We now emit a move of -1 before the cmov and do the addition after the cmov just like the case with an extra addition.
This may be slightly worse for code size, but is more consistent with other compilers. And we might be able to hoist the mov -1 outside of loops.
llvm-svn: 338613
There is nothing x86-specific about this code, so it'd be nice to make this available for other targets to use in the future (and get it out of X86ISelLowering!).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50083
llvm-svn: 338586
It's not strictly required by the transform of the cmov and the add, but it makes sure we restrict it to the cases we know we want to match.
While there canonicalize the operand order of the cmov to simplify the matching and emitting code.
llvm-svn: 338492
As was done for vector rotations, we can efficiently use ISD::MULHU for vXi8/vXi16 ISD::SRL lowering.
Shift-by-zero cases are still problematic (mainly on v32i8 due to extra AND/ANDN/OR or VPBLENDVB blend masks but v8i16/v16i16 aren't great either if PBLENDW fails) so I've limited this first patch to known non-zero cases if we can't easily use PBLENDW.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49562
llvm-svn: 338407
Summary:
Similar to D49636, but for PMADDUBSW. This instruction has the additional complexity that the addition of the two products saturates to 16-bits rather than wrapping around. And one operand is treated as signed and the other as unsigned.
A C example that triggers this pattern
```
static const int N = 128;
int8_t A[2*N];
uint8_t B[2*N];
int16_t C[N];
void foo() {
for (int i = 0; i != N; ++i)
C[i] = MIN(MAX((int16_t)A[2*i]*(int16_t)B[2*i] + (int16_t)A[2*i+1]*(int16_t)B[2*i+1], -32768), 32767);
}
```
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, zvi
Reviewed By: RKSimon, zvi
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49829
llvm-svn: 338402
isFNEG was duplicating much of what was done by getTargetConstantBitsFromNode in its own calls to getTargetConstantFromNode.
Noticed while reviewing D48467.
llvm-svn: 338358
Not sure why they were being explicitly excluded, but I believe all the math inside the if works. I changed the absolute value to be uint64_t instead of int64_t so INT64_MIN+1 wouldn't be signed wrap.
llvm-svn: 338101
Summary:
This is the pattern you get from the loop vectorizer for something like this
int16_t A[1024];
int16_t B[1024];
int32_t C[512];
void pmaddwd() {
for (int i = 0; i != 512; ++i)
C[i] = (A[2*i]*B[2*i]) + (A[2*i+1]*B[2*i+1]);
}
In this case we will have (add (mul (build_vector), (build_vector)), (mul (build_vector), (build_vector))). This is different than the pattern we currently match which has the build_vectors between an add and a single multiply. I'm not sure what C code would get you that pattern.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, zvi
Reviewed By: zvi
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49636
llvm-svn: 338097
If this happens the operands aren't updated and the existing node is returned. Make sure we pass this existing node up to the DAG combiner so that a proper replacement happens. Otherwise we get stuck in an infinite loop with an unoptimized node.
llvm-svn: 338090
I'm not sure if this was trying to avoid optimizing the new nodes further or what. Or maybe to prevent a cycle if something tried to reform the multiply? But I don't think its a reliable way to do that. If the user of the expanded multiply is visited by the DAGCombiner after this conversion happens, the DAGCombiner will check its operands, see that they haven't been visited by the DAGCombiner before and it will then add the first node to the worklist. This process will repeat until all the new nodes are visited.
So this seems like an unreliable prevention at best. So this patch just returns the new nodes like any other combine. If this starts causing problems we can try to add target specific nodes or something to more directly prevent optimizations.
Now that we handle the combine normally, we can combine any negates the mul expansion creates into their users since those will be visited now.
llvm-svn: 338007
These calls were making sure some newly created nodes were added to worklist, but the DAGCombiner has internal support for ensuring it has visited all nodes. Any time it visits a node it ensures the operands have been queued to be visited as well. This means if we only need to return the last new node. The DAGCombiner will take care of adding its inputs thus walking backwards through all the new nodes.
llvm-svn: 337996
- Avoid duplication of regmask size calculation.
- Simplify allocateRegisterMask() call.
