This is a follow up to the rL330983. The patch teaches lh and lhu
commands accepts 32-bit memory offsets by replacing `mem_simm16` operand
to `mem_simmptr`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46513
llvm-svn: 331996
Previously these instructions were unselectable and instead were generated
through the instruction mapping tables.
Reviewers: atanasyan, smaksimovic, abeserminji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46055
llvm-svn: 331165
`lb` and `lbu` commands accepts 16-bit signed offsets. But GAS accepts
larger offsets for these commands. If an offset does not fit in 16-bit
range, `lb` command is translated into lui/lb or lui/addu/lb series.
It's interesting that initially LLVM assembler supported this feature,
but later it was broken.
This patch restores support for 32-bit offsets. It replaces `mem_simm16`
operand for `LB` and `LBu` definitions by the new `mem_simmptr` operand.
This operand is intended to check that offset fits to the same size as
using for pointers. Later we will be able to extend this rule and
accepts 64-bit offsets when it is possible.
Some issues remain:
- The regression also affects LD, SD, LH, LHU commands. I'm going
to fix them by a separate patch.
- GAS accepts any 32-bit values as an offset. Now LLVM accepts signed
16-bit values and this patch extends the range to signed 32-bit offsets.
In other words, the following code accepted by GAS and still triggers
an error by LLVM:
```
lb $4, 0x80000004
# gas
lui a0, 0x8000
lb a0, 4(a0)
```
- In case of 64-bit pointers GAS accepts a 64-bit offset and translates
it to the li/dsll/lb series of commands. LLVM still rejects it.
Probably this feature has never been implemented in LLVM. This issue
is for a separate patch.
```
lb $4, 0x800000001
# gas
li a0, 0x8000
dsll a0, a0, 0x14
lb a0, 4(a0)
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45020
llvm-svn: 330983
Current code does not check that a register number is in the 0-31 range.
Sometimes the parser checks that later for some kinds of instructions,
but that leads to unclear / incorrect error messages like that:
% cat test.s
.text
lb $4, 8($32)
% llvm-mc test.s -triple=mips64-unknown-linux
test.s:2:10: error: expected memory with 16-bit signed offset
lb $4, 8($32)
^
Sometimes the parser just crashes:
% cat test.s
.text
lw $4, 8($32)
% llvm-mc test.s -triple=mips64-unknown-linux
This patch resolves the problem by checking that register number after
'$' sign is in the 0-31 range. If the number is out of the range the
parser shows the `invalid register number` error, but treats invalid
register number as a normal one to continue parsing and catch other
possible errors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45919
llvm-svn: 330732
Commit r266977 was reason for failing LLVM test suite with error message: fatal error: error in backend: Cannot select: t17: i32 = rotr t2, t11 ...
llvm-svn: 267418
Summary:
The bug was that microMIPS's [ls]w[lr]e instructions claimed to support a
12-bit offset when it is only 9-bit.
Reviewers: vkalintiris
Subscribers: llvm-commits, dsanders
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18434
llvm-svn: 265010
Summary:
Also renamed li_simm7 to li16_imm since it's not a simm7 and has an unusual
encoding (it's a uimm7 except that 0x7f represents -1).
Reviewers: vkalintiris
Subscribers: dsanders, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18145
llvm-svn: 264056
Summary:
The bugs were:
* append, prepend, and balign were not tested
* balign takes a uimm2 not a uimm5.
* drotr32 was correctly implemented with a uimm5 but the tests expected
'52' to be valid.
* li/la were implemented with a uimm5 instead of simm32. simm32 isn't
completely correct either but I'll fix that when I get to simm32.
A notable omission are some of the shift instructions. Several of these
have been implemented using a single uimm6 instruction (rather than two
uimm5 instructions and a CodeGen-only uimm6 pseudo). These will be updated
in the uimm6 patch.
Reviewers: vkalintiris
Subscribers: llvm-commits, dsanders
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14712
llvm-svn: 254164
Summary:
The bug was that the sldi instructions have immediate widths dependant on
their element size. So sldi.d has a 1-bit immediate and sldi.b has a 4-bit
immediate. All of these were using 4-bit immediates previously.
Reviewers: vkalintiris
Subscribers: llvm-commits, atanasyan, dsanders
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14018
llvm-svn: 252297
Simon Atanasyan