"To" selects an odd-numbered GPR, and "Te" an even one. There are some
8.1-M instructions that have one too few bits in their register fields
and require registers of particular parity, without necessarily using
a consecutive even/odd pair.
Also, the constraint letter "t" should select an MVE q-register, when
MVE is present. This didn't need any source changes, but some extra
tests have been added.
Reviewers: dmgreen, samparker, SjoerdMeijer
Subscribers: javed.absar, eraman, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60709
llvm-svn: 364331
error: 'error' diagnostics expected but not seen:
File /vol/llvm/src/clang/local/test/Sema/wchar.c Line 22: initializing wide char array with non-wide string literal
error: 'error' diagnostics seen but not expected:
File /vol/llvm/src/clang/local/test/Sema/wchar.c Line 20: array initializer must be an initializer list
File /vol/llvm/src/clang/local/test/Sema/wchar.c Line 22: array initializer must be an initializer list
It turns out the definition is wrong, as can be seen in GCC's gcc/config/sol2.h:
/* wchar_t is called differently in <wchar.h> for 32 and 64-bit
compilations. This is called for by SCD 2.4.1, p. 6-83, Figure 6-65
(32-bit) and p. 6P-10, Figure 6.38 (64-bit). */
#undef WCHAR_TYPE
#define WCHAR_TYPE (TARGET_64BIT ? "int" : "long int")
The following patch implements this, and at the same time corrects the wint_t
definition which is the same:
/* Same for wint_t. See SCD 2.4.1, p. 6-83, Figure 6-66 (32-bit). There's
no corresponding 64-bit definition, but this is what Solaris 8
<iso/wchar_iso.h> uses. */
#undef WINT_TYPE
#define WINT_TYPE (TARGET_64BIT ? "int" : "long int")
Clang :: Preprocessor/wchar_t.c and Clang :: Sema/format-strings.c need to
be adjusted to account for that.
Tested on i386-pc-solaris2.11, x86_64-pc-solaris2.11, and x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62944
llvm-svn: 363612
ARM has a special target feature called soft-float-abi. This feature is
special, since we get it passed to us explicitly in the frontend, but
filter it out before it can land in any target feature strings in LLVM
IR.
__attribute__((target(""))) doesn't quite filter these features out
properly, so today, we get warnings about soft-float-abi being an
unknown feature from the backend.
This CL has us filter soft-float-abi out at a slightly different point,
so we don't end up passing these invalid features to the backend.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61750
llvm-svn: 363346
This allows the constraints I, J & K to be used in inline asm for
RISC-V, with the following semantics (equivalent to GCC):
I: Any 12-bit signed immediate.
J: Integer zero only.
K: Any 5-bit unsigned immediate.
See the GCC definitions here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Machine-Constraints.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54091
llvm-svn: 363055
The recently added cooperlake CPU has made our already ugly switch statement even worse. There's a CPU exclusion list around the bf16 feature in the cooper lake block. I worry that we'll have to keep adding new CPUs to that until bf16 intercepts a client space CPU. We have several other exclusion lists in other parts of the switch due to skylakeserver, cascadelake, and cooperlake not having sgx. Another for cannonlake not having clwb but having all other features from skx.
This removes all these special ifs at the cost of some duplication of features and a goto. I've copied all of the skx features into either cannonlake or icelakeclient(for clwb). And pulled sklyakeserver, cascadelake, and cooperlake out of the main inheritance chain into their own chain. At the end of skylakeserver we merge back into the main chain at skylakeclient but below sgx. I think this is at least easier to follow.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63018
llvm-svn: 362965
If MVE is present at all, then the macro __ARM_FEATURE_MVE is defined
to a value which has bit 0 set for integer MVE, and bit 1 set for
floating-point MVE.
(Floating-point MVE implies integer MVE, so if this macro is defined
at all then it will be set to 1 or 3, never 2.)