- Rename allocateRegisterMask() to allocateRegMask() to be consistent
with naming in MachineOperand.
llvm-svn: 337986
We generated a subtract for the power of 2 minus one then negated the result. The negate can be optimized away by swapping the subtract operands, but DAG combine doesn't know how to do that and we don't add any of the new nodes to the worklist anyway.
This patch makes use explicitly emit the swapped subtract.
llvm-svn: 337858
Use a left shift and 2 subtracts like we do for 30. Move this out from behind the slow lea check since it doesn't even use an LEA.
Use this for multiply by 14 as well.
llvm-svn: 337856
This seems to be a net improvement. There's still an issue under avx512f where we have a 512-bit vpaddd, but not vpmaddwd so we end up doing two 256-bit vpmaddwds and inserting the results before a 512-bit vpaddd. It might be better to do two 512-bits paddds with zeros in the upper half. Same number of instructions, but breaks a dependency.
llvm-svn: 337656
Ideally our ISD node types going into the isel table would have types consistent with their instruction domain. This prevents us having to duplicate patterns with different types for the same instruction.
Unfortunately, it seems our shuffle combining is currently relying on this a little remove some bitcasts. This seems to enable some switching between shufps and shufd. Hopefully there's some way we can address this in the combining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49280
llvm-svn: 337590
CombineTo is most useful when you need to replace multiple results, avoid the worklist management, or you need to something else after the combine, etc. Otherwise you should be able to just return the new node and let DAGCombiner go through its usual worklist code.
All of the places changed in this patch look to be standard cases where we should be able to use the more stand behavior of just returning the new node.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49569
llvm-svn: 337589
We can safely use getConstant here as we're still lowering, which allows constant folding to kick in and simplify the vector shift codegen.
Noticed while working on D49562.
llvm-svn: 337578
This is an early step towards using SimplifyDemandedVectorElts for target shuffle combining - this merely moves the existing X86ISD::VBROADCAST simplification code to use the SimplifyDemandedVectorElts mechanism.
Adds X86TargetLowering::SimplifyDemandedVectorEltsForTargetNode to handle X86ISD::VBROADCAST - in time we can support all target shuffles (and other ops) here.
llvm-svn: 337547
We have a number of cases where we fail to reduce vector op widths, performing the op in a larger vector and then extracting a subvector. This is often because by default it would create illegal types.
This peephole patch attempts to handle a few common cases detailed in PR36761, which typically involved extension+conversion to vX2f64 types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49556
llvm-svn: 337500
Returning SDValue() means nothing was changed. Returning the result of CombineTo returns the first argument of CombineTo. This is specially detected by DAGCombiner as meaning that something changed, but worklist management was already taken care of.
I think the only real effect of this change is that we now properly update the Statistic the counts the number of combines performed. That's the only thing between the check for null and the check for N in the DAGCombiner.
llvm-svn: 337491
As discussed on PR38197, this canonicalizes MOVS*(N0, OP(N0, N1)) --> MOVS*(N0, SCALAR_TO_VECTOR(OP(N0[0], N1[0])))
This returns the scalar-fp codegen lost by rL336971.
Additionally it handles the OP(N1, N0)) case for commutable (FADD/FMUL) ops.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49474
llvm-svn: 337419
When rL336971 removed the scalar-fp isel patterns, we lost the need for this canonicalization - commutation/folding can handle everything else.
llvm-svn: 337387
I'm trying to restrict the MOVLHPS/MOVHLPS ISD nodes to SSE1 only. With SSE2 we can use unpcks. I believe this will allow some patterns to be cleaned up to require fewer bitcasts.
I've put in an odd isel hack to still select MOVHLPS instruction from the unpckh node to avoid changing tests and because movhlps is a shorter encoding. Ideally we'd do execution domain switching on this, but the operands are in the wrong order and are tied. We might be able to try a commute in the domain switching using custom code.
We already support domain switching for UNPCKLPD and MOVLHPS.
llvm-svn: 337348
This unfortunately requires a bunch of bitcasts to be added added to SUBREG_TO_REG, COPY_TO_REGCLASS, and instructions in output patterns. Otherwise tablegen seems to default to picking f128 and then we fail when something tries to get the register class for f128 which isn't always valid.
