Part of the C++20 concepts implementation effort.
- Associated constraints (requires clauses, currently) are now enforced when instantiating/specializing templates and when considering partial specializations and function overloads.
- Elaborated diagnostics give helpful insight as to why the constraints were not satisfied.
Phabricator: D41569
Re-commit, after fixing some memory bugs.
Part of the C++20 concepts implementation effort.
- Associated constraints (requires clauses, currently) are now enforced when instantiating/specializing templates and when considering partial specializations and function overloads.
- Elaborated diagnostics give helpful insight as to why the constraints were not satisfied.
Phabricator: D41569
This adds support for rewriting <, >, <=, and >= to a normal or reversed
call to operator<=>, for rewriting != to a normal or reversed call to
operator==, and for rewriting <=> and == to reversed forms of those same
operators.
Note that this is a breaking change for various C++17 code patterns,
including some in use in LLVM. The most common patterns (where an
operator== becomes ambiguous with a reversed form of itself) are still
accepted under this patch, as an extension (with a warning). I'm hopeful
that we can get the language rules fixed before C++20 ships, and the
extension warning is aimed primarily at providing data to inform that
decision.
llvm-svn: 375306
Part of C++20 Concepts implementation effort. Added Concept Specialization Expressions that are created when a concept is refe$
D41217 on Phabricator.
(recommit after fixing failing Parser test on windows)
llvm-svn: 374903
Part of C++20 Concepts implementation effort. Added Concept Specialization Expressions that are created when a concept is referenced with arguments, and tests thereof.
llvm-svn: 374882
Summary:
The overload resolution for enums with a fixed underlying type has changed in the C++14 standard. This patch implements the new rule.
Patch by Mark de Wever!
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65695
llvm-svn: 373866
has a constexpr destructor.
For constexpr variables, reject if the variable does not have constant
destruction. In all cases, do not emit runtime calls to the destructor
for variables with constant destruction.
llvm-svn: 373159
appropriate during constant evaluation.
Note that the evaluator is sometimes invoked on incomplete expressions.
In such cases, if an object is constructed but we never reach the point
where it would be destroyed (and it has non-trivial destruction), we
treat the expression as having an unmodeled side-effect.
llvm-svn: 372538
Summary:
Microsoft seems to do this regardless of the language mode, so we must
also do it in order to be ABI compatible.
Fixes PR36125
Reviewers: thakis
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47956
llvm-svn: 371642
This is mostly the same as the
[[clang::require_constant_initialization]] attribute, but has a couple
of additional syntactic and semantic restrictions.
In passing, I added a warning for the attribute form being added after
we have already seen the initialization of the variable (but before we
see the definition); that case previously slipped between the cracks and
the attribute was silently ignored.
llvm-svn: 370972
initializers.
This has some interesting interactions with our existing extensions to
support C99 designated initializers as an extension in C++. Those are
resolved as follows:
* We continue to permit the full breadth of C99 designated initializers
in C++, with the exception that we disallow a partial overwrite of an
initializer with a non-trivially-destructible type. (Full overwrite
is OK, because we won't run the first initializer at all.)
* The C99 extensions are disallowed in SFINAE contexts and during
overload resolution, where they could change the meaning of valid
programs.
* C++20 disallows reordering of initializers. We only check for that for
the simple cases that the C++20 rules permit (designators of the form
'.field_name =' and continue to allow reordering in other cases).
It would be nice to improve this behavior in future.
* All C99 designated initializer extensions produce a warning by
default in C++20 mode. People are going to learn the C++ rules based
on what Clang diagnoses, so it's important we diagnose these properly
by default.
* In C++ <= 17, we apply the C++20 rules rather than the C99 rules, and
so still diagnose C99 extensions as described above. We continue to
accept designated C++20-compatible initializers in C++ <= 17 silently
by default (but naturally still reject under -pedantic-errors).
This is not a complete implementation of P0329R4. In particular, that
paper introduces new non-C99-compatible syntax { .field { init } }, and
we do not support that yet.
This is based on a previous patch by Don Hinton, though I've made
substantial changes when addressing the above interactions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59754
llvm-svn: 370544
Allow implementations to provide complete definitions of
std::tuple_size<T>, but to omit the 'value' member to signal that T is
not tuple-like. The Microsoft standard library implements
std::tuple_size<const T> this way.
