As of SWIG 4.0, __swig_getmethods__ and __swig_setmethods__ are no
longer defined. It appears that there's no need to mess with these
internals, we can simplify define the corresponding properties inline.
Originally I wanted to use the swig extension %attribute and
%attributeref to define properties. However, I couldn't find a way to
add documentation to these attributes. Since we already had the
properties defined inline, we might as well keep them.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63530
llvm-svn: 364974
As of SWIG 4.0, __swig_getmethods__ and __swig_setmethods__ are no
longer defined. The solution is to stop using these internal swig
dictionaries and use %attribute and %attributeref instead. I plan on
doing this incrementally, with this differential serving as an example.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63530
llvm-svn: 364946
Summary:
This patch removes the "//----" frames and "///" leading lines from
docstring comments. We already have code doing transformations like this in
modify-python-lldb.py, but that's a script I'd like to remove. Instead
of running these transformations everytime we run swig, we can just
perform equivalent on its input once.
This patch can be reproduced (e.g. for downstream merges) with the
following "sweet" perl command:
perl -i -p -e 'BEGIN{ $/ = undef;} s:(" *\n) *//-----*\n:\1:gs; s:^( *)/// ?:\1:gsm; s:^ *//------*\n( *\n)?( *"):\2:gsm; s: *$::gsm; s:\n *"\):"):gsm' scripts/interface/*.i
This command produces nearly equivalent python files to those produced
by the relevant code in modify-python-lldb.py. The only difference I
noticed is that here I am slightly more agressive in removing trailing
newlines from docstring comments (the python script seems to leave
newlines in class-level docstrings).
Reviewers: amccarth, clayborg, jingham, aprantl
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60498
llvm-svn: 358683
Summary:
Instead of modifying the swig-generated code, just add the appropriate
methods to the interface files in order to get the swig to do the
generation for us.
This is a straight-forward move from the python script to the interface
files. The single class which has nontrivial handling in the script
(SBModule) has been left for a separate patch.
For the cases where I did not find any tests exercising the
iteration/length methods (i.e., no tests failed after I stopped emitting
them), I tried to add basic tests for that functionality.
Reviewers: zturner, jingham, amccarth
Subscribers: jdoerfert, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60119
llvm-svn: 357572
Summary:
modify-python-lldb.py had code to insert python equality operators to
some classes. Some of those classes already had c++ equality operators,
and some didn't.
This makes the situation more consistent, by removing all equality
handilng from modify-python-lldb. Instead, I add c++ operators to
classes where they were missing, and expose them in the swig interface
files so that they are available to python too.
The only tricky case was the SBAddress class, which had an operator==
defined as a free function, which is not handled by swig. This function
cannot be removed without breaking ABI, and we cannot add an extra
operator== member, as that would make equality comparisons ambiguous.
For this class, I define a python __eq__ function by hand and have it
delegate to the operator!=, which I have defined as a member function.
This isn't fully NFC, as the semantics of some equality functions in
python changes slightly, but I believe it changes for the better (e.g.,
previously SBBreakpoint.__eq__ would consider two breakpoints with the
same ID as equal, even if they belonged to different targets; now they
are only equal if they belong to the same target).
Reviewers: jingham, clayborg, zturner
Subscribers: jdoerfert, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59819
llvm-svn: 357463
Summary:
Our python version of the SB API has (the python equivalent of)
operator bool, but the C++ version doesn't.
This is because our python operators are added by modify-python-lldb.py,
which performs postprocessing on the swig-generated interface files.
In this patch, I add the "operator bool" to all SB classes which have an
IsValid method (which is the same logic used by modify-python-lldb.py).
This way, we make the two interfaces more constent, and it allows us to
rely on swig's automatic syntesis of python __nonzero__ methods instead
of doing manual fixups.
Reviewers: zturner, jingham, clayborg, jfb, serge-sans-paille
Subscribers: jdoerfert, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58792
llvm-svn: 355824
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
When debugging read-only memory we cannot use software breakpoint. We
already have support for hardware breakpoints and users can specify them
with `-H`. However, there's no option to force LLDB to use hardware
breakpoints internally, for example while stepping.
This patch adds a setting target.require-hardware-breakpoint that forces
LLDB to always use hardware breakpoints. Because hardware breakpoints
are a limited resource and can fail to resolve, this patch also extends
error handling in thread plans, where breakpoints are used for stepping.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54221
llvm-svn: 346920
This change allows you to write a new breakpoint type where the
logic for setting breakpoints is determined by a Python callback
written using the SB API's.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51830
llvm-svn: 342185
When introduced, breakpoint names were just tags that you could
apply to breakpoints that would allow you to refer to a breakpoint
when you couldn't capture the ID, or to refer to a collection of
breakpoints.
This change makes the names independent holders of breakpoint options
that you can then apply to breakpoints when you add the name to the
breakpoint. It adds the "breakpoint name configure" command to set
up or reconfigure breakpoint names. There is also full support for
then in the SB API, including a new SBBreakpointName class.
The connection between the name and the breakpoints
sharing the name remains live, so if you reconfigure the name, all the
breakpoint options all change as well. This allows a quick way
to share complex breakpoint behavior among a bunch of breakpoints, and
a convenient way to iterate on the set.
You can also create a name from a breakpoint, allowing a quick way
to copy options from one breakpoint to another.
I also added the ability to make hidden and delete/disable protected
names. When applied to a breakpoint, you will only be able to list,
delete or disable that breakpoint if you refer to it explicitly by ID.
This feature will allow GUI's that need to use breakpoints for their
own purposes to keep their breakpoints from getting accidentally
disabled or deleted.
<rdar://problem/22094452>
llvm-svn: 313292
You can get a breakpoint to auto-continue by adding "continue"
as a command, but that has the disadvantage that if you hit two
breakpoints simultaneously, the continue will force the process
to continue, and maybe even forstalling the commands on the other.
The auto-continue flag means the breakpoints can negotiate about
whether to stop.
Writing tests, I wanted to supply some commands when I made the
breakpoints, so I also added that ability.
llvm-svn: 309969
When an option was set at on a location, I was just copying the whole option set
to the location, and letting it shadow the breakpoint options. That was wrong since
it meant changes to unrelated options on the breakpoint would no longer take on this
location. I added a mask of set options and use that for option propagation.
I also added a "location" property to breakpoints, and added SBBreakpointLocation.{G,S}etCommandLineCommands
since I wanted to use them to write some more test cases.
<rdar://problem/24397798>
llvm-svn: 309772
Serialize breakpoint names & the hardware_requested attributes.
Also added a few missing affordances to SBBreakpoint whose absence
writing the tests pointed out.
<rdar://problem/12611863>
llvm-svn: 282036
Moved the guts of the code from CommandObjectBreakpoint to Target (should
have done it that way in the first place.) Added an SBBreakpointList class
so there's a way to specify which breakpoints to serialize and to report the
deserialized breakpoints.
<rdar://problem/12611863>
llvm-svn: 281520
Summary:
Move scripts/Python/interface to scripts/interface so that we
can start making iterative improvements towards sharing the
interface files between multiple languages (each of which would
have their own directory as now).
Test Plan: Build and see.
Reviewers: zturner, emaste, clayborg
Reviewed By: clayborg
Subscribers: mjsabby, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9212
llvm-svn: 235676
Jonas Devlieghere