer able to implement this functionality itself.
Reviewers: jingham, davide, labath
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49322
llvm-svn: 338151
Summary:
As suggested in D48796, this patch replaces even more internal calls that were using the old
completion API style with a single CompletionRequest. In some cases we also pass an option
vector/index, but as we don't always have this information, it currently is not part of the
CompletionRequest class.
The constructor of the CompletionRequest is now also more sensible. You only pass the
user input, cursor position and your list of matches to the request and the rest will be
inferred (using the same code we used before to calculate this). You also have to pass these
match window parameters to it, even though they are unused right now.
The patch shouldn't change any behavior.
Reviewers: jingham
Reviewed By: jingham
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48976
llvm-svn: 337031
This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit
(r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment
paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to read.
FYI, the script I used was:
import textwrap
import commands
import os
import sys
import re
tmp = "%s.tmp"%sys.argv[1]
out = open(tmp, "w+")
with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f:
header = ""
text = ""
comment = re.compile(r'^( *//) ([^ ].*)$')
special = re.compile(r'^((([A-Z]+[: ])|([0-9]+ )).*)|(.*;)$')
for line in f:
match = comment.match(line)
if match and not special.match(match.group(2)):
# skip intentionally short comments.
if not text and len(match.group(2)) < 40:
out.write(line)
continue
if text:
text += " " + match.group(2)
else:
header = match.group(1)
text = match.group(2)
continue
if text:
filled = textwrap.wrap(text, width=(78-len(header)),
break_long_words=False)
for l in filled:
out.write(header+" "+l+'\n')
text = ""
out.write(line)
os.rename(tmp, sys.argv[1])
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46144
llvm-svn: 331197
Summary:
The ObjectFile class was used to determine the architecture of a running
process by inspecting it's main executable. There were two issues with
this:
- it's in the wrong layer
- the call can be very expensive (it can end up computing the crc of the
whole file).
Since the process is running on the host, ideally we would be able to
just query the data straight from the OS like darwin does, but there
doesn't seem to be a reasonable way to do that. So, this fixes the
layering issue by using the llvm object library to inspect the file.
Since we know the process is already running on the host, we just need
to peek at a few bytes of the elf header to determine whether it's 32-
or 64-bit (which should make this faster as well).
Pretty much the same logic was implemented in
NativeProcessProtocol::ResolveProcessArchitecture, so I delete this
logic and replace calls with GetProcessInfo.
Reviewers: eugene, krytarowski
Subscribers: mgorny, hintonda, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42488
llvm-svn: 323637
The rationale here is that ArchSpec is used throughout the codebase,
including in places which should not depend on the rest of the code in
the Core module.
This commit touches many files, but most of it is just renaming of
#include lines. In a couple of cases, I removed the #include ArchSpec
line altogether, as the file was not using it. In one or two places,
this necessitated adding other #includes like lldb-private-defines.h.
llvm-svn: 318048
Raphael Isemann