Use forward declarations and move the include down to dependent files that actually use it.
This also exposes a number of implicit dependencies on KnownBits.h
This relands e9a3d1a401 which was originally
missing linking LLVMSupport into LLMVFileCheck which broke the SHARED_LIBS build.
Original summary:
The actual FileCheck logic seems to be implemented in LLVMSupport. I don't see a
good reason for having FileCheck implemented there as it has a very specific use
while LLVMSupport is a dependency of pretty much every LLVM tool there is. In
fact, the only use of FileCheck I could find (outside the FileCheck tool and the
FileCheck unit test) is a single call in GISelMITest.h.
This moves the FileCheck logic to its own LLVMFileCheck library. This way only
FileCheck and the GlobalISelTests now have a dependency on this code.
Reviewed By: jhenderson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86344
The actual FileCheck logic seems to be implemented in LLVMSupport. I don't see a
good reason for having FileCheck implemented there as it has a very specific use
while LLVMSupport is a dependency of pretty much every LLVM tool there is. In
fact, the only use of FileCheck I could find (outside the FileCheck tool and the
FileCheck unit test) is a single call in GISelMITest.h.
This moves the FileCheck logic to its own LLVMFileCheck library. This way only
FileCheck and the GlobalISelTests now have a dependency on this code.
Reviewed By: jhenderson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86344
This patch changes ElementCount so that the Min and Scalable
members are now private and can only be accessed via the get
functions getKnownMinValue() and isScalable(). In addition I've
added some other member functions for more commonly used operations.
Hopefully this makes the class more useful and will reduce the
need for calling getKnownMinValue().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86065
Known bits for G_ANYEXT was incorrectly using KnownBits::zext, causing
us to treat the high bits as zero even though they're (by definition)
unknown.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86323
This patch implements initial backend support for a -mtune CPU controlled by a "tune-cpu" function attribute. If the attribute is not present X86 will use the resolved CPU from target-cpu attribute or command line.
This patch adds MC layer support a tune CPU. Each CPU now has two sets of features stored in their GenSubtargetInfo.inc tables . These features lists are passed separately to the Processor and ProcessorModel classes in tablegen. The tune list defaults to an empty list to avoid changes to non-X86. This annoyingly increases the size of static tables on all target as we now store 24 more bytes per CPU. I haven't quantified the overall impact, but I can if we're concerned.
One new test is added to X86 to show a few tuning features with mismatched tune-cpu and target-cpu/target-feature attributes to demonstrate independent control. Another new test is added to demonstrate that the scheduler model follows the tune CPU.
I have not added a -mtune to llc/opt or MC layer command line yet. With no attributes we'll just use the -mcpu for both. MC layer tools will always follow the normal CPU for tuning.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85165
In GlobalISel, if you have a load into a small type with a range, you'll hit
an assert if you try to compute known bits on it starting at a larger type.
e.g.
```
%x:_(s8) = G_LOAD %whatever(p0) :: (load 1 ... !range !n)
...
%y:_(s32) = G_SOMETHING %x
```
When we walk through G_SOMETHING and hit the load, the width of our known bits
is 32. However, the width of the range is going to be 8. This will cause us
to hit an assert.
To fix this, make computeKnownBitsFromRangeMetadata zero extend or truncate
the range type to match the bitwidth of the known bits we're calculating.
Add a testcase in CodeGen/GlobalISel/KnownBitsTest.cpp to reflect that this
works now.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D85375
Use pad with undef and unmerge with unused results. This is annoyingly
similar to several other places in LegalizerHelper, but they're all
slightly different.
This was using invalid MIR for the test instructions. The test add was
the first instruction in the block, before the trunc inputs or copies
from physical registers which I assume was not intended.
Try to make the behavior more consistent with getGCDType, and bias
towards returning something closer to the source type whenever there's
an ambiguity.
Try harder to find a canonical unmerge type when trying to cover the
desired target type. Handle finding a compatible unmerge type for two
vectors with different element types. This will return the largest
multiple of the source vector element that will evenly divide the
target vector type.
Also make the handling mixing scalars and vectors, and prefer the
source element type as the unmerge target type.
