This patch, by hamzasood, implements P0409R2, and allows [=, this] pre-C++2a as an extension (with appropriate warnings) for consistency.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D36572
Thanks Hamza!
llvm-svn: 311224
a FieldDecl from it, and propagate both into the closure type and the
LambdaExpr.
You can't do much useful with them yet -- you can't use them within the body
of the lambda, because we don't have a representation for "the this of the
lambda, not the this of the enclosing context". We also don't have support or a
representation for a nested capture of an init-capture yet, which was intended
to work despite not being allowed by the current standard wording.
llvm-svn: 181985
default is '=', and reword the warning about explicitly capturing
'this' in such lambdas to indicate that only explicit capture is
banned.
Introduce Fix-Its for this and other "save the programmer from
themself" rules regarding what can be explicitly captured and what
must be implicitly captured.
llvm-svn: 150256
- Complete the lambda class when we finish the lambda expression
(previously, it was left in the "being completed" state)
- Actually return the LambdaExpr object and bind to the resulting
temporary when needed.
- Detect when cleanups are needed while capturing a variable into a
lambda (e.g., due to default arguments in the copy constructor), and
make sure those cleanups apply for the whole of the lambda
expression.
llvm-svn: 150123
- Actually building the var -> capture mapping properly (there was an off-by-one error)
- Keeping track of the source location of each capture
- Minor QoI improvements, e.g, highlighing the prior capture if
there are multiple captures, pointing at the variable declaration we
found if we reject it.
As part of this, add standard citations for the various semantic
checks we perform, and note where we're not performing those checks as
we should.
llvm-svn: 149462
Faisal Vali