The Swift symbol name prefix has changed from `_T0` to `_$s` as
documented here [1]. This prevents Swift names from properly being
symbolicated when using the in-process LLVM symbolizer. The best way to
fix this seems to be to avoid the duplication of "Is this a Swift symbol
name?" here. We can simply remove this check as `swift_demangle`
already returns null for non-Swift names [2,3].
The check was included in the initial support for Swift name demangling
to avoid superfluous calls to `dlsym()` [4]. A subsequent commit
changed this logic to retrieve the `swift_demangle` function pointer
eagerly during sanitizer initialization, but did not remove the check
[5].
[1] https://github.com/apple/swift/blob/master/docs/ABI/Mangling.rst
[2] b5a8b518ea/include/swift/Demangling/Demangle.h (L643)
[3] b5a8b518ea/stdlib/public/runtime/Demangle.cpp (L656)
[4] https://reviews.llvm.org/D19135
[5] https://reviews.llvm.org/D20015
rdar://62753845
Reviewers: kubamracek, delcypher, dcoughlin, samsonov, thakis
Reviewed By: kubamracek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81705
Summary:
Currently, there is no way to let the `InternalSymbolizer` implemented
functions know if inline frames should be symbolized. This patch updates
the function `__sanitizer_symbolize_code` to include a parameter for
this ASAN option and toggle between LLVM symbolization functions when
appropriate.
Fixes the following two failing tests when internal symbolization is
enabled:
```
SanitizerCommon-*-x86_64-Linux :: print-stack-trace.cpp
SanitizerCommon-*-x86_64-Linux :: symbolize_pc_inline.cpp
```
Reviewers: vitalybuka, kcc, filcab
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Subscribers: #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79280
Summary:
This is implemented by adding a `Symbolizer::LateInitializeTools()`
method that iterates over the registered tools and calls the
`LateInitialize()` method on them.
`Symbolizer::LateInitializeTools()` is now called from the various
`Symbolizer::LateInitialize()` implementations.
The default implementation of `SymbolizerTool::LateInitialize()`
does nothing so this change should be NFC.
This change allows `SymbolizerTool` implementations to perform
any initialization that they need to perform at the
LateInitialize stage of a sanitizer runtime init.
rdar://problem/58789439
Reviewers: kubamracek, yln, vitalybuka, cryptoad, phosek, rnk
Subscribers: #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78178
Summary:
In preparation for writing a test for a bug fix we need to be able to
see the command used to launch the symbolizer process. This feature
will likely be useful for debugging how the Sanitizers use the
symbolizer in general.
This patch causes the command line used to launch the process to be
shown at verbosity level 3 and higher.
A small test case is included.
Reviewers: kubamracek, yln, vitalybuka, eugenis, kcc
Subscribers: #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77622
Summary:
This change introduces the `Symbolizer::GetEnvP()` method that returns a
pointer to environment array used for spawning the symbolizer process.
The motivation is to allow implementations to customise the environment
if required. The default implementation just returns
`__sanitizer::GetEnviron()` which (provided it's implemented) should
preserve the existing behaviours of the various implementations.
This change has been plumbed through the `internal_spawn(...)` and
`StartSubprocess(...)` process spawning implementations.
For the `StartSubprocess()` implementation we need to call `execve()`
rather than `execv()` to pass the environment. However, it appears that
`internal_execve(...)` exists in sanitizer_common so this patch use that
which seems like a nice clean up.
Support in the Windows implementation of
`SymbolizerProcess:StartSymbolizerSubprocess()` has not been added
because the Windows sanitizer runtime doesn't implement `GetEnviron()`.
rdar://problem/58789439
Reviewers: kubamracek, yln, dvyukov, vitalybuka, eugenis, phosek, aizatsky, rnk
Subscribers: #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76666
On Darwin, we currently use forkpty to communicate with the "atos"
symbolizer. There are several problems that fork[pty] has, e.g. that
after fork, interceptors are still active and this sometimes causes
crashes or hangs. This is especially problematic for TSan, which uses
interceptors for OS-provided locks and mutexes, and even Libc functions
use those.
This patch replaces forkpty with posix_spawn on Darwin. Since
posix_spawn doesn't fork (at least on Darwin), the interceptors are not
a problem. Another benefit is that we'll handle post-fork failures (e.g.
sandbox disallows "exec") gracefully now.
Related revisions and previous attempts that were blocked by or had to
be revered due to test failures:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D48451https://reviews.llvm.org/D40032
Reviewed By: kubamracek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65253
llvm-svn: 368947
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D58620 for discussion, and for the commands
I ran. In addition I also ran
for f in $(svn diff | diffstat | grep .cc | cut -f 2 -d ' '); do rg $f . ; done
and manually updated (many) references to renamed files found by that.
llvm-svn: 367463
Julian Lettner