Summary:
Requesting registers one by one takes a while in our project.
We want to get rid of it by using target.xml.
Reviewers: jarin, labath, omjavaid
Reviewed By: labath, omjavaid
Subscribers: omjavaid, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74217
LLDB has a few different styles of header guards and they're not very
consistent because things get moved around or copy/pasted. This patch
unifies the header guards across LLDB and converts everything to match
LLVM's style.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74743
Summary:
Synthesize target.xml in lldb-server to avoid a long chain of
qRegisterInfo packets, which can be slow over low-latency links.
Reviewers: jarin, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74217
- reduce indentation by removing the defensive
GetID()!=INVALID_PROCESS_ID check -- this function is only called when
an attach or launch succeeds
- replace LLDB_LOGF with LLDB_LOG
StringRef will call strlen on the C string which is inefficient (as ConstString already
knows the string lenght and so does StringRef). This patch replaces all those calls
with GetStringRef() which doesn't recompute the length.
This is a step towards making the initialize and terminate calls be
generated by CMake, which in turn is towards making it possible to
disable plugins at configuration time.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74245
Due to a c++ quirk, these are found through ADL only when a function with that
name is found through regular lookup. We have one such function in SharingPtr.h,
but I am trying to remove it.
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).
This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).
Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258
qemu has a very small maximum packet size (4096) and it actually
only uses half of that buffer for some implementation reason,
so when lldb asks for the register target definitions, the x86_64
definition is larger than 4096/2 and we need to fetch it in two parts.
This patch and test is fixing a bug in
GDBRemoteCommunicationClient::ReadExtFeature when reading a target
file in multiple parts. lldb was assuming that it would always
get back the maximum packet size response (4096) instead of
using the actual size received and asking for the next group of
bytes.
We now have two tests in gdb_remote_client for unique features
of qemu - TestNestedRegDefinitions.py would test the ability
of lldb to follow multiple levels of xml includes; I opted to
create a separate TestRegDefinitionInParts.py test to test this
wrinkle in qemu's gdb remote serial protocol stub implementation.
Instead of combining both tests into a single test file.
<rdar://problem/49537922>
Summary: There are a few places in LLDB where we do a `reinterpret_cast` for conversions that we could also do with `static_cast`. This patch moves all this code to `static_cast`.
Reviewers: shafik, JDevlieghere, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: arphaman, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72161
Rather than handling zlib handling manually, use `find_package` from CMake
to find zlib properly. Use this to normalize the `LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB`,
`HAVE_ZLIB`, `HAVE_ZLIB_H`. Furthermore, require zlib if `LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB` is
set to `YES`, which requires the distributor to explicitly select whether
zlib is enabled or not. This simplifies the CMake handling and usage in
the rest of the tooling.
This restores 68a235d07f,
e6c7ed6d21. The problem with the windows
bot is a need for clearing the cache.
This reverts commit 68a235d07f.
This commit broke the clang-x64-windows-msvc build bot and a follow-up
commit did not fix it. Reverting to fix the bot.
Rather than handling zlib handling manually, use `find_package` from CMake
to find zlib properly. Use this to normalize the `LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB`,
`HAVE_ZLIB`, `HAVE_ZLIB_H`. Furthermore, require zlib if `LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB` is
set to `YES`, which requires the distributor to explicitly select whether
zlib is enabled or not. This simplifies the CMake handling and usage in
the rest of the tooling.
When running the test suite with always capture on, a handful of tests
are failing because they have multiple targets and therefore multiple
GDB remote connections. The current reproducer infrastructure is capable
of dealing with that.
This patch reworks the GDB remote provider to support multiple GDB
remote connections, similar to how the reproducers support shadowing
multiple command interpreter inputs. The provider now keeps a list of
packet recorders which deal with a single GDB remote connection. During
replay we rely on the order of creation to match the number of packets
to the GDB remote connection.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71105
Summary:
Previously the ABI plugin exposed some "register infos" and the
gdb-remote code used those to fill in the missing bits. Now, the
"filling in" code is in the ABI plugin itself, and the gdb-remote code
just invokes that.
The motivation for this is two-fold:
a) the "augmentation" logic is useful outside of process gdb-remote. For
instance, it would allow us to avoid repeating the register number
definitions in minidump code.
b) It gives more implementation freedom to the ABI classes. Now that
these "register infos" are essentially implementation details, classes
can use other methods to obtain dwarf/eh_frame register numbers -- for
instance they can consult llvm MC layer.
