Since this patch provided support for the __float128 type but disabled it
on all platforms by default, some platforms can't compile type_traits with
-std=gnu++11 since there is a specialization with __float128.
This reverts the patch until D19125 is approved (i.e. we know which platforms
need this support enabled).
llvm-svn: 266460
This patch implements __unaligned as a type qualifier; before that, it was
modeled as an attribute. Proper mangling of __unaligned is implemented as well.
Some OpenCL code/tests are tangenially affected, as they relied on existing
number and sizes of type qualifiers.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18596
llvm-svn: 266415
This patch corresponds to review:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15120
It adds support for the __float128 keyword, literals and a target feature to
enable it. This support is disabled by default on all targets and any target
that has support for this type is free to add it.
Based on feedback that I've received from target maintainers, this appears to
be the right thing for most targets. I have not heard from the maintainers of
X86 which I believe supports this type. I will subsequently investigate the
impact of enabling this on X86.
llvm-svn: 266186
Putting OpenCLImageTypes.def to clangAST library violates layering requirement: "It's not OK for a Basic/ header to include an AST/ header".
This fixes the modules build.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18954
Reviewers: Richard Smith, Vassil Vassilev.
llvm-svn: 266180
I. Current implementation of images is not conformant to spec in the following points:
1. It makes no distinction with respect to access qualifiers and therefore allows to use images with different access type interchangeably. The following code would compile just fine:
void write_image(write_only image2d_t img);
kernel void foo(read_only image2d_t img) { write_image(img); } // Accepted code
which is disallowed according to s6.13.14.
2. It discards access qualifier on generated code, which leads to generated code for the above example:
call void @write_image(%opencl.image2d_t* %img);
In OpenCL2.0 however we can have different calls into write_image with read_only and wite_only images.
Also generally following compiler steps have no easy way to take different path depending on the image access: linking to the right implementation of image types, performing IR opts and backend codegen differently.
3. Image types are language keywords and can't be redeclared s6.1.9, which can happen currently as they are just typedef names.
4. Default access qualifier read_only is to be added if not provided explicitly.
II. This patch corrects the above points as follows:
1. All images are encapsulated into a separate .def file that is inserted in different points where image handling is required. This avoid a lot of code repetition as all images are handled the same way in the code with no distinction of their exact type.
2. The Cartesian product of image types and image access qualifiers is added to the builtin types. This simplifies a lot handling of access type mismatch as no operations are allowed by default on distinct Builtin types. Also spec intended access qualifier as special type qualifier that are combined with an image type to form a distinct type (see statement above - images can't be created w/o access qualifiers).
3. Improves testing of images in Clang.
Author: Anastasia Stulova
Reviewers: bader, mgrang.
Subscribers: pxli168, pekka.jaaskelainen, yaxunl.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17821
llvm-svn: 265783
I broke this back in r264529 because I forgot to serialize the UuidAttr
member. Fix this by replacing the UuidAttr with a StringRef which is
properly serialized and deserialized.
llvm-svn: 264562
Keep a pointer to the UuidAttr that the CXXUuidofExpr corresponds to.
This makes translating from __uuidof to the underlying constant a lot
more straightforward.
llvm-svn: 264529
Really long symbols are hashed using MD5 and prefixed/suffixed with the
usual sigils. There is an additional reason beyond the usual
compatibility with MSVC, it is important to keep COFF symbols shorter
than 0xFFFF because the CodeView debugging format has a maximum
symbol/record size of 0xFFFF.
There are some quirks worth noting:
- Some mangled names reference other entities which are mangled
separately. A quick example:
int I;
template <int *> struct S {};
S<I> s;
In this case, the mangling for 's' doesn't depend directly on the
mangling for 'I'. While 's' would need an MD5 hash if 'I' also needed
one, the hash for 's' applied to the fully realized mangled name. In
other words, the mangled name for 's' will not depend on the MD5 of the
mangled name for 'I'.
- Some mangled names, like the venerable CatchableType, embed the MD5
verbatim.
- Finally, the complete object locator is handled as a special case.
A complete object locators are mangled exactly like a VFTable except for
a small deviation in the prefix sigils. However, complete object
locators for hashed vftables result in a complete object locator whose
name is identical to the vftable except for an additional suffix.
llvm-svn: 262818
Add parsing, sema analysis and serialization/deserialization for 'declare reduction' construct.
User-defined reductions are defined as
#pragma omp declare reduction( reduction-identifier : typename-list : combiner ) [initializer ( initializer-expr )]
These custom reductions may be used in 'reduction' clauses of OpenMP constructs. The combiner specifies how partial results can be combined into a single value. The
combiner can use the special variable identifiers omp_in and omp_out that are of the type of the variables being reduced with this reduction-identifier. Each of them will
denote one of the values to be combined before executing the combiner. It is assumed that the special omp_out identifier will refer to the storage that holds the resulting
combined value after executing the combiner.
