Summary:
This was introduced in D42646 but ended up being reverted because the original implementation was buggy.
Depends on D42646
Reviewers: craig.topper, niravd, spatel, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42741
llvm-svn: 323899
Summary:
It seems it's main effect is to create addition copies when values are inr register that do not support this trick, which increase register pressure and makes the code bigger.
Reviewers: craig.topper, niravd, spatel, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42646
llvm-svn: 323888
Summary:
It seems it's main effect is to create addition copies when values are inr register that do not support this trick, which increase register pressure and makes the code bigger.
The main noteworthy regression I was able to observe was pattern of the type (setcc (trunc (and X, C)), 0) where C is such as it would benefit from the hi register trick. To prevent this, a new pattern is added to materialize such pattern using a 32 bits test. This has the added benefit of working with any constant that is materializable as a 32bits immediate, not just the ones that can leverage the high register trick, as demonstrated by the test case in test-shrink.ll using the constant 2049 .
Reviewers: craig.topper, niravd, spatel, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42646
llvm-svn: 323690
Legalization is still biased to turn LT compares in to GT by swapping operands to avoid needing extra isel patterns to commute.
I'm hoping to remove TESTM/TESTNM next and this should simplify that by making EQ/NE more similar.
llvm-svn: 323604
Previously some targets printed their own message at the start of Select to indicate what they were selecting. For the targets that didn't, it means there was no print of the root node before any custom handling in the target executed. So if the target did something custom and never called SelectNodeCommon, no print would be made. For the targets that did print a message in Select, if they didn't custom handle a node SelectNodeCommon would reprint the root node before walking the isel table.
It seems better to just print the message before the call to Select so all targets behave the same. And then remove the root node printing from SelectNodeCommon and just leave a message that says we're starting the table search.
There were also some oddities in blank line behavior. Usually due to a \n after a call to SelectionDAGNode::dump which already inserted a new line.
llvm-svn: 323551
Summary:
First, we need to explain the core of the vulnerability. Note that this
is a very incomplete description, please see the Project Zero blog post
for details:
https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/2018/01/reading-privileged-memory-with-side.html
The basis for branch target injection is to direct speculative execution
of the processor to some "gadget" of executable code by poisoning the
prediction of indirect branches with the address of that gadget. The
gadget in turn contains an operation that provides a side channel for
reading data. Most commonly, this will look like a load of secret data
followed by a branch on the loaded value and then a load of some
predictable cache line. The attacker then uses timing of the processors
cache to determine which direction the branch took *in the speculative
execution*, and in turn what one bit of the loaded value was. Due to the
nature of these timing side channels and the branch predictor on Intel
processors, this allows an attacker to leak data only accessible to
a privileged domain (like the kernel) back into an unprivileged domain.
The goal is simple: avoid generating code which contains an indirect
branch that could have its prediction poisoned by an attacker. In many
cases, the compiler can simply use directed conditional branches and
a small search tree. LLVM already has support for lowering switches in
this way and the first step of this patch is to disable jump-table
lowering of switches and introduce a pass to rewrite explicit indirectbr
sequences into a switch over integers.
However, there is no fully general alternative to indirect calls. We
introduce a new construct we call a "retpoline" to implement indirect
calls in a non-speculatable way. It can be thought of loosely as
a trampoline for indirect calls which uses the RET instruction on x86.
Further, we arrange for a specific call->ret sequence which ensures the
processor predicts the return to go to a controlled, known location. The
retpoline then "smashes" the return address pushed onto the stack by the
call with the desired target of the original indirect call. The result
is a predicted return to the next instruction after a call (which can be
used to trap speculative execution within an infinite loop) and an
actual indirect branch to an arbitrary address.
On 64-bit x86 ABIs, this is especially easily done in the compiler by
using a guaranteed scratch register to pass the target into this device.
For 32-bit ABIs there isn't a guaranteed scratch register and so several
different retpoline variants are introduced to use a scratch register if
one is available in the calling convention and to otherwise use direct
stack push/pop sequences to pass the target address.
This "retpoline" mitigation is fully described in the following blog
post: https://support.google.com/faqs/answer/7625886
We also support a target feature that disables emission of the retpoline
thunk by the compiler to allow for custom thunks if users want them.
