Summary:
Now that there is a one-to-one mapping from MachineFunction to
WinEHFuncInfo, we don't need to use a DenseMap to select the right
WinEHFuncInfo for the current funclet.
The main challenge here is that X86WinEHStatePass is an IR pass that
doesn't have access to the MachineFunction. I gave it its own
WinEHFuncInfo object that it uses to calculate state numbers, which it
then throws away. As long as nobody creates or removes EH pads between
this pass and SDAG construction, we will get the same state numbers.
The other thing X86WinEHStatePass does is to mark the EH registration
node. Instead of communicating which alloca was the registration through
WinEHFuncInfo, I added the llvm.x86.seh.ehregnode intrinsic. This
intrinsic generates no code and simply marks the alloca in use.
Reviewers: JCTremoulet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14668
llvm-svn: 253378
Statepoint lowering currently expects that the target method of a
statepoint only defines a single value. This precludes using
statepoints with ABIs that return values in multiple registers
(e.g. the SysV AMD64 ABI). This change adds support for lowering
statepoints with mutli-def targets.
llvm-svn: 253339
Richard Trieu noted that UBSan detected an overflowing shift, and the obvious fix caused a crash.
What was happening was that the shiftee (1U) was indeed too small for the possible range of shifts it had to handle, but also we were using "VT.getSizeInBits()" to get the maximum type bitwidth, but we wanted "VT.getScalarSizeInBits()" to get the vector lane size instead of the entire vector size.
Use an APInt for the shift and VT.getScalarSizeInBits().
llvm-svn: 253023
This reverts commit r252565.
This also includes the revert of the commit mentioned below in order to
avoid breaking tests in AMDGPU:
Revert "AMDGPU: Set isAllocatable = 0 on VS_32/VS_64"
This reverts commit r252674.
llvm-svn: 252956
Several backends have instructions to reverse the order of bits in an integer. Conceptually matching such patterns is similar to @llvm.bswap, and it was mentioned in http://reviews.llvm.org/D14234 that it would be best if these patterns were matched in InstCombine instead of reimplemented in every different target.
This patch introduces an intrinsic @llvm.bitreverse.i* that operates similarly to @llvm.bswap. For plumbing purposes there is also a new ISD node ISD::BITREVERSE, with simple expansion and promotion support.
The intention is that InstCombine's BSWAP detection logic will be extended to support BITREVERSE too, and @llvm.bitreverse intrinsics emitted (if the backend supports lowering it efficiently).
llvm-svn: 252878
- Factor out code to query and modify the sign bit of a floatingpoint
value as an integer. This also works if none of the targets integer
types is big enough to hold all bits of the floatingpoint value.
- Legalize FABS(x) as FCOPYSIGN(x, 0.0) if FCOPYSIGN is available,
otherwise perform bit manipulation on the sign bit. The previous code
used "x >u 0 ? x : -x" which is incorrect for x being -0.0! It also
takes 34 instructions on ARM Cortex-M4. With this patch we only
require 5:
vldr d0, LCPI0_0
vmov r2, r3, d0
lsrs r2, r3, #31
bfi r1, r2, #31, #1
bx lr
(This could be further improved if the compiler would recognize that
r2, r3 is zero).
- Only lower FCOPYSIGN(x, y) = sign(x) ? -FABS(x) : FABS(x) if FABS is
available otherwise perform bit manipulation on the sign bit.
- Perform the sign(x) test by masking out the sign bit and comparing
with 0 rather than shifting the sign bit to the highest position and
testing for "<s 0". For x86 copysignl (on 80bit values) this gets us:
testl $32768, %eax
rather than:
shlq $48, %rax
sets %al
testb %al, %al
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11172
llvm-svn: 252839
Summary:
Don't fold
(zext (and (load x), cst)) -> (and (zextload x), (zext cst))
if
(and (load x) cst)
will match as a zextload already and has additional users.
For example, the following IR:
%load = load i32, i32* %ptr, align 8
%load16 = and i32 %load, 65535
%load64 = zext i32 %load16 to i64
store i32 %load16, i32* %dst1, align 4
store i64 %load64, i64* %dst2, align 8
used to produce the following aarch64 code:
ldr w8, [x0]
and w9, w8, #0xffff
and x8, x8, #0xffff
str w9, [x1]
str x8, [x2]
but with this change produces the following aarch64 code:
ldrh w8, [x0]
str w8, [x1]
str x8, [x2]
Reviewers: resistor, mcrosier
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14340
llvm-svn: 252789
This allows avoiding the default Expand behavior which
introduces stack usage. Bitcast the scalar and replace
the missing elements with undef.
This is covered by existing tests and used by a future
commit which makes 64-bit vectors legal types on AMDGPU.
llvm-svn: 252632
This is for AMDGPU to implement v2i64 extract as extract of
half of a v4i32.
This is covered by existing tests and used by a future
commit which makes 64-bit vectors legal types on AMDGPU.
llvm-svn: 252630
I'm not sure what the point of this was. I'm not sure why
you would ever define an instruction that produces an unallocatable
register class. No tests fail with this removed, and it seems like
it should be a verifier error to define such an instruction.