Patch mostly by Simon Tatham
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60710
llvm-svn: 362806
Change D60691 caused some knock-on failures that weren't caught by the
existing tests. Firstly, selecting a CPU that should have had a
restricted FPU (e.g. `-mcpu=cortex-m4`, which should have 16 d-regs
and no double precision) could give the unrestricted version, because
`ARM::getFPUFeatures` returned a list of features including subtracted
ones (here `-fp64`,`-d32`), but `ARMTargetInfo::initFeatureMap` threw
away all the ones that didn't start with `+`. Secondly, the
preprocessor macros didn't reliably match the actual compilation
settings: for example, `-mfpu=softvfp` could still set `__ARM_FP` as
if hardware FP was available, because the list of features on the cc1
command line would include things like `+vfp4`,`-vfp4d16` and clang
didn't realise that one of those cancelled out the other.
I've fixed both of these issues by rewriting `ARM::getFPUFeatures` so
that it returns a list that enables every FP-related feature
compatible with the selected FPU and disables every feature not
compatible, which is more verbose but means clang doesn't have to
understand the dependency relationships between the backend features.
Meanwhile, `ARMTargetInfo::handleTargetFeatures` is testing for all
the various forms of the FP feature names, so that it won't miss cases
where it should have set `HW_FP` to feed into feature test macros.
That in turn caused an ordering problem when handling `-mcpu=foo+bar`
together with `-mfpu=something_that_turns_off_bar`. To fix that, I've
arranged that the `+bar` suffixes on the end of `-mcpu` and `-march`
cause feature names to be put into a separate vector which is
concatenated after the output of `getFPUFeatures`.
Another side effect of all this is to fix a bug where `clang -target
armv8-eabi` by itself would fail to set `__ARM_FEATURE_FMA`, even
though `armv8` (aka Arm v8-A) implies FP-Armv8 which has FMA. That was
because `HW_FP` was being set to a value including only the `FPARMV8`
bit, but that feature test macro was testing only the `VFP4FPU` bit.
Now `HW_FP` ends up with all the bits set, so it gives the right
answer.
Changes to tests included in this patch:
* `arm-target-features.c`: I had to change basically all the expected
results. (The Cortex-M4 test in there should function as a
regression test for the accidental double-precision bug.)
* `arm-mfpu.c`, `armv8.1m.main.c`: switched to using `CHECK-DAG`
everywhere so that those tests are no longer sensitive to the order
of cc1 feature options on the command line.
* `arm-acle-6.5.c`: been updated to expect the right answer to that
FMA test.
* `Preprocessor/arm-target-features.c`: added a regression test for
the `mfpu=softvfp` issue.
Reviewers: SjoerdMeijer, dmgreen, ostannard, samparker, JamesNagurne
Reviewed By: ostannard
Subscribers: srhines, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62998
llvm-svn: 362791
Given the existing infrastructure in LLVM side for +fp and +fp.dp,
this is more or less trivial, needing only one tiny source change and
a couple of tests.
Patch by Simon Tatham.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60699
llvm-svn: 362096
Those two subtarget features were awkward because their semantics are
reversed: each one indicates the _lack_ of support for something in
the architecture, rather than the presence. As a consequence, you
don't get the behavior you want if you combine two sets of feature
bits.
Each SubtargetFeature for an FP architecture version now comes in four
versions, one for each combination of those options. So you can still
say (for example) '+vfp2' in a feature string and it will mean what
it's always meant, but there's a new string '+vfp2d16sp' meaning the
version without those extra options.
A lot of this change is just mechanically replacing positive checks
for the old features with negative checks for the new ones. But one
more interesting change is that I've rearranged getFPUFeatures() so
that the main FPU feature is appended to the output list *before*
rather than after the features derived from the Restriction field, so
that -fp64 and -d32 can override defaults added by the main feature.
