Makes it easier to test "this doesn't produce an error" (& indeed makes
that the implied default so we don't accidentally write tests that have
silent/sneaky errors as well as the positive behavior we're testing for)
Though the support for applying relocations is patchy enough that a
bunch of tests treat lack of relocation application as more of a warning
than an error - so rather than me trying to figure out how to add
support for a bunch of relocation types, let's degrade that to a warning
to match the usage (& indeed, it's sort of more of a tool warning anyway
- it's not that the DWARF is wrong, just that the tool can't fully cope
with it - and it's not like the tool won't dump the DWARF, it just won't
follow/render certain relocations - I guess in the most general case it
might try to render an unrelocated value & instead render something
bogus... but mostly seems to be about interesting relocations used in
eh_frame (& honestly it might be nice if we were lazier about doing this
relocation resolution anyway - if you're not dumping eh_frame, should we
really be erroring about the relocations in it?))
A future MC change may add a warning/error when a .section directive
specifies incorrect sh_flags/sh_type. Fix the tests to use correct
sh_flags/sh_type.
Tests "dwarfdump-rnglists-dwarf64.s" and "dwarfdump-rnglists.s" were
malformed because they had missing required DWO ID fields in split
compilation unit headers. The patch fixes the tests and checks
the reading of a unit header more thoroughly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71704
Summary:
Currently these function return the raw content of the appropriate table
header, which means they are relative to the DW_AT_{loc,rng}list_base,
and one has to relocate them in order to do anything.
This changes the functions to perform the relocation themselves, which
seems more clearer, particularly as they are sitting right next to the
find{Rng,Loc}listFromOffset functions, but one *cannot* simply take the
result of these functions and take pass them there.
The only effect of this patch is to change what value is dumped for the
DW_AT_ranges attribute, which I think is for the better, as previously
the values appeared to point into thin air.
(The main reason I am looking at this is because I was trying to
implement equivalent functionality in lldb's DWARFUnit, and was stumped
by this behavior.
Reviewers: dblaikie, JDevlieghere, aprantl
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, SouraVX
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71006
Errors found processing the DW_AT_ranges attribute are propagated by lower level
routines and reported by their callers.
Reviewer: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48344
llvm-svn: 335188
David Blaikie