Summary:
On hover, the whole asm snippet is displayed, including operands.
This requires the actual assembly output instead of just the MCInsts:
This is because some pseudo-instructions get lowered to actual target
instructions during codegen (e.g. ABS_Fp32 -> SSE or X87).
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: mgorny, tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48164
llvm-svn: 334805
Summary:
We now highlight any sched classes whose measurements do not match the
LLVM SchedModel. "bad" clusters are marked in red.
Screenshot in phabricator diff.
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: tschuett, mgrang, RKSimon, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47639
llvm-svn: 333884
Summary: This makes the report much more readable.
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: tschuett, mgrang, craig.topper, RKSimon, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47189
llvm-svn: 332979
Summary:
Warn on instructions that should have the same performance
characteristics according to the sched model but actually
differ in their benchmarks.
Next step: Make the display nicer to browse, I was thinking maybe html.
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46945
llvm-svn: 332601
Summary:
The analysis mode gives the user a clustered view of the measurement results.
Next steps are (requires the split ok AsmTemplate.Name into {mnemonic, mode}):
- Show the sched class.
- Highlight any inconsistencies with the checked-in data.
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits, tschuett
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46865
llvm-svn: 332344
The analysis mode gives the user a clustered view of the measurement results and
highlights any inconsistencies with the checked-in data.
llvm-svn: 332229
Clement Courbet