Commit Graph

11 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Eugene Leviant 3efcfadde4 [LLVMgold] Use platform dependent extension in tests
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41238

llvm-svn: 320710
2017-12-14 15:59:05 +00:00
Sean Fertile 4595a915f6 [LTO][ThinLTO] Use the linker resolutions to mark global values as dso_local.
Now that we have a way to mark GlobalValues as local we can use the symbol
resolutions that the linker plugin provides as part of lto/thinlto link
step to refine the compilers view on what symbols will end up being local.

Originally commited as r317374, but reverted in r317395 to update some missed
tests.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35702

llvm-svn: 317408
2017-11-04 17:04:39 +00:00
Asiri Rathnayake 9670051657 Fix x86 gold tests on non-x86 targets.
These tests are missing a target triple and the -m elf_x86_64 gold option,
which makes them fail on non-x86 targets.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28285

Reviewers: tejohnson
llvm-svn: 290965
2017-01-04 14:43:51 +00:00
Davide Italiano 2ceb628f36 [LTO] Reject modules without datalayout.
Also, udpate the ~60 failing tests in the tree which did
not contain a valid datalayout.
This fixes PR31123. lld will be updated in a following patch,
immediately after this is committed.

Differential Revision:  https://reviews.llvm.org/D27082

llvm-svn: 289719
2016-12-14 21:57:04 +00:00
NAKAMURA Takumi a535636759 Fix tests in llvm/test/tools/gold/X86 to satisfy r279014.
They would unexpectedly pass if test/tools/gold/X86/Output had outputs of previous tests.

llvm-svn: 279214
2016-08-19 06:44:44 +00:00
Teresa Johnson 9ba95f99f3 Restore "Resolution-based LTO API."
This restores commit r278330, with fixes for a few bot failures:
- Fix a late change I had made to the save temps output file that I
  missed due to existing files sitting on my disk
- Fix a bunch of Windows bot failures with "ambiguous call to overloaded
  function" due to confusion between llvm::make_unique vs
  std::make_unique (preface the new make_unique calls with "llvm::")
- Attempt to fix a modules bot failure by adding a missing include
  to LTO/Config.h.

Original change:

Resolution-based LTO API.

Summary:
This introduces a resolution-based LTO API. The main advantage of this API over
existing APIs is that it allows the linker to supply a resolution for each
symbol in each object, rather than the combined object as a whole. This will
become increasingly important for use cases such as ThinLTO which require us
to process symbol resolutions in a more complicated way than just adjusting
linkage.

Patch by Peter Collingbourne.

Reviewers: rafael, tejohnson, mehdi_amini

Subscribers: lhames, tejohnson, mehdi_amini, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D20268

llvm-svn: 278338
2016-08-11 14:58:12 +00:00
Teresa Johnson cbf684e6c6 Revert "Resolution-based LTO API."
This reverts commit r278330.

I made a change to the save temps output that is causing issues with the
bots. Didn't realize this because I had older output files sitting on
disk in my test output directory.

llvm-svn: 278331
2016-08-11 13:03:56 +00:00
Teresa Johnson f99573b3ee Resolution-based LTO API.
Summary:
This introduces a resolution-based LTO API. The main advantage of this API over
existing APIs is that it allows the linker to supply a resolution for each
symbol in each object, rather than the combined object as a whole. This will
become increasingly important for use cases such as ThinLTO which require us
to process symbol resolutions in a more complicated way than just adjusting
linkage.

Patch by Peter Collingbourne.

Reviewers: rafael, tejohnson, mehdi_amini

Subscribers: lhames, tejohnson, mehdi_amini, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D20268

Address review comments

llvm-svn: 278330
2016-08-11 12:56:40 +00:00
Kristof Beyls a14e9a5576 Remove size 1 from check as that isn't part of what the test is meant to be testing.
This test also runs on e.g. ARM-native builds when the X86 backend is also
built.  This test produces code for the default instruction set, even though it
is in a "X86" sub-directory. Given that this test doesn't seem to be testing
anything architecture-specific, it seems it's best to adapt the check to not
check for an architecture-dependent value (the size of the function), rather
than hard-code the test to target x86.

llvm-svn: 267722
2016-04-27 15:03:09 +00:00
Rafael Espindola 468d327b34 Also check the IR.
llvm-svn: 267367
2016-04-24 21:42:56 +00:00
Rafael Espindola 2adb06a820 Add a test for how we handle protected visibility.
llvm-svn: 267366
2016-04-24 21:30:18 +00:00