Since the augmentation code was not currently tested anywhere, I took
the opportunity to create a simple test for it.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, clayborg, tatyana-krasnukha
Subscribers: aprantl, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70906
lldb would silently accept a response to the 'g' packet
(read all registers) which was too large; this handles the
case where it is too small.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70417
<rdar://problem/34916465>
until we can automatically fall back to p/P if g/G are not supported;
it looks like there is a bug in debugserver's g/G packets taht needs
to be fixed, or debugserver should stop supporting g/G until that bug
is fixed. But we need lldb to be able to fall back to p/P correctly
for that to be a viable workaround.
While investigating an issue where a different packet was sent during
replay I noticed how annoying it is that the existing assert doesn't
specify what packet is actually different. It's printed to the log, but
enabling logging has the potential to change LLDB's behavior. The same
is true when debugging LLDB while it's replaying the reproducer.
I replaced the assert with a printf of the unexpected packet followed by
a fatal_error wrapped in ifndef NDEBUG. The behavior is the same as the
previous assert, just with more/better context.
Following up on https://reviews.llvm.org/D62221, this change introduces
the settings plugin.process.gdb-remote.use-g-packet-for-reading. When
they are on, 'g' packets are used for reading registers.
Using 'g' packets can improve performance by reducing the number of
packets exchanged between client and server when a large number of
registers needs to be fetched.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62931
This patch removes the size_t return value and the append parameter
from the remainder of the Find.* functions in LLDB's internal API. As
in the previous patches, this is motivated by the fact that these
parameters aren't really used, and in the case of the append parameter
were frequently implemented incorrectly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69119
llvm-svn: 375160
Summary:
This patch re-types everywhere that passes a File::OpenOptions
as a uint32_t so it actually uses File::OpenOptions.
It also converts some OpenOptions related functions that fail
by returning 0 or NULL into llvm::Expected
split off from https://reviews.llvm.org/D68737
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jasonmolenda, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68853
llvm-svn: 374817
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
> llvm-svn: 374584
llvm-svn: 374631
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
> llvm-svn: 374584
llvm-svn: 374626
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
> llvm-svn: 374584
llvm-svn: 374622
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
> llvm-svn: 374584
llvm-svn: 374620
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
> llvm-svn: 374584
llvm-svn: 374609
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
llvm-svn: 374584
Summary:
Someone wrote SetEffectiveSetEffectiveGroupID instead of SetEffectiveUserID.
After this fix, the android process list can show user names, e.g.
```
PID PARENT USER GROUP EFF USER EFF GROUP TRIPLE ARGUMENTS
====== ====== ========== ========== ========== ========== ============================== ============================
529 1 root 0 root 0 /sbin/ueventd
```
Reviewers: labath,clayborg,aadsm,xiaobai
Subscribers:
llvm-svn: 373953
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
llvm-svn: 373931
There's no need to wrap the just-constructed json::Array in a
json::Value, we can just return that and pass ownership to the
raw_ostream.
llvm-svn: 373656
Although it's called "GetString", StreamString::GetString actually
returns a StringRef. Creating a json object with a StringRef does not
make a copy, which means the StringRef will be dangling as soon as the
underlying stream is destroyed. Add a .str() to force the json object to
hold a copy of the string.
This fixes nearly every test on linux.
llvm-svn: 373572
Summary:
This patch factors out File as an abstract base
class and moves most of its actual functionality into
a subclass called NativeFile. In the next patch,
I'm going to be adding subclasses of File that
don't necessarily have any connection to actual OS files,
so they will not inherit from NativeFile.
This patch was split out as a prerequisite for
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68188
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jasonmolenda, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68317
llvm-svn: 373564
This patch replaces the LLDB's JSON implementation with the one from
LLVM in GDBRemoteCommunicationServerCommon.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68304
llvm-svn: 373500
This patch replaces the LLDB's JSON implementation with the one from
LLVM in GDBRemoteCommunicationServerPlatform.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68302
llvm-svn: 373499
This patch replaces the LLDB's JSON implementation with the one from
LLVM in GDBRemoteCommunicationClient.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68301
llvm-svn: 373498
This patch replaces the LLDB's JSON implementation with the one from
LLVM in GDBRemoteCommunicationServerLLGS.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68299
llvm-svn: 373497
This patch replaces the hand-rolled JSON emission in StructuredData with
LLVM's JSON library.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68248
llvm-svn: 373359
Summary:
It uses the new ability of ABI plugins to vend llvm::MCRegisterInfo
structs (which is what is needed to turn dwarf register numbers into
strings).