Reviewers: dmgreen, samparker, SjoerdMeijer
Subscribers: srhines, javed.absar, eraman, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, zzheng, Petar.Avramovic, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60691
llvm-svn: 361845
We had an if statement that checked over every avx512* feature to see if it should enabled avx512f. Since they are all prefixed with avx512 just check for that instead.
llvm-svn: 361557
Summary:
These features will both be implemented soon, so I thought I would
save time by adding the boilerplate for both of them at the same time.
Reviewers: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62047
llvm-svn: 361516
Summary:
For big-endian powerpc64, the default ABI is ELFv1. OpenPower ABI ELFv2 is supported when -mabi=elfv2 is specified. FreeBSD support for PowerPC64 ELFv2 ABI with LLVM is in progress[1]. This patch adds an alternative way to specify ELFv2 ABI on target triple [2].
The following results are expected:
ELFv1 when using:
-target powerpc64-unknown-freebsd12.0
-target powerpc64-unknown-freebsd12.0 -mabi=elfv1
-target powerpc64-unknown-freebsd12.0-elfv1
ELFv2 when using:
-target powerpc64-unknown-freebsd12.0 -mabi=elfv2
-target powerpc64-unknown-freebsd12.0-elfv2
[1] https://wiki.freebsd.org/powerpc/llvm-elfv2
[2] https://clang.llvm.org/docs/CrossCompilation.html
Patch by Alfredo Dal'Ava Júnior!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61950
llvm-svn: 361355
Defines macro ARM_FEATURE_CMSE to 1 for v8-M targets and introduces
-mcmse option which for v8-M targets sets ARM_FEATURE_CMSE to 3.
A diagnostic is produced when the option is given on architectures
without support for Security Extensions.
Reviewed By: dmgreen, snidertm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59879
llvm-svn: 361261
Previously we were doing this so that the 256 bit selectw builtin could be used in the implementation of the 512->256 bit conversion intrinsic.
After this commit we now use a masked convert builtin that will emit the intrinsic call and the 256-bit select from custom code in CGBuiltin. Then the header only needs to call that one intrinsic.
llvm-svn: 360924
Summary:
- This patch checks the AIX version and defines the appropriate macros.
- Follow up to a comment on D59048.
Author: andusy
Reviewers: hubert.reinterpretcast, jasonliu, sfertile, xingxue
Reviewed By: sfertile
Subscribers: jsji, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61530
llvm-svn: 360900
Darwin if the version of libc++abi isn't new enough to include the fix
in r319123
This patch resurrects r264998, which was committed to work around a bug
in libc++abi that was causing _cxa_allocate_exception to return a memory
that wasn't double-word aligned.
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20160328/154332.html
In addition, this patch makes clang issue a warning if the type of the
thrown object requires an alignment that is larger than the minimum
guaranteed by the target C++ runtime.
rdar://problem/49864414
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61667
llvm-svn: 360404
Summary:
1. Enable infrastructure of AVX512_BF16, which is supported for BFLOAT16 in Cooper Lake;
2. Enable intrinsics for VCVTNE2PS2BF16, VCVTNEPS2BF16 and DPBF16PS instructions, which are Vector Neural Network Instructions supporting BFLOAT16 inputs and conversion instructions from IEEE single precision.
For more details about BF16 intrinsic, please refer to the latest ISE document: https://software.intel.com/en-us/download/intel-architecture-instruction-set-extensions-programming-reference
Patch by LiuTianle
Reviewers: craig.topper, smaslov, LuoYuanke, wxiao3, annita.zhang, spatel, RKSimon
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60552
llvm-svn: 360018
According to alignment section in below ARM64 ABI document, MSVC could increase
alignment of global data based on its total size. Clang doesn't do this. Compile
the same symbol into different alignments by Clang and MSVC could cause link
error because some instruction encodings, like 64-bit LDR/STR with immediate,
require the target to be 8 bytes aligned, and linker could choose code stream
with such LDR/STR instruction from MSVC and 4 bytes aligned data from Clang into
final image, which actually cannot be linked together
(see https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41506 for more details).
