Currently, the DAG Combiner only tries to convert type-legal build_vector nodes
into shuffles. This patch simply moves the logic that checks if a
build_vector has a legal value type up before we even start analyzing the
operands. This allows to early exit immediately from method
'visitBUILD_VECTOR' if the node type is known to be illegal.
No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 218677
If there is a store followed by a store with the same value to the same location, then the store is dead/noop. It can be removed.
This problem is found in spec2006-197.parser.
For example,
stur w10, [x11, #-4]
stur w10, [x11, #-4]
Then one of the two stur instructions can be removed.
Patch by David Xu!
llvm-svn: 218569
This is purely refactoring. No functional changes intended. PowerPC is the only target
that is currently using this interface.
The ultimate goal is to allow targets other than PowerPC (certainly X86 and Aarch64) to turn this:
z = y / sqrt(x)
into:
z = y * rsqrte(x)
And:
z = y / x
into:
z = y * rcpe(x)
using whatever HW magic they can use. See http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20900 .
There is one hook in TargetLowering to get the target-specific opcode for an estimate instruction
along with the number of refinement steps needed to make the estimate usable.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5484
llvm-svn: 218553
This is purely a plumbing patch. No functional changes intended.
The ultimate goal is to allow targets other than PowerPC (certainly X86 and Aarch64) to turn this:
z = y / sqrt(x)
into:
z = y * rsqrte(x)
using whatever HW magic they can use. See http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20900 .
The first step is to add a target hook for RSQRTE, take the already target-independent code selfishly hoarded by PPC, and put it into DAGCombiner.
Next steps:
The code in DAGCombiner::BuildRSQRTE() should be refactored further; tests that exercise that logic need to be added.
Logic in PPCTargetLowering::BuildRSQRTE() should be hoisted into DAGCombiner.
X86 and AArch64 overrides for TargetLowering.BuildRSQRTE() should be added.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5425
llvm-svn: 218219
The heuristic used by DAGCombine to form FMAs checks that the FMUL has only one
use, but this is overly-conservative on some systems. Specifically, if the FMA
and the FADD have the same latency (and the FMA does not compete for resources
with the FMUL any more than the FADD does), there is no need for the
restriction, and furthermore, forming the FMA leaving the FMUL can still allow
for higher overall throughput and decreased critical-path length.
Here we add a new TLI callback, enableAggressiveFMAFusion, false by default, to
elide the hasOneUse check. This is enabled for PowerPC by default, as most
PowerPC systems will benefit.
Patch by Olivier Sallenave, thanks!
llvm-svn: 218120
Do
(shl (add x, c1), c2) -> (add (shl x, c2), c1 << c2)
This is already done for multiplies, but since multiplies
by powers of two are turned into shifts, we also need
to handle it here.
This might want checks for isLegalAddImmediate to avoid
transforming an add of a legal immediate with one that isn't.
llvm-svn: 217610
This is an extension of the change made with r215820:
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=215820
That patch allowed combining of splatted vector FP constants that are multiplied.
This patch allows combining non-uniform vector FP constants too by relaxing the
check on the type of vector. Also, canonicalize a vector fmul in the
same way that we already do for scalars - if only one operand of the fmul is a
constant, make it operand 1. Otherwise, we miss potential folds.
This fold is also done by -instcombine, but it's possible that extra
fmuls may have been generated during lowering.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5254
llvm-svn: 217599
This problem is bigger than just fsub, but this is the minimum fix to solve
fneg for PR20556 ( http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20556 ), and we solve
zero subtraction with the same change.
llvm-svn: 217286
If an fmul was introduced by lowering, it wouldn't be folded
into a multiply by a constant since the earlier combine would
have replaced the fmul with the fadd.
llvm-svn: 216932
When I recommitted r208640 (in r216898) I added an exclusion for TargetConstant
offsets, as there is no guarantee that a backend can handle them on generic
ADDs (even if it generates them during address-mode matching) -- and,
specifically, applying this transformation directly with TargetConstants caused
a self-hosting failure on PPC64. Ignoring all TargetConstants, however, is less
than ideal. Instead, for non-opaque constants, we can convert them into regular
constants for use with the generated ADD (or SUB).
llvm-svn: 216908
I reverted r208640 in r209747 because r208640 broke self-hosting on PPC64. The
underlying cause of the failure is that pre-inc loads with increments
represented by ISD::TargetConstants were being transformed into ISD:::ADDs with
ISD::TargetConstant operands. PPC doesn't have a pattern for those, and so they
were selected as invalid r+r adds.
This recommits r208640, rebased and with an exclusion for ISD::TargetConstant
increments. This behavior seems correct, although in the future we might want
to ask the target to split out the indexing that uses ISD::TargetConstants.
Unfortunately, I don't yet have small test case where the relevant invalid
'add' instruction is not itself dead (and thus eliminated by
DeadMachineInstructionElim -- sometimes bugpoint is too good at removing things)
Original commit message (by Adam Nemet):
Right now the load may not get DCE'd because of the side-effect of updating
the base pointer.
