Summary:
C++ does not allow shadowing template parameters, but previously we
allowed it under -fms-extensions. Now this behavior is controlled by
-fms-compatibility, and we emit a -Wmicrosoft-template warning when it
happens.
Fixes PR43265
Reviewers: thakis, hans
Subscribers: amccarth, rsmith, STL_MSFT, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67463
llvm-svn: 371753
This reverts r371497 (git commit 3d7e9ab7b9)
Reorder `not` with `env` in these two tests so they pass:
Driver/rewrite-map-in-diagnostics.c
Index/crash-recovery-modules.m.
This will not be necessary after D66531 lands.
llvm-svn: 371552
I see in the history for some of these tests REQUIRES:shell was used as
a way to disable tests on Windows because they are flaky there. I tried
not to re-enable such tests, but it's possible that I missed some and
this will re-enable flaky tests on Windows. If so, we should disable
them with UNSUPPORTED:system-windows and add a comment that they are
flaky there. So far as I can tell, the lit internal shell is capable of
running all of these tests, and we shouldn't use REQUIRES:shell as a
proxy for Windows.
llvm-svn: 371478
This is mostly the same as the
[[clang::require_constant_initialization]] attribute, but has a couple
of additional syntactic and semantic restrictions.
In passing, I added a warning for the attribute form being added after
we have already seen the initialization of the variable (but before we
see the definition); that case previously slipped between the cracks and
the attribute was silently ignored.
llvm-svn: 370972
initializers.
This has some interesting interactions with our existing extensions to
support C99 designated initializers as an extension in C++. Those are
resolved as follows:
* We continue to permit the full breadth of C99 designated initializers
in C++, with the exception that we disallow a partial overwrite of an
initializer with a non-trivially-destructible type. (Full overwrite
is OK, because we won't run the first initializer at all.)
* The C99 extensions are disallowed in SFINAE contexts and during
overload resolution, where they could change the meaning of valid
programs.
* C++20 disallows reordering of initializers. We only check for that for
the simple cases that the C++20 rules permit (designators of the form
'.field_name =' and continue to allow reordering in other cases).
It would be nice to improve this behavior in future.
* All C99 designated initializer extensions produce a warning by
default in C++20 mode. People are going to learn the C++ rules based
on what Clang diagnoses, so it's important we diagnose these properly
by default.
* In C++ <= 17, we apply the C++20 rules rather than the C99 rules, and
so still diagnose C99 extensions as described above. We continue to
accept designated C++20-compatible initializers in C++ <= 17 silently
by default (but naturally still reject under -pedantic-errors).
This is not a complete implementation of P0329R4. In particular, that
paper introduces new non-C99-compatible syntax { .field { init } }, and
we do not support that yet.
This is based on a previous patch by Don Hinton, though I've made
substantial changes when addressing the above interactions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59754
llvm-svn: 370544
If a class or struct or union declaration contains a pragma that
is not valid in this context, compiler issues generic error like
"expected member name or ';' after declaration specifiers". With this
change the error tells that this pragma cannot appear in this declaration.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64932
llvm-svn: 367779
Rename lang mode flag to -cl-std=clc++/-cl-std=CLC++
or -std=clc++/-std=CLC++.
This aligns with OpenCL C conversion and removes ambiguity
with OpenCL C++.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65102
llvm-svn: 367008
This adds a new vectorize predication loop hint:
#pragma clang loop vectorize_predicate(enable)
that can be used to indicate to the vectoriser that all (load/store)
instructions should be predicated (masked). This allows, for example, folding
of the remainder loop into the main loop.
This patch will be followed up with D64916 and D65197. The former is a
refactoring in the loopvectorizer and the groundwork to make tail loop folding
a more general concept, and in the latter the actual tail loop folding
transformation will be implemented.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64744
llvm-svn: 366989
If the type didn't exist, we used to emit a really bad error:
t.m:3:12: error: expected ')'
-(nullable NoSuchType)foo3;
^
rdar://50925632
llvm-svn: 364489
Syntax:
asm [volatile] goto ( AssemblerTemplate
:
: InputOperands
: Clobbers
: GotoLabels)
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Extended-Asm.html
New llvm IR is "callbr" for inline asm goto instead "call" for inline asm
For:
asm goto("testl %0, %0; jne %l1;" :: "r"(cond)::label_true, loop);
IR:
callbr void asm sideeffect "testl $0, $0; jne ${1:l};", "r,X,X,~{dirflag},~{fpsr},~{flags}"(i32 %0, i8* blockaddress(@foo, %label_true), i8* blockaddress(@foo, %loop)) #1
to label %asm.fallthrough [label %label_true, label %loop], !srcloc !3
asm.fallthrough:
Compiler need to generate:
1> a dummy constarint 'X' for each label.
2> an unique fallthrough label for each asm goto stmt " asm.fallthrough%number".
Diagnostic
1> duplicate asm operand name are used in output, input and label.
2> goto out of scope.
llvm-svn: 362045
message sends, designators, and attributes.
Instead of having the tentative parsing phase sometimes return an
indicator to say what diagnostic to produce if parsing fails and
sometimes ask the caller to run it again, consistently ask the caller to
try parsing again if tentative parsing would fail or is otherwise unable
to completely parse the lambda-introducer without producing an
irreversible semantic effect.
Mostly NFC, but we should recover marginally better in some error cases
(avoiding duplicate diagnostics).
llvm-svn: 361182
Summary:
This adds a new error for missing parentheses around lambdas in delete operators.
