I've put CMPXCHG8B/CMPXCHG16B in the same file, even though technically they are under separate CPUID bits all targets seem to support both (or neither).
llvm-svn: 338595
These aren't exhaustive, but cover some instructions that are only available in 32-bit mode (where would we be without good BCD math performance?).
llvm-svn: 338404
Before revision 336728, the "mayLoad" flag for instruction (V)MOVLPSrm was
inferred directly from the "default" pattern associated with the instruction
definition.
r336728 removed special node X86Movlps, and all the patterns associated to it.
Now instruction (V)MOVLPSrm doesn't have a pattern associated to it, and the
'mayLoad/hasSideEffects' flags are left unset.
When the instruction info is emitted by tablegen, method
CodeGenDAGPatterns::InferInstructionFlags() sees that (V)MOVLPSrm doesn't have a
pattern, and flags are undefined. So, it conservatively sets the
"hasSideEffects" flag for it.
As a consequence, we were losing the 'mayLoad' flag, and we were gaining a
'hasSideEffect' flag in its place.
This patch fixes the issue (originally reported by Michael Holmen).
The mca tests show the differences in the instruction info flags. Instructions
that were affected by this problem were: MOVLPSrm/VMOVLPSrm/VMOVLPSZ128rm.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49182
llvm-svn: 336818
This makes easier to identify changes in the instruction info flags. It also
helps spotting potential regressions similar to the one recently introduced at
r336728.
Using the same character to mark MayLoad/MayStore/HasSideEffects is problematic
for llvm-lit. When pattern matching substrings, llvm-lit consumes tabs and
spaces. A change in position of the flag marker may not trigger a test failure.
This patch only changes the character used for flag `hasSideEffects`. The reason
why I didn't touch other flags is because I want to avoid spamming the mailing
because of the massive diff due to the numerous tests affected by this change.
In future, each instruction flag should be associated with a different character
in the Instruction Info View.
llvm-svn: 336797
Summary:
I ran llvm-exegesis on SKX, SKL, BDW, HSW, SNB.
Atom is from Agner and SLM is a guess.
I've left AMD processors alone.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48079
llvm-svn: 335097
I noticed while working on zero-idiom + dependency-breaking support (PR36671) that most of our binary instruction tests were reusing the same src registers, which would cause the tests to fail once we enable scalar zero-idiom support on btver2. Fixed in all targets to keep them in sync.
llvm-svn: 334110
This is a fix for the problem arising in D47374 (PR37678):
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37678
We may not have throughput info because it's not specified in the model
or it's not available with variant scheduling, so assume that those
instructions can execute/complete at max-issue-width.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47723
llvm-svn: 334055
Summary:
It's super irritating.
[properly configured] git client then complains about that double-newline,
and you have to use `--force` to ignore the warning, since even if you
fix it manually, it will be reintroduced the very next runtime :/
Reviewers: RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, craig.topper, javed.absar, gbedwell
Reviewed By: gbedwell
Subscribers: javed.absar, tschuett, gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47697
llvm-svn: 333887
Summary:
{FLDL2E, FLDL2T, FLDLG2, FLDLN2, FLDPI} were using WriteMicrocoded.
- I've measured the values for Broadwell, Haswell, SandyBridge, Skylake.
- For ZnVer1 and Atom, values were transferred form InstRWs.
- For SLM and BtVer2, I've guessed some values :(
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, andreadb
Subscribers: gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47585
llvm-svn: 333656
Summary:
- I've measured the values for Broadwell, Haswell, SandyBridge, Skylake.
- For ZnVer1 and Atom, values were transferred form `InstRW`s.
- For SLM and BtVer2, values are from Agner.
This is split off from https://reviews.llvm.org/D47377
Reviewers: RKSimon, andreadb
Subscribers: gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47523
llvm-svn: 333642
Retag some instructions that were missed when we split off vector load/store/moves - MOVQ/MOVD etc.
Fixes BtVer2/SLM which have different behaviours for GPR stores.
llvm-svn: 332718
Retag some instructions that were missed when we split off vector load/store/moves - MOVSS/MOVSD/MOVHPD/MOVHPD/MOVLPD/MOVLPS etc.
Fixes BtVer2/SLM which have different behaviours for GPR stores.
llvm-svn: 332714
Confirmed by both Agner and Intel's AOM - the IEC/FPC are not required for pure load/stores (even if its a partial update).
Can't fix WriteStore until all RMW instructions are cleaned up though....
llvm-svn: 332096
WriteFRcp/WriteFRsqrt are split to support scalar, XMM and YMM/ZMM instructions.
WriteFSqrt is split into single/double/long-double sizes and scalar, XMM, YMM and ZMM instructions.
This removes all InstrRW overrides for these instructions.
NOTE: There were a couple of typos in the Znver1 model - notably a 1cy throughput for SQRT that is highly unlikely and doesn't tally with Agner.
NOTE: I had to add Agner's numbers for several targets for WriteFSqrt80.
llvm-svn: 331629
I intend to add further instruction tests to the resources-x86_64.s test file as required, but this initial commit is to help remove a load of unnecessary InstRW overrides in a future patch
llvm-svn: 331108
The SandyBridge BMI tests are actually run on IvyBridge as that's the first lowest CPU that actually support the ISAs (but still use the SandyBridge model).
llvm-svn: 330556
I've copied and regenerated a resource file from btver2 to every x86 scheduler model supported by llvm-mca so we have at least some basic coverage.
For most this has been the avx1 tests, but for silvermont I've used sse42 as thats the latest it supports.
More will be added later.
llvm-svn: 330352
Andrew V. Tischenko