This can happen if we lower a read-modify-write of an illegal larger type
(e.g. i48) such that the modification only affects one of the subparts (the
lower i32 part but not the higher i16 part). See the testcase.
In order to spot the dead load we need to revisit it when SimplifyDemandedBits
decided that the value of the load is masked off. This is the
CommitTargetLoweringOpt piece.
I checked compile time with ARM64 by sending SPEC bitcode files through llc.
No measurable change.
Fixes <rdar://problem/16031651>
llvm-svn: 216898
was marked custom. The target independent DAG combine has no way to know if
the shuffles it is introducing are ones that the target could support or not.
llvm-svn: 216678
isPow2DivCheap
That name doesn't specify signed or unsigned.
Lazy as I am, I eventually read the function and variable comments. It turns out that this is strictly about signed div. But I discovered that the comments are wrong:
srl/add/sra
is not the general sequence for signed integer division by power-of-2. We need one more 'sra':
sra/srl/add/sra
That's the sequence produced in DAGCombiner. The first 'sra' may be removed when dividing by exactly '2', but that's a special case.
This patch corrects the comments, changes the name of the flag bit, and changes the name of the accessor methods.
No functional change intended.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5010
llvm-svn: 216237
When combining a pair of shuffle nodes, check if the combined shuffle mask is
trivially Undef. In case, immediately fold that pair of shuffles to Undef.
The lack of checks for undef masks was the root-cause of a poor-codegen bug
in the dag combiner.
Example:
%1 = shufflevector <4 x i32> %A, <4 x i32> %B, <4 x i32> <i32 4, i32 1, i32 1, i32 6>
%2 = shufflevector <4 x i32> %1, <4 x i32> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 0, i32 4, i32 1, i32 6>
%3 = shufflevector <4 x i32> %2, <4 x i32> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 1, i32 5, i32 3, i32 3>
Before this patch, on x86 (with -mcpu=corei7) we failed to fold the entire
sequence to Undef value and therefore we generated:
shufps $-123, %xmm1, $xmm0
pshufd $-46, %xmm0, %xmm0
With this patch, the entire shuffle sequence is folded to Undef and no
shuffles are generated in the output assembly.
Added new test cases to test 'combine-vec-shuffle-5.ll'.
llvm-svn: 215797
This patch allows a vector fneg of a bitcasted integer value to be optimized in the same way that we already optimize a scalar fneg. If the integer variable is a constant, we can precompute the result and not require any logic ops.
This patch is very similar to a fabs patch committed at r214892.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4852
llvm-svn: 215646
input node after manually adding it to the worklist and using CombineTo.
Once we use CombineTo the input node may have been deleted. Despite this
being *completely confusing* and somewhat broken, the only way to
"correctly" return from a DAG combine after potentially deleting the
input node is to return *that exact node*....
But really, this code should just never have used CombineTo. It won't do
what it wants (returning the node as mentioned above just causes the
combine to infloop). The correct way to combine away a casted load to
a load of the correct type is to RAUW the chain directly and then return
the loaded value to replace the actual value node.
I managed to find this with the vector shuffle fuzzer even though it
clearly has nothing at all to do with vector shuffles and rather those
happen to trigger a load of a constant pool that hits this combine *just
right*. I've included the test as it is small and a nice stress test
that the infrastructure isn't asserting.
llvm-svn: 215622
This patch improves the existing algorithm in DAGCombiner that
attempts to fold shuffles according to rule:
shuffle(shuffle(x, y, M1), undef, M2) -> shuffle(y, undef, M3)
Before this change, there were cases where the DAGCombiner conservatively
avoided folding shuffles even if the resulting mask would have been legal.
That is because the algorithm wrongly assumed that commuting
an illegal shuffle mask would always produce an illegal mask.
With this change, we now correctly compute the commuted shuffle mask before
calling method 'isShuffleMaskLegal' on it.
On X86, this improves for example the codegen for the following function:
define <4 x i32> @test(<4 x i32> %A, <4 x i32> %B) {
%1 = shufflevector <4 x i32> %B, <4 x i32> %A, <4 x i32> <i32 1, i32 2, i32 6, i32 7>
%2 = shufflevector <4 x i32> %1, <4 x i32> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 2, i32 3, i32 2, i32 3>
ret <4 x i32> %2
}
Before this change the X86 backend (-mcpu=corei7) generated
the following assembly code for function @test:
shufps $-23, %xmm0, %xmm1 # xmm1 = xmm1[1,2],xmm0[2,3]
movhlps %xmm1, %xmm1 # xmm1 = xmm1[1,1]
movaps %xmm1, %xmm0
Now we produce:
movhlps %xmm0, %xmm0 # xmm0 = xmm0[1,1]
Added extra test cases in combine-vec-shuffle-2.ll to verify that we correctly
fold according to the above-mentioned rule.
llvm-svn: 215555
Allow vector fabs operations on bitcasted constant integer values to be optimized
in the same way that we already optimize scalar fabs.