The test changes are because we were previously mixing fr128 and vr128 due to contrainRegClass finding FR128 first and passes like live range shrinking weren't handling that well.
llvm-svn: 337147
canWidenShuffleElements can do a better job if given a mask with ZeroableElements info. Apparently, ZeroableElements was being only used to identify AllZero candidates, but possibly we could plug it into more shuffle matchers.
Original Patch by Zvi Rackover @zvi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42044
llvm-svn: 336903
Noticed while updating D42044, lowerV2X128VectorShuffle can improve the shuffle mask with the zeroable data to create a target shuffle mask to recognise more 'zero upper 128' patterns.
NOTE: lowerV4X128VectorShuffle could benefit as well but the code needs refactoring first to discriminate between SM_SentinelUndef and SM_SentinelZero for negative shuffle indices.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49092
llvm-svn: 336900
We now use llvm.fma.f32/f64 or llvm.x86.fmadd.f32/f64 intrinsics that use scalar types rather than vector types. So we don't these special ISD nodes that operate on the lowest element of a vector.
llvm-svn: 336883
This converts them to what clang is now using for codegen. Unfortunately, there seem to be a few kinks to work out still. I'll try to address with follow up patches.
llvm-svn: 336871
Summary:
These changes cover the PR#31399.
Now the ffs(x) function is lowered to (x != 0) ? llvm.cttz(x) + 1 : 0
and it corresponds to the following llvm code:
%cnt = tail call i32 @llvm.cttz.i32(i32 %v, i1 true)
%tobool = icmp eq i32 %v, 0
%.op = add nuw nsw i32 %cnt, 1
%add = select i1 %tobool, i32 0, i32 %.op
and x86 asm code:
bsfl %edi, %ecx
addl $1, %ecx
testl %edi, %edi
movl $0, %eax
cmovnel %ecx, %eax
In this case the 'test' instruction can't be eliminated because
the 'add' instruction modifies the EFLAGS, namely, ZF flag
that is set by the 'bsf' instruction when 'x' is zero.
We now produce the following code:
bsfl %edi, %ecx
movl $-1, %eax
cmovnel %ecx, %eax
addl $1, %eax
Patch by Ivan Kulagin
Reviewers: davide, craig.topper, spatel, RKSimon
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48765
llvm-svn: 336768
These ISD nodes try to select the MOVLPS and MOVLPD instructions which are special load only instructions. They load data and merge it into the lower 64-bits of an XMM register. They are logically equivalent to our MOVSD node plus a load.
There was only one place in X86ISelLowering that used MOVLPD and no places that selected MOVLPS. The one place that selected MOVLPD had to choose between it and MOVSD based on whether there was a load. But lowering is too early to tell if the load can really be folded. So in isel we have patterns that use MOVSD for MOVLPD if we can't find a load.
We also had patterns that select the MOVLPD instruction for a MOVSD if we can find a load, but didn't choose the MOVLPD ISD opcode for some reason.
So it seems better to just standardize on MOVSD ISD opcode and manage MOVSD vs MOVLPD instruction with isel patterns.
llvm-svn: 336728
Now that rL336250 has landed, we should prefer 2 immediate shifts + a shuffle blend over performing a multiply. Despite the increase in instructions, this is quicker (especially for slow v4i32 multiplies), avoid loads and constant pool usage. It does mean however that we increase register pressure. The code size will go up a little but by less than what we save on the constant pool data.
This patch also adds support for v16i16 to the BLEND(SHIFT(v,c1),SHIFT(v,c2)) combine, and also prevents blending on pre-SSE41 shifts if it would introduce extra blend masks/constant pool usage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48936
llvm-svn: 336642
Summary:
This adds a reverse transform for the instcombine canonicalizations
that were added in D47980, D47981.
As discussed later, that was worse at least for the code size,
and potentially for the performance, too.
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/Zmpl
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: reames, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48768
llvm-svn: 336585
This replaces some asserts in lowerV2F64VectorShuffle with the similar asserts from lowerVIF64VectorShuffle which are more readable. The original asserts mentioned a blend, but there's no guarantee that it is a blend.