If the value member exists, clang still validates that it is an ICE, but
if it does not, then the type is considered to not be tuple-like.
Fixes PR33236
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66040
llvm-svn: 369043
When handling a member access into a non-class, non-ObjC-object type, we
would perform a lookup into the surrounding scope as if for an
unqualified lookup. If the member access was followed by a '<' and this
lookup (or the typo-correction for it) found a template name, we'd treat
the member access as naming that template.
Now we treat such accesses as never naming a template if the type of the
object expression is of vector type, so that vector component accesses
are never misinterpreted as naming something else. This is not entirely
correct, since it is in fact valid to name a template from the enclosing
scope in this context, when invoking a pseudo-destructor for the vector
type via an alias template, but that's very much a corner case, and this
change leaves that case only as broken as the corresponding case for
Objective-C types is.
This incidentally adds support for dr2292, which permits a 'template'
keyword at the start of a member access naming a pseudo-destructor.
llvm-svn: 368940
For consistency with normal instructions and clarity when reading IR,
it's best to print the %0, %1, ... names of function arguments in
definitions.
Also modifies the parser to accept IR in that form for obvious reasons.
llvm-svn: 367755
check the formal rules rather than seeing if the normal checks produce a
diagnostic.
This fixes the handling of C++2a extensions in lambdas in C++17 mode,
as well as some corner cases in earlier language modes where we issue
diagnostics for things other than not satisfying the formal constexpr
requirements.
llvm-svn: 367254
As passed in the Cologne meeting and treated by Core as a DR,
[[nodiscard]] was applied to constructors so that they can be diagnosed
in cases where the user forgets a variable name for a type.
The intent is to enable the library to start using this on the
constructors of scope_guard/lock_guard.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64914
llvm-svn: 367027
Summary:
Prior to r329065, we used [-max, max] as the range of representable
values because LLVM's `fptrunc` did not guarantee defined behavior when
truncating from a larger floating-point type to a smaller one. Now that
has been fixed, we can make clang follow normal IEEE 754 semantics in this
regard and take the larger range [-inf, +inf] as the range of representable
values.
In practice, this affects two parts of the frontend:
* the constant evaluator no longer treats floating-point evaluations
that result in +-inf as being undefined (because they no longer leave
the range of representable values of the type)
* UBSan no longer treats conversions to floating-point type that are
outside the [-max, +max] range as being undefined
In passing, also remove the float-divide-by-zero sanitizer from
-fsanitize=undefined, on the basis that while it's undefined per C++
rules (and we disallow it in constant expressions for that reason), it
is defined by Clang / LLVM / IEEE 754.
Reviewers: rnk, BillyONeal
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63793
llvm-svn: 365272
nullptr_t does not access memory.
We now reuse CK_NullToPointer to represent a conversion from a glvalue
of type nullptr_t to a prvalue of nullptr_t where necessary.
This reinstates r363337, reverted in r363352.
llvm-svn: 363429
Summary:
When a variable is named in a context where we can't directly emit a
reference to it (because we don't know for sure that it's going to be
defined, or it's from an enclosing function and not captured, or the
reference might not "work" for some reason), we emit a copy of the
variable as a global and use that for the known-to-be-read-only access.
This reinstates r363295, reverted in r363352, with a fix for PR42276:
we now produce a proper name for a non-odr-use reference to a static
constexpr data member. The name <mangled-name>.const is used in that
case; such names are reserved to the implementation for cases such as
this and should demangle nicely.
Reviewers: rjmccall
Subscribers: jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63157
llvm-svn: 363428
Revert 363340 "Remove unused SK_LValueToRValue initialization step."
Revert 363337 "PR23833, DR2140: an lvalue-to-rvalue conversion on a glvalue of type"
Revert 363295 "C++ DR712 and others: handle non-odr-use resulting from an lvalue-to-rvalue conversion applied to a member access or similar not-quite-trivial lvalue expression."
llvm-svn: 363352
nullptr_t does not access memory.
We now reuse CK_NullToPointer to represent a conversion from a glvalue
of type nullptr_t to a prvalue of nullptr_t where necessary.
This reinstates r345562, reverted in r346065, now that CodeGen's
handling of non-odr-used variables has been fixed.
llvm-svn: 363337
Summary:
When a variable is named in a context where we can't directly emit a
reference to it (because we don't know for sure that it's going to be
defined, or it's from an enclosing function and not captured, or the
reference might not "work" for some reason), we emit a copy of the
variable as a global and use that for the known-to-be-read-only access.