These are particularly useful in environments like kernels that
routinely do hot-patching on boot and want to hot-patch their thunk to
different code sequences. They can write this custom thunk and use
`-mretpoline-external-thunk` *in addition* to `-mretpoline`. In this
case, on x86-64 thu thunk names must be:
```
__llvm_external_retpoline_r11
```
or on 32-bit:
```
__llvm_external_retpoline_eax
__llvm_external_retpoline_ecx
__llvm_external_retpoline_edx
__llvm_external_retpoline_push
```
And the target of the retpoline is passed in the named register, or in
the case of the `push` suffix on the top of the stack via a `pushl`
instruction.
There is one other important source of indirect branches in x86 ELF
binaries: the PLT. These patches also include support for LLD to
generate PLT entries that perform a retpoline-style indirection.
The only other indirect branches remaining that we are aware of are from
precompiled runtimes (such as crt0.o and similar). The ones we have
found are not really attackable, and so we have not focused on them
here, but eventually these runtimes should also be replicated for
retpoline-ed configurations for completeness.
For kernels or other freestanding or fully static executables, the
compiler switch `-mretpoline` is sufficient to fully mitigate this
particular attack. For dynamic executables, you must compile *all*
libraries with `-mretpoline` and additionally link the dynamic
executable and all shared libraries with LLD and pass `-z retpolineplt`
(or use similar functionality from some other linker). We strongly
recommend also using `-z now` as non-lazy binding allows the
retpoline-mitigated PLT to be substantially smaller.
When manually apply similar transformations to `-mretpoline` to the
Linux kernel we observed very small performance hits to applications
running typical workloads, and relatively minor hits (approximately 2%)
even for extremely syscall-heavy applications. This is largely due to
the small number of indirect branches that occur in performance
sensitive paths of the kernel.
When using these patches on statically linked applications, especially
C++ applications, you should expect to see a much more dramatic
performance hit. For microbenchmarks that are switch, indirect-, or
virtual-call heavy we have seen overheads ranging from 10% to 50%.
However, real-world workloads exhibit substantially lower performance
impact. Notably, techniques such as PGO and ThinLTO dramatically reduce
the impact of hot indirect calls (by speculatively promoting them to
direct calls) and allow optimized search trees to be used to lower
switches. If you need to deploy these techniques in C++ applications, we
*strongly* recommend that you ensure all hot call targets are statically
linked (avoiding PLT indirection) and use both PGO and ThinLTO. Well
tuned servers using all of these techniques saw 5% - 10% overhead from
the use of retpoline.
We will add detailed documentation covering these components in
subsequent patches, but wanted to make the core functionality available
as soon as possible. Happy for more code review, but we'd really like to
get these patches landed and backported ASAP for obvious reasons. We're
planning to backport this to both 6.0 and 5.0 release streams and get
a 5.0 release with just this cherry picked ASAP for distros and vendors.
This patch is the work of a number of people over the past month: Eric, Reid,
Rui, and myself. I'm mailing it out as a single commit due to the time
sensitive nature of landing this and the need to backport it. Huge thanks to
everyone who helped out here, and everyone at Intel who helped out in
discussions about how to craft this. Also, credit goes to Paul Turner (at
Google, but not an LLVM contributor) for much of the underlying retpoline
design.
Reviewers: echristo, rnk, ruiu, craig.topper, DavidKreitzer
Subscribers: sanjoy, emaste, mcrosier, mgorny, mehdi_amini, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41723
llvm-svn: 323155
Try to reverse the constant-shrinking that happens in SimplifyDemandedBits()
for 'and' masks when it results in a smaller sign-extended immediate.
We are also able to detect dead 'and' ops here (the mask is all ones). In
that case, we replace and return without selecting the 'and'.
Other targets might want to share some of this logic by enabling this under a
target hook, but I didn't see diffs for simple cases with PowerPC or AArch64,
so they may already have some specialized logic for this kind of thing or have
different needs.
This should solve PR35907:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35907
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42088
llvm-svn: 322957
Currently we infer the scale at isel time by analyzing whether the base is a constant 0 or not. If it is we assume scale is 1, else we take it from the element size of the pass thru or stored value. This seems a little weird and I think it makes more sense to make it explicit in the DAG rather than doing tricky things in the backend.