For now I have changed SimplifyDemandedBits and it's various callers
to assume we know nothing for scalable vectors and to ignore the
demanded bits completely. I have also done something similar for
SimplifyDemandedVectorElts. These changes fix up lots of warnings
due to calls to EVT::getVectorNumElements() for types with scalable
vectors. These functions are all used for optimisations, rather than
functional requirements. In future we can revisit this code if
there is a need to improve code quality for SVE.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80537
When trying to calculate the number of sign bits for scalable vectors
we should just bail out for now and pretend we know nothing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81093
This reverts commit 5a95be22d2.
It causes GCC 5.3 to segfault:
In file included from /work/llvm.monorepo/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/GISel/AArch64InstructionSelector.cpp:357:0: lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64GenGlobalISel.inc:189:17: in constexpr expansion of ‘llvm::LLT::scalar(16u)’
lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64GenGlobalISel.inc:205:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Add a unit test that shows how CSE works if we install an observer
at the machine function level and not use the CSEMIRBuilder to build
instructions.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D81625
Until we have a real need for computing known bits for scalable
vectors I have simply changed the code to bail out for now and
pretend we know nothing. I've also fixed up some simple callers of
computeKnownBits too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80437
It was annoying enough that every custom lowering needed to set the
insert point, but this was made worse since now these all needed to be
updated to setInstrAndDebugLoc. Consolidate these so every
legalization action has the right insert position by default.
This should fix dropping debug info in every custom AMDGPU
legalization.
This patch updates TargetLoweringBase::computeRegisterProperties and
TargetLoweringBase::getTypeConversion to support scalable vectors,
and make the right calls on how to legalise them. These changes are required
to legalise both MVTs and EVTs.
Reviewers: efriedma, david-arm, ctetreau
Reviewed By: efriedma
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80640
Summary:
I have fixed several places in getSplatSourceVector and isSplatValue
to work correctly with scalable vectors. I added new support for
the ISD::SPLAT_VECTOR DAG node as one of the obvious cases we can
support with scalable vectors. In other places I have tried to do
the sensible thing, such as bail out for vector types we don't yet
support or don't intend to support.
It's not possible to add IR test cases to cover these changes, since
they are currently only ever exercised on certain targets, e.g.
only X86 targets use the result of getSplatSourceVector. I've
assumed that X86 tests already exist to test these code paths for
fixed vectors. However, I have added some AArch64 unit tests that
test the specific functions I have changed.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79083
Summary:
This verifier tries to ensure that DebugLoc's don't just disappear as
we transform the MIR. It observes the instructions created, erased, and
changed and at checkpoints chosen by the client algorithm verifies the
locations affected by those changes.
In particular, it verifies that:
* Every DebugLoc for an erased/changing instruction is still present on
at least one new/changed instruction
* Failing that, that there is a line-0 location in the new/changed
instructions. It's not possible to confirm which locations were merged so
it conservatively assumes all unaccounted for locations are accounted
for by any line-0 location to avoid false positives.
If that fails, it prints the lost locations in the debug output along with
the instructions that should have accounted for them.
In theory, this is usable by the legalizer, combiner, selector and any other
pass that performs incremental changes to the MIR. However, it has so far
only really been tested on the legalizer (not including the artifact
combiner) where it has caught lots of lost locations, particularly in Custom
legalizations. There's only one example here as my initial testing was on an
out-of-tree target and I haven't done a pass over the in-tree targets yet.
Depends on D77575, D77446
Reviewers: bogner, aprantl, vsk
Subscribers: jvesely, nhaehnle, mgorny, rovka, hiraditya, volkan, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77576
Previously, getWithOffset() would drop the offset if the base was null.
Because of this, MachineMemOperand would return the wrong result from
getAlign() in these cases. MachineMemOperand stores the alignment of
the pointer without the offset.
A bunch of MIR tests changed because we print the offset now.
Split off from D77687.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78049
Summary:
Preserve call site info for duplicated instructions. We copy over the
call site info in CloneMachineInstrBundle to avoid repeated calls to
copyCallSiteInfo in CloneMachineInstr.
(Alternatively, we could copy call site info higher up the stack, e.g.
into TargetInstrInfo::duplicate, or even into individual backend passes.
However, I don't see how that would be safer or more general than the
current approach.)
Reviewers: aprantl, djtodoro, dstenb
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77685
Jay Foad