This patch adds an initial, incomeplete and unsound implementation of
canReplacePointersIfEqual to check if a pointer value A can be replaced
by another pointer value B, that are deemed to be equivalent through
some means (e.g. information from conditions).
Note that is in general not sound to blindly replace pointers based on
equality, for example if they are based on different underlying objects.
LLVM's memory model is not completely settled as of now; see
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34548 for a more detailed
discussion.
The initial version of canReplacePointersIfEqual only rejects a very
specific case: replacing a pointer with a constant expression that is
not dereferenceable. Such a replacement is problematic and can be
restricted relatively easily without impacting most code. Using it to
limit replacements in GVN/SCCP/CVP only results in small differences in
7 programs out of MultiSource/SPEC2000/SPEC2006 on X86 with -O3 -flto.
This patch is supposed to be an initial step to improve the current
situation and the helper should be made stricter in the future. But this
will require careful analysis of the impact on performance.
Reviewed By: aqjune
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85524
For StackLifetime after finding alloca we need to check that
values ponting to the begining of alloca.
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86692
We only need the C++ type and the corresponding TF Enum. The other
parameter was used for the output spec json file, but we can just
standardize on the C++ type name there.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86549
These were implementation detail, but become necessary for generic data
copying.
Also added const variations to them, and move assignment, since we had a
move ctor (and the move assignment helps in a subsequent patch).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85262
Added a mechanism to check the element type, get the total element
count, and the size of an element.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85250
A JSON->TensorSpec utility we will use subsequently to specify
additional outputs needed for certain training scenarios.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84976
As discussed on D81500, this adds a more general ElementCount variant of the build helper and converts the (non-scalable) unsigned NumElts variant to use it internally.
Further abstracting the specification of a tensor, to more easily
support different types and shapes of tensor, and also to perform
initialization up-front, at TFModelEvaluator construction time.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84685
PassManager.h is one of the top headers in the ClangBuildAnalyzer frontend worst offenders list.
This exposes a large number of implicit dependencies on various forward declarations/includes in other headers that need addressing.
(This reverts commit a5e0194709, and
corrects author).
Rename the pass to be able to extend it to function properties other than inliner features.
Reviewed By: mtrofin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82044
Rename the pass to be able to extend it to function properties other than inliner features.
Reviewed By: mtrofin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82044
This patch
- adds `canCreateUndefOrPoison`
- refactors `canCreatePoison` so it can deal with constantexprs
`canCreateUndefOrPoison` will be used at D83926.
Reviewed By: nikic, jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84007
Summary:
This change avoids exposing tensorflow types when including TFUtils.h.
They are just an implementation detail, and don't need to be used
directly when implementing an analysis requiring ML model evaluation.
The TFUtils APIs, while generically typed, are still not exposed unless
the tensorflow C library is present, as they currently have no use
otherwise.
Reviewers: mehdi_amini, davidxl
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83843
Summary:
This allows users of the llvm library discover whether llvm was built
with the tensorflow c API dependency, which helps if using the TFUtils
wrapper, for example.
We don't do the same for the LLVM_HAVE_TF_AOT flag, because that does
not expose any API.
Reviewers: mehdi_amini, davidxl
Subscribers: mgorny, aaron.ballman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83746
This reverts commit 9908a3b9f5.
The fix was to exclude the content of TFUtils.h (automatically
included in the LLVM_Analysis module, when LLVM_ENABLE_MODULES is enabled).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82817
Summary:
NOTE: There is a mailing list discussion on this: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137632.html
Complemantary to the assumption outliner prototype in D71692, this patch
shows how we could simplify the code emitted for an alignemnt
assumption. The generated code is smaller, less fragile, and it makes it
easier to recognize the additional use as a "assumption use".
As mentioned in D71692 and on the mailing list, we could adopt this
scheme, and similar schemes for other patterns, without adopting the
assumption outlining.
Reviewers: hfinkel, xbolva00, lebedev.ri, nikic, rjmccall, spatel, jdoerfert, sstefan1
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: thopre, yamauchi, kuter, fhahn, merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, bollu, rkruppe, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71739
Summary:
This is an experimental ML-based native size estimator, necessary for
computing partial rewards during -Oz inliner policy training. Data
extraction for model training will be provided in a separate patch.
RFC: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-April/140763.html
Reviewers: davidxl, jdoerfert
Subscribers: mgorny, hiraditya, mgrang, arphaman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82817
Summary: This patch moves OrderedInstructions to CodeMoverUtils as It was
the only place where OrderedInstructions is required.
