MVE has VPT instructions, which perform the duties of both a VCMP and a VPST in
a single instruction, performing the compare and starting the VPT block in one.
This teaches the MVEVPTBlockPass to fold them, searching back through the
basicblock for a valid VCMP and creating the VPT from its operands.
There are some changes to the VPT instructions to accommodate this, altering
the order of the operands to match the VCMP better, and changing P0 register
defs to be VPR defs, as is used in other places.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66577
llvm-svn: 371982
This fold and several others were added in:
rL125734 <https://reviews.llvm.org/rL125734>
...with no explanation for the one-use checks other than the code
comments about register pressure.
Given that this is IR canonicalization, we shouldn't be worried
about register pressure though; the backend should be able to
adjust for that as needed.
This is part of solving PR43310 the theoretically right way:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43310
...ie, if we don't cripple basic transforms, then we won't
need to add special-case code to detect larger patterns.
rL371940 is a related patch in this series.
llvm-svn: 371981
Summary:
Adds the following inline asm constraints for SVE:
- Upl: One of the low eight SVE predicate registers, P0 to P7 inclusive
- Upa: SVE predicate register with full range, P0 to P15
Reviewers: t.p.northover, sdesmalen, rovka, momchil.velikov, cameron.mcinally, greened, rengolin
Reviewed By: rovka
Subscribers: javed.absar, tschuett, rkruppe, psnobl, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66524
llvm-svn: 371967
After our previous machinecombiner exercises (rL371321, rL371818, rL371833), we
were still missing a few FP16 FMA patterns.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67576
llvm-svn: 371960
D53362 gives a prototype heap-to-stack conversion pass. With addition of new attributes in the attributor, this can now be revisted and improved. This will place it in the Attributor to make it easier to use new attributes (eg. nofree, nosync, willreturn, etc.) and other attributor features.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, uenoku, hfinkel, efriedma
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, xbolva00, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65408
llvm-svn: 371942
This fold and several others were added in:
rL125734
...with no explanation for the one-use checks other than the code
comments about register pressure.
Given that this is IR canonicalization, we shouldn't be worried
about register pressure though; the backend should be able to
adjust for that as needed.
There are similar checks as noted with the TODO comments. I'm
hoping to remove those restrictions too, but if any of these
does cause a regression, it should be easier to correct by making
small, individual commits.
This is part of solving PR43310 the theoretically right way:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43310
...ie, if we don't cripple basic transforms, then we won't
need to add special-case code to detect larger patterns.
llvm-svn: 371940
Masked loads and store fit naturally with MVE, the instructions being easily
predicated. This adds lowering for the simple cases of masked loads and stores.
It does not yet deal with widening/narrowing or pre/post inc, and so is
currently behind an option.
The llvm masked load intrinsic will accept a "passthru" value, dictating the
values used for the zero masked lanes. In MVE the instructions write 0 to the
zero predicated lanes, so we need to match a passthru that isn't 0 (or undef)
with a select instruction to pull in the correct data after the load.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67186
llvm-svn: 371932
This is a fix for:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33958
It seems universally true that we would not want to transform this kind of
sequence on any target, but if that's not correct, then we could view this
as a target-specific cost model problem. We could also white-list ConstantInt,
ConstantFP, etc. rather than blacklist Global and ConstantExpr.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67362
llvm-svn: 371931
Some VLIW instruction sets are Very Long Indeed. Using uint64_t constricts the Inst encoding to 64 bits (naturally).
This change switches CodeEmitter to a mode that uses APInts when Inst's bitwidth is > 64 bits (NFC for existing targets).
When Inst.BitWidth > 64 the prototype changes to:
void TargetMCCodeEmitter::getBinaryCodeForInstr(const MCInst &MI,
SmallVectorImpl<MCFixup> &Fixups,
APInt &Inst,
APInt &Scratch,
const MCSubtargetInfo &STI);
The Inst parameter returns the encoded instruction, the Scratch parameter is used internally for manipulating operands and is exposed so that the underlying storage can be reused between calls to getBinaryCodeForInstr. The goal is to elide any APInt constructions that we can.
Similarly the operand encoding prototype changes to:
getMachineOpValue(const MCInst &MI, const MCOperand &MO, APInt &op, SmallVectorImpl<MCFixup> &Fixups, const MCSubtargetInfo &STI);
That is, the operand is passed by reference as APInt rather than returned as uint64_t.