Also remove an if that the asserts prove is always true. Mask[0] is always less than 2 and Mask[1] is always at least 2. Therefore (Mask[0] >= 2) + (Mask[1] >= 2) == 1 must wlays be true.
llvm-svn: 336517
Pre-AVX512 (which can perform a quick extend/shift/truncate), extending to 2 v8i16 for the PMULLW and then truncating is more performant than relying on the generic PBLENDVB vXi8 shift path and uses a similar amount of mask constant pool data.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48963
llvm-svn: 336513
Splits off isKnownNeverZeroFloat to handle +/- 0 float cases.
This will make it easier to be more aggressive with the integer isKnownNeverZero tests (similar to ValueTracking), use computeKnownBits etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48969
llvm-svn: 336492
It's a bit neater to write T.isIntOrPtrTy() over `T.isIntegerTy() ||
T.isPointerTy()`.
I used Python's re.sub with this regex to update users:
r'([\w.\->()]+)isIntegerTy\(\)\s*\|\|\s*\1isPointerTy\(\)'
llvm-svn: 336462
The intrinsics can be implemented with a f32/f64 llvm.fma intrinsic and an insert into a zero vector.
There are a couple regressions here due to SelectionDAG not being able to pull an fneg through an extract_vector_elt. I'm not super worried about this though as InstCombine should be able to do it before we get to SelectionDAG.
llvm-svn: 336416
This upgrades all of the intrinsics to use fneg instructions to convert fma into fmsub/fnmsub/fnmadd/fmsubadd. And uses a select instruction for masking.
This matches how clang uses the intrinsics these days.
llvm-svn: 336409
Previously we could only negate the FMADD opcodes. This used to be mostly ok when we lowered FMA intrinsics during lowering. But with the move to llvm.fma from target specific intrinsics, we can combine (fneg (fma)) to (fmsub) earlier. So if we start with (fneg (fma (fneg))) we would get stuck at (fmsub (fneg)).
This patch fixes that so we can also combine things like (fmsub (fneg)).
llvm-svn: 336304
We were only doing this for basic blends, despite shuffle lowering now being good enough to handle more complex blends. This means that the two v8i16 splat shifts are performed in parallel instead of serially as the general shift case.
Reapplied with a fixed (extra null tests) version of rL336113 after reversion in rL336189 - extra test case added at rL336247.
llvm-svn: 336250
We were only doing this for basic blends, despite shuffle lowering now being good enough to handle more complex blends. This means that the two v8i16 splat shifts are performed in parallel instead of serially as the general shift case.
llvm-svn: 336113
I believe all of these are constants so legalizing them should be pretty trivial, but this saves a step.
In one case it looks like we may have been creating a shift amount larger than the shift input itself.
llvm-svn: 336052
This combine runs pretty late and causes us to introduce a shift after the op legalization phase has run. We need to be sure we create the shift with the proper type for the shift amount. If we don't do this, we will still re-legalize the operation properly, but we won't get a chance to fully optimize the truncate that gets inserted.
So this patch adds the necessary truncate when the shift is created. I've also narrowed the subtract that gets created to always be an i32 type. The truncate would have trigered SimplifyDemandedBits to optimize it anyway. But using a more appropriate VT here is free and saves an optimization step.
llvm-svn: 336051
The important part is the creation of the SHLD/SHRD nodes. The compare and the conditional move can use target independent nodes that can be legalized on their own. This gives some opportunities to trigger the optimizations present in the lowering for those things. And its just better to limit the number of places we emit target specific nodes.
The changed test cases still aren't optimal.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48619
llvm-svn: 335998
This uses the same technique as for shifts - split the rotation into 4/2/1-bit partial rotations and select those partials based on the amount bit, making use of PBLENDVB if available. This halves the use of PBLENDVB compared to expanding to shifts, which can be a slow op.
Unfortunately I haven't found a decent way to share much of this code with the shift equivalent.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48655
llvm-svn: 335957
These opcodes have a fixed type of i8 for their immediate and shouldn't have anything to do with the scalar shift amount used by target independent shift nodes.
llvm-svn: 335578
This recommits r335562 and 335563 as a single commit.