Reviewers: rjmccall
Subscribers: jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63157
llvm-svn: 363295
This permits an init-capture to introduce a new pack:
template<typename ...T> auto x = [...a = T()] { /* a is a pack */ };
To support this, the mechanism for allowing ParmVarDecls to be packs has
been extended to support arbitrary local VarDecls.
llvm-svn: 361300
object rather than tracking the originating expression.
This is groundwork for supporting polymorphic typeid expressions. (Note
that this somewhat regresses our support for DR1968, but it turns out
that that never actually worked anyway, at least in non-trivial cases.)
This reinstates r360974, reverted in r360988, with a fix for a
static_assert failure on 32-bit builds: force Type base class to have
8-byte alignment like the rest of Clang's AST nodes.
llvm-svn: 360995
object rather than tracking the originating expression.
This is groundwork for supporting polymorphic typeid expressions. (Note
that this somewhat regresses our support for DR1968, but it turns out
that that never actually worked anyway, at least in non-trivial cases.)
llvm-svn: 360974
evaluation.
This reinstates r360559, reverted in r360580, with a fix to avoid
crashing if evaluation-for-overflow mode encounters a virtual call on an
object of a class with a virtual base class, and to generally not try to
resolve virtual function calls to objects whose (notional) vptrs are not
readable. (The standard rules are unclear here, but this seems like a
reasonable approach.)
llvm-svn: 360635
their lifetime in constant expressions.
This is undefined behavior per [class.cdtor]p2.
We continue to allow this for objects whose values are not visible
within the constant evaluation, because there's no way we can tell
whether the access is defined or not, existing code relies on the
ability to make such calls, and every other compiler allows such
calls.
This reinstates r360499, reverted in r360531.
llvm-svn: 360538
Reject attempts to call non-static member functions on objects outside
their lifetime in constant expressions.
This is undefined behavior per [class.cdtor]p2.
We continue to allow this for objects whose values are not visible
within the constant evaluation, because there's no way we can tell
whether the access is defined or not, existing code relies on the
ability to make such calls, and every other compiler allows such
calls.
........
Fix handling of objects under construction during constant expression
evaluation.
It's not enough to just track the LValueBase that we're evaluating, we
need to also track the path to the objects whose constructors are
running.
........
Fixes windows buildbots
llvm-svn: 360531
their lifetime in constant expressions.
This is undefined behavior per [class.cdtor]p2.
We continue to allow this for objects whose values are not visible
within the constant evaluation, because there's no way we can tell
whether the access is defined or not, existing code relies on the
ability to make such calls, and every other compiler allows such
calls.
llvm-svn: 360499
This fixes a crash where we would neglect to mark a destructor referenced for an
__attribute__((no_destory)) array. The destructor is needed though, since if an
exception is thrown we need to cleanup the elements.
rdar://48462498
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61165
llvm-svn: 360446
template name is not visible to unqualified lookup.
In order to support this without a severe degradation in our ability to
diagnose typos in template names, this change significantly restructures
the way we handle template-id-shaped syntax for which lookup of the
template name finds nothing.
Instead of eagerly diagnosing an undeclared template name, we now form a
placeholder template-name representing a name that is known to not find
any templates. When the parser sees such a name, it attempts to
disambiguate whether we have a less-than comparison or a template-id.
Any diagnostics or typo-correction for the name are delayed until its
point of use.
The upshot should be a small improvement of our diagostic quality
overall: we now take more syntactic context into account when trying to
resolve an undeclared identifier on the left hand side of a '<'. In
fact, this works well enough that the backwards-compatible portion (for
an undeclared identifier rather than a lookup that finds functions but
no function templates) is enabled in all language modes.
llvm-svn: 360308
This caused Clang to start erroring on the following:
struct S {
template <typename = int> explicit S();
};
struct T : S {};
struct U : T {
U();
};
U::U() {}
$ clang -c /tmp/x.cc
/tmp/x.cc:10:4: error: call to implicitly-deleted default constructor of 'T'
U::U() {}
^
/tmp/x.cc:5:12: note: default constructor of 'T' is implicitly deleted
because base class 'S' has no default constructor
struct T : S {};
^
1 error generated.
See discussion on the cfe-commits email thread.