To reiterate, this APInt mode is enabled only when Inst.BitWidth > 64, so this change is NFC for existing targets.
llvm-svn: 371928
Summary: This should be obsolete once the functionality in D66967 is integrated.
Reviewers: uenoku, sstefan1
Subscribers: hiraditya, bollu, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67231
llvm-svn: 371915
GNU objcopy documents that -B is only useful with architecture-less
input (i.e. "binary" or "ihex"). After D67144, -O defaults to -I, and
-B is essentially a NOP.
* If -O is binary/ihex, GNU objcopy ignores -B.
* If -O is elf*, -B provides the e_machine field in GNU objcopy.
So to convert a blob to an ELF, `-I binary -B i386:x86-64 -O elf64-x86-64` has to be specified.
`-I binary -B i386:x86-64 -O elf64-x86-64` creates an ELF with its
e_machine field set to EM_NONE in GNU objcopy, but a regular x86_64 ELF
in elftoolchain elfcopy. Follow the elftoolchain approach (ignoring -B)
to simplify code. Users that expect their command line portable should
specify -B.
Reviewed By: jhenderson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67215
llvm-svn: 371914
Fixes PR42171.
In GNU objcopy, if -O (--output-target) is not specified, the value is
copied from -I (--input-target).
```
objcopy -I binary -B i386:x86-64 a.txt b # b is copied from a.txt
llvm-objcopy -I binary -B i386:x86-64 a.txt b # b is an x86-64 object file
```
This patch changes our behavior to match GNU. With this change, we can
delete code related to -B handling (D67215).
Reviewed By: jakehehrlich
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67144
llvm-svn: 371913
Most GNU binutils don't append full stops in error messages. This
convention has been adopted by a bunch of LLVM binary utilities. Make
llvm-ar follow the convention as well.
Reviewed By: grimar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67558
llvm-svn: 371912
For some reason we sometimes insert new instructions one instruction before
the first non-PHI when legalizing. This can result in having non-PHI
instructions before PHIs, which mean that PHI elimination doesn't catch them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67570
llvm-svn: 371901
Because memory intrinsics are handled differently than other calls, we need to
check them for tail call eligiblity in the legalizer. This allows us to still
inline them when it's beneficial to do so, but also tail call when possible.
This adds simple tail calling support for when the intrinsic is followed by a
return.
It ports the attribute checks from `TargetLowering::isInTailCallPosition` into
a similarly-named function in LegalizerHelper.cpp. The target-specific
`isUsedByReturnOnly` hook is not ported here.
Update tailcall-mem-intrinsics.ll to show that GlobalISel can now tail call
memory intrinsics.
Update legalize-memcpy-et-al.mir to have a case where we don't tail call.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67566
llvm-svn: 371893
This adds support for tail calling callees with varargs, equivalent to how it
is done in AArch64ISelLowering.
This only works for sibling calls, and does not add the necessary support for
musttail with varargs. (See r345641 for equivalent ISelLowering support.) This
should be implemented when we stop falling back on musttail.
Update call-translator-tail-call.ll to show that we can now tail call varargs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67518
llvm-svn: 371868
This is a continuation of the YAML library error reporting
refactoring/improvement and the idea by itself was mentioned
in the following thread:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D67182?id=218714#inline-603404
This performs a cleanup of all object emitters in the library.
It allows using the custom one provided by the caller.
One of the nice things is that each tool can now print its tool name,
e.g: "yaml2obj: error: <text>"
Also, the code became a bit simpler.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67445
llvm-svn: 371865
All tests with -run-pass !=none should not in MIR/, See MIR/README.
```
Tests for codegen passes should NOT be here but in
test/CodeGen/sometarget. As
a rule of thumb this directory should only contain tests using
'llc -run-pass none'.
```
llvm-svn: 371857
Follow up of rL371321 that added FMA FP16 patterns. This adds more tests
for @llvm.fma.f16. This probably shows we miss one fmsub optimisation
opportunity, which I will look into.
llvm-svn: 371833
This patch adds vecreduce_smax, vecredude_umax, vecreduce_smin, vecreduce_umin and selection for vmaxv and minv.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66413
llvm-svn: 371827
Patch by Justice Adams!