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, jasonmolenda
Subscribers: tatyana-krasnukha, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67966
llvm-svn: 373208
Summary:
This patch converts FileSystem::Open from this prototype:
Status
Open(File &File, const FileSpec &file_spec, ...);
to this one:
llvm::Expected<std::unique_ptr<File>>
Open(const FileSpec &file_spec, ...);
This is beneficial on its own, as llvm::Expected is a more modern
and recommended error type than Status. It is also a necessary step
towards https://reviews.llvm.org/D67891, and further developments
for lldb_private::File.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jasonmolenda, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67996
llvm-svn: 373003
lvm_private::File::GetStream() can fail if m_options == 0
It's not clear from the header a File created with a descriptor will be
not be usable by many parts of LLDB unless SetOptions is also called,
but it is.
This is because those parts of LLDB rely on GetStream() to use the
file, and that in turn relies on calling fdopen on the descriptor. When
calling fdopen, GetStream relies on m_options to determine the access
mode. If m_options has never been set, GetStream() will fail.
This patch adds options as a required argument to File::SetDescriptor
and the corresponding constructor.
Patch by: Lawrence D'Anna
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67792
llvm-svn: 372652
Fix processing of "C" packet with signal for the whole process to
default signal value for action list to LLDB_INVALID_SIGNAL_NUMBER
rather than 0.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67625
llvm-svn: 372090
This moves the dumping logic from the GDBRemoteCommunicationHistory
class into the GDBRemotePacket so that it can be reused from the
reproducer command object.
llvm-svn: 372028
To support dumping the reproducer's GDB remote packets, we need the
(de)serialization logic to live in Utility rather than the GDB remote
plugin. This patch renames StreamGDBRemote to GDBRemote and moves the
relevant packet code there.
Its uses in the GDBRemoteCommunicationHistory and the
GDBRemoteCommunicationReplayServer are updated as well.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67523
llvm-svn: 371907
Originally the idea was for providers to be defined close to where they
are used. While this helped designing the providers in such a way that
they don't depend on each other, it also means that it's not possible to
access them from a central place. This proved to be a problem for some
providers and resulted in them living in the reproducer class.
The ProcessGDBRemote provider is the last remaining exception. This
patch makes things consistent and moves it into the reproducer like the
other providers.
llvm-svn: 371685
This removes the CleanUp class and replaces its usages with llvm's
ScopeExit, which has similar semantics.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67378
llvm-svn: 371474
This is a fix for the issue described in r371144.
> On more than one occasion I've found this test got stuck during replay
> while waiting for a packet from debugserver when the debugger was in
> the process of being destroyed.
When the replay server is out of packets we should just disconnect so
the debugger doesn't have to do any cleanup that it wouldn't do during
capture.
llvm-svn: 371459
plugin.
Unfortunately the test is currently XFAILed because of missing changes
to the clang driver.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67124
llvm-svn: 370931
My previous attempt in attempt in r369904 actually broke the 32bit build
because File::Read expects to take a reference to size_t. Fix the
warning by using SIZE_MAX to denote failure instead.
llvm-svn: 369910
This patch removes the two variant of StringExtractor::GetStringRef that
return (non-)const references to std::string. The non-const one was
being abused to reinitialize the StringExtractor and its uses are
replaced by calls to the copy asignment operator. The const variant was
refactored to return an actual llvm::StringRef.
llvm-svn: 369493
I find as a good cleanup to drop the Compile method. As I do not find TIMTOWTDI
as an advantage and there is already constructor parameter to compile the
regex.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66392
llvm-svn: 369352
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259
llvm-svn: 368933
Summary:
This commit contains three small changes to enable lldb-server on Windows.
- Add lldb-server for Windows to the build
- Disable pty redirection on Windows for the initial lldb-server bring up
- Add a support to get the parent pid for a process on Windows
- Ifdef some signals which aren't supported on Windows
Thanks to Hui Huang for the help with this patch!
Reviewers: labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, compnerd, Hui, amccarth, xiaobai, srhines, mgorny, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61686
llvm-svn: 368774
Summary:
This test doesn't make sense. Change to be consistent with what we did
in GDBRemoteCommunication.cpp.