This also reverts the follow-ups r359966 and r359968.
> this patch adds support for the explicit bool specifier.
>
> Changes:
> - The parsing for the explicit(bool) specifier was added in ParseDecl.cpp.
> - The storage of the explicit specifier was changed. the explicit specifier was stored as a boolean value in the FunctionDeclBitfields and in the DeclSpec class. now it is stored as a PointerIntPair<Expr*, 2> with a flag and a potential expression in CXXConstructorDecl, CXXDeductionGuideDecl, CXXConversionDecl and in the DeclSpec class.
> - Following the AST change, Serialization, ASTMatchers, ASTComparator and ASTPrinter were adapted.
> - Template instantiation was adapted to instantiate the potential expressions of the explicit(bool) specifier When instantiating their associated declaration.
> - The Add*Candidate functions were adapted, they now take a Boolean indicating if the context allowing explicit constructor or conversion function and this boolean is used to remove invalid overloads that required template instantiation to be detected.
> - Test for Semantic and Serialization were added.
>
> This patch is not yet complete. I still need to check that interaction with CTAD and deduction guides is correct. and add more tests for AST operations. But I wanted first feedback.
> Perhaps this patch should be spited in smaller patches, but making each patch testable as a standalone may be tricky.
>
> Patch by Tyker
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60934
llvm-svn: 360024
this patch adds support for the explicit bool specifier.
Changes:
- The parsing for the explicit(bool) specifier was added in ParseDecl.cpp.
- The storage of the explicit specifier was changed. the explicit specifier was stored as a boolean value in the FunctionDeclBitfields and in the DeclSpec class. now it is stored as a PointerIntPair<Expr*, 2> with a flag and a potential expression in CXXConstructorDecl, CXXDeductionGuideDecl, CXXConversionDecl and in the DeclSpec class.
- Following the AST change, Serialization, ASTMatchers, ASTComparator and ASTPrinter were adapted.
- Template instantiation was adapted to instantiate the potential expressions of the explicit(bool) specifier When instantiating their associated declaration.
- The Add*Candidate functions were adapted, they now take a Boolean indicating if the context allowing explicit constructor or conversion function and this boolean is used to remove invalid overloads that required template instantiation to be detected.
- Test for Semantic and Serialization were added.
This patch is not yet complete. I still need to check that interaction with CTAD and deduction guides is correct. and add more tests for AST operations. But I wanted first feedback.
Perhaps this patch should be spited in smaller patches, but making each patch testable as a standalone may be tricky.
Patch by Tyker
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60934
llvm-svn: 359949
const-qualified type is not implicitly given internal linkage. But a
variable template declared 'static' is.
This reinstates part of r359048, reverted in r359076.
llvm-svn: 359260
internal linkage entities.
Such constructs are ill-formed by [temp.explicit]p13. We make a special
exception to permit an invalid construct used by libc++ in some build
modes: its <valarray> header declares some functions with the
internal_linkage attribute and then (meaninglessly) provides explicit
instantiation declarations for them. Luckily, Clang happens to
effectively ignore the explicit instantiation declaration when
generating code in this case, and this change codifies that behavior.
This reinstates part of r359048, reverted in r359076. (The libc++ issue
triggering the rollback has been addressed.)
llvm-svn: 359259
The change breaks libc++ with the follwing error:
In file included from valarray:4:
.../include/c++/v1/valarray:1062:60: error: explicit instantiation declaration of 'valarray<_Tp>' with internal linkage
_LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE(_LIBCPP_FUNC_VIS valarray<size_t>::valarray(size_t))
^
.../include/c++/v1/valarray:1063:60: error: explicit instantiation declaration of '~valarray<_Tp>' with internal linkage
_LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE(_LIBCPP_FUNC_VIS valarray<size_t>::~valarray())
llvm-svn: 359076
CWG 1691 changed the definition of the namespaces associated with a class
type or enumeration type.
For a class type, the associated namespaces are the innermost enclosing
namespaces of the associated classes. For an enumeration type, the associated
namespace is the innermost enclosing namespace of its declaration.
This also fixes CWG 1690 and CWG 1692.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60573
Reviewed By: rjmccall, rsmith
llvm-svn: 358882
The goal here is to exercise each rule in [basic.lookup.argdep] at least once.
