Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Richard Smith becb92dec8 [Modules TS] Module ownership semantics for redeclarations.
When declaring an entity in the "purview" of a module, it's never a
redeclaration of an entity in the purview of a default module or in no module
("in the global module"). Don't consider those other declarations as possible
redeclaration targets if they're not visible, and reject any cases where we
pick a prior visible declaration that violates this rule.

This reinstates r315251 and r315256, reverted in r315309 and r315308
respectively, tweaked to avoid triggering a linkage calculation when declaring
implicit special members (this exposed our pre-existing issue with typedef
names for linkage changing the linkage of types whose linkage has already been
computed and cached in more cases). A testcase for that regression has been
added in r315366.

llvm-svn: 315379
2017-10-10 22:33:17 +00:00
Eric Liu f01516db8d Revert "[Modules TS] Module ownership semantics for redeclarations."
This reverts commit r315251. See the original commit thread for reason.

llvm-svn: 315309
2017-10-10 13:09:40 +00:00
Richard Smith b87720b77a [Modules TS] Module ownership semantics for redeclarations.
When declaring an entity in the "purview" of a module, it's never a
redeclaration of an entity in the purview of a default module or in no module
("in the global module"). Don't consider those other declarations as possible
redeclaration targets if they're not visible, and reject any cases where we
pick a prior visible declaration that violates this rule.

llvm-svn: 315251
2017-10-09 23:42:09 +00:00