Made llvm-objdump --all-headers output match the order of GNU objdump for compatibility reasons.
Old order of the headers output:
* file header
* section header table
* symbol table
* program header table
* dynamic section
New order of the headers output (GNU compatible):
* file header information
* program header table
* dynamic section
* section header table
* symbol table
(Relevant BugZilla Bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41830)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67357
llvm-svn: 371826
Unlike SelectionDAG, treat this as a normally legalizable operation.
In SelectionDAG this is supposed to only ever formed if it's legal,
but I've found that to be restricting. For AMDGPU this is contextually
legal depending on whether denormal flushing is allowed in the use
function.
Technically we currently treat the denormal mode as a subtarget
feature, so custom lowering could be avoided. However I consider this
to be a defect, and this should be contextually dependent on the
controllable rounding mode of the parent function.
llvm-svn: 371800
This testcase is invalid, and caught by the verifier. For the verifier
to catch it, the live interval computation needs to complete. Remove
the assert so the verifier catches this, which is less confusing.
In this testcase there is an undefined use of a subregister, and lanes
which aren't used or defined. An equivalent testcase with the
super-register shrunk to have no untouched lanes already hit this
verifier error.
llvm-svn: 371792
This was relying on the SGPR usable for the carry out clobber to also
be used for the input. There was no carry out on gfx9. With no carry
out clobber to worry about, so the literal can just be directly used
with a VOP2 add.
llvm-svn: 371791
With the landing of the previous patch (in particular D66318) there are a lot fewer diffs now. I added an experimental O0 line, and updated all the tests to group experimental and non-experimental O0/O3 together.
Skimming the remaining diffs, there's only a few which are obviously incorrect. There's a large number which are questionable, so more todo.
llvm-svn: 371790
Swiftself uses a callee-saved register. We can tail call when the register used
in the caller and callee is the same.
This behaviour is equivalent to that in `TargetLowering::parametersInCSRMatch`.
Update call-translator-tail-call.ll to verify that we can do this. When we
support inline assembly, we can write a check similar to the one in the
general swiftself.ll. For now, we need to verify that we get the correct COPY
instruction after call lowering.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67511
llvm-svn: 371788
This is the first sweep of generic code to add isAtomic bailouts where appropriate. The intention here is to have the switch from AtomicSDNode to LoadSDNode/StoreSDNode be close to NFC; that is, I'm not looking to allow additional optimizations at this time. That will come later. See D66309 for context.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66318
llvm-svn: 371786
This adds support for lowering sibling calls with outgoing arguments.
e.g
```
define void @foo(i32 %a)
```
Support is ported from AArch64ISelLowering's `isEligibleForTailCallOptimization`.
The only thing that is missing is a full port of
`TargetLowering::parametersInCSRMatch`. So, if we're using swiftself,
we'll never tail call.
- Rename `analyzeCallResult` to `analyzeArgInfo`, since the function is now used
for both outgoing and incoming arguments
- Teach `OutgoingArgHandler` about tail calls. Tail calls use frame indices for
stack arguments.
- Teach `lowerFormalArguments` to set the bytes in the caller's stack argument
area. This is used later to check if the tail call's parameters will fit on
the caller's stack.
- Add `areCalleeOutgoingArgsTailCallable` to perform the eligibility check on
the callee's outgoing arguments.
For testing:
- Update call-translator-tail-call to verify that we can now tail call with
outgoing arguments, use G_FRAME_INDEX for stack arguments, and respect the
size of the caller's stack
- Remove GISel-specific check lines from speculation-hardening.ll, since GISel
now tail calls like the other selectors
- Add a GISel test line to tailcall-string-rvo.ll since we can tail call in that
test now
- Add a GISel test line to tailcall_misched_graph.ll since we tail call there
now. Add specific check lines for GISel, since the debug output from the
machine-scheduler differs with GlobalISel. The dependency still holds, but
the output comes out in a different order.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67471
llvm-svn: 371780
Summary:
Since the SPE4RC register class contains an identical set of registers
and an identical spill size to the GPRC class its slightly confusing
the tablegen emitter. It's preventing the GPRC_and_GPRC_NOR0 synthesized
register class from inheriting VTs and AltOrders from GPRC or GPRC_NOR0.