This was problematic for AMDGPU because it would make bad decisions
by arbitrarily changing the register class when unsetting isAllocatable
for VS_32/VS_64, which is currently set as a workaround to this problem.
AMDGPU uses the VS_32/VS_64 register classes to represent operands which
can use either VGPRs or SGPRs. When isAllocatable is unset for these,
this would need to pick either the SGPR or VGPR class and insert either
a copy we don't want, or an illegal copy we would need to deal with
later. A semi-arbitrary register class ordering decision is made in tablegen,
which resulted in always picking a VGPR class because it happens to have
more registers than the SGPR register class. We really just want to
use whatever register class the original register had.
llvm-svn: 252565
We don't currently have any runtime library functions for operations on
f16 values (other than conversions to and from f32 and f64), so we
should always promote it to f32, even if that is not a legal type. In
that case, the f32 values would be softened to f32 library calls.
SoftenFloatRes_FP_EXTEND now needs to check the promoted operand's type,
as it may ne a no-op or require a different library call.
getCopyFromParts and getCopyToParts now need to cope with a
floating-point value stored in a larger integer part, as is the case for
any target that needs to store an f16 value in a 32-bit integer
register.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12856
llvm-svn: 252459
Summary:
The CLR's personality routine passes these in rdx/edx, not rax/eax.
Make getExceptionPointerRegister a virtual method parameterized by
personality function to allow making this distinction.
Similarly make getExceptionSelectorRegister a virtual method parameterized
by personality function, for symmetry.
Reviewers: pgavlin, majnemer, rnk
Subscribers: jyknight, dsanders, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14344
llvm-svn: 252383
We already had a test for this for 32-bit SEH catchpads, but those don't
actually create funclets. We had a bug that only appeared in funclet
prologues, where we would establish EBP and ESI as our FP and BP, and
then downstream prologue code would overwrite them.
While I was at it, I fixed Win64+funclets+stackrealign. This issue
doesn't come up as often there due to the ABI requring 16 byte stack
alignment, but now we can rest easy that AVX and WinEH will work well
together =P.
llvm-svn: 252210
There is no point in having invoke safepoints handled differently than the
call safepoints. All relevant decisions could be made by looking at whether
or not gc.result and gc.relocate lay in a same basic block. This change will
allow to lower call safepoints with relocates and results in a different
basic blocks. See test case for example.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14158
llvm-svn: 252028
1) PR25154. This is basically a repeat of PR18102, which was fixed in
r200201, and broken again by r234430. The latter changed which of the
store nodes was merged into from the first to the last. Thus, we now
also need to prefer merging a later store at a given address into the
target node, instead of an earlier one.
2) While investigating that, I also realized I'd introduced a bug in
r236850. There, I removed a check for alignment -- not realizing that
nothing except the alignment check was ensuring that none of the stores
were overlapping! This is a really bogus way to ensure there's no
aliased stores.
A better solution to both of these issues is likely to always use the
code added in the 'if (UseAA)' branches which rearrange the chain based
on a more principled analysis. I'll look into whether that can be used
always, but in the interest of getting things back to working, I think a
minimal change makes sense.
llvm-svn: 251816
Summary:
Don't call `computeKnownBitsFromRangeMetadata` for extended loads --
this can cause a mismatch between the width of the !range metadata and
the width of the APInt's accumulating `KnownZero` (and `KnownOne` in the
future). This isn't a problem now, but will be after a future change.
Note: this can be made more aggressive in the future.
Reviewers: nlewycky
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14107
llvm-svn: 251486
r248010 changed the -debug output to use short ids, but did not
similarly modify the graph printer. Change to be consistent, for ease of
cross-reference.
llvm-svn: 251465
This is a usage of the IR-level fast-math-flags now that they are propagated to SDNodes.
This was originally part of D8900.
Removing the global 'enable-unsafe-fp-math' checks will require auto-upgrade and
possibly other changes.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9708
llvm-svn: 251450
When optimization is disabled, edge weights that are stored in MBB won't be used so that we don't have to store them. Currently, this is done by adding successors with default weight 0, and if all successors have default weights, the weight list will be empty. But that the weight list is empty doesn't mean disabled optimization (as is stated several times in MachineBasicBlock.cpp): it may also mean all successors just have default weights.
We should discourage using default weights when adding successors, because it is very easy for users to forget update the correct edge weights instead of using default ones (one exception is that the MBB only has one successor). In order to detect such usages, it is better to differentiate using default weights from the case when optimizations is disabled.
In this patch, a new interface addSuccessorWithoutWeight(MBB*) is created for when optimization is disabled. In this case, MBB will try to maintain an empty weight list, but it cannot guarantee this as for many uses of addSuccessor() whether optimization is disabled or not is not checked. But it can guarantee that if optimization is enabled, then the weight list always has the same size of the successor list.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13963
llvm-svn: 251429
When taking the remainder of a value divided by a constant, visitREM()
attempts to convert the REM to a longer but faster sequence of instructions.
