Now we switch to the subregister in expandPostRAPseudos where we already switched the opcode.
This simplifies a few isel patterns that used the pseudo directly. And magically seems to have improved our ability to CSE it in the undef-label.ll test.
llvm-svn: 339496
At one point in time acquire implied mayLoad and mayStore as did release. Thus we needed separate pseudos that also carried that property. This appears to no longer be the case. I believe it was changed in 2012 with a comment saying that atomic memory accesses are marked volatile which preserves the ordering.
So from what I can tell we shouldn't need additional pseudos since they aren't carry any flags that are different from the normal instructions. The only thing I can think of is that we may consider them for load folding candidates in the peephole pass now where we didn't before. If that's important hopefully there's something in the memory operand we can check to prevent the folding without relying on pseudo instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50212
llvm-svn: 338925
operations.
Specifically, we had code that tried to badly approximate reconstructing
all of the possible variations on addressing modes in two x86
instructions based on those in one pseudo instruction. This is not the
first bug uncovered with doing this, so stop doing it altogether.
Instead generically and pedantically copy every operand from the address
over to both new instructions, and strip kill flags from any register
operands.
This fixes a subtle bug seen in the wild where we would mysteriously
drop parts of the addressing mode, causing for example the index
argument in the added test case to just be completely ignored.
Hypothetically, this was an extremely bad miscompile because it actually
caused a predictable and leveragable write of a 64bit quantity to an
unintended offset (the first element of the array intead of whatever
other element was intended). As a consequence, in theory this could even
have introduced security vulnerabilities.
However, this was only something that could happen with an atomic
floating point add. No other operation could trigger this bug, so it
seems extremely unlikely to have occured widely in the wild.
But it did in fact occur, and frequently in scientific applications
which were using relaxed atomic updates of a floating point value after
adding a delta. Those would end up being quite badly miscompiled by
LLVM, which is how we found this. Of course, this often looks like
a race condition in the code, but it was actually a miscompile.
I suspect that this whole RELEASE_FADD thing was a complete mistake.
There is no such operation, and I worry that anything other than add
will get remarkably worse codegeneration. But that's not for this
change....
llvm-svn: 264845
Summary:
x86 codegen is clever about generating good code for relaxed
floating-point operations, but it was being silly when globals and
immediates were involved, forgetting where the global was and
loading/storing from/to the wrong place. The same applied to hard-coded
address immediates.
Don't let it forget about the displacement.
This fixes https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25171
A very similar bug when doing floating-points atomics to the stack is
also fixed by this patch.
This fixes https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25144
Reviewers: pete
Subscribers: llvm-commits, majnemer, rsmith
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13749
llvm-svn: 250429
Summary: PR24191 finds that the expected memory-register operations aren't generated when relaxed { load ; modify ; store } is used. This is similar to PR17281 which was addressed in D4796, but only for memory-immediate operations (and for memory orderings up to acquire and release). This patch also handles some floating-point operations.
Reviewers: reames, kcc, dvyukov, nadav, morisset, chandlerc, t.p.northover, pete
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11382
llvm-svn: 244128
Essentially the same as the GEP change in r230786.
A similar migration script can be used to update test cases, though a few more
test case improvements/changes were required this time around: (r229269-r229278)
import fileinput
import sys
import re
pat = re.compile(r"((?:=|:|^)\s*load (?:atomic )?(?:volatile )?(.*?))(| addrspace\(\d+\) *)\*($| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$)")
for line in sys.stdin:
sys.stdout.write(re.sub(pat, r"\1, \2\3*\4", line))
Reviewers: rafael, dexonsmith, grosser
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7649
llvm-svn: 230794
Summary:
I had forgotten to check for NotSlowIncDec in the patterns that can generate
inc/dec for the above pattern (added in D4796).
This currently applies to Atom Silvermont, KNL and SKX.
Test Plan: New checks on atomic_mi.ll
Reviewers: jfb, nadav
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5677
llvm-svn: 219336
The only valid lowering of atomic stores in the X86 backend was mov from
register to memory. As a result, storing an immediate required a useless copy
of the immediate in a register. Now these can be compiled as a simple mov.
Similarily, adding/and-ing/or-ing/xor-ing an
immediate to an atomic location (but through an atomic_store/atomic_load,
not a fetch_whatever intrinsic) can now make use of an 'add $imm, x(%rip)'
instead of using a register. And the same applies to inc/dec.
This second point matches the first issue identified in
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=17281
llvm-svn: 216980
Craig Topper