Reviewers: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65965
llvm-svn: 368352
This function is not portable, and there are only a handful of usages of
it anyway. Replacing it with std::this_thread::sleep_for enables us to
get rid of the compatibility code in PosixApi.h.
llvm-svn: 367814
Improved the GDB client base documentation while I was reading through
it. Looks like it got messed up during the automatic comment reflow a
while ago.
llvm-svn: 367481
Summary:
This is a bit more explicit, and makes it possible to build LLDB without
varying the -I lines per-directory.
(The latter is useful because many build systems only allow this to be
configured per-library, and LLDB is insufficiently layered to be split into
multiple libraries on stricter build systems).
(My comment on D65185 has some more context)
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, labath, chandlerc, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65397
Patch by Sam McCall!
llvm-svn: 367241
Right now our Properties.inc only generates the initializer for the
options list but not the array declaration boilerplate around it. As the
array definition is identical for all arrays, we might as well also let
the Properties.inc generate it alongside the initializers.
Unfortunately we cannot do the same for enums, as there's this magic
ePropertyExperimental, which needs to come at the end to be interpreted
correctly. Hopefully we can get rid of this in the future and do the
same for the property enums.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65353
llvm-svn: 367238
Property definitions are currently defined in a PropertyDefinition array
and have a corresponding enum to index in this array. Unfortunately this
is quite error prone. Indeed, just today we found an incorrect merge
where a discrepancy between the order of the enum values and their
definition caused the test suite to fail spectacularly.
Tablegen can streamline the process of generating the property
definition table while at the same time guaranteeing that the enums stay
in sync. That's exactly what this patch does. It adds a new tablegen
file for the properties, building on top of the infrastructure that
Raphael added recently for the command options. It also introduces two
new tablegen backends: one for the property definitions and one for
their corresponding enums.
It might be worth mentioning that I generated most of the tablegen
definitions from the existing property definitions, by adding a dump
method to the struct. This seems both more efficient and less error
prone that copying everything over by hand. Only Enum properties needed
manual fixup for the EnumValues and DefaultEnumValue fields.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65185
llvm-svn: 367058
Summary:
Here's a replacement for D62504. I thought I could use LoadModules to implement this but in reality I can't because there are at few issues with it:
* The LoadModules assumes that the list returned by GetLoadedModuleList is comprehensive in the sense that reflects all the mapped segments, however, this is not true, for instance VDSO entry is not there since it's loaded manually by LoadVDSO using GetMemoryRegionInfo and it doesn't represent a specific shared object in disk. Because of this LoadModules will unload the VDSO module.
* The loader (interpreter) module might have also been loaded using GetMemoryRegionInfo, this is true when we launch the process and the rendezvous structure is not yet available (done through LoadInterpreterModule()). The problem here is that this entry will point to the same file name as the one found in /proc/pid/maps, however, when we read the same module from the r_debug.link_map structure it might be under a different name. This is true at least on CentOS where the loader is a symlink. Because of this LoadModules will unload and load the module in a way where the rendezvous breakpoint is unresolved but not resolved again (because we add the new module first and remove the old one after).
The symlink issue might be fixable by first unloading the old and loading the news (but sounds super brittle), however, I'm not sure how to fix the VDSO issue.
Since I can't trust it I'm just going to use GetLoadedModuleList directly with the same logic that we use today for when we read the linked list in lldb. The only safe thing to do here is to only calculate differences between different snapshots of the svr4 packet itself. This will also cut the dependency this plugin has from LoadModules.
I separated the 2 logics into 2 different functions (remote and not remote) because I don't like mixing 2 different logics in the same function with if/else's. Two different functions makes it easier to reason with I believe. However, I did abstract away the logic that decides if we should take a snapshot or add/remove modules so both functions could reuse it.
The other difference between the two is that on the UpdateSOEntriesFromRemote I take the snapshot only once when state = Consistent because I didn't find a good reason to always update that, as we already got the list from state = Add | Remove. I probably should use the same logic on UpdateSOEntries though I don't see a reason not to since it's really using the same data, just read in different places. Any thoughts here?
It might also be worthwhile to add a test to make sure we don't unload modules that were not actually "unloaded" like the vdso. I haven't done this yet though.
This diff is also missing the option for svr4 like proposed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D62503#1564296, I'll start working on this but wanted to have this up first.
Reviewers: labath, jankratochvil, clayborg, xiaobai
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: srhines, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64013
llvm-svn: 367020
This patch replaces explicit calls to log::Printf with the new LLDB_LOGF
macro. The macro is similar to LLDB_LOG but supports printf-style format
strings, instead of formatv-style format strings.