Most of this patch is just making sure we copy the scale around everywhere.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40055
llvm-svn: 322210
Summary:
There are few oddities that occur due to v1i1, v8i1, v16i1 being legal without v2i1 and v4i1 being legal when we don't have VLX. Particularly during legalization of v2i32/v4i32/v2i64/v4i64 masked gather/scatter/load/store. We end up promoting the mask argument to these during type legalization and then have to widen the promoted type to v8iX/v16iX and truncate it to get the element size back down to v8i1/v16i1 to use a 512-bit operation. Since need to fill the upper bits of the mask we have to fill with 0s at the promoted type.
It would be better if we could just have the v2i1/v4i1 types as legal so they don't undergo any promotion. Then we can just widen with 0s directly in a k register. There are no real v4i1/v2i1 instructions anyway. Everything is done on a larger register anyway.
This also fixes an issue that we couldn't implement a masked vextractf32x4 from zmm to xmm properly.
We now have to support widening more compares to 512-bit to get a mask result out so new tablegen patterns got added.
I had to hack the legalizer for widening the operand of a setcc a bit so it didn't try create a setcc returning v4i32, extract from it, then try to promote it using a sign extend to v2i1. Now we create the setcc with v4i1 if the original setcc's result type is v2i1. Then extract that and don't sign extend it at all.
There's definitely room for improvement with some follow up patches.
Reviewers: RKSimon, zvi, guyblank
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41560
llvm-svn: 321967
Summary:
1/ Operand folding during complex pattern matching for LEAs has been extended, such that it promotes Scale to
accommodate similar operand appearing in the DAG e.g.
T1 = A + B
T2 = T1 + 10
T3 = T2 + A
For above DAG rooted at T3, X86AddressMode will now look like
Base = B , Index = A , Scale = 2 , Disp = 10
2/ During OptimizeLEAPass down the pipeline factorization is now performed over LEAs so that if there is an opportunity
then complex LEAs (having 3 operands) could be factored out e.g.
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,2), %rcx
will be factored as following
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
leal (%rdx,%rcx) , %edx
3/ Aggressive operand folding for AM based selection for LEAs is sensitive to loops, thus avoiding creation of any complex LEAs within a loop.
4/ Simplify LEA converts (lea (BASE,1,INDEX,0) --> add (BASE, INDEX) which offers better through put.
PR32755 will be taken care of by this pathc.
Previous patch revisions : r313343 , r314886
Reviewers: lsaba, RKSimon, craig.topper, qcolombet, jmolloy, jbhateja
Reviewed By: lsaba, RKSimon, jbhateja
Subscribers: jmolloy, spatel, igorb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35014
llvm-svn: 319543
This makes the fact that X86 needs an explicit mask output not part of the type constraint for the ISD::MSCATTER.
This also gives the X86ISD::MGATHER/MSCATTER nodes a common base class simplifying the address selection code in X86ISelDAGToDAG.cpp
llvm-svn: 318823
If the base of our gather corresponds to something contained in X86ISD::Wrapper we should be able to fold it into the address.
This patch refactors some of the address matching to more fully use the X86ISelAddressMode struct and the getAddressOperands helper. A new helper function matchVectorAddress is added to call matchWrapper or fall back to matchAddressBase.
We should also be able to support constant offsets from a wrapper, but I'll look into that in a future patch. We may even be able to completely reuse matchAddress here, but I wanted to start simple and work up to it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39927
llvm-svn: 318057
We were calling tryFoldLoad with the 'and' node was the root and parent node of the load. But the parent of the load should be the shift that proceeds the and. While the and node is correctly the root node.
To fix this I had to make tryFoldLoad take a separate use and root input. I've added a convenience version with the old signature to avoid updating the other call sites.
llvm-svn: 317720
Added TESTM and TESTNM to the list of instructions that already zeroing unused upper bits
and does not need the redundant shift left and shift right instructions afterwards.
Added a pattern for TESTM and TESTNM in iselLowering, so now icmp(neq,and(X,Y), 0) goes folds into TESTM
and icmp(eq,and(X,Y), 0) goes folds into TESTNM
This commit is a preparation for lowering the test and testn X86 intrinsics to IR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38732
llvm-svn: 317465
I think this code is unreachable due to some promotions that occur elsewhere. I'll look into that to be sure, but for now I thought I should at least fix the obvious typo.
llvm-svn: 316840
If the extend type is 64-bits, emit a 32-bit -> 64-bit extend after the UDIVREM8_ZEXT_HREG/UDIVREM8_SEXT_HREG operation.
This gives a shorter encoding for the second extend in the sext case, and allows us to completely remove the second extend in the zext case.
