to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
Write out records about logged function call first arguments. D32840
implements the reading of this in llvm-xray.
Reviewers: dberris
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32844
llvm-svn: 314378
Summary:
This change exercises the end-to-end functionality defined in the FDR
logging implementation. We also prepare for being able to run traces
generated by the FDR logging implementation from being analysed with the
llvm-xray command that comes with the LLVM distribution.
This also unblocks D31385, D31384, and D31345.
Reviewers: kpw, pelikan
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31452
llvm-svn: 298977
Summary:
Separated the IO and the thread local storage state machine of logging
from the writing of log records once the contents are deterministic.
Finer granularity functions are provided as inline functions in the same
header such that stack does not grow due to the functions being separated.
An executable utility xray_fdr_log_printer is also implemented to use the
finest granularity functions to produce binary test data in the FDR format
with a relatively convenient text input.
For example, one can take a file with textual contents layed out in rows
and feed it to the binary to generate data that llvm-xray convert can then
read. This is a convenient way to build a test suite for llvm-xray convert
to ensure it's robust to the fdr format.
Example:
$cat myFile.txt
NewBuffer : { time = 2 , Tid=5}
NewCPU : { CPU =1 , TSC = 123}
Function : { FuncId = 5, TSCDelta = 3, EntryType = Entry }
Function : { FuncId = 5, TSCDelta = 5, EntryType = Exit}
TSCWrap : { TSC = 678 }
Function : { FuncId = 6, TSCDelta = 0, EntryType = Entry }
Function : { FuncId = 6, TSCDelta = 50, EntryType = Exit }
EOB : { }
$cat myFile.txt | ./bin/xray_fdr_log_printer > /tmp/binarydata.bin
$./bin/llvm-xray convert -output-format=yaml -output=- /tmp/binarydata.bin
yaml format comes out as expected.
Reviewers: dberris, pelikan
Reviewed By: dberris
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30850
llvm-svn: 297801
Summary:
As pointed out in casual reading of the XRay codebase, that we had
some interesting named functions that didn't quite follow the LLVM coding
conventions.
Reviewers: chandlerc, dblaikie
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29625
llvm-svn: 294373
Summary:
In this change we introduce the notion of a "flight data recorder" mode
for XRay logging, where XRay logs in-memory first, and write out data
on-demand as required (as opposed to the naive implementation that keeps
logging while tracing is "on"). This depends on D26232 where we
implement the core data structure for holding the buffers that threads
will be using to write out records of operation.
This implementation only currently works on x86_64 and depends heavily
on the TSC math to write out smaller records to the inmemory buffers.
Also, this implementation defines two different kinds of records with
different sizes (compared to the current naive implementation): a
MetadataRecord (16 bytes) and a FunctionRecord (8 bytes). MetadataRecord
entries are meant to write out information like the thread ID for which
the metadata record is defined for, whether the execution of a thread
moved to a different CPU, etc. while a FunctionRecord represents the
different kinds of function call entry/exit records we might encounter
in the course of a thread's execution along with a delta from the last
time the logging handler was called.
While this implementation is not exactly what is described in the
original XRay whitepaper, this one gives us an initial implementation
that we can iterate and build upon.
Reviewers: echristo, rSerge, majnemer
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27038
llvm-svn: 293015
Summary:
In this change we introduce the notion of a "flight data recorder" mode
for XRay logging, where XRay logs in-memory first, and write out data
on-demand as required (as opposed to the naive implementation that keeps
logging while tracing is "on"). This depends on D26232 where we
implement the core data structure for holding the buffers that threads
will be using to write out records of operation.
This implementation only currently works on x86_64 and depends heavily
on the TSC math to write out smaller records to the inmemory buffers.
Also, this implementation defines two different kinds of records with
different sizes (compared to the current naive implementation): a
MetadataRecord (16 bytes) and a FunctionRecord (8 bytes). MetadataRecord
entries are meant to write out information like the thread ID for which
the metadata record is defined for, whether the execution of a thread
moved to a different CPU, etc. while a FunctionRecord represents the
different kinds of function call entry/exit records we might encounter
in the course of a thread's execution along with a delta from the last
time the logging handler was called.
While this implementation is not exactly what is described in the
original XRay whitepaper, this one gives us an initial implementation
that we can iterate and build upon.
Reviewers: echristo, rSerge, majnemer
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27038
llvm-svn: 290852
Chandler Carruth