So for code like this:
%bitcast = bitcast i64 18446744069414584320 to <2 x float> ; 0xFFFF_FFFF_0000_0000
%fabs = call <2 x float> @llvm.fabs.v2f32(<2 x float> %bitcast)
%ret = bitcast <2 x float> %fabs to i64
Instead of generating something like this:
movabsq (constant pool loadi of mask for sign bits)
vmovq (move from integer register to vector/fp register)
vandps (mask off sign bits)
vmovq (move vector/fp register back to integer return register)
We should generate:
mov (put constant value in return register)
I have also removed a redundant clause in the first 'if' statement:
N0.getOperand(0).getValueType().isInteger()
is the same thing as:
IntVT.isInteger()
Testcases for x86 and ARM added to existing files that deal with vector fabs.
One existing testcase for x86 removed because it is no longer ideal.
For more background, please see:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D4770
And:
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20354
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4785
llvm-svn: 214892
This code is completely wrong. It is also dead, as if it were to *ever*
run, it would crash. Fortunately, after my work to the combiner, it is
at least *possible* to reach the code, and llvm-stress has found a test
case. Thanks to Patrick for reporting.
It would be really good if anyone who remembers how this code works and
what it was intended to do could add some more obvious test coverage
instead of my completely contrived and reduced test case. My test case
was so brittle I left a bread crumb comment in it to help the next
person to stumble on it and not know what it was actually testing for.
llvm-svn: 214785
combines) until they are legal.
Doing it the old way could, when the stars align *just* right, cause
a node to get into the combine set prior to being legalized. Then, when
the same node showed up as an operand to another node later on (but not
so much later on that it had been deleted as dead) we would fail to add
it back to the worklist thinking it had already been combined. This
would in turn cause it to not be legalized. Fortunately, we can also
walk the operands looking for uncombined (and thus potentially
un-legalized) nodes late. It will still ensure that we walk all operands
of all nodes and send all of them through both the legalizer without
changes and the combiner at least once. (Which was the original goal of
this).
I have a test case for this bug, but it is terribly brittle. For
example, it will stop finding the bug the moment I enable the new
shuffle lowering. I don't yet have any test case that reliably exercises
this bug, and it isn't clear that it will be possible to craft one. It
is entirely possible that with the new shuffle lowering the two forms of
doing this are precisely equivalent. That doesn't mean we shouldn't take
the more conservative approach of insisting on things in the combined
set having survived the legalizer.
llvm-svn: 214673
This is intended to be the minimal change needed to fix PR20354 ( http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20354 ). The check for a vector operation was wrong; we need to check that the fabs itself is not a vector operation.
This patch will not generate the optimal code. A constant pool load and 'and' op will be generated instead of just returning a value that we can calculate in advance (as we do for the scalar case). I've put a 'TODO' comment for that here and expect to have that patch ready soon.
There is a very similar optimization that we can do in visitFNEG, so I've put another 'TODO' there and expect to have another patch for that too.
llvm-svn: 214670
so using a single helper which adds operands back onto the worklist.
Several places didn't rigorously do this but a couple already did.
Factoring them together and doing it rigorously is important to delete
things recursively early on in the combiner and get a chance to see
accurate hasOneUse values. While no existing test cases change, an
upcoming patch to add DAG combining logic for PSHUFB requires this to
work correctly.
llvm-svn: 214623
during DAGCombine in certain circumstances. Unfortunately, the circumstances required
to trigger the issue seem to require a pretty specific interaction of DAGCombines,
and I haven't been able to find a testcase that reproduces on X86, ARM, or AArch64.
The functionality added here is replicated in essentially every other DAG combine,
so it seems pretty obviously correct.
llvm-svn: 214622
Currently when DAGCombine converts loads feeding a switch into a switch of
addresses feeding a load the new load inherits the isInvariant flag of the left
side. This is incorrect since invariant loads can be reordered in cases where it
is illegal to reoarder normal loads.
This patch adds an isInvariant parameter to getExtLoad() and updates all call
sites to pass in the data if they have it or false if they don't. It also
changes the DAGCombine to use that data to make the right decision when
creating the new load.
llvm-svn: 214449
DAGCombine may choose to rewrite graphs where two loads feed a select into
graphs where a select of two addresses feed a load. While it sanity checks the
loads to make sure they are broadly equivalent it currently just uses the
alignment restriction of the left node. In cases where the right node has
stronger alignment requiresment this may lead to bad codegen, such as generating
an aligned load where an unaligned load is required. This patch makes the
combine generate a load with an alignment that is the same as whichever is more
restrictive of the two alignments.
Tests included.
rdar://17762530
llvm-svn: 214322
Andrea Di Biagio