The frontend will surround the intrinsic with the appropriate marshalling to/from a scalar type to match the sigature of the builtin that software expects.
By exposing the vXi1 type directly in the llvm intrinsic we make it available to optimizers much earlier. This can enable the scalar marshalling code to be optimized away.
llvm-svn: 335568
They appear to be untested other than the test case for p37879.ll and I believe we should be using SimplifyDemandedElts here to handle these cases.
llvm-svn: 335436
Changing the logic of scalar mask folding to check for valid input types rather
than against invalid ones, making it more robust and fixing PR37879.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48366
llvm-svn: 335323
This should help in lowering the following four intrinsics:
_mm256_cvtepi32_epi8
_mm256_cvtepi64_epi16
_mm256_cvtepi64_epi8
_mm512_cvtepi64_epi8
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46957
llvm-svn: 335238
I don't believe there is any real reason to have separate X86 specific opcodes for vector compares. Setcc has the same behavior just uses a different encoding for the condition code.
I had to change the CondCodeAction for SETLT and SETLE to prevent some transforms from changing SETGT lowering.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43608
llvm-svn: 335173
This patch handles back-end folding of generic patterns created by lowering the
X86 rounding intrinsics to native IR in cases where the instruction isn't a
straightforward packed values rounding operation, but a masked operation or a
scalar operation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45203
llvm-svn: 335037
isVectorClearMaskLegal() is the TLI hook used by the generic
DAGCombiner::XformToShuffleWithZero().
We've grown to accomodate/expect this transform to shuffle
(disabling it more generally results in many regressions).
So I'm narrowly excluding the 256-bit types that clearly
are not worthwhile for AVX1.
I think in most cases we are able to recover by converting
the shuffle back into 'and' ops, but the cases in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37749
...show that there are cracks.
llvm-svn: 334759
This shortcoming was noted in D47330, and the test diffs show we already
had other examples where we failed to fold to a SHRUNKBLEND:
/// Dynamic (non-constant condition) vector blend where only the sign bits
/// of the condition elements are used. This is used to enforce that the
/// condition mask is not valid for generic VSELECT optimizations.
This patch implements an idea from D48043 and would obsolete that patch
because it catches more cases (notable the AVX1 case that was missed there).
All we're doing is allowing the existing transform to fire more often by
removing the post-legalize constraint. All of the relevant feature checks
and other predicates are left as-is.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48078
llvm-svn: 334592
Extension to D46954 (PR37426), this patch adds support for v8i16/v16i16 rotations in a similar manner - the conversion of the shift/rotate amount to a multiplication factor and the use of PMULLW to shift left and PMULHUW (ISD::MULHU) to shift the wrapped bits back around to be ORd together.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47822
llvm-svn: 334309
Simplify combineVectorTruncationWithPACKUS to mask the upper bits followed by calling truncateVectorWithPACK instead of duplicating with similar code.
This results in the codegen using (V)PACKUSDW on SSE41+ targets for vXi64/vXi32 inputs where before it always used PACKUSWB (along with a lot more bitcasting).
I've raised PR37749 as until we avoid unnecessary concats back to 256-bit for bitwise ops, we can't avoid splitting the input value into 128-bit subvectors for masking.
llvm-svn: 334289
We have some combines/lowerings that attempt to use PACKSS-then-PACKUS and others that use PACKUS-then-PACKSS.
PACKUS is much easier to combine with if we know the upper bits are zero as ComputeKnownBits can easily see through BITCASTs etc. especially now that rL333995 and rL334007 have landed. It also effectively works at byte level which further simplifies shuffle combines.
The only (minor) annoyances are that ComputeKnownBits can sometimes take longer as it doesn't fail as quickly as ComputeNumSignBits (but I'm not seeing any actual regressions in tests) and PACKUSDW only became available after SSE41 so we have more codegen diffs between targets.
llvm-svn: 334276
Simplify combineVectorTruncationWithPACKSS to just a SIGN_EXTEND_INREG followed by using the existing truncateVectorWithPACK instead of duplicating code.
llvm-svn: 334193
Reid Kleckner