Implement major improvements to multithreaded program support. Notably,
support tracking new and exited threads, associate signals and events
with correct threads and support controlling individual threads when
resuming.
Firstly, use PT_SET_EVENT_MASK to enable reporting of created and exited
threads via SIGTRAP. Handle TRAP_LWP events to keep track
of the currently running threads.
Secondly, update the signal (both generic and SIGTRAP) handling code
to account for per-thread signals correctly. Signals delivered
to the whole process are reported on all threads, while per-thread
signals and events are reported only to the specific thread.
The remaining threads are marked as 'stopped with no reason'. Note that
NetBSD always stops all threads on debugger events.
Thirdly, implement the ability to set every thread as running, stopped
or single-stepping separately while continuing the process. This also
provides the ability to send a signal to the whole process or to one
of its thread while resuming.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70022
D62502, together with D62503 have broken the builds which have XML
support enabled. Reverting D62503 (r364355) fixed that, but has broken
has left some of the tests introduced by D62502 broken more or less
nondeternimistically (it depended on whether the system happens to place
the library list near unreadable pages of memory). I attempted to make a
partial fix for this in r364748, but Jan Kratochvil pointed out that
this reintroduces the problem which reverting D62503 was trying to
solve.
So instead, I back out the whole thing so we can get back to a clean
slate that works for everyone. We can figure out a way forward from
there.
This reverts r364748, r363772 and r363707.
llvm-svn: 364751
Summary:
This is the fourth patch to improve module loading in a series that started here (where I explain the motivation and solution): D62499
Implement the `xfer:libraries-svr4` packet by adding a new function that generates the list and then in Handle_xfer I generate the XML for it. The XML is really simple so I'm just using string concatenation because I believe it's more readable than having to deal with a DOM api.
Reviewers: clayborg, xiaobai, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: emaste, mgorny, srhines, krytarowski, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62502
llvm-svn: 363707
A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.
Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the
lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are
omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit,
where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much.
Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks
particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the
impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment.
I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between
comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a
great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for
the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the
inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508
llvm-svn: 358135
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
This function existed (with identical code) in both NativeProcessLinux
and NativeProcessNetBSD, and it is likely that it would be useful to any
future implementation of NativeProcessProtocol.
Therefore I move it to the base class.
Reviewers: krytarowski
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52719
llvm-svn: 343683
The two existing implementations have the function implemented
identically, and there's no reason to believe that this would be
different for other implementations.
llvm-svn: 342167
This recommits r341487, which was reverted due to failing tests with
clang. It turned out I had incorrectly expected that the literal arrays
passed to ArrayRef constructor will have static (permanent) storage.
This was only the case with gcc, while clang was constructing them on
stack, leading to dangling pointers when the function returns.
The fix is to explicitly assign static storage duration to the opcode
arrays.
llvm-svn: 341758
return the opcode as a Expected<ArrayRef> instead of a
Status+pointer+size combo.
I also move the linux implementation to the base class, as the trap
opcodes are likely to be the same for all/most implementations of the
class (except the arm one, where linux chooses a different opcode than
what the arm spec recommends, which I keep linux-specific).
llvm-svn: 341487
This brings the LLDB configuration closer to LLVM's and removes visual
clutter in the source code by removing the @brief commands from
comments.
This patch also reflows the paragraphs in all doxygen comments.
See also https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46321
llvm-svn: 331373
Summary:
These functions used to return bool to signify whether they were able to
retrieve the data. This is redundant because the ArchSpec and ByteOrder
already have their own "invalid" states, *and* because both of the
current implementations (linux, netbsd) can always provide a valid
result.
This allows us to simplify bits of the code handling these values.
Reviewers: eugene, krytarowski
Subscribers: javed.absar, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39733
llvm-svn: 317779
Summary:
The NativeThread class is useless without the containing process (and in
some places it is already assuming the process is always around). This
makes it clear that the NativeProcessProtocol is the object owning the
threads, and makes the destruction order deterministic (first threads,
then process). The NativeProcess is the only thing holding a thread
unique_ptr, and methods that used to hand out thread shared pointers now
return raw pointers or references.
Reviewers: krytarowski, eugene
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35618
llvm-svn: 316007
Summary:
The usage of shared_from_this forces us to separate construction and
initialization phases, because shared_from_this() is not available in
the constructor (or destructor). The shared semantics are not necessary,
as we always have a clear owner of the native process class
(GDBRemoteCommunicationServerLLDB object). Even if we need shared
semantics in the future (which I think we should strongly avoid),
reverting this will not be necessary -- the owners can still easily
store the native process object in a shared pointer if they really want
to -- this just prevents the knowledge of that from leaking into the
class implementation.