This also adds known bit and num sign bits support for UDIVREM8_ZEXT_HREG/SDIVREM8_SEXT_HREG.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38275
llvm-svn: 316702
Summary:
Add LLVM_FORCE_ENABLE_DUMP cmake option, and use it along with
LLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS to set LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP.
Remove NDEBUG and only use LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP to enable dump methods.
Move definition of LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP from config.h to llvm-config.h so
it'll be picked up by public headers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38406
llvm-svn: 315590
It broke the Chromium / SQLite build; see PR34830.
> Summary:
> 1/ Operand folding during complex pattern matching for LEAs has been
> extended, such that it promotes Scale to accommodate similar operand
> appearing in the DAG.
> e.g.
> T1 = A + B
> T2 = T1 + 10
> T3 = T2 + A
> For above DAG rooted at T3, X86AddressMode will no look like
> Base = B , Index = A , Scale = 2 , Disp = 10
>
> 2/ During OptimizeLEAPass down the pipeline factorization is now performed over LEAs
> so that if there is an opportunity then complex LEAs (having 3 operands)
> could be factored out.
> e.g.
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,2), %rcx
> will be factored as following
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
> leal (%rdx,%rcx) , %edx
>
> 3/ Aggressive operand folding for AM based selection for LEAs is sensitive to loops,
> thus avoiding creation of any complex LEAs within a loop.
>
> Reviewers: lsaba, RKSimon, craig.topper, qcolombet, jmolloy
>
> Reviewed By: lsaba
>
> Subscribers: jmolloy, spatel, igorb, llvm-commits
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35014
llvm-svn: 314919
Summary:
1/ Operand folding during complex pattern matching for LEAs has been
extended, such that it promotes Scale to accommodate similar operand
appearing in the DAG.
e.g.
T1 = A + B
T2 = T1 + 10
T3 = T2 + A
For above DAG rooted at T3, X86AddressMode will no look like
Base = B , Index = A , Scale = 2 , Disp = 10
2/ During OptimizeLEAPass down the pipeline factorization is now performed over LEAs
so that if there is an opportunity then complex LEAs (having 3 operands)
could be factored out.
e.g.
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,2), %rcx
will be factored as following
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
leal (%rdx,%rcx) , %edx
3/ Aggressive operand folding for AM based selection for LEAs is sensitive to loops,
thus avoiding creation of any complex LEAs within a loop.
Reviewers: lsaba, RKSimon, craig.topper, qcolombet, jmolloy
Reviewed By: lsaba
Subscribers: jmolloy, spatel, igorb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35014
llvm-svn: 314886
Summary:
X86ISelDAGToDAG tries to analyze ANDs compared with 0 to optimize to narrower immediates using subregisters.
I don't think we should be optimizing to 16-bit test instructions. It goes against our normal behavior of promoting i16 operations to i32. It only saves one byte due to the need to add a 0x66 prefix. I think it would also be subject to a length changing prefix penalty in the decoders on Intel CPUs.
Reviewers: RKSimon, zvi, spatel
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38273
llvm-svn: 314474
Summary:
Lowering never creates X86ISD::UMUL for 8-bit types. X86ISD::UMUL8 is used instead. If X86ISD::UMUL 8-bit were ever used it would crash.
DAGCombiner replaces UMUL_LOHI/SMUL_LOHI with a wider MUL and a shift if the type twice as wide is legal. So we should never see i8 UMUL_LOHI/SMUL_LOHI. In fact I think there was a bug in part of the i8 code. Similar is true for i16 though without the bug.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, zvi
Reviewed By: zvi
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38276
llvm-svn: 314430
This replaces the large number of patterns that handle every possible case of zeroing after a masked compare with a few simpler patterns that use a predicate to check for a masked compare producer.
This is similar to what we do for detecting free GR32->GR64 zero extends and free xmm->ymm/zmm zero extends.
This shrinks the isel table from ~590k to ~531k. This is a roughly 10% reduction in size.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38217
llvm-svn: 314133
Similar to what we do for X86ISD::SHRUNKBLEND just turn X86ISD::SELECT into ISD::VSELECT. This allows us to remove the duplicated TRUNC patterns.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38022
llvm-svn: 313644
This is similar to D37843, but for sub_8bit. This fixes all of the patterns except for the 2 that emit only an EXTRACT_SUBREG. That causes a verifier error with global isel because global isel doesn't know to issue the ABCD when doing this extract on 32-bits targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37890
llvm-svn: 313558
I'm pretty sure that InstrEmitter::EmitSubregNode will take care of this itself by calling ConstrainForSubReg which in turn calls TRI->getSubClassWithSubReg.