These new tests expose what I believe are 2 issues:
1. CWG 1691 needs to be implemented (p2: [...] Its associated namespaces are
the innermost enclosing namespaces of its associated classes [...]) The
corresponding tests are adl_class_type::X2 and adl_class_type::X5.
2. The end of paragraph 2 ([...] Additionally, if the aforementioned set of
overloaded functions is named with a template-id, its associated classes
and namespaces also include those of its type template-arguments and its
template template-arguments.) is not implemented. Closely related, the
restriction on non-dependent parameter types in this same paragraph needs
to be removed. The corresponding tests are in adl_overload_set (both issues
are from CWG 997).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60570
Reviewed By: riccibruno, Quuxplusone
llvm-svn: 358881
global module fragment.
We know that the declaration in question should have been introduced by
a '#include', so try to figure out which one and suggest it. Don't
suggest importing the global module fragment itself!
llvm-svn: 358631
and the global and private module fragment.
For now, the private module fragment introducer is ignored, but use of
the global module fragment introducer should be properly enforced.
llvm-svn: 358353
When a template-name is looked up, we need to give injected-class-name
declarations of class templates special treatment, as they denote a
template rather than a type.
Previously we achieved this by applying a filter to the lookup results
after completing name lookup, but that is incorrect in various ways, not
least of which is that it lost all information about access and how
members were named, and the filtering caused us to generally lose
all ambiguity errors between templates and non-templates.
We now preserve the lookup results exactly, and the few places that need
to map from a declaration found by name lookup into a declaration of a
template do so explicitly. Deduplication of repeated lookup results of
the same injected-class-name declaration is done by name lookup instead
of after the fact.
This reinstates r354091, which was previously reverted in r354097
because it exposed bugs in lldb and compiler-rt. Those bugs were fixed
in r354173 and r354174 respectively.
llvm-svn: 354176
When a template-name is looked up, we need to give injected-class-name
declarations of class templates special treatment, as they denote a
template rather than a type.
Previously we achieved this by applying a filter to the lookup results
after completing name lookup, but that is incorrect in various ways, not
least of which is that it lost all information about access and how
members were named, and the filtering caused us to generally lose
all ambiguity errors between templates and non-templates.
We now preserve the lookup results exactly, and the few places that need
to map from a declaration found by name lookup into a declaration of a
template do so explicitly. Deduplication of repeated lookup results of
the same injected-class-name declaration is done by name lookup instead
of after the fact.
llvm-svn: 354091
member enum and then its enclosing class.
There are situations where ADL will collect a class but not the complete
set of associated classes / namespaces of that class. When that
happened, and we later tried to collect those associated classes /
namespaces, we would previously short-circuit the lookup and not find
them. Eg, for:
struct A : B { enum E; };
if we first looked for associated classes/namespaces of A::E, we'd find
only A. But if we then tried to also collect associated
classes/namespaces of A (which should include the base class B), we
would not add B because we had already visited A.
This also fixes a minor issue where we would fail to collect associated
classes from an overloaded class member access expression naming a
static member function.
llvm-svn: 351382
template specialization if there is no matching non-template function.
This exposed a couple of related bugs:
- we would sometimes substitute into a friend template instead of a
suitable non-friend declaration; this would now crash because we'd
decide the specialization of the friend is a redeclaration of itself
- ADL failed to properly handle the case where an invisible local
extern declaration redeclares an invisible friend
Both are fixed herein: in particular, we now never make invisible
friends or local extern declarations visible to name lookup unless
they are the only declaration of the entity. (We already mostly did
this for local extern declarations.)
llvm-svn: 350505
Rather than sprinkle calls to DiagnoseUnusedExprResult() around in places where we want diagnostics, we now diagnose unused expression statements and full expressions in a more generic way when acting on the final expression statement. This results in more appropriate diagnostics for [[nodiscard]] where we were previously lacking them, such as when the body of a for loop is not a compound statement.
This patch fixes PR39837.
llvm-svn: 350404
When a function returns a type and that type was declared [[nodiscard]], we diagnose any unused results from that call as though the function were marked nodiscard. The same behavior should apply to calls through a function pointer.
This addresses PR31526.
llvm-svn: 350317
functions that are unavailable on Darwin are explicitly called or called
from deleting destructors.
rdar://problem/40736230
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47757
llvm-svn: 349890
Implement support for try-catch blocks in constexpr functions, as
proposed in http://wg21.link/P1002 and voted in San Diego for c++20.