This is because SPE4C is found first in the super register class list
when inheriting these properties and it doesn't set the VTs or
AltOrders the same way as GPRC or GPRC_NOR0.
This patch replaces all uses of GPE4RC with GPRC and allows GPRC and
GPRC_NOR0 to contain f32.
The test changes here are because the AltOrders are being inherited
to GPRC_NOR0 now.
Found while trying to determine if getCommonSubClass needs to take
a VT argument. It was originally added to support fp128 on x86-64,
I've changed some things about that so that it might be needed
anymore. But a PowerPC test crashed without it and I think its
due to this subclass issue.
Reviewers: jhibbits, nemanjai, kbarton, hfinkel
Subscribers: wuzish, nemanjai, mehdi_amini, hiraditya, kbarton, MaskRay, dexonsmith, jsji, shchenz, steven.zhang, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67513
llvm-svn: 371779
We were failing to compute trip counts (both exact and maximum) for any loop which involved a comparison against either an umin or smin. It looks like this simply got missed when we added smin/umin to SCEV. (Note: umin was submitted separately earlier today. Turned out two folks hit this at the same time.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67514
llvm-svn: 371776
The X86 decision assumes the compare will produce a result in an XMM
register, but that can't happen for an fp128 compare since those
go to a libcall the returns an i32. Pass the VT so X86 can check
the type.
llvm-svn: 371775
Expanding the folding of `nearbyint()`, `rint()` and `trunc()` to library
functions, in addition to the current support for intrinsics.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67468
llvm-svn: 371774
This patch adds support for SCEVUMinExpr to getRangeRef,
similar to the support for SCEVUMaxExpr.
Reviewers: sanjoy.google, efriedma, reames, nikic
Reviewed By: sanjoy.google
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67177
llvm-svn: 371768
Implement a TODO from rL371452, and handle loop invariant addresses in predicated blocks. If we can prove that the load is safe to speculate into the header, then we can avoid using a masked.load in favour of a normal load.
This is mostly about vectorization robustness. In the common case, it's generally expected that LICM/LoadStorePromotion would have eliminated such loads entirely.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67372
llvm-svn: 371745
In MVE, as of rL371218, we are attempting to sink chains of instructions such as:
%l1 = insertelement <8 x i8> undef, i8 %l0, i32 0
%broadcast.splat26 = shufflevector <8 x i8> %l1, <8 x i8> undef, <8 x i32> zeroinitializer
In certain situations though, we can end up breaking the dominance relations of
instructions. This happens when we sink the instruction into a loop, but cannot
remove the originals. The Use is updated, which might in fact be a Use from the
second instruction to the first.
This attempts to fix that by reversing the order of instruction that are sunk,
and ensuring that we update the uses on new instructions if they have already
been sunk, not the old ones.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67366
llvm-svn: 371743
Folding for fma/fmuladd was added here:
rL202914
...and as seen in existing/unchanged tests, that works to propagate NaN
if it's already an input, but we should fold an fma() that creates NaN too.
From IEEE-754-2008 7.2 "Invalid Operation", there are 2 clauses that apply
to fma, so I added tests for those patterns:
c) fusedMultiplyAdd: fusedMultiplyAdd(0, ∞, c) or fusedMultiplyAdd(∞, 0, c)
unless c is a quiet NaN; if c is a quiet NaN then it is implementation
defined whether the invalid operation exception is signaled
d) addition or subtraction or fusedMultiplyAdd: magnitude subtraction of
infinities, such as: addition(+∞, −∞)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67446
llvm-svn: 371735
IRTranslator creates G_DYN_STACKALLOC instruction during expansion of
alloca when argument that tells number of elements to allocate on stack
is a virtual register. Use default lowering for MIPS32.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67440
llvm-svn: 371728
G_IMPLICIT_DEF is used for both integer and floating point implicit-def.
Handle G_IMPLICIT_DEF as ambiguous opcode in MipsRegisterBankInfo.
Select G_IMPLICIT_DEF for MIPS32.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67439
llvm-svn: 371727
This is the main CodeGen patch to support the arm64_32 watchOS ABI in LLVM.
FastISel is mostly disabled for now since it would generate incorrect code for
ILP32.
llvm-svn: 371722
Summary:
I don't have a direct motivational case for this,
but it would be good to have this for completeness/symmetry.
