We saw a crash recently (rdar://problem/65276489) that looks related to an invalid ValueObjectSP in a summary providers in Cocoa.cpp e.g. NSBundleSummaryProvider(...).
This adds checks before we use them usually by calling NSStringSummaryProvider.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84272
Summary:
Certain `NSDate` constructors return a special `NSConstantDate` class which
currently ends up being unformatted as it's not in the list of supported classes
for the NSDate formatter. This patch adds that class to the supported class list
so LLDB produces a summary for it.
One of these special constructors is `[NSDate distantPast]` which returns the
date for `0001-01-01 00:00:00 UTC`. LLDB has a special case for formatting this
date but for some reason we did hardcode the wrong summary string in that
special case. Maybe the summary string was correct back when the code was
written but it isn't correct anymore (`distantPast` isn't actually defined to be
a special date but just some 'a guaranteed temporal boundary.' so maybe someone
changed the value in the last 10 years).
If someone else is wondering why we even have this special case for
`distantPast` but not for the future. The reason seems to be that our date
formatting for really old dates is off by 24 hours. So for example, adding one
second to `distantPast` will cause LLDB to print `0000-12-30 00:00:01 UTC`
(which is 24 hours behind the expected result). So to make our code appear to be
correct it seems we just hardcoded the most common NSDate result from that time
span. I'll replace that logic with a generic solution in a probably more
invasive follow up patch.
I also took the freedom to replace the magic value `-63114076800` with some
constant + documentation. I heard there are some people that don't know from the
top of their head that there are 63114076800 seconds between 1. Jan 0001 and 1.
January 2001 in whatever calendar system NSDate is using.
Reviewers: mib, davide
Reviewed By: mib
Subscribers: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83217
Summary:
When printing an NSDate (for example with `NSLog` or `po`) the seconds value is
always rounded down. LLDB's own formatter however isn't following that behaviour
which leads to situations where the formatted result is sometimes one second
off. For example:
```
(lldb) p [NSDate dateWithTimeIntervalSince1970:0.1]
(__NSTaggedDate *) $1 = [...] 1970-01-01 00:00:01 UTC
(lldb) po [NSDate dateWithTimeIntervalSince1970:0.1]
1970-01-01 00:00:00 +0000
(lldb) p [NSDate dateWithTimeIntervalSince1970:0.6]
(__NSTaggedDate *) $4 =[...] 1970-01-01 00:00:01 UTC
(lldb) po [NSDate dateWithTimeIntervalSince1970:0.6]
1970-01-01 00:00:00 +0000
```
This patch just always rounds down the seconds value we get from the NSDate
object.
Fixes rdar://65084800
Reviewers: mib, davide
Reviewed By: mib
Subscribers: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83221
The formatter was requesting an unsigned integer from the ValueObject,
but CFAbsoluteTime is a signed double, so in the NSDate test the formatter
actually just printed the 'error value' date which is the Cocoa epoch. This
started failing after the recent Scalar changes.
This patch just changes the logic to use a signed value which fits to the data
we try to read and avoids this issue.
This reverts commit b783f70a42. This
change had multiple issues which required post-commit fixups, and not
all issues are fixed yet. In particular, the LLDB build bot for ARM is
still broken. There is also an ongoing conversation in the original
phabricator review about whether there is undefined behavior in the
code.
This addresses some post-commit review feedback from
https://reviews.llvm.org/D80150 by renaming "Mock.h" to something less
misleading, and keeping logic related to the ObjC plugin separate from
the generic DataFormatters library.
Summary:
Fixes UBSan-reported issues where the date value inside of an
uninitialized NSDate overflows the 64-bit epoch.
rdar://61774575
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, mib, teemperor
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80150
This patch improves data formatting for CFDictionaryRef and CFSetRef.
It uses the same data-formatter as NSCFDictionaries and NSCFSets introduced
previously but did require some adjustments in Core::ValueObject.
Since the "Ref" types are opaque pointers to the actual CF containers, if the
value object has a synthetic value, lldb will use the opaque pointer's pointee
type to create the new ValueObjectChild needed to dereference the ValueObject.
This allows the "Ref" types to behaves the same as CF containers when used with
the `frame variable` command, the SBAPI or in Xcode's variable inspector.
This patch also adds support for incomplete types in ValueObject.
rdar://53104287
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79554
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
Summary:
Languages can have different ways of formatting special characters.
E.g. when debugging C++ code a string might look like "\b", but when
debugging Swift code the same string would look like "\u{8}".
To make this work, plugins override GetStringPrinterEscapingHelper.
However, because there's a large amount of subtly divergent work done in
each override, we end up with large amounts of duplicated code. And all
the memory smashers fixed in one copy of the logic (see D73860) don't
get fixed in the others.
IMO the GetStringPrinterEscapingHelper is overly general and hard to
use. I propose deleting it and replacing it with an EscapeStyle enum,
which can be set as needed by each plugin.
