This reverts commit r187991 and adjusts the comment. /Za is much more
involved, and we don't want to give anyone the impression we actually
support it.
llvm-svn: 187998
'-fno-unroll-loops'. The option to the backend is even called
'DisableUnrollLoops'. This is precisely the form that Clang *didn't*
support. We didn't recognize the flag, we didn't pass it to the CC1
layer, and even if we did we wouldn't use it. Clang only inspected the
positive form of the flag, and only did so to enable loop unrolling when
the optimization level wasn't high enough. This only occurs for an
optimization level that even has a chance of running the loop unroller
when optimizing for size.
This commit wires up the 'no' variant, and switches the code to actually
follow the standard flag pattern of using the last flag and allowing
a flag in either direction to override the default.
I think this is still wrong. I don't know why we disable the loop
unroller entirely *from Clang* when optimizing for size, as the loop
unrolling pass *already has special logic* for the case where the
function is attributed as optimized for size! We should really be
trusting that. Maybe in a follow-up patch, I don't really want to change
behavior here.
llvm-svn: 187969
These flags set some preprocessor macros and injects a dependency
on the runtime library into the object file, which later is picked up
by the linker.
This also adds a new CC1 flag for adding a dependent library.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1315
llvm-svn: 187945
DataFlowSanitizer is a generalised dynamic data flow analysis.
Unlike other Sanitizer tools, this tool is not designed to detect a
specific class of bugs on its own. Instead, it provides a generic
dynamic data flow analysis framework to be used by clients to help
detect application-specific issues within their own code.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D966
llvm-svn: 187925
This implements support for the /Fo option, which is used
to set the filename or output dir for object files.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1302
llvm-svn: 187820
These are used to specify source files, and whether to treat source
files as C or C++.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1290
llvm-svn: 187760
> This adds a bunch of options to clang-cl. Notably, this includes
> all the options that get passed when doing a default build of a
> command-line project with msbuild.exe in Debug and Release modes,
> and I believe all flags from Reid's original patch.
The original commit was reverted in r187640 after it broke the Mac build.
This should now be fixed, by Clang r187668, LLVM r187675, and putting
a -- before %s in the test.
llvm-svn: 187679
It broke the "phase1 - sanity" buildbot. Reverting until
we can figure out what's going on.
And Eric says it broke all current Mac builds actually.
llvm-svn: 187640
This adds a bunch of options to clang-cl. Notably, this includes
all the options that get passed when doing a default build of a
command-line project with msbuild.exe in Debug and Release modes,
and I believe all flags from Reid's original patch.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1264
llvm-svn: 187637
Patch by Ana Pazos
- Completed implementation of instruction formats:
AdvSIMD three same
AdvSIMD modified immediate
AdvSIMD scalar pairwise
- Completed implementation of instruction classes
(some of the instructions in these classes
belong to yet unfinished instruction formats):
Vector Arithmetic
Vector Immediate
Vector Pairwise Arithmetic
- Initial implementation of instruction formats:
AdvSIMD scalar two-reg misc
AdvSIMD scalar three same
- Intial implementation of instruction class:
Scalar Arithmetic
- Initial clang changes to support arm v8 intrinsics.
Note: no clang changes for scalar intrinsics function name mangling yet.
- Comprehensive test cases for added instructions
To verify auto codegen, encoding, decoding, diagnosis, intrinsics.
llvm-svn: 187568
This adds a few more clang-cl options. It also exposes two core clang
options to the clang-cl mode: we need to be able to claim --driver_mode
so it doesn't show up as unused in cl mode, and we need -### for tests.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1232
llvm-svn: 187527
Clang when linking and using a GCC installation from a GCC
cross-compiler.
This was desired already by two special case platforms (Android and
Mips), and turns out to be generally (if frustratingly) true. I've added
a substantial comment to the code clarifying the underlying assumptions
of doing actual cross compiles with Clang (or GCC for that matter!) and
help avoid further confusion here.
The end result is to realize that fully general form of PR12478 cannot
be resolved while we support existing cross-compiling GCC toolchains,
and linking with them (namely, linking against their libgcc and
libstdc++ installs). GCC installs these target libraries under
a target-specific prefix but one that may not be available within the
actual sysroot in use. When linking in this world, GCC works and Clang
should as well, but caveat emptor: DSOs from this tree must be
replicated and rpath-fixed to be found at runtime within the sysroot.
I've extended the cross compile test cases to cover these issues by
pointing them at a sysroot and actually checking the library search
paths.
llvm-svn: 187466
on the system, and report it when running the driver in verbose mode.
Without this it is essentially impossible to understand why a particular
GCC toolchain is used by Clang for libstdc++, libgcc, etc.
This also required threading a hook through the toolchain layers for
a specific toolchain implementation to print custom information under
'clang -v'. The naming here isn't spectacular. Suggestions welcome.
llvm-svn: 187427
This establishes a new Flag in Options.td, which can be assigned to
options that should be made available in clang's cl.exe compatible
mode, and updates the Driver to make use of the flag.
(The whitespace change to CMakeLists forces the build to re-run CMake
and pick up the include dependency on the new .td file. This makes the
build work if someone moves backwards in commit history after this change.)
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1215
llvm-svn: 187280
This patch provides basic support for powerpc64le as an LLVM target.
However, use of this target will not actually generate little-endian
code. Instead, use of the target will cause the correct little-endian
built-in defines to be generated, so that code that tests for
__LITTLE_ENDIAN__, for example, will be correctly parsed for
syntax-only testing. Code generation will otherwise be the same as
powerpc64 (big-endian), for now.
The patch leaves open the possibility of creating a little-endian
PowerPC64 back end, but there is no immediate intent to create such a
thing.
The new test case variant ensures that correct built-in defines for
little-endian code are generated.
llvm-svn: 187180
They seemed to have the same implications, and this makes for one
less flag to worry about.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1219
llvm-svn: 187168
Use the same filtering for assembly arguments to -cc1as as we do for
-cc1, this allows a consistent (& more useful) diagnostic experience for
users (rather than getting an error from -cc1as (which a user shouldn't
really be thinking about) about --foo, they get an error from clang
about --foo in -Wa,)
I'm sort of surprised by the separation of -cc1as & the separate
argument handling, etc, but at least this removes a little bit of the
duplication.
llvm-svn: 187156
and add a new option --driver-mode= to control it explicitly.
The CCCIsCXX and CCCIsCPP flags were non-overlapping, i.e. there
are currently really three modes that Clang can run in: gcc, g++
or cpp, so it makes sense to represent them as an enum.
Having a command line flag to control it helps testing.
llvm-svn: 186605
Hans Wennborg