This pattern is basically the motivational pattern from
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43251
but with different predicate that requires that the offset is non-zero.
The completeness bit comes from the fact that a similar pattern (offset != zero)
will be needed for https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43259,
so it'd seem to be good to not overlook very similar patterns..
Proofs: https://rise4fun.com/Alive/21b
Also, there is something odd with `isKnownNonZero()`, if the non-zero
knowledge was specified as an assumption, it didn't pick it up (PR43267)
Reviewers: spatel, nikic, xbolva00
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67411
llvm-svn: 371718
Current implementation of estimating divisions loses precision since it
estimates reciprocal first and does multiplication. This patch is to re-order
arithmetic operations in the last iteration in DAGCombiner to improve the
accuracy.
Reviewed By: Sanjay Patel, Jinsong Ji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66050
llvm-svn: 371713
Fixing a couple of asan-identified bugs
* use of an invalid "Use" iterator after the element was removed
* use of StringRef to Function name after the Function was erased
This reapplies r371567, which was reverted in r371580.
llvm-svn: 371700
This modifies the tool somewhat to only create files when about to run
the "interestingness" test, and delete them immediately after - this
means some more files will be created sometimes (when "double checking"
work - which should probably be fixed/avoided anyway).
This now creates temporary files, rather than only unique ones, and also
uses ToolOutputFile (without ever calling "keep") to ensure the files
are deleted as soon as the interestingness test is run.
llvm-svn: 371696
AVX512 instructions can cause a frequency drop on these CPUs. This
can negate the performance gains from using wider vectors. Enabling
prefer-vector-width=256 will prevent generation of zmm registers
unless explicit 512 bit operations are used in the original source
code.
I believe gcc and icc both do something similar to this by default.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67259
llvm-svn: 371694
First we were asserting that the ValNo of a VA was the wrong value. It doesn't actually
make a difference for us in CallLowering but fix that anyway to silence the assert.
The bigger issue was that after fixing the assert we were generating invalid MIR
because the merging/unmerging of values split across multiple registers wasn't
also implemented for memory locs. This happens when we run out of registers and
have to pass the split types like i128 -> i64 x 2 on the stack. This is do-able, but
for now just fall back.
llvm-svn: 371693
Before, we only checked the callee for swifterror. However, we should also be
checking the caller to see if it has a swifterror parameter.
Since we don't currently handle outgoing arguments, this didn't show up in the
swifterror.ll testcase.
Also, remove the swifterror checks from call-translator-tail-call.ll, since
they are covered by the existing swifterror testing. Better to have it all in
one place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67465
llvm-svn: 371692
I found three issues:
1. the loop over E[ABCD]X copies run over BB start
2. the direct address of cmpxchg8b could be a frame index
3. the displacement of cmpxchg8b could be a global instead of an
immediate
These were all introduced together in r287875, and should be fixed with
this change.
Issue reported by Zachary Turner.
llvm-svn: 371678
I think this case would crash before I added back the -x86-experimental-vector-widening command line option. Adding this test case to prevent breaking it again when we remove the option.
llvm-svn: 371673
fp128 is considered a legal type for a register, but has almost no legal operations so everything needs to be converted to a libcall. Previously this was implemented by tricking type legalization into softening the operations with various checks for "is legal in hardware register" to change the behavior to still use f128 as the resulting type instead of converting to i128.
This patch abandons this approach and instead moves the libcall conversions to LegalizeDAG. This is the approach taken by AArch64 where they also have a legal fp128 type, but no legal operations. I think this is more in spirit with how SelectionDAG's phases are supposed to work.
I had to make some hacks for STRICT_FP_ROUND because some of the strict FP handling checks if ISD::FP_ROUND is Legal for a given result type, but I had to make ISD::FP_ROUND Custom to allow making a libcall when the input is f128. For all other types the Custom handler just returns the original node. These hacks are incomplete and don't work for a strict truncate from f128, but I don't think it worked before either since LegalizeFloatTypes doesn't know about strict ops yet. I've also raised PR43209 against AArch64 which currently crashes on a strict ftrunc from f64->f32 because of FP_ROUND being marked Custom for the same reason there.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67128
llvm-svn: 371672
Matt Arsenault