```
int main() {
delete []() { return new int(); }();
}
```
This will result in:
```
test.cpp:2:3: error: '[]' after delete interpreted as 'delete[]'
delete []() { return new int(); }();
^~~~~~~~~
test.cpp:2:9: note: add parentheses around the lambda
delete []() { return new int(); }();
^
( )
```
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: riccibruno, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36357
llvm-svn: 361119
object rather than tracking the originating expression.
This is groundwork for supporting polymorphic typeid expressions. (Note
that this somewhat regresses our support for DR1968, but it turns out
that that never actually worked anyway, at least in non-trivial cases.)
This reinstates r360974, reverted in r360988, with a fix for a
static_assert failure on 32-bit builds: force Type base class to have
8-byte alignment like the rest of Clang's AST nodes.
llvm-svn: 360995
object rather than tracking the originating expression.
This is groundwork for supporting polymorphic typeid expressions. (Note
that this somewhat regresses our support for DR1968, but it turns out
that that never actually worked anyway, at least in non-trivial cases.)
llvm-svn: 360974
Summary:
This patch implements the source location builtins `__builtin_LINE(), `__builtin_FUNCTION()`, `__builtin_FILE()` and `__builtin_COLUMN()`. These builtins are needed to implement [`std::experimental::source_location`](https://rawgit.com/cplusplus/fundamentals-ts/v2/main.html#reflection.src_loc.creation).
With the exception of `__builtin_COLUMN`, GCC also implements these builtins, and Clangs behavior is intended to match as closely as possible.
Reviewers: rsmith, joerg, aaron.ballman, bogner, majnemer, shafik, martong
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: rnkovacs, loskutov, riccibruno, mgorny, kunitoki, alexr, majnemer, hfinkel, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37035
llvm-svn: 360937
(and less wrong).
It's not correct to assume that X<something, Type> is always a
template-id; there are a few cases where the comma takes us into a
non-expression syntactic context in which 'Type' might be permissible.
Stop doing that.
This slightly regresses our error recovery on the cases where the
construct is intended to be a template-id. We typically do still manage
to diagnose a missing 'template' keyword, but we realize this too late
to properly recover from the error.
This fixes a regression introduced by r360308.
llvm-svn: 360827
This can be used for better support of `-fno-gnu-inline-asm` builds.
rdar://problem/49540880
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, rsmith
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: eraman, jkorous, dexonsmith, craig.topper, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61619
llvm-svn: 360625
template name is not visible to unqualified lookup.
In order to support this without a severe degradation in our ability to
diagnose typos in template names, this change significantly restructures
the way we handle template-id-shaped syntax for which lookup of the
template name finds nothing.
Instead of eagerly diagnosing an undeclared template name, we now form a
placeholder template-name representing a name that is known to not find
any templates. When the parser sees such a name, it attempts to
disambiguate whether we have a less-than comparison or a template-id.
Any diagnostics or typo-correction for the name are delayed until its
point of use.
The upshot should be a small improvement of our diagostic quality
overall: we now take more syntactic context into account when trying to
resolve an undeclared identifier on the left hand side of a '<'. In
fact, this works well enough that the backwards-compatible portion (for
an undeclared identifier rather than a lookup that finds functions but
no function templates) is enabled in all language modes.
llvm-svn: 360308
Summary:
- For template arguments ending with `>>>`, we should cease lookahead
and treat it as type-id firstly, so that deduction could work
properly.
Reviewers: tra, yaxunl
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61396
llvm-svn: 360214
Keep looking for decl-specifiers after an unknown identifier. Don't
issue diagnostics about an error type specifier conflicting with later
type specifiers.
llvm-svn: 360117
The parser was dealing with unexpected "template" keywords after "using"
keywords too late and putting the parser into the wrong state, which could
lead to a crash down the line. This change allows the parser to consume the
bad "template" keywords earlier, and continue parsing as if "template" was
never there to begin with for better error recovery.
llvm-svn: 359740
Clang emits a warning when using a pure specifier =0 in a function definition
at class scope (a MS-specific construct), when using -fms-extensions.
However, to detect this, it was using FD->isCanonicalDecl() on function
declaration, which was also detecting out-of-class definition of member
functions of class templates. Fix this by using !FD->isOutOfLine() instead.
Fixes PR21334.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29707
Reviewed By: riccibruno
Reviewers: rnk, riccibruno
Patch By: Rudy Pons
llvm-svn: 358849
We want to make objc_nonlazy_class apply to implementations, but ran into this.
There doesn't seem to be any reason that this isn't supported.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60542
llvm-svn: 358200
For backwards compatibility we allow alternative spelling of address
spaces - 'private', 'local', 'global', 'constant', 'generic'.
In order to accept 'private' correctly, parsing has been changed to
understand different use cases - access specifier vs address space.
Fixes PR40707 and PR41011!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59603
llvm-svn: 356888
This adds support for static_assert() (and _Static_assert()) in
@interface/@implementation ivar lists and in @interface method declarations.
It was already supported in @implementation blocks outside of the ivar lists.
The assert AST nodes are added at file scope, matching where other
(non-Objective-C) declarations at @interface / @implementation level go (cf
`allTUVariables`).
Also add a `__has_feature(objc_c_static_assert)` that's true in C11 (and
`__has_extension(objc_c_static_assert)` that's always true) and
`__has_feature(objc_cxx_static_assert)` that's true in C++11 modea fter this
patch, so it's possible to check if this is supported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59223
llvm-svn: 356148
Reid Kleckner