I think Jakob Stoklund Olesen alluded to this in his commit message for r141207 which added the code to EmitSubregNode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37843
llvm-svn: 313557
This caused PR34629: asserts firing when building Chromium. It also broke some
buildbots building test-suite as reported on the commit thread.
> Summary:
> 1/ Operand folding during complex pattern matching for LEAs has been
> extended, such that it promotes Scale to accommodate similar operand
> appearing in the DAG.
> e.g.
> T1 = A + B
> T2 = T1 + 10
> T3 = T2 + A
> For above DAG rooted at T3, X86AddressMode will no look like
> Base = B , Index = A , Scale = 2 , Disp = 10
>
> 2/ During OptimizeLEAPass down the pipeline factorization is now performed over LEAs
> so that if there is an opportunity then complex LEAs (having 3 operands)
> could be factored out.
> e.g.
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,2), %rcx
> will be factored as following
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
> leal (%rdx,%rcx) , %edx
>
> 3/ Aggressive operand folding for AM based selection for LEAs is sensitive to loops,
> thus avoiding creation of any complex LEAs within a loop.
>
> Reviewers: lsaba, RKSimon, craig.topper, qcolombet
>
> Reviewed By: lsaba
>
> Subscribers: spatel, igorb, llvm-commits
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35014
llvm-svn: 313376
Summary:
1/ Operand folding during complex pattern matching for LEAs has been
extended, such that it promotes Scale to accommodate similar operand
appearing in the DAG.
e.g.
T1 = A + B
T2 = T1 + 10
T3 = T2 + A
For above DAG rooted at T3, X86AddressMode will no look like
Base = B , Index = A , Scale = 2 , Disp = 10
2/ During OptimizeLEAPass down the pipeline factorization is now performed over LEAs
so that if there is an opportunity then complex LEAs (having 3 operands)
could be factored out.
e.g.
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,2), %rcx
will be factored as following
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
leal (%rdx,%rcx) , %edx
3/ Aggressive operand folding for AM based selection for LEAs is sensitive to loops,
thus avoiding creation of any complex LEAs within a loop.
Reviewers: lsaba, RKSimon, craig.topper, qcolombet
Reviewed By: lsaba
Subscribers: spatel, igorb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35014
llvm-svn: 313343
Recognizing this pattern during DAG combine hides information about the 'and' and the shift from other combines. I think it should be recognized at isel so its as late as possible. But it can't be done with table based isel because you need to be able to look at both immediates. This patch moves it to custom isel in X86ISelDAGToDAG.cpp.
This does break a couple tests in tbm_patterns because we are now emitting an and_flag node or (cmp and, 0) that we dont' recognize yet. We already had this problem for several other TBM patterns so I think this fine and we can address of them together.
I've also fixed a bug where the combine to BEXTR was preventing us from using a trick of zero extending AH to handle extracts of bits 15:8. We might still want to use BEXTR if it enables load folding. But honestly I hope we narrowed the load instead before got to isel.
I think we should probably also support matching BEXTR from (srl/srl (and mask << C), C). But that should be a different patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37592
llvm-svn: 313054
Summary:
Once we've done our custom isel for these nodes, I think we should be calling removeDeadNode to prune them out of the DAG. Table driven isel ultimately either calls morphNodeTo which modifies a node and doesn't leave dead nodes. Or it emits new nodes and then calls removeDeadNode as part of Opc_CompleteMatch.
If you run a simple multiply test case like this through llc with -debug you'll see a umul_lohi node get printed as part of the dump for Instruction Selection ends.
```
define i64 @foo(i64 %a, i64 %b) local_unnamed_addr #0 {
entry:
%conv = zext i64 %a to i128
%conv1 = zext i64 %b to i128
%mul = mul nuw nsw i128 %conv1, %conv
%shr = lshr i128 %mul, 64
%conv2 = trunc i128 %shr to i64
ret i64 %conv2
}
```
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, zvi, guyblank, niravd
Reviewed By: niravd
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37547
llvm-svn: 312857
cover the bitwise operators.
Nothing really exciting here, this just stamps out the rest of the core
operations that can RMW memory and set flags.
