Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jonas Devlieghere 89b658428b [swig] Don't mess with swig internals.
As of SWIG 4.0, __swig_getmethods__ and __swig_setmethods__ are no
longer defined. It appears that there's no need to mess with these
internals, we can simplify define the corresponding properties inline.

Originally I wanted to use the swig extension %attribute and
%attributeref to define properties. However, I couldn't find a way to
add documentation to these attributes. Since we already had the
properties defined inline, we might as well keep them.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63530

llvm-svn: 364974
2019-07-02 22:18:35 +00:00
Jonas Devlieghere 97316fff5d Revert "[swig] Define attribute(ref) instead of accessing swig internals."
This reverts commit f9b91a5279.

llvm-svn: 364951
2019-07-02 18:04:55 +00:00
Jonas Devlieghere f9b91a5279 [swig] Define attribute(ref) instead of accessing swig internals.
As of SWIG 4.0, __swig_getmethods__ and __swig_setmethods__ are no
longer defined. The solution is to stop using these internal swig
dictionaries and use %attribute and %attributeref instead. I plan on
doing this incrementally, with this differential serving as an example.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63530

llvm-svn: 364946
2019-07-02 17:25:20 +00:00
Pavel Labath eba97426d4 Clean up docstrings in swig interface files
Summary:
This patch removes the "//----" frames and "///" leading lines from
docstring comments.  We already have code doing transformations like this in
modify-python-lldb.py, but that's a script I'd like to remove. Instead
of running these transformations everytime we run swig, we can just
perform equivalent on its input once.

This patch can be reproduced (e.g. for downstream merges) with the
following "sweet" perl command:

  perl -i -p -e 'BEGIN{ $/ = undef;} s:(" *\n) *//-----*\n:\1:gs; s:^(     *)/// ?:\1:gsm; s:^ *//------*\n( *\n)?( *"):\2:gsm; s: *$::gsm; s:\n *"\):"):gsm' scripts/interface/*.i

This command produces nearly equivalent python files to those produced
by the relevant code in modify-python-lldb.py. The only difference I
noticed is that here I am slightly more agressive in removing trailing
newlines from docstring comments (the python script seems to leave
newlines in class-level docstrings).

Reviewers: amccarth, clayborg, jingham, aprantl

Subscribers: lldb-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60498

llvm-svn: 358683
2019-04-18 16:23:33 +00:00
Pavel Labath 4bc0500635 Make operator==s consistent between c++ and python APIs
Summary:
modify-python-lldb.py had code to insert python equality operators to
some classes. Some of those classes already had c++ equality operators,
and some didn't.

This makes the situation more consistent, by removing all equality
handilng from modify-python-lldb. Instead, I add c++ operators to
classes where they were missing, and expose them in the swig interface
files so that they are available to python too.

The only tricky case was the SBAddress class, which had an operator==
defined as a free function, which is not handled by swig. This function
cannot be removed without breaking ABI, and we cannot add an extra
operator== member, as that would make equality comparisons ambiguous.
For this class, I define a python __eq__ function by hand and have it
delegate to the operator!=, which I have defined as a member function.

This isn't fully NFC, as the semantics of some equality functions in
python changes slightly, but I believe it changes for the better (e.g.,
previously SBBreakpoint.__eq__ would consider two breakpoints with the
same ID as equal, even if they belonged to different targets; now they
are only equal if they belong to the same target).

Reviewers: jingham, clayborg, zturner

Subscribers: jdoerfert, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59819

llvm-svn: 357463
2019-04-02 10:18:46 +00:00
Pavel Labath 7f5237bccc Add "operator bool" to SB APIs
Summary:
Our python version of the SB API has (the python equivalent of)
operator bool, but the C++ version doesn't.

This is because our python operators are added by modify-python-lldb.py,
which performs postprocessing on the swig-generated interface files.

In this patch, I add the "operator bool" to all SB classes which have an
IsValid method (which is the same logic used by modify-python-lldb.py).
This way, we make the two interfaces more constent, and it allows us to
rely on swig's automatic syntesis of python __nonzero__ methods instead
of doing manual fixups.

Reviewers: zturner, jingham, clayborg, jfb, serge-sans-paille

Subscribers: jdoerfert, lldb-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58792

llvm-svn: 355824
2019-03-11 13:58:46 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 2946cd7010 Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636
2019-01-19 08:50:56 +00:00
Tatyana Krasnukha 9e1a117d4b Move AddressClass to private enums since API doesn't provide any functions to manage it.
This change allows to make AddressClass strongly typed enum and not to have issues with old versions of SWIG that don't support enum classes.

llvm-svn: 335710
2018-06-27 06:50:10 +00:00
Bruce Mitchener 17d2730ee0 Start to share SWIG interface files between languages.
Summary:
Move scripts/Python/interface to scripts/interface so that we
can start making iterative improvements towards sharing the
interface files between multiple languages (each of which would
have their own directory as now).

Test Plan: Build and see.

Reviewers: zturner, emaste, clayborg

Reviewed By: clayborg

Subscribers: mjsabby, lldb-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9212

llvm-svn: 235676
2015-04-24 00:38:53 +00:00