A fix for some swift-lldb memory smashers falls out fairly naturally
from this deletion (https://github.com/apple/llvm-project/pull/1046). As
the swift logic becomes really tiny, I propose moving it upstream as
part of this change. I've added unit tests to cover it.
rdar://61419673
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, davide
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77843
This patch improves data formatting for CoreFoundation containers:
CFDictionary and CFSet.
These data formatters make the containers and their children appear in Xcode's
variables view (and on the command line) without having to expand the
data structure.
Previous implementation only supported showing the container's element count.
```
(lldb) frame var dict
(__NSCFDictionary *) dict = 0x00000001004062b0 2 key/value pairs
(lldb) frame var set
(__NSCFSet *) set = 0x0000000100406330 2 elements
```
Now the variable can be dereferenced to dispaly the container's children:
```
(lldb) frame var *dict
(__NSCFDictionary) *dict = {
[0] = {
key = 0x0000000100004050 @"123"
value = 0x0000000100004090 @"456"
}
[1] = {
key = 0x0000000100004030 @"abc"
value = 0x0000000100004070 @"def"
}
}
(lldb) frame var *set
(__NSCFSet) *set = {
[0] = 0x0000000100004050 @"123"
[1] = 0x0000000100004030 @"abc"
}
```
rdar://39882287
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78396
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
Types that came from a Clang module are nested in DW_TAG_module tags
in DWARF. This patch recreates the Clang module hierarchy in LLDB and
1;95;0csets the owning module information accordingly. My primary motivation
is to facilitate looking up per-module APINotes for individual
declarations, but this likely also has other applications.
This reapplies the previously reverted commit, but without support for
ClassTemplateSpecializations, which I'm going to look into separately.
rdar://problem/59634380
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75488
Types that came from a Clang module are nested in DW_TAG_module tags
in DWARF. This patch recreates the Clang module hierarchy in LLDB and
sets the owning module information accordingly. My primary motivation
is to facilitate looking up per-module APINotes for individual
declarations, but this likely also has other applications.
rdar://problem/59634380
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75488
(This is D68010 but I also set the new parameter in LibStdcpp.cpp to fix
the Debian tests).
Summary:
Printing a summary for an empty NSPathStore2 string currently prints random bytes behind the empty string pointer from memory (rdar://55575888).
It seems the reason for this is that the SourceSize parameter in the `ReadStringAndDumpToStreamOptions` - which is supposed to contain the string
length - actually uses the length 0 as a magic value for saying "read as much as possible from the buffer" which is clearly wrong for empty strings.
This patch adds another flag that indicates if we have know the string length or not and makes this behaviour dependent on that (which seemingly
was the original purpose of this magic value).
Reviewers: aprantl, JDevlieghere, shafik
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: christof, abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68010
This reverts commit 939ca455e7.
This failed on the debian bot for some reason:
File "/home/worker/lldb-x86_64-debian/lldb-x86_64-debian/llvm-project/lldb/test/API/functionalities/data-formatter/data-formatter-stl/libstdcpp/string/TestDataFormatterStdString.py", line 67, in test_with_run_command
"s summary wrong")
AssertionError: 'L"hello world! מזל טוב!\\0!\\0!!!!\\0\\0A\\0\\U0000fffd\\U0000fffd\\U0000fffd\\ [truncated]... != 'L"hello world! מזל טוב!"'
Diff is 2156 characters long. Set self.maxDiff to None to see it. : s summary wrong
Summary:
Printing a summary for an empty NSPathStore2 string currently prints random bytes behind the empty string pointer from memory (rdar://55575888).
It seems the reason for this is that the SourceSize parameter in the `ReadStringAndDumpToStreamOptions` - which is supposed to contain the string
length - actually uses the length 0 as a magic value for saying "read as much as possible from the buffer" which is clearly wrong for empty strings.
This patch adds another flag that indicates if we have know the string length or not and makes this behaviour dependent on that (which seemingly
was the original purpose of this magic value).
Reviewers: aprantl, JDevlieghere, shafik
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: christof, abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68010
LLDB has a few different styles of header guards and they're not very
consistent because things get moved around or copy/pasted. This patch
unifies the header guards across LLDB and converts everything to match
LLVM's style.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74743
This patch changes the way we initialize and terminate the plugins in
the system initializer. It uses an approach similar to LLVM's
TARGETS_TO_BUILD with a def file that enumerates the plugins.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73067
This is a step towards making the initialize and terminate calls be
generated by CMake, which in turn is towards making it possible to
disable plugins at configuration time.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74245
Summary:
This change represents the move of ClangASTImporter, ClangASTMetadata,
ClangExternalASTSourceCallbacks, ClangUtil, CxxModuleHandler, and
TypeSystemClang from lldbSource to lldbPluginExpressionParserClang.h
This explicitly removes knowledge of clang internals from lldbSymbol,
moving towards a more generic core implementation of lldb.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, davide, aprantl, teemperor, clayborg, labath, jingham, shafik
Subscribers: emaste, mgorny, arphaman, jfb, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73661
Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).