Still not implemented here: ADC, SBB. Those will require more
interesting logic to channel the flags *in*, and I'm not currently
planning to try to tackle that. It might be interesting for someone who
wants to improve our code generation for bignum implementations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37141
llvm-svn: 312768
operands and used flags to support matching immediate operands.
This is a bit trickier than register operands, and we still want to fall
back on a register operands even for things that appear to be
"immediates" when they won't actually select into the operation's
immediate operand. This also requires us to handle things like selecting
`sub` vs. `add` to minimize the number of bits needed to represent the
immediate, and picking the shortest immediate encoding. In order to
that, we in turn need to scan to make sure that CF isn't used as it will
get inverted.
The end result seems very nice though, and we're now generating
optimal instruction sequences for these patterns IMO.
A follow-up patch will further expand this to other operations with RMW
memory operands. But handing `add` and `sub` are useful starting points
to flesh out the machinery and make sure interesting and complex cases
can be handled.
Thanks to Craig Topper who provided a few fixes and improvements to this
patch in addition to the review!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37139
llvm-svn: 312764
Summary: Knights Landing, because it is Atom derived, has slow two memory operand instructions. Mark the Knights Landing CPU model accordingly.
Patch by David Zarzycki.
Reviewers: craig.topper
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37224
llvm-svn: 311979
to instructions.
These can't be reasonably matched in tablegen due to the handling of
flags, so we have to do this in C++ code. We only did it for `inc` and
`dec` historically, this starts fleshing that out to more interesting
instructions. Notably, this handles transfering operands to `add` and
`sub`.
Currently this forces them into a register. The next patch will add
support for keeping immediate operands as immediates. Then I'll extend
this beyond just `add` and `sub`.
I'm not super thrilled by the repeated switches in the code but
everything else I tried was really ugly or problematic.
Many thanks to Craig Topper for the suggestions about where to even
begin here and how to make this stuff work.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37130
llvm-svn: 311806
to handle other x86 pseudos that carry flags and thus can't be matched
by our ISel patterns with fused memory accesses.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37088
llvm-svn: 311749
This extracts the code out of a giant switch in preparation for expanding it to
handle operations other thin `inc` and `dec`. Add a FIXME indicating what's
coming here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37045
llvm-svn: 311748
Summary: With masked operations, its possible for the operation node like fadd, fsub, etc. to be used by multiple different vselects. Since the pattern matching will start at the vselect, we need to make sure the operation node itself is only used once before we can fold a load. Otherwise we'll end up folding the same load into multiple instructions.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, zvi, igorb
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36938
llvm-svn: 311342
We can load the memory VT and check for natural alignment. This also adds a new preferNonTemporalLoad helper that checks the correct subtarget feature based on the load size.
This shrinks the isel table by at least 5000 bytes by allowing more reordering and combining to occur.
llvm-svn: 311266
Masked gather for vector length 2 is lowered incorrectly for element type i32.
The type <2 x i32> was automatically extended to <2 x i64> and we generated VPGATHERQQ instead of VPGATHERQD.
The type <2 x float> is extended to <4 x float>, so there is no bug for this type, but the sequence may be more optimal.
In this patch I'm fixing <2 x i32>bug and optimizing <2 x float> sequence for GATHERs only. The same fix should be done for Scatters as well.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34343
llvm-svn: 305987
Summary: As per discution on how to get better codegen an large int legalization, it became clear that using a glue for the carry was preventing several desirable optimizations. Passing the carry down as a value allow for more flexibility.
Reviewers: jyknight, nemanjai, mkuper, spatel, RKSimon, zvi, bkramer
Subscribers: igorb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29872
llvm-svn: 301775
This patch replaces the separate APInts for KnownZero/KnownOne with a single KnownBits struct. This is similar to what was done to ValueTracking's version recently.
This is largely a mechanical transformation from KnownZero to Known.Zero.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32569
llvm-svn: 301620
This will become asan errors once the patch lands that poisons the
memory after free. The x86 change is a hack, but I don't see how to
solve this properly at the moment.
llvm-svn: 300867
For AVX-512 we force the input to zero if the input is undef or the mask is all ones to break an execution dependency. This patch brings the same behavior to AVX2.
llvm-svn: 297652
The Fuchsia ABI defines slots from the thread pointer where the
stack-guard value for stack-protector, and the unsafe stack pointer
for safe-stack, are stored. This parallels the Android ABI support.
