The code sequence before the spiller is something like:
= tMOVrr
%reg1117 = tMOVrr
%reg1078 = tLSLri %reg1117, 2
The it starts spilling:
%r0 = tRestore <fi#5>, 0
%r1 = tRestore <fi#7>, 0
%r1 = tMOVrr %r1<kill>
tSpill %r1, <fi#5>, 0
%reg1078 = tLSLri %reg1117, 2
It restores the value while processing the first tMOVrr. At this point, the
spiller remembers fi#5 is available in %r0. Next it processes the second move.
It restores the source before the move and spills the result afterwards. The
move becomes a noop and is deleted. However, a spill has been inserted and that
should invalidate reuse of %r0 for fi#5 and add reuse of %r1 for fi#5.
Therefore, %reg1117 (which is also assigned fi#5) should get %r1, not %r0.
llvm-svn: 34039
t1 := op t2, t3
t2 <- assigned r0 for use by the reload but ended up reuse r1
t3 <- assigned r1 for use by the reload but ended up reuse r0
t1 <- desires r1
sees r1 is taken by t2, tries t2's reload register r0
sees r0 is taken by t3, tries t3's reload register r1
sees r1 is taken by t2, tries t2's reload register r0 ...
llvm-svn: 33382
rework the hacks that had us passing OStream in. We pass in std::ostream*
instead, check for null, and then dispatch to the correct print() method.
llvm-svn: 32636
If a spillslot value is available in a register, and there is a noop copy that
targets that register, the spiller correctly decide not to invalidate the
spillslot register.
However, even though the noop copy does not clobbers the value. It does start a
new intersecting live range. That means the spillslot register is available for
use but should not be reused for a two-address instruction modref operand which
would clobber the new live range.
When we remove the noop copy, update the available information by clearing the
canClobber bit.
llvm-svn: 32576
tied to another oeprand, 2) whether is is being tied to by another operand. So
the destination operand of a two-address MI can be correctly identified.
llvm-svn: 32354
there may be other def(s) apart from the use&def two-address operand. We need
to check if the register reuse for a use&def operand may conflicts with another
def. Provide a mean to recover from the conflict if it is detected when the
defs are processed later.
llvm-svn: 31439
actually *removes* one of the operands, instead of just assigning both operands
the same register. This make reasoning about instructions unnecessarily complex,
because you need to know if you are before or after register allocation to match
up operand #'s with the target description file.
Changing this also gets rid of a bunch of hacky code in various places.
This patch also includes changes to fold loads into cmp/test instructions in
the X86 backend, along with a significant simplification to the X86 spill
folding code.
llvm-svn: 30108
instructions which define each value#) to simplify and improve the coallescer.
In particular, this patch:
1. Implements iterative coallescing.
2. Reverts an unsafe hack from handlePhysRegDef, superceeding it with a
better solution.
3. Implements PR865, "coallescing" away the second copy in code like:
A = B
...
B = A
This also includes changes to symbolically print registers in intervals
when possible.
llvm-svn: 29862
instructions in the virtregfolded map that were deleted. Because they
were deleted, newly allocated instructions could end up at the same address,
magically finding themselves in the map. The solution is to remove entries
from the map when we delete the instructions.
llvm-svn: 28041
But this is incorrect if the spilled value live range extends beyond the
current BB.
It is currently controlled by a temporary option -spiller-check-liveout.
llvm-svn: 28024
and is already available, instead of falling back to emitting a load, fall
back to emitting a reg-reg copy. This generates significantly better code
for some SSE testcases, as SSE has lots of two-address instructions and
none of them are read/modify/write. As one example, this change does:
pshufd %XMM5, XMMWORD PTR [%ESP + 84], 255
xorps %XMM2, %XMM5
cmpltps %XMM1, %XMM0
- movaps XMMWORD PTR [%ESP + 52], %XMM0
- movapd %XMM6, XMMWORD PTR [%ESP + 52]
+ movaps %XMM6, %XMM0
cmpltps %XMM6, XMMWORD PTR [%ESP + 68]
movapd XMMWORD PTR [%ESP + 52], %XMM6
movaps %XMM6, %XMM0
cmpltps %XMM6, XMMWORD PTR [%ESP + 36]
cmpltps %XMM3, %XMM0
- movaps XMMWORD PTR [%ESP + 20], %XMM0
- movapd %XMM7, XMMWORD PTR [%ESP + 20]
+ movaps %XMM7, %XMM0
cmpltps %XMM7, XMMWORD PTR [%ESP + 4]
movapd XMMWORD PTR [%ESP + 20], %XMM7
cmpltps %XMM4, %XMM0
... which is far better than a store followed by a load!
llvm-svn: 28001
exposed with a fastcc problem (breaking pcompress2 on x86 with -enable-x86-fastcc).