Authored By: RithikSharma
Reviewer: Whitney, bmahjour, etiotto, fhahn, nikic
Reviewed By: Whitney, nikic
Subscribers: mgorny, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80643
Assume bundle can have more than one entry with the same name,
but at least AlignmentFromAssumptionsPass::extractAlignmentInfo() uses
getOperandBundle("align"), which internally assumes that it isn't the
case, and happily crashes otherwise.
Minimal reduced reproducer: run `opt -alignment-from-assumptions` on
target datalayout = "e-m:e-p270:32:32-p271:32:32-p272:64:64-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
%0 = type { i64, %1*, i8*, i64, %2, i32, %3*, i8* }
%1 = type opaque
%2 = type { i8, i8, i16 }
%3 = type { i32, i32, i32, i32 }
; Function Attrs: nounwind
define i32 @f(%0* noalias nocapture readonly %arg, %0* noalias %arg1) local_unnamed_addr #0 {
bb:
call void @llvm.assume(i1 true) [ "align"(%0* %arg, i64 8), "align"(%0* %arg1, i64 8) ]
ret i32 0
}
; Function Attrs: nounwind willreturn
declare void @llvm.assume(i1) #1
attributes #0 = { nounwind "reciprocal-estimates"="none" }
attributes #1 = { nounwind willreturn }
This is what we'd have with -mllvm -enable-knowledge-retention
This reverts commit c95ffadb24.
Summary:
NOTE: There is a mailing list discussion on this: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137632.html
Complemantary to the assumption outliner prototype in D71692, this patch
shows how we could simplify the code emitted for an alignemnt
assumption. The generated code is smaller, less fragile, and it makes it
easier to recognize the additional use as a "assumption use".
As mentioned in D71692 and on the mailing list, we could adopt this
scheme, and similar schemes for other patterns, without adopting the
assumption outlining.
Reviewers: hfinkel, xbolva00, lebedev.ri, nikic, rjmccall, spatel, jdoerfert, sstefan1
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: yamauchi, kuter, fhahn, merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, bollu, rkruppe, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71739
Move ScalarEvolution::forgetLoopDispositions implementation to ScalarEvolution.cpp to remove the dependency.
Add implicit header dependency to source files where necessary.
The initial intent was to organize ML stuff in its own directory, but
it turns out that conflicts with llvm component layering policies: it
is not a component, because subsequent changes want to rely on other
analyses, which would create a cycle; and we don't have a reliable,
cross-platform mechanism to compile files in a subdirectory, and fit in
the existing LLVM build structure.
This change moves the files into Analysis, and subsequent changes will
leverage conditional compilation for those that have optional
dependencies.
Summary:
Currently, add_llvm_library would create an OBJECT library alongside
of a STATIC / SHARED library, but losing the link interface (its
elements would become dependencies instead). To support scenarios
where linking an object library also brings in its usage
requirements, this patch adds support for 'stand-alone' OBJECT
libraries - i.e. without an accompanying SHARED/STATIC library, and
maintaining the link interface defined by the user.
The support is via a new option, OBJECT_ONLY, to avoid breaking changes
- since just specifying "OBJECT" would currently imply also STATIC or
SHARED, depending on BUILD_SHARED_LIBS.
This is useful for cases where, for example, we want to build a part
of a component separately. Using a STATIC target would incur the risk
that symbols not referenced in the consumer would be dropped (which may
be undesirable).
The current application is the ML part of Analysis. It should be part
of the Analysis component, so it may reference other analyses; and (in
upcoming changes) it has dependencies on optional libraries.
Reviewers: karies, davidxl
Subscribers: mgorny, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81447
Summary:
When an SCC got split due to inlining, we have two mechanisms for reprocessing the updated SCC, first is UR.UpdatedC
that repeatedly rerun the new, current SCC; second is a worklist for all newly split SCCs. We can avoid rerun of
the same SCC when the SCC is set to be processed by both mechanisms *back to back*. In pathological cases, such redundant
rerun could cause exponential size growth due to inlining along cycles, even when there's no SCC mutation and hence
convergence is not a problem.
Note that it's ok to have SCC updated and rerun immediately, and also in the work list if we have actually moved an SCC
to be topologically "below" the current one due to merging. In that case, we will need to revisit the current SCC after
those moved SCCs. For that reason, the redundant avoidance here only targets back to back rerun of the same SCC - the
case described by the now removed FIXME comment.
Reviewers: chandlerc, wmi
Subscribers: llvm-commits, hoy
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80589
Florian Hahn