We saw a crash recently (rdar://problem/65276489) that looks related to an invalid ValueObjectSP in a summary providers in Cocoa.cpp e.g. NSBundleSummaryProvider(...).
This adds checks before we use them usually by calling NSStringSummaryProvider.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84272
Summary:
Certain `NSDate` constructors return a special `NSConstantDate` class which
currently ends up being unformatted as it's not in the list of supported classes
for the NSDate formatter. This patch adds that class to the supported class list
so LLDB produces a summary for it.
One of these special constructors is `[NSDate distantPast]` which returns the
date for `0001-01-01 00:00:00 UTC`. LLDB has a special case for formatting this
date but for some reason we did hardcode the wrong summary string in that
special case. Maybe the summary string was correct back when the code was
written but it isn't correct anymore (`distantPast` isn't actually defined to be
a special date but just some 'a guaranteed temporal boundary.' so maybe someone
changed the value in the last 10 years).
If someone else is wondering why we even have this special case for
`distantPast` but not for the future. The reason seems to be that our date
formatting for really old dates is off by 24 hours. So for example, adding one
second to `distantPast` will cause LLDB to print `0000-12-30 00:00:01 UTC`
(which is 24 hours behind the expected result). So to make our code appear to be
correct it seems we just hardcoded the most common NSDate result from that time
span. I'll replace that logic with a generic solution in a probably more
invasive follow up patch.
I also took the freedom to replace the magic value `-63114076800` with some
constant + documentation. I heard there are some people that don't know from the
top of their head that there are 63114076800 seconds between 1. Jan 0001 and 1.
January 2001 in whatever calendar system NSDate is using.
Reviewers: mib, davide
Reviewed By: mib
Subscribers: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83217
Summary:
When printing an NSDate (for example with `NSLog` or `po`) the seconds value is
always rounded down. LLDB's own formatter however isn't following that behaviour
which leads to situations where the formatted result is sometimes one second
off. For example:
```
(lldb) p [NSDate dateWithTimeIntervalSince1970:0.1]
(__NSTaggedDate *) $1 = [...] 1970-01-01 00:00:01 UTC
(lldb) po [NSDate dateWithTimeIntervalSince1970:0.1]
1970-01-01 00:00:00 +0000
(lldb) p [NSDate dateWithTimeIntervalSince1970:0.6]
(__NSTaggedDate *) $4 =[...] 1970-01-01 00:00:01 UTC
(lldb) po [NSDate dateWithTimeIntervalSince1970:0.6]
1970-01-01 00:00:00 +0000
```
This patch just always rounds down the seconds value we get from the NSDate
object.
Fixes rdar://65084800
Reviewers: mib, davide
Reviewed By: mib
Subscribers: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83221
This reverts commit b783f70a42. This
change had multiple issues which required post-commit fixups, and not
all issues are fixed yet. In particular, the LLDB build bot for ARM is
still broken. There is also an ongoing conversation in the original
phabricator review about whether there is undefined behavior in the
code.
This addresses some post-commit review feedback from
https://reviews.llvm.org/D80150 by renaming "Mock.h" to something less
misleading, and keeping logic related to the ObjC plugin separate from
the generic DataFormatters library.
Summary:
Fixes UBSan-reported issues where the date value inside of an
uninitialized NSDate overflows the 64-bit epoch.
rdar://61774575
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, mib, teemperor
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80150
Summary:
This change represents the move of ClangASTImporter, ClangASTMetadata,
ClangExternalASTSourceCallbacks, ClangUtil, CxxModuleHandler, and
TypeSystemClang from lldbSource to lldbPluginExpressionParserClang.h
This explicitly removes knowledge of clang internals from lldbSymbol,
moving towards a more generic core implementation of lldb.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, davide, aprantl, teemperor, clayborg, labath, jingham, shafik
Subscribers: emaste, mgorny, arphaman, jfb, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73661
Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).
This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).
Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258
Summary:
This commit renames ClangASTContext to TypeSystemClang to better reflect what this class is actually supposed to do
(implement the TypeSystem interface for Clang). It also gets rid of the very confusing situation that we have both a
`clang::ASTContext` and a `ClangASTContext` in clang (which sometimes causes Clang people to think I'm fiddling
with Clang's ASTContext when I'm actually just doing LLDB work).
I also have plans to potentially have multiple clang::ASTContext instances associated with one ClangASTContext so
the ASTContext naming will then become even more confusing to people.
Reviewers: #lldb, aprantl, shafik, clayborg, labath, JDevlieghere, davide, espindola, jdoerfert, xiaobai
Reviewed By: clayborg, labath, xiaobai
Subscribers: wuzish, emaste, nemanjai, mgorny, kbarton, MaskRay, arphaman, jfb, usaxena95, jingham, xiaobai, abidh, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72684
Remove hardcoded string prefix length assumption causing issues when
concatenating summary for NSURL in NSURLSummaryProvider. Provider relies
on concatenation of NSStringProvider results for summary, and while the
strings are prefixed with '@' in Objective-C, that is not the case in
Swift causing part of the description to be truncated.
This will be tested in the downstream fork.
Patch by Martin Svensson!