So instead of writing:
if (log)
log->Printf("%s\n", str);
You'd write:
LLDB_LOG(log, "%s\n", str);
This change was done mechanically with the command below. I replaced the
spurious if-checks with vim, since I know how to do multi-line
replacements with it.
find . -type f -name '*.cpp' -exec \
sed -i '' -E 's/log->Printf\(/LLDB_LOGF\(log, /g' "{}" +
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65128
llvm-svn: 366936
Change the interface to return an expected, instead of taking a Status
pointer.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64163
llvm-svn: 365226
Summary:
This option allow the toggling of the libraries-svr4 usage in ProcessGDBRemote. It's a follow up of https://reviews.llvm.org/D62503#1564296 and it's meant to test / tweak this new packet with, hopefully, minimum impact and in a faster way.
Enable it with `settings set plugin.process.gdb-remote.use-libraries-svr4 true`. For now, by default it's false.
I didn't put tests up for this but I did test it manually.
Reviewers: labath, jankratochvil
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64112
llvm-svn: 365059
I'm not able to reproduce the reproducer flakiness we're seeing on
GreenDragon. I want to add this assert to find out if the GDB remote
packets are somehow getting out of sync when this happens.
llvm-svn: 364852
D62502, together with D62503 have broken the builds which have XML
support enabled. Reverting D62503 (r364355) fixed that, but has broken
has left some of the tests introduced by D62502 broken more or less
nondeternimistically (it depended on whether the system happens to place
the library list near unreadable pages of memory). I attempted to make a
partial fix for this in r364748, but Jan Kratochvil pointed out that
this reintroduces the problem which reverting D62503 was trying to
solve.
So instead, I back out the whole thing so we can get back to a clean
slate that works for everyone. We can figure out a way forward from
there.
This reverts r364748, r363772 and r363707.
llvm-svn: 364751
The arbitrary timeout when flushing GDB remote packets caused
non-determinism and flakiness between test runs. I suspect it is what's
causing the flakiness of the reproducer tests on GreenDragon, and want
to see if removing it causes that to go away.
This change was originally introduced in r197579 to discard a
`$T02thread:01;#4` that QEMU was sending. If anybody knows how to test
that this continues working after removing this code, I'd love to hear
it.
llvm-svn: 364669
on a thread. When talking to some older gdb-remote stubs, We were getting
a stop reason from the stop reply packet and setting it on the relevant
thread before we updated the full stop list. That would get discarded when
the full list was updated.
Also, if you already have a thread list when you go to see if there is an
Operating System plugin, and you do indeed load a new OS plugin, you have to
re-fetch the thread list or it will only show the raw threads.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62887
llvm-svn: 364666
This fixes two replay issues that caused the tests to behave
erratically:
1. It fixes an off-by-one error, where all replies where shifted by 1
because of a `+` packet that should've been ignored.
2. It fixes another off-by-one-error, where an asynchronous ^C was
offsetting all subsequent packets. The reason is that we
'synchronize' requests and replies. In reality, a stop reply is only
sent when the process halt. During replay however, we instantly
report the stop, as the reply to packets like continue (vCont).
Both packets should be ignored, and indeed, checking the gdb-remote log,
no unexpected packets are received anymore.
Additionally, be more pedantic when it comes to unexpected packets and
return an failure form the replay server. This way we should be able to
catch these things faster in the future.
llvm-svn: 364494
The qemu x86_64 target returns a target.xml register definition file which
includes other xml files and they include others, etc. Also, the registers
are not put in register groups like lldb wants to see.
This patch (1) puts registers that aren't in a register group in a "general"
register group, (2) change ProcessGDBRemote::GetGDBServerRegisterInfo to
be a method that starts the parsing, asking a recurisve function to fetch
and parse target.xml, (3) adds
ProcessGDBRemote::GetGDBServerRegisterInfoXMLAndProcess which can recusively
call itself to read and parse included xml files, (4) in addition to expecting
the top-level <target> element (which only happens in the top level xml file),
also an xml file that consists of a <feature> node - read the register
defintions and includes from that <feature> element.
<rdar://problem/49537922>
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63802
llvm-svn: 364484
Summary:
This is the fourth patch to improve module loading in a series that started here (where I explain the motivation and solution): D62499
Implement the `xfer:libraries-svr4` packet by adding a new function that generates the list and then in Handle_xfer I generate the XML for it. The XML is really simple so I'm just using string concatenation because I believe it's more readable than having to deal with a DOM api.