As the initializer-expr value of a user-defined reduction is not known a priori the initializer-clause can be used to specify one. Then the contents of the initializer-clause
will be used as the initializer for private copies of reduction list items where the omp_priv identifier will refer to the storage to be initialized. The special identifier
omp_orig can also appear in the initializer-clause and it will refer to the storage of the original variable to be reduced.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11182
llvm-svn: 262582
This reverts commit r260449.
We would supress our emission of vftable definitions if we thought
another translation unit would provide the definition because we saw an
explicit instantiation declaration. This is not the case with
dllimport, we want to synthesize a definition of the vftable regardless.
This fixes PR26569.
llvm-svn: 260548
Referencing a dllimported vtable is impossible in a constexpr
constructor. It would be friendlier to C++ programmers if we
synthesized a copy of the vftable which referenced imported virtual
functions. This would let us initialize the object in a way which
preserves both the intent to import functionality from another DLL while
also making constexpr work.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17061
llvm-svn: 260388
We might get into bad situations where we try to embed the signature of
an inner lambda into an outer lambda which cannot work: the inner lambda
wants to embed the name of the outer lambda!
Instead, omit the return type for lambdas.
This fixes PR26105.
N.B. While we are here, make lambdas nested within functions use an
artificial scope so that they can get demangled.
llvm-svn: 258003
Summary:
Support for OpenCL 2.0 pipe type.
This is a bug-fix version for bader's patch reviews.llvm.org/D14441
Reviewers: pekka.jaaskelainen, Anastasia
Subscribers: bader, Anastasia, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15603
llvm-svn: 257254
Only function template specializations are exempt from being added to
the NameBackReferences. Redundant variable template specializations
should be appropriately substituted.
llvm-svn: 256623
We didn't add the artificial pass_object_size arguments to the
backreference map which bloated the size of manglings which involved
pass_object_size with duplicate types.
This lets us go from:
?qux@PassObjectSize@@YAHQAHW4__pass_object_size1@__clang@@0W4__pass_object_size1@3@@Z
to:
?qux@PassObjectSize@@YAHQAHW4__pass_object_size1@__clang@@01@Z
llvm-svn: 256622
MSVC doesn't implement a mangling for C99's _Complex so we must invent
our own.
For now, treating it like a class type called _Complex in the __clang
namespace.
This means that 'void f(__Complex int))'
will demangle as: 'void f(struct __clang::_Complex<int>)'
llvm-svn: 256583
MSVC doesn't implement a mangling for C11's _Atomic so we must invent
our own.
For now, treating it like a class type called _Atomic in the __clang
namespace.
This means that 'void f(__Atomic(int))'
will demangle as: 'void f(struct __clang::_Atomic<int>)'
llvm-svn: 256557
We used to produce a type which demangled to:
union __clang_vec8_F
That 'F' is the mangling for 'short' but it is present in the mangled
name in an inappropriate place, leading to it not getting demangled.
Instead, create a synthetic class type in a synthetic namespace called
__clang. With this, it now demangles to:
union __clang::__vector<short,8>
llvm-svn: 256556
`pass_object_size` is our way of enabling `__builtin_object_size` to
produce high quality results without requiring inlining to happen
everywhere.
A link to the design doc for this attribute is available at the
Differential review link below.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13263
llvm-svn: 254554
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Typeof.html
Differences from the GCC extension:
* __auto_type is also permitted in C++ (but only in places where
it could appear in C), allowing its use in headers that might
be shared across C and C++, or used from C++98
* __auto_type can be combined with a declarator, as with C++ auto
(for instance, "__auto_type *p")
* multiple variables can be declared in a single __auto_type
declaration, with the C++ semantics (the deduced type must be
the same in each case)
This patch also adds a missing restriction on applying typeof to
a bit-field, which GCC has historically rejected in C (due to
lack of clarity as to whether the operand should be promoted).
The same restriction also applies to __auto_type in C (in both
GCC and Clang).
This also fixes PR25449.
Patch by Nicholas Allegra!
llvm-svn: 252690
We believed that internal linkage variables at global scope which are
not variable template specializations did not have to be mangled.
However, static anonymous unions have no identifier and therefore must
be mangled.
This fixes PR18204.
llvm-svn: 250997
This flag causes the compiler to emit bit set entries for functions as well
as runtime bitset checks at indirect call sites. Depends on the new function
bitset mechanism.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11857
llvm-svn: 247238
TagDecls (structs, enums, etc.) may have the same name for linkage
purposes of one another; to disambiguate, we add a number to the mangled
named. However, we didn't do this if the TagDecl has a pseudo-name for
linkage purposes (it was defined alongside a DeclaratorDecl or a
TypeNameDecl).