The idea is that we can still never throw inside constexpr, so the catch
block is never entered. A try-catch block like this:
try { f(); } catch (...) { }
is then morally equivalent to just
{ f(); }
Same idea should apply for function/constructor try blocks.
rdar://problem/45530773
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55097
llvm-svn: 348789
This exposes a (known) CodeGen bug: it can't cope with emitting lvalue
expressions that denote non-odr-used but usable-in-constant-expression
variables. See PR39528 for a testcase.
Reverted for now until that issue can be fixed.
llvm-svn: 346065
nullptr_t does not access memory.
We now reuse CK_NullToPointer to represent a conversion from a glvalue
of type nullptr_t to a prvalue of nullptr_t where necessary.
llvm-svn: 345562
Summary:
This change rejects the shadowing of a capture by a parameter in lambdas in C++17.
```
int main() {
int a;
auto f = [a](int a) { return a; };
}
```
results in:
```
main.cpp:3:20: error: a lambda parameter cannot shadow an explicitly captured entity
auto f = [a](int a) { return a; };
^
main.cpp:3:13: note: variable a is explicitly captured here
auto f = [a](int a) { return a; };
^
```
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, erik.pilkington, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53595
llvm-svn: 345308
Rather, they are subexpressions of the enclosing lambda-expression, and
any temporaries in them are destroyed at the end of that
full-expression, or when the corresponding lambda-expression is
destroyed if they are lifetime-extended.
llvm-svn: 344801
This reverts commit https://reviews.llvm.org/rL344150 which causes
MachineOutliner related failures on the ppc64le multistage buildbot.
llvm-svn: 344526
This is currently a clang extension and a resolution
of the defect report in the C++ Standard.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46441
llvm-svn: 344150
render the function deleted instead of rendering the program ill-formed.
This change also adds an enabled-by-default warning for the case where
an explicitly-defaulted special member function of a non-template class
is implicitly deleted by the type checking rules. (This fires either due
to this language change or due to pre-C++20 reasons for the member being
implicitly deleted). I've tested this on a large codebase and found only
bugs (where the program means something that's clearly different from
what the programmer intended), so this is enabled by default, but we
should revisit this if there are problems with this being enabled by
default.
llvm-svn: 343285
triggers instantiation of constexpr functions.
We mostly implemented this since Clang 6, but missed the template
instantiation case.
We do not implement the '&cast-expression' special case. It appears to
be a mistake / oversight. I've mailed CWG to see if we can remove it.
llvm-svn: 343064
for loop if both members exist.
This resolves a DR whereby an errant 'begin' or 'end' member in a base
class could result in a derived class not being usable as a range with
non-member 'begin' and 'end'.
llvm-svn: 342925
A lambda's closure is initialized when the lambda is declared. For
implicit captures, the initialization code emitted from EmitLambdaExpr
references source locations *within the lambda body* in the function
containing the lambda. This results in a poor debugging experience: we
step to the line containing the lambda, then into lambda, out again,
over and over, until every capture's field is initialized.
To improve stepping behavior, assign the starting location of the lambda
to expressions which initialize an implicit capture within it.
rdar://39807527
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50927
llvm-svn: 342194
destructors.
We previously tried to patch up the exception specification after
completing the class, which went wrong when the exception specification
was needed within the class body (in particular, by a friend
redeclaration of the destructor in a nested class). We now mark the
destructor as having a not-yet-computed exception specification
immediately after creating it.
This requires delaying various checks against the exception
specification (where we'd previously have just got the wrong exception
specification, and now find we have an exception specification that we
can't compute yet) when those checks fire while the class is being
defined.
This also exposed an issue that we were missing a CodeSynthesisContext
for computation of exception specifications (otherwise we'd fail to make
the module containing the definition of the class visible when computing
its members' exception specs). Adding that incidentally also gives us a
diagnostic quality improvement.
This has also exposed an pre-existing problem: making the exception
specification evaluation context a non-SFINAE context (as it should be)
results in a bootstrap failure; PR38850 filed for this.
llvm-svn: 341499
Given 'typename T typename U', we would correctly diagnose the missing
comma, but incorrectly disambiguate the first parameter as being a
non-type parameter and complain that the 'T' is not a qualified-id.
See also gcc.gnu.org/PR86998.
llvm-svn: 340074
in some member function calls.