This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).
Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258
Summary:
This commit renames ClangASTContext to TypeSystemClang to better reflect what this class is actually supposed to do
(implement the TypeSystem interface for Clang). It also gets rid of the very confusing situation that we have both a
`clang::ASTContext` and a `ClangASTContext` in clang (which sometimes causes Clang people to think I'm fiddling
with Clang's ASTContext when I'm actually just doing LLDB work).
I also have plans to potentially have multiple clang::ASTContext instances associated with one ClangASTContext so
the ASTContext naming will then become even more confusing to people.
Reviewers: #lldb, aprantl, shafik, clayborg, labath, JDevlieghere, davide, espindola, jdoerfert, xiaobai
Reviewed By: clayborg, labath, xiaobai
Subscribers: wuzish, emaste, nemanjai, mgorny, kbarton, MaskRay, arphaman, jfb, usaxena95, jingham, xiaobai, abidh, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72684
LLDB frequently converts QualType to CompilerType. This is currently done like this:
result = CompilerType(this, qual_type_var.getAsOpaquePtr())
There are a few shortcomings in this current approach:
1. CompilerType's constructor takes a void* pointer so it isn't type safe.
2. We can't add any sanity checks to the CompilerType constructor (e.g. that the type
actually belongs to the passed ClangASTContext) without expanding the TypeSystem API.
3. The logic for converting QualType->CompilerType is spread out over all of LLDB so
changing it is difficult (e.g., what if we want to just pass the type ptr and not the
1type_ptr | qual_flags1 to CompilerType).
This patch adds a `ClangASTContext::GetType` function similar to the other GetTypeForDecl
functions that does this conversion in a type safe way.
It also adds a sanity check for Tag-based types that the type actually belongs to the
current ClangASTContext (Types don't seem to know their ASTContext, so we have to
workaround by looking at the decl for the underlying TagDecl. This doesn't cover all types
we construct but it's better than no sanity check).
ClangASTContext::getASTContext() currently returns a ptr but we have an assert there since a
while that the ASTContext is not a nullptr. This causes that we still have a lot of code
that is doing nullptr checks on the result of getASTContext() which is all unreachable code.
This patch changes the return value to a reference to make it clear this can't be a nullptr
and deletes all the nullptr checks.
Summary:
Right now, NSException::GetSummary() has the following output:
"name: $exception_name - reason: $exception_reason"
It would be better to simplify the output by removing the name and only
showing the exception's reason. This way, annotations would look nicer in
the editor, and would be a shorter summary in the Variables Inspector.
Accessing the exception's name can still be done by expanding the
NSException object in the Variables Inspector.
rdar://54770115
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71311
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
Target doesn't really need to know about ClangASTContext more than any
other TypeSystem. We can create a method ClangASTContext::GetScratch for
anything who needs a ClangASTContext specifically instead of just a
generic TypeSystem.
Remove hardcoded string prefix length assumption causing issues when
concatenating summary for NSURL in NSURLSummaryProvider. Provider relies
on concatenation of NSStringProvider results for summary, and while the
strings are prefixed with '@' in Objective-C, that is not the case in
Swift causing part of the description to be truncated.
This will be tested in the downstream fork.
Patch by Martin Svensson!
We call IsPossibleDynamicType but we also need to check if this is a Clang type,
otherwise other languages with dynamic types (like Swift) might end up being interpreted
as potential Obj-C dynamic types.
Link against clang-cpp dylib rather than split libs when
CLANG_LINK_CLANG_DYLIB is enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68456
llvm-svn: 373734
ClangASTContext doesn't use m_persistent_variables in a way specific to
ClangPersistentVariables. Therefore, it should hold a unique pointer to
PersistentExpressionState instead of a ClangPersistentVariablesUP.
This also prevents you from pulling in a plugin header when including
ClangASTContext.h
Doing this exposed an implicit dependency in ObjCLanguage that was
corrected by including ClangModulesDeclVendor.h
llvm-svn: 371470
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259
llvm-svn: 368933
Summary:
Ideally CompilerType would have no knowledge of clang or any individual
TypeSystem. Decoupling clang is relatively straightforward.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66102
llvm-svn: 368741
Summary:
This commit achieves the following:
- Functions used to return a `TypeSystem *` return an
`llvm::Expected<TypeSystem *>` now. This means that the result of a call
is always checked, forcing clients to move more carefully.
- `TypeSystemMap::GetTypeSystemForLanguage` will either return an Error or a
non-null pointer to a TypeSystem.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, davide, compnerd
Subscribers: jdoerfert, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65122
llvm-svn: 367360
Summary:
Following up to my CPPLanguageRuntime change, I'm moving
ObjCLanguageRuntime into a plugin as well.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, compnerd, jingham, clayborg
Subscribers: mgorny, arphaman, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64763
llvm-svn: 366148
Jonas Devlieghere