Patch by Roland McGrath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30237
llvm-svn: 296081
Merging Load-add-store pattern into a increment op previously dropped
the load's chain from the instructions dependence if the store is
chained to a TokenFactor.
llvm-svn: 293892
Summary:
Attaching !absolute_symbol to a global variable does two things:
1) Marks it as an absolute symbol reference.
2) Specifies the value range of that symbol's address.
Teach the X86 backend to allow absolute symbols to appear in place of
immediates by extending the relocImm and mov64imm32 matchers. Start using
relocImm in more places where it is legal.
As previously proposed on llvm-dev:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-October/105800.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25878
llvm-svn: 289087
Summary: When selectScalarSSELoad is looking for a scalar_to_vector of a scalar load, it makes sure the load is only used by the scalar_to_vector. But it doesn't make sure the scalar_to_vector is only used once. This can cause the same load to be folded multiple times. This can be bad for performance. This also causes the chain output to be duplicated, but not connected to anything so chain dependencies will not be satisfied.
Reviewers: RKSimon, zvi, delena, spatel
Subscribers: andreadb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26790
llvm-svn: 287983
We only ever create TargetConstantPool, TargetJumpTable, TargetExternalSymbol,
TargetGlobalAddress, TargetGlobalTLSAddress, MCSymbol and TargetBlockAddress
nodes as operands of X86ISD::Wrapper nodes, so we can remove one check and
invert the other.
Also update the documentation comment for X86ISD::Wrapper.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26731
llvm-svn: 287160
Suspected to be the cause of a sanitizer-windows bot failure:
Assertion failed: isImm() && "Wrong MachineOperand accessor", file C:\b\slave\sanitizer-windows\llvm\include\llvm/CodeGen/MachineOperand.h, line 420
llvm-svn: 286385
A relocatable immediate is either an immediate operand or an operand that
can be relocated by the linker to an immediate, such as a regular symbol
in non-PIC code.
Start using relocImm for 32-bit and 64-bit MOV instructions, and for operands
of type "imm32_su". Remove a number of now-redundant patterns.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25812
llvm-svn: 286384
This is a mechanical change of comments in switches like fallthrough,
fall-through, or fall-thru to use the LLVM_FALLTHROUGH macro instead.
llvm-svn: 278902
Summary:
Instead, we take a single flags arg (a bitset).
Also add a default 0 alignment, and change the order of arguments so the
alignment comes before the flags.
This greatly simplifies many callsites, and fixes a bug in
AMDGPUISelLowering, wherein the order of the args to getLoad was
inverted. It also greatly simplifies the process of adding another flag
to getLoad.
Reviewers: chandlerc, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: jholewinski, arsenm, jyknight, dsanders, nemanjai, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22249
llvm-svn: 275592
Memory references were not being propagated for this folded load. This
prevented optimizations like LICM from hoisting the load.
Added test to verify that this allows LICM to proceed.
llvm-svn: 273617
The setCallee function will set the number of fixed arguments based
on the size of the argument list. The FixedArgs parameter was often
explicitly set to 0, leading to a lack of consistent value for non-
vararg functions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20376
llvm-svn: 273403
This used to be free, copying and moving DebugLocs became expensive
after the metadata rewrite. Passing by reference eliminates a ton of
track/untrack operations. No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 272512
It's very common to want to replace a node and then remove it since
it's dead, especially as we port backends from the SDNode *Select API
to the void Select one. This helper makes this sequence a bit less
verbose.
llvm-svn: 269236
Don't bother returning a result we don't use here. I've also renamed
this from selectGather to tryGather to better indicate that it may not
do anything.
llvm-svn: 269215
This is a step towards removing the rampant undefined behaviour in
SelectionDAG, which is a part of llvm.org/PR26808.
We rename SelectionDAGISel::Select to SelectImpl and update targets to
match, and then change Select to return void and consolidate the
sketchy behaviour we're trying to get away from there.
Next, we'll update backends to implement `void Select(...)` instead of
SelectImpl and eventually drop the base Select implementation.
llvm-svn: 268693
Both Linux and kFreeBSD use glibc, so follow similiar code paths.
Add isTargetGlibc to check for this, and use it instead of isTargetLinux
in a few places.
Fixes PR22248 for kFreeBSD.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19104
llvm-svn: 268624
Amaury Sechet