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/arm64-windows-abi-conventions?view=vs-2019#alignment
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61225
llvm-svn: 359744
This provides intrinsics support for Memory Tagging Extension (MTE),
which was introduced with the Armv8.5-a architecture.
These intrinsics are available when __ARM_FEATURE_MEMORY_TAGGING is defined.
Each intrinsic is described in detail in the ACLE Q1 2019 documentation:
https://developer.arm.com/docs/101028/latest
Reviewed By: Tim Nortover, David Spickett
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60485
llvm-svn: 359348
"DefineStd(Builder, "bpf", Opts)" generates the following three
macros:
bpf
__bpf
__bpf__
and the macro "bpf" is due to the fact that the target language
is C which allows GNU extensions.
The name "bpf" could be easily used as variable name or type
field name. For example, in current linux kernel, there are
four places where bpf is used as a field name. If the corresponding
types are included in bpf program, the compilation error will
occur.
This patch removed predefined macro "bpf" as well as "__bpf" which
is rarely used if used at all.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61173
llvm-svn: 359310
These builtins provide access to the new integer and
sub-integer variants of MMA (matrix multiply-accumulate) instructions
provided by CUDA-10.x on sm_75 (AKA Turing) GPUs.
Also added a feature for PTX 6.4. While Clang/LLVM does not generate
any PTX instructions that need it, we still need to pass it through to
ptxas in order to be able to compile code that uses the new 'mma'
instruction as inline assembly (e.g used by NVIDIA's CUTLASS library
https://github.com/NVIDIA/cutlass/blob/master/cutlass/arch/mma.h#L101)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60279
llvm-svn: 359248
The Emscripten OS provides a definition of __EMSCRIPTEN__, and also that it
supports iprintf optimizations.
Also define small_printf optimizations, which is a printf with float support
but not long double (which in wasm can be useful since long doubles are 128
bit and force linking of float128 emulation code). This part is based on
sunfish's https://reviews.llvm.org/D57620 (which can't land yet since
the WASI integration isn't ready yet).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60167
llvm-svn: 357552
Summary:
This feature is not actually used for anything in the WebAssembly
backend, but adding it allows users to get it into the target features
sections of their objects, which makes these objects
future-compatible.
Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, jdoerfert, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60013
llvm-svn: 357321
Use the new cx8 feature flag that was added to the backend to represent support for cmpxchg8b. Use this flag to set the MaxAtomicInlineWidth.
This also assumes all the cmpxchg instructions are enabled for CK_Generic which is what cc1 defaults to when nothing is specified.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59566
llvm-svn: 356709
PentiumPro has HasNOPL set in the backend. i686 does not.
Despite having a function that looks like it canonicalizes alias names. It
doesn't seem to be called. So I don't think this is a functional change. But its
good to be consistent between the backend and frontend.
llvm-svn: 356537
llvm-svn 356197 relanded previously failing test case max_align.c.
This commit will reland the rest of llvm-svn 356060 commit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59048
llvm-svn: 356208
Summary:
This define should correspond to CMPXCHG16B being available which requires 64-bit mode.
I checked and gcc also seems to only define this in 64-bit mode.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, efriedma, jyknight, jfb
Reviewed By: jfb
Subscribers: jfb, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59287
llvm-svn: 356118
Summary:
A first pass over platform-specific properties of the C API/ABI
on AIX for both 32-bit and 64-bit modes.
This is a continuation of D18360 by Andrew Paprocki and further work by Wu Zhao.
Patch by Andus Yu
Reviewers: apaprocki, chandlerc, hubert.reinterpretcast, jasonliu,
xingxue, sfertile
Reviewed by: hubert.reinterpretcast, apaprocki, sfertile
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59048
llvm-svn: 356060
Yaxun Liu