When reloading a reused reg, make sure to invalidate the reloaded reg, and
check to see if there are any other pending uses of the same register.
llvm-svn: 26369
store EAX -> [ss#0]
[ss#0] += 1
...
use(EAX)
In this case, it is not valid to rewrite this as:
store EAX -> [ss#0]
EAX += 1
store EAX -> [ss#0] ;;; this would also delete the store above
...
use(EAX)
... because EAX is not a dead at that point. Keep track of which registers
we are allowed to clobber, and which ones we aren't, and don't clobber the
ones we're not supposed to. :)
This should resolve the issues on X86 last night.
llvm-svn: 25948
and PhysRegsAvailable maps out into a new AvailableSpills struct. No
functionality change.
This paves the way for a bugfix, coming up next.
llvm-svn: 25947
1. a target doesn't know how to fold load/stores into copies, or
2. the spiller rewrites the input to a copy to the same register as the dest
instead of to the reloaded reg.
This will be moved/improved in the near future, but allows elimination of
some ancient x86 hacks. This eliminates 92 copies from SMG2000 on X86 and
163 copies from 252.eon.
llvm-svn: 25922
of this, and use it to our advantage (bwahahah). This allows us to eliminate another
60 instructions from smg2000 on PPC (probably significantly more on X86). A common
old-new diff looks like this:
stw r2, 3304(r1)
- lwz r2, 3192(r1)
stw r2, 3300(r1)
- lwz r2, 3192(r1)
stw r2, 3296(r1)
- lwz r2, 3192(r1)
stw r2, 3200(r1)
- lwz r2, 3192(r1)
stw r2, 3196(r1)
- lwz r2, 3192(r1)
+ or r2, r2, r2
stw r2, 3188(r1)
and
- lwz r31, 604(r1)
- lwz r13, 604(r1)
- lwz r14, 604(r1)
- lwz r15, 604(r1)
- lwz r16, 604(r1)
- lwz r30, 604(r1)
+ or r31, r30, r30
+ or r13, r30, r30
+ or r14, r30, r30
+ or r15, r30, r30
+ or r16, r30, r30
+ or r30, r30, r30
Removal of the R = R copies is coming next...
llvm-svn: 25919
this code:
store [stack slot #0], R10
= add R14, [stack slot #0]
The spiller didn't know that the store made the value of [stackslot#0] available
in R10 *IF* the store came from a copy instruction with the store folded into it.
This patch teaches VirtRegMap to look at these stores and recognize the values
they make available. In one case Evan provided, this code:
divsd %XMM0, %XMM1
movsd %XMM1, QWORD PTR [%ESP + 40]
1) movsd QWORD PTR [%ESP + 48], %XMM1
2) movsd %XMM1, QWORD PTR [%ESP + 48]
addsd %XMM1, %XMM0
3) movsd QWORD PTR [%ESP + 48], %XMM1
movsd QWORD PTR [%ESP + 4], %XMM0
turns into:
divsd %XMM0, %XMM1
movsd %XMM1, QWORD PTR [%ESP + 40]
addsd %XMM1, %XMM0
3) movsd QWORD PTR [%ESP + 48], %XMM1
movsd QWORD PTR [%ESP + 4], %XMM0
In this case, instruction #2 was removed because of the value made
available by #1, and inst #1 was later deleted because it is now
never used before the stack slot is redefined by #3.
This occurs here and there in a lot of code with high spilling, on PPC
most of the removed loads/stores are LSU-reject-causing loads, which is
nice.
On X86, things are much better (because it spills more), where we nuke
about 1% of the instructions from SMG2000 and several hundred from eon.
More improvements to come...
llvm-svn: 25917
Evan Cheng