This fixes PR24651.
llvm-svn: 246659
A class without a name for linkage purposes gets a name along the lines
of <unnamed-type-foo> where foo is either the name of a declarator which
defined it (like a variable or field) or a
typedef-name (like a typedef or alias-declaration).
We handled the declarator case correctly but it would fall down during
template instantiation if the declarator didn't share the tag's type.
We failed to handle the typedef-name case at all.
Instead, keep track of the association between the two and keep it up to
date in the face of template instantiation.
llvm-svn: 246469
After r244870 flush() will only compare two null pointers and return,
doing nothing but wasting run time. The call is not required any more
as the stream and its SmallString are always in sync.
Thanks to David Blaikie for reviewing.
llvm-svn: 244928
Function types without prototypes can arise when mangling a function type
within an overloadable function in C. We mangle these as the absence of
any parameter types (not even an empty parameter list).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11848
llvm-svn: 244374
It turns out that nullptr pointers to data members act differently in
function templates vs class templates. Class templates use a variable
width representation proportional to the number of fields needed to
materialize it. Function templates always use a single '0' template
parameter. However, using '0' all the time is problematic if the class
uses single or multiple inheritance. In those cases, use -1.
llvm-svn: 241251
Virtual inheritance member pointers are always relative to the vbindex,
even when the member pointer doesn't point into a virtual base. This is
corrected by adjusting the non-virtual offset backwards from the vbptr
back to the top of the most derived class. While we performed this
adjustment when manifesting member pointers as constants or when
performing conversions, we didn't perform the adjustment when mangling
them.
llvm-svn: 240453
Member pointers in the MS ABI are made complicated due to the following:
- Virtual methods in the most derived class (MDC) might live in a
vftable in a virtual base.
- There are four different representations of member pointer: single
inheritance, multiple inheritance, virtual inheritance and the "most
general" representation.
- Bases might have a *more* general representation than classes which
derived from them, a most surprising result.
We believed that we could treat all member pointers as-if they were a
degenerate case of the multiple inheritance model. This fell apart once
we realized that implementing standard member pointers using this ABI
requires referencing members with a non-zero vbindex.
On a bright note, all but the virtual inheritance model operate rather
similarly. The virtual inheritance member pointer representation
awkwardly requires a virtual base adjustment in order to refer to
entities in the MDC.
However, the first virtual base might be quite far from the start of the
virtual base. This means that we must add a negative non-virtual
displacement.
However, things get even more complicated. The most general
representation interprets vbindex zero differently from the virtual
inheritance model: it doesn't reference the vbtable at all.
It turns out that this complexity can increase for quite some time:
consider a derived to base conversion from the most general model to the
multiple inheritance model...
To manage this complexity we introduce a concept of "normalized" member
pointer which allows us to treat all three models as the most general
model. Then we try to figure out how to map this generalized member
pointer onto the destination member pointer model. I've done my best to
furnish the code with comments explaining why each adjustment is
performed.
This fixes PR23878.
llvm-svn: 240384
The patch is generated using this command:
$ tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
work/llvm/tools/clang
To reduce churn, not touching namespaces spanning less than 10 lines.
llvm-svn: 240270
Clang's control flow integrity implementation works by conceptually attaching
"tags" (in the form of bitset entries) to each virtual table, identifying
the names of the classes that the virtual table is compatible with. Under
the Itanium ABI, it is simple to assign tags to virtual tables; they are
simply the address points, which are available via VTableLayout. Because any
overridden methods receive an entry in the derived class's virtual table,
a check for an overridden method call can always be done by checking the
tag of whichever derived class overrode the method call.
The Microsoft ABI is a little different, as it does not directly use address
points, and overrides in a derived class do not cause new virtual table entries
to be added to the derived class; instead, the slot in the base class is
reused, and the compiler needs to adjust the this pointer at the call site
to (generally) the base class that initially defined the method. After the
this pointer has been adjusted, we cannot check for the derived class's tag,
as the virtual table may not be compatible with the derived class. So we
need to determine which base class we have been adjusted to.
Specifically, at each call site, we use ASTRecordLayout to identify the most
derived class whose virtual table is laid out at the "this" pointer offset
we are using to make the call, and check the virtual table for that tag.
Because address point information is unavailable, we "reconstruct" it as
follows: any virtual tables we create for a non-derived class receive a tag
for that class, and virtual tables for a base class inside a derived class
receive a tag for the base class, together with tags for any derived classes
which are laid out at the same position as the derived class (and therefore
have compatible virtual tables).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10520
llvm-svn: 240117
We probably shouldn't say that all appropriately sized vector types are
intel vector types (i.e. __m128, etc.) as they don't exist for all
architectures. While this is largely academic, it'd save some debugging
if we supported such a platform.
llvm-svn: 238731
Nemanja Ivanovic