Specifically, when calling a conversion function, we would fail to
create the AST node representing materialization of the class object.
llvm-svn: 338135
Previously, clang marked the specialization as invalid without emitting a
diagnostic. This lead to an assert in CodeGen.
rdar://41806724
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49085
llvm-svn: 337497
qualifiers from all levels matching a multidimensional array.
For example, this allows casting from
pointer to array of array of const volatile int
to
pointer to const pointer to volatile pointer to int
because the multidimensional array part of the source type corresponds
to a part of the destination type that contains both 'const' and
'volatile'.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49457
llvm-svn: 337422
This change implements C++ DR1696, which makes initialization of a
reference member of a class from a temporary object ill-formed. The
standard wording here is imprecise, but we interpret it as meaning that
any time a mem-initializer would result in lifetime extension, the
program is ill-formed.
This reinstates r337226, reverted in r337255, with a fix for the
InitializedEntity alignment problem that was breaking ARM buildbots.
llvm-svn: 337329
This change breaks on ARM because pointers to clang::InitializedEntity are only
4 byte aligned and do not have 3 bits to store values. A possible solution
would be to change the fields in clang::InitializedEntity to enforce a bigger
alignment requirement.
The error message is
llvm/include/llvm/ADT/PointerIntPair.h:132:3: error: static_assert failed "PointerIntPair with integer size too large for pointer"
static_assert(IntBits <= PtrTraits::NumLowBitsAvailable,
include/llvm/ADT/PointerIntPair.h:73:13: note: in instantiation of template class 'llvm::PointerIntPairInfo<const clang::InitializedEntity *, 3, llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<const clang::InitializedEntity *> >' requested here
Value = Info::updateInt(Info::updatePointer(0, PtrVal),
llvm/include/llvm/ADT/PointerIntPair.h:51:5: note: in instantiation of member function 'llvm::PointerIntPair<const clang::InitializedEntity *, 3, (anonymous namespace)::LifetimeKind, llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<const clang::InitializedEntity *>, llvm::PointerIntPairInfo<const clang::InitializedEntity *, 3, llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<const clang::InitializedEntity *> > >::setPointerAndInt' requested here
setPointerAndInt(PtrVal, IntVal);
^
llvm/tools/clang/lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp:6237:12: note: in instantiation of member function 'llvm::PointerIntPair<const clang::InitializedEntity *, 3, (anonymous namespace)::LifetimeKind, llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<const clang::InitializedEntity *>, llvm::PointerIntPairInfo<const clang::InitializedEntity *, 3, llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<const clang::InitializedEntity *> > >::PointerIntPair' requested here
return {Entity, LK_Extended};
Full log here:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv7-global-isel/builds/1330http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv7-full/builds/1394
llvm-svn: 337255
This change implements C++ DR1696, which makes initialization of a
reference member of a class from a temporary object ill-formed. The
standard wording here is imprecise, but we interpret it as meaning that
any time a mem-initializer would result in lifetime extension, the
program is ill-formed.
llvm-svn: 337226
function parameter packs.
This makes our handling of non-trailing function parameter packs
consistent between the case of deduction at the top level in a function
call and other cases where deduction encounters a non-trailing function
parameter pack.
Instead of treating a non-trailing pack and all later parameters as
being non-deduced, we treat a non-trailing pack as exactly matching
any explicitly-specified template arguments (or being an empty pack
if there are no such arguments). This corresponds to the "never deduced"
rule in [temp.deduct.call]p1, but generalized to all deduction contexts.
Non-trailing template argument packs still result in the entire
template argument list being treated as non-deduced, as specified in
[temp.deduct.type]p9.
llvm-svn: 336962
types.
We previously tried to use the "parameter is a reference" logic here,
but that doesn't work because it gets P and A backwards. Instead, add
a separate implementation of the "deduced A can be less qualified than
A" rule.
This also exposes that we incorrectly stripped cv-qualifiers from the
referent of A if it was a reference. However, if we don't do that, we
get the wrong results when P is a reference. In an attempt to match
what sanity dictates and what other implementations are doing, we now
remove cv-qualifiers from A and P unless both are reference types. I've
brought this up on the core reflector too, to try to get the standard
fixed.
llvm-svn: 336867
with another in template argument deduction.