After this a NativeThread object will hold a reference to the parent
process (instead of a weak_ptr) -- having a process instance always
available allows us to simplify some logic in this class (some of it was
already simplified because we were asserting that the process is
available, but this makes it obvious).
Reviewers: krytarowski, eugene, zturner
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35123
llvm-svn: 308282
Summary:
This replaces the static functions used for creating
NativeProcessProtocol instances with a factory pattern, and modernizes
the interface of the new class in the process -- I use llvm::Expected
instead of the Status+value combo. I also move some of the common code
(like the Delegate registration into the base class). The new
arrangement has multiple benefits:
- it removes the NativeProcess*** dependency from Process/gdb-remote
(which for example means that liblldb no longer pulls in this code).
- it enables unit testing of the GDBRemoteCommunicationServerLLGS class
(by providing a mock Native Process).
- serves as another example on how to use the llvm::Expected class (I
couldn't get rid of the Initialize-type functions completely here
because of the use of shared_from_this, but that's the next thing on
my list here)
Tests still pass on Linux and I've made sure NetBSD compiles after this.
Reviewers: zturner, eugene, krytarowski
Subscribers: srhines, lldb-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33778
llvm-svn: 307390
Summary:
A number of places were trying to decode the result of wait(). Add a simple
utility function that does that and a struct that encapsulates the
decoded result. Then also provide a pretty-printer for that class.
Reviewers: zturner, krytarowski, eugene
Subscribers: lldb-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33998
llvm-svn: 305689
This renames the LLDB error class to Status, as discussed
on the lldb-dev mailing list.
A change of this magnitude cannot easily be done without
find and replace, but that has potential to catch unwanted
occurrences of common strings such as "Error". Every effort
was made to find all the obvious things such as the word "Error"
appearing in a string, etc, but it's possible there are still
some lingering occurences left around. Hopefully nothing too
serious.
llvm-svn: 302872
Summary:
Include initial support for:
- single step mode (PT_STEP)
- single step trap handling (TRAP_TRACE)
- exec() trap (TRAP_EXEC)
- add placeholder interfaces for FPR
- initial code for NetBSD core(5) files
- minor tweaks
While there improve style of altered elf-core/ files.
This code raises the number of passing tests on NetBSD to around 50% (600+/1200+).
The introduced code is subject to improve afterwards for additional features and bug fixes.
Sponsored by <The NetBSD Foundation>
Reviewers: labath, joerg, emaste, kettenis
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: srhines, #lldb
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31450
llvm-svn: 299109
Summary:
This patch is a stripped down from features a NetBSD process
code (patch is kept under 2k LOC). This code has assumption that
there is only one thread within a debugged process. The only
debugger trap supported is software breakpoint (TRAP_BRKPT).
The generic platform code requires to add dummy function for
watchpoints etc. These functions are currently empty.
This code is not the final platform support as is and it's treated as
a base to extend, refactor and address issues afterwards.
Supported features:
- handle software breakpoints,
- correctly attach to a tracee,
- support NetBSD specific ptrace(2),
- monitor process termination,
- monitor SIGTRAP events,
- monitor SIGSTOP events,
- monitor other signals events,
- resume the whole process,
- get memory region info perms,
- read memory from tracee,
- write memory to tracee,
- read ELF AUXV,
- x86_64 GPR read and write code
For the generic framework include:
- halt,
- detach,
- signal,
- kill,
- allocatememory,
- deallocatememory,
- update threads,
- getarchitecture,
- getfileloadaddress,
- and others.
This code has preliminary AddThread code.
Out of interest in this patch:
- exec() traps,
- hardware debug register traps,
- single step trap,
- thread creation/termination trap,
- process fork(2), vfork(2) and vfork(2) done traps,
- syscall entry and exit trap,
- threads,
- FPR registers,
- retrieving tracee's thread name,
- non x86_64 support.
This code can be used to start a hello world application and trace it.
This code can be used by other BSD systems as a starting point to get similar
capabilities.
Sponsored by <The NetBSD Foundation>
Reviewers: emaste, joerg, kettenis, labath
Subscribers: mgorny, #lldb
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31374
llvm-svn: 298953
Summary:
This is the base for introduction of further features to support Process Tracing on NetBSD, in local and remote setup.
This code is also a starting point to synchronize the development with other BSDs. Currently NetBSD is ahead and other systems can catch up.
Sponsored by <The NetBSD Foundation>
Reviewers: emaste, joerg, kettenis, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: mgorny, #lldb
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31138
llvm-svn: 298408
Michał Górny