Summary:
This patch addresses https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46256
The spec of coroutine requires that the expression co_await promise.final_suspend() shall not be potentially-throwing.
To check this, we recursively look at every call (including Call, MemberCall, OperatorCall and Constructor) in all code
generated by the final suspend, and ensure that the callees are declared with noexcept. We also look at any returned data
type that requires explicit destruction, and check their destructors for noexcept.
This patch does not check declarations with dependent types yet, which will be done in future patches.
Updated all tests to add noexcept to the required functions, and added a dedicated test for this patch.
This patch might start to cause existing codebase fail to compile because most people may not have been strict in tagging
all the related functions noexcept.
Reviewers: lewissbaker, modocache, junparser
Reviewed By: modocache
Subscribers: arphaman, junparser, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82029
If we're going to assume references are dereferenceable, we should also
assume they're aligned: otherwise, we can't actually dereference them.
See also D80072.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80166
For consistency with normal instructions and clarity when reading IR,
it's best to print the %0, %1, ... names of function arguments in
definitions.
Also modifies the parser to accept IR in that form for obvious reasons.
llvm-svn: 367755
Summary:
If await_suspend returns a coroutine_handle, as in the example below:
```
coroutine_handle<> await_suspend(coroutine_handle<> h) {
coro.promise().waiter = h;
return coro;
}
```
suspensionExpression processing will resume the coroutine pointed at by that handle.
Related LLVM change rL311751 makes resume calls of this kind `musttail` at any optimization level.
This enables unlimited symmetric control transfer from coroutine to coroutine without blowing up the stack.
Reviewers: GorNishanov
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: rsmith, EricWF, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37131
llvm-svn: 311762
Summary:
The title says it all.
Reviewers: GorNishanov, rsmith
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: rjmccall, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34194
llvm-svn: 305496
SemaCoroutine forms expressions referring to the coroutine frame of the enclosing coroutine using coro.frame builtin.
During codegen, we emit llvm.coro.begin intrinsic that returns the address of the coroutine frame.
When coro.frame is emitted, we replace it with SSA value of coro.begin.
llvm-svn: 303598
Details:
Emit suspend expression which roughly looks like:
auto && x = CommonExpr();
if (!x.await_ready()) {
llvm_coro_save();
x.await_suspend(...); (*)
llvm_coro_suspend(); (**)
}
x.await_resume();
where the result of the entire expression is the result of x.await_resume()
(*) If x.await_suspend return type is bool, it allows to veto a suspend:
if (x.await_suspend(...))
llvm_coro_suspend();
(**) llvm_coro_suspend() encodes three possible continuations as a switch instruction:
%where-to = call i8 @llvm.coro.suspend(...)
switch i8 %where-to, label %coro.ret [ ; jump to epilogue to suspend
i8 0, label %yield.ready ; go here when resumed
i8 1, label %yield.cleanup ; go here when destroyed
]
llvm-svn: 298784
Xun Li