Reviewers: clayborg, xiaobai, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: emaste, mgorny, srhines, krytarowski, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62502
llvm-svn: 363707
This replaces the `info` typedef with a nested struct named Info. This
means we now have FooProvider and FooProvider::Info, instead of two
related but separate classes FooProvider and FooInfo. This change is
mostly cosmetic.
llvm-svn: 363211
Summary:
This is the second patch to improve module loading in a series that started here (where I explain the motivation and solution): https://reviews.llvm.org/D62499
I need to read the aux vector to know where the r_debug map with the loaded libraries are.
The AuxVector class was made generic so it could be reused between the POSIX-DYLD plugin and NativeProcess*. The class itself ended up in the ProcessUtility plugin.
Reviewers: clayborg, xiaobai, labath, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: clayborg, labath, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: emaste, JDevlieghere, mgorny, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62500
llvm-svn: 363098
Summary:
This is the first of a few patches I have to improve the performance of dynamic module loading on Android.
In this first diff I'll describe the context of my main motivation and will then link to it in the other diffs to avoid repeating myself.
## Motivation
I have a few scenarios where opening a specific feature on an Android app takes around 40s when lldb is attached to it. The reason for that is because 40 modules are dynamicly loaded at that point in time and each one of them is taking ~1s.
## The problem
To learn about new modules we have a breakpoint on a linker function that is called twice whenever a module is loaded. One time just before it's loaded (so lldb can check which modules are loaded) and another right after it's loaded (so lldb can check again which ones are loaded and calculate the diference).
It's figuring out which modules are loaded that is taking quite some time. This is currently done by traversing the linked list of loaded shared libraries that the linker maintains in memory. Each item in the linked list requires its own `x` packet sent to the gdb server (this is android so the network also plays a part). In my scenario there are 400+ loaded libraries and even though we read 0x800 worth of bytes at a time we still make ~180 requests that end up taking 150-200ms.
We also do this twice, once before the module is loaded (state = eAdd) and another right after (state = eConsistent) which easly adds up to ~400ms per module.
## A solution
**Implement `xfer:libraries-svr4` in lldb-server:**
I noticed in the code that loads the new modules that it had support for the `xfer:libraries-svr4` packet (added ~4 years ago to support the ds2 debug server) but we didn't support it in lldb-server. This single packet returns an xml list of all the loaded modules by the process. The advantage is that there's no more need to make 180 requests to read the linked list. Additionally this new requests takes around 10ms.
**More efficient usage of the `xfer:libraries-svr4` packet in lldb:**
When `xfer:libraries-svr4` is available the Process class has a `LoadModules` function that requests this packet and then loads or unloads modules based on the current list of loaded modules by the process.
This is the function that is used by the DYLDRendezvous class to get the list of loaded modules before and after the module is loaded. However, this is really not needed since the LoadModules function already loaded or unloaded the modules accordingly. I changed this strategy to call LoadModules only once (after the process has loaded the module).
**Bugs**
I found a few issues in lldb while implementing this and have submitted independent patches for them.
I tried to devide this into multiple logical patches to make it easier to review and discuss.
## Tests
I wanted to put these set of diffs up before having all the tests up and running to start having them reviewed from a techical point of view. I'm also having some trouble making the tests running on linux so I need more time to make that happen.
# This diff
The `xfer` packages follow the same protocol, they are requested with `xfer:<object>:<read|write>:<annex>:<offset,length>` and a return that starts with `l` or `m` depending if the offset and length covers the entire data or not. Before implementing the `xfer:libraries-svr4` I refactored the `xfer:auxv` to generically handle xfer packets so we can easly add new ones.
The overall structure of the function ends up being:
* Parse the packet into its components: object, offset etc.
* Depending on the object do its own logic to generate the data.
* Return the data based on its size, the requested offset and length.
Reviewers: clayborg, xiaobai, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: mgorny, krytarowski, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62499
llvm-svn: 362982
Summary:
My main goal here is to make lldb-server work with Android Studio.
This is currently not the case because lldb-server is started in platform mode listening on a domain socket. When Android Studio connects to it lldb-server crashes because even though it's listening on a domain socket as soon as it gets a connection it asserts that it's a TCP connection, which will obviously fails for any non-tcp connection.
To do this I came up with a new method called GetConnectURI() in Socket that returns the URI needed to connect to the connected portion of the socket.
Reviewers: labath, clayborg, xiaobai
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: mgorny, jfb, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62089
llvm-svn: 362173
Muhammad Omair Javaid