We happened to typically get away with getting this wrong, because the
cases where we'd produce a bogus deduction were caught by the final
"deduced A is compatible with A" check.
llvm-svn: 336852
This allows more qualification conversions, eg. conversion from
'int *(*)[]' -> 'const int *const (*)[]'
is now permitted, along with all the consequences of that: more types
are similar, more cases are permitted by const_cast, and conversely,
fewer "casting away constness" cases are permitted by reinterpret_cast.
llvm-svn: 336745
The "casts away constness" check doesn't care at all how the different
layers of the source and destination type were formed: for example, if
the source is a pointer and the destination is a pointer-to-member, the
types are still decomposed and their pointee qualifications are still
checked.
This rule is bizarre and somewhat ridiculous, so as an extension we
accept code making use of such reinterpret_casts with a warning outside
of SFINAE contexts.
llvm-svn: 336738
buildbots.
On Windows targets, enums always get an underlying type of 'int', even
if they have wider enumerators. (This is non-conforming, but it's
effectively part of the target ABI.)
llvm-svn: 336013
not like bit-fields.
We used to get this right "by accident", because conversions for the
selected built-in overloaded operator would convert the enum bit-field
to its corresponding underlying type early. But after DR1687 that no
longer happens.
Technically this change should also apply to C, where bit-fields only
have special promotion rules if the bit-field's declared type is
_Bool, int, signed int, or unsigned int, but for GCC compatibility we
only look at the bit-width and not the underlying type when performing
bit-field integral promotions in C.
llvm-svn: 335925
conversions are only applied to operands of class type, and the second
standard conversion sequence is not applied.
When diagnosing an invalid builtin binary operator, talk about the
original types rather than the converted types. If these differ by a
user-defined conversion, tell the user what happened.
llvm-svn: 335781
members of dependent contexts.
This permits cases where the names before and after the '::' in a
dependent inherited constructor using-declaration do not match, but
where we can nonetheless tell when parsing the template that a
constructor is being named. Under (open) core language DR 2070, such
cases will probably be ill-formed, but r335182 does not quite give
that result and didn't intend to change this, so restore the old
behavior for now.
llvm-svn: 335381
Diagnose the name of the class being shadowed by using declarations, and
improve the diagnostics for the case where the name of the class is
shadowed by a non-static data member in a class with constructors. In
the latter case, we now always give the "member with the same name as
its class" diagnostic regardless of the relative order of the member and
the constructor, rather than giving an inscrutible diagnostic if the
constructor appears second.
llvm-svn: 335182
Summary:
This patch adds the newly added `%sub` diagnostic modifier to cleanup repetition in the overload candidate diagnostics.
I think this should be good to go.
@rsmith: Some of the notes now emit `function template` where they only said `function` previously. It seems OK to me, but I would like your sign off on it.
Reviewers: rsmith, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits, rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47101
llvm-svn: 333485
If the name after 'template' is an unresolved using declaration (not containing
'typename'), then we don't yet know if it's a valid template-name, so don't
reject it prior to instantiation. Instead, treat it as naming a dependent
member of the current instantiation.
llvm-svn: 332291
For 'x::template y', consistently give a "no member named 'y' in 'x'"
diagnostic if there is no such member, and give a 'template keyword not
followed by a template' name error if there is such a member but it's not a
template. In the latter case, add a note pointing at the non-template.
Don't suggest inserting a 'template' keyword in 'X::Y<' if X is dependent
if the lookup of X::Y was actually not a dependent lookup and found only
non-templates.
llvm-svn: 332076
template arguments.
This fixes some cases where we'd incorrectly accept "A::template B" when B is a
kind of template that requires template arguments (in particular, a variable
template or a concept).
llvm-svn: 331013
Found via codespell -q 3 -I ../clang-whitelist.txt
Where whitelist consists of:
archtype
cas
classs
checkk
compres
definit
frome
iff
inteval
ith
lod
methode
nd
optin
ot
pres
statics
te
thru
Patch by luzpaz! (This is a subset of D44188 that applies cleanly with a few
files that have dubious fixes reverted.)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44188
llvm-svn: 329399
layout" rules.
The new rules say that a standard-layout struct has its first non-static
data member and all base classes at offset 0, and consider a class to
not be standard-layout if that would result in multiple subobjects of a
single type having the same address.
We track "is C++11 standard-layout class" separately from "is
standard-layout class" so that the ABIs that need this information can
still use it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45176
llvm-svn: 329332
Richard Smith