This conversion calls combine() on a speculative DIV instruction. Commit
rL250825 may cause this combine() to return a DIVREM, corrupting nearby nodes.
Flow eventually hits unreachable().
This patch adds a test case and a check to prevent visitREM() from trying
to convert the REM instruction in cases where a DIVREM is possible.
See http://reviews.llvm.org/D14035
llvm-svn: 251373
When using the MCU psABI, compiler-generated library calls should pass
some parameters in-register. However, since inreg marking for x86 is currently
done by the front end, it will not be applied to backend-generated calls.
This is a workaround for PR3997, which describes a similar issue for -mregparm.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13977
llvm-svn: 251223
We don't need a mask of a rotation result to be a constant splat - any constant scalar/vector can be usefully folded.
Followup to D13851.
llvm-svn: 251197
This patch adds support for lowering to the XOP VPROT / VPROTI vector bit rotation instructions.
This has required changes to the DAGCombiner rotation pattern matching to support vector types - so far I've only changed it to support splat vectors, but generalising this further is feasible in the future.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13851
llvm-svn: 251188
When we fold "mul ((add x, c1), c1)" -> "add ((mul x, c2), c1*c2)", we bail if (add x, c1) has multiple
users which would result in an extra add instruction.
In such cases, this patch adds a check to see if we can eliminate a multiply instruction in exchange for the extra add.
I also added the capability of doing the existing optimization with non-splatted vectors (splatted also works).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13740
llvm-svn: 251028
This will be used in future commits for AMDGPU to promote
operations on i64 vectors into operations on 32-bit vector
components.
This will be used / tested in future AMDGPU commits.
llvm-svn: 250945
default: llvm_unreachable("This action is not supported yet!");
-- so I'm adding one to the third switch block, too.
This is a follow-up fix for http://reviews.llvm.org/D13862
llvm-svn: 250830
Summary:
TargetLoweringBase::Expand is defined as "Try to expand this to other ops,
otherwise use a libcall." For ISD::UDIV and ISD::SDIV, the choice between
the two possibilities was defined in a rather convoluted way:
- if DIVREM is legal, expand to DIVREM
- if DIVREM has a custom lowering, expand to DIVREM
- if DIVREM libcall is defined and a remainder from the same division is
computed elsewhere, expand to a DIVREM libcall
- else, expand to a DIV libcall
This had the undesirable effect that if both DIV and DIVREM are implemented
as libcalls, then ISD::UDIV and ISD::SDIV are expanded to the heavier DIVREM
libcall, even when the remainder isn't used.
The new code adds a new LegalizeAction, TargetLoweringBase::LibCall, so that
backends can directly control whether they prefer an expansion or a conversion
to a libcall. This makes the generic lowering code even more generic,
allowing its reuse in a wider range of target-specific configurations.
The useful effect is that ARM backend will now generate a call
to __aeabi_{i,u}div rather than __aeabi_{i,u}divmod in cases where
it doesn't need the remainder. There's no functional change outside
the ARM backend.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, rengolin
Subscribers: t.p.northover, llvm-commits, aemerson
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13862
llvm-svn: 250826
Summary:
In addition to moving the code over, this patch amends the DIV,REM -> DIVREM
combining to run on all affected nodes at once: if the nodes are converted
to DIVREM one at a time, then the resulting DIVREM may get legalized by the
backend into something target-specific that we won't be able to recognize
and correlate with the remaining nodes.
The motivation is to "prepare terrain" for D13862: when we set DIV and REM
to be legalized to libcalls, instead of the DIVREM, we otherwise lose the
ability to combine them together. To prevent this, we need to take the
DIV,REM -> DIVREM combining out of the lowering stage.
Reviewers: RKSimon, eli.friedman, rengolin
Subscribers: john.brawn, rengolin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13733
llvm-svn: 250825
Summary:
Some shared code for handling eh.exceptionpointer and eh.exceptioncode
needs to not share the part that truncates to 32 bits, which is intended
just for exception codes.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13747
llvm-svn: 250588
Summary:
Caching SDLoc(N), instead of recreating it in every single
function call, keeps the code denser, and allows to unwrap long lines.
Reviewers: sunfish, atrick, sdmitrouk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13726
llvm-svn: 250305
Summary: The two implementations had more code in common than not.
Reviewers: sunfish, MatzeB, sdmitrouk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13724
llvm-svn: 250302
The comment says this was stopped because it was unlikely to be
profitable. This is not true if you want to combine vector loads
with multiple components.
For a simple case that looks like
t0 = load t0 ...
t1 = load t0 ...
t2 = load t0 ...
t3 = load t0 ...
t4 = store t0:1, t0:1
t5 = store t4, t1:0
t6 = store t5, t2:0
t7 = store t6, t3:0
We want to get all of these stores onto a chain
that is a TokenFactor of these N loads. This mostly
solves the AMDGPU merge-stores.ll regressions
with -combiner-alias-analysis for merging vector
stores of vector loads.
llvm-svn: 250138
Reid Kleckner