Summary:
Following up to my CPPLanguageRuntime change, I'm moving
ObjCLanguageRuntime into a plugin as well.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, compnerd, jingham, clayborg
Subscribers: mgorny, arphaman, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64763
llvm-svn: 366148
Summary:
In an effort to make Process more language agnostic, I removed
GetCPPLanguageRuntime from Process. I'm following up now with an equivalent
change for ObjC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63052
llvm-svn: 362981
Summary:
Using llvm-style rtti gives us stronger guarantees around casting
LanguageRuntimes.
As discussed in D62755
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62934
llvm-svn: 362884
My apologies for the large patch. With the exception of ConstString.h
itself it was entirely produced by sed.
ConstString has exactly one const char * data member, so passing a
ConstString by reference is not any more efficient than copying it by
value. In both cases a single pointer is passed. But passing it by
value makes it harder to accidentally return the address of a local
object.
(This fixes rdar://problem/48640859 for the Apple folks)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59030
llvm-svn: 355553
Type punning through a union -> no good.
double to uint64 to double again -> no good either.
The nice side effect, other than silencing the sanitizer bot
is that it fixes the formatting of some dates, e.g. Jan 1st 1970.
<rdar://problem/47617983>
llvm-svn: 353191
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This fixes two compilation failures:
1) Designated initializers are C++20. We can't use them in LLVM.
2) thread_result_t is not a pointer type on all platforms, so
returning nullptr is an error.
llvm-svn: 346873
error: implicit conversion from 'double' to 'uint64_t' (aka 'unsigned long') changes value from -0 to 0 [-Werror,-Wliteral-conversion]
llvm-svn: 346841
This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were
added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little
value, are often outdates and burdensome to maintain.
llvm-svn: 346626
This patch adds a data formatter for NSDecimalNumber. The latter is a
Foundation object used for representing and performing arithmetic on
base-10 numbers that bridges to Decimal.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48114
llvm-svn: 334638
This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit
(r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment
paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to read.
FYI, the script I used was:
import textwrap
import commands
import os
import sys
import re
tmp = "%s.tmp"%sys.argv[1]
out = open(tmp, "w+")
with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f:
header = ""
text = ""
comment = re.compile(r'^( *//) ([^ ].*)$')
special = re.compile(r'^((([A-Z]+[: ])|([0-9]+ )).*)|(.*;)$')
for line in f:
match = comment.match(line)
if match and not special.match(match.group(2)):
# skip intentionally short comments.
if not text and len(match.group(2)) < 40:
out.write(line)
continue
if text:
text += " " + match.group(2)
else:
header = match.group(1)
text = match.group(2)
continue
if text:
filled = textwrap.wrap(text, width=(78-len(header)),
break_long_words=False)
for l in filled:
out.write(header+" "+l+'\n')
text = ""
out.write(line)
os.rename(tmp, sys.argv[1])
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46144
llvm-svn: 331197
Summary:
Testing the value of type_code against the closed enum TypeCodes
provides statically verifiable completeness of testing. However, one
branch assigns to type_code by casting directly from a masked integer
value. This is currently handled by adding a default: case after
checking each TypeCodes instance. This patch introduces a bool variable
containing the "default" state value, allowing the switch to be
exhaustive, protect against future instances not being handled in the
switch, and preserves the original logic.
This addresses the warning:
warning: default label in switch which covers all enumeration values
[-Wcovered-switch-default]
As an issue of maintainability, the bitmask on line 524 handles the
current values of TypeCodes enum, but this will be invalid if the enum
is extended. This patch does not address this, and a more closed
conversion from cfinfoa -> TypeCodes would help protect against this.
Reviewers: spyffe, lhames, sas
Reviewed By: sas
Subscribers: sas, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35036
llvm-svn: 307712
This renames the LLDB error class to Status, as discussed
on the lldb-dev mailing list.
A change of this magnitude cannot easily be done without
find and replace, but that has potential to catch unwanted
occurrences of common strings such as "Error". Every effort
was made to find all the obvious things such as the word "Error"
appearing in a string, etc, but it's possible there are still
some lingering occurences left around. Hopefully nothing too
serious.
llvm-svn: 302872
With this patch, the only dependency left is from Utility
to Host. After this is broken, Utility will finally be
standalone.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29909
llvm-svn: 295088
This moves the following classes from Core -> Utility.
ConstString
Error
RegularExpression
Stream
StreamString
The goal here is to get lldbUtility into a state where it has
no dependendencies except on itself and LLVM, so it can be the
starting point at which to start untangling LLDB's dependencies.
These are all low level and very widely used classes, and
previously lldbUtility had dependencies up to lldbCore in order
to use these classes. So moving then down to lldbUtility makes
sense from both the short term and long term perspective in
solving this problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29427
llvm-svn: 293941
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
T x;
U y;
doing
x = *((T*)y)
is undefined behavior, even if sizeof(T) == sizeof(U), due to pointer aliasing rules
Fix up a couple of places in LLDB that were doing this, and transform them into a defined and safe memcpy() operation
Also, add a test case to ensure we didn't regress by doing this w.r.t. tagged pointer NSDate instances
llvm-svn: 270793
This can cause differences in which bit patterns end up meaning YES or NO. In general, however, 0 == NO and 1 == YES.
To keep it simple, LLDB will now show "YES" and "NO" only for 1 and 0 respectively, and format other values as the plain numeric value instead.
Fixes rdar://24809994
llvm-svn: 263604
shafik