Other generators honor the `LIBRARY_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY` target property, but apparently Xcode doesn't. So we call `set_output_directory()` as `llvm_add_library()` would do and this works.
Note that `LIBRARY_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY` is still necessary, because it's used to store and read the target's absolute build directory (while `LLDB_FRAMEWORK_BUILD_DIR` is relative!).
llvm-svn: 363280
Summary:
Modify the way LLDB.framework tools are collected. This allows for better fine-tuning of the install behavior downstream. Each target calls `lldb_add_to_framework()` individually. When entering the function, the target exists and we can tweak its very own post-build and install steps. This was not possible with the old `LLDB_FRAMEWORK_TOOLS` approach.
No function change otherwise.
This is a reduced follow-up from the proposal in D61952.
Reviewers: xiaobai, compnerd, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: clayborg, friss, ki.stfu, mgorny, lldb-commits, labath, #lldb
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62472
llvm-svn: 361946
Summary:
The current install-clang-headers target installs clang's resource
directory headers. This is different from the install-llvm-headers
target, which installs LLVM's API headers. We want to introduce the
corresponding target to clang, and the natural name for that new target
would be install-clang-headers. Rename the existing target to
install-clang-resource-headers to free up the install-clang-headers name
for the new target, following the discussion on cfe-dev [1].
I didn't find any bots on zorg referencing install-clang-headers. I'll
send out another PSA to cfe-dev to accompany this rename.
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-February/061365.html
Reviewers: beanz, phosek, tstellar, rnk, dim, serge-sans-paille
Subscribers: mgorny, javed.absar, jdoerfert, #sanitizers, openmp-commits, lldb-commits, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #sanitizers, #lldb, #openmp, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58791
llvm-svn: 355340
Summary:
Add features to LLDB CMake builds that have so far only been available in Xcode. Clean up a few inconveniences and prepare further improvements.
Options:
* `LLDB_FRAMEWORK_BUILD_DIR` determines target directory (in build-tree)
* `LLDB_FRAMEWORK_INSTALL_DIR` **only** determines target directory in install-tree
* `LLVM_EXTERNALIZE_DEBUGINFO` allows externalized debug info (dSYM on Darwin, emitted to `bin`)
* `LLDB_FRAMEWORK_TOOLS` determines which executables will be copied to the framework's Resources (dropped symlinking, removed INCLUDE_IN_SUITE, removed dummy targets)
Other changes:
* clean up `add_lldb_executable()`
* include `LLDBFramework.cmake` from `source/API/CMakeLists.txt`
* use `*.plist.in` files, which are typical for CMake and independent from Xcode
* add clang headers to the framework bundle
Reviewers: xiaobai, JDevlieghere, aprantl, davide, beanz, stella.stamenova, clayborg, labath
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: friss, mgorny, lldb-commits, #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55328
llvm-svn: 350391
Summary:
Previously, I thought that install-liblldb would fail because CMake had
a bug related to installing frameworks. In actuality, I misunderstood the
semantics of `add_custom_target`: the DEPENDS option refers to specific files,
not targets. Therefore `install-liblldb` should rely on the actual liblldb
getting generated rather than the target.
This means that the previous patch I committed (to stop relying on CMake's
framework support) is no longer needed and has been reverted. Using CMake's
framework support greatly simplifies the implementation.
`install-lldb-framework` (and the stripped variant) is as simple as
depending on `install-liblldb` because CMake knows that liblldb was built as a
framework and will install the whole framework for you. The stripped variant
will depend on the stripped variants of individual tools only to ensure they
actually are stripped as well.
Reviewers: labath, sas
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50038
llvm-svn: 338594
This reverts r338154. This change is actually unnecessary, as the CMake
bug I referred to was actually not a bug but a misunderstanding of
CMake.
Original Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49888
llvm-svn: 338178
In r338058 we removed the target `lldb-framework-headers`, which mean
lldb-framework no longer depended on `framework_headers`, so they never
actually got generated. This is a partial revert of r338058: I added
back the lldb-framework-headers target, but the framework-header-fix.sh
script still runs on the copied headers.
llvm-svn: 338074
Summary:
Previously the framework-header-fix script would change the sources
before they were copied, leading to unnecessary rebuilds on repeat
`ninja lldb` invocations. This runs the script on the headers after
they're copied into the produced LLDB.framework, meaning it doesn't
affect any files being built.
Patch by Keith Smiley <keithbsmiley@gmail.com>!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49779
llvm-svn: 338058
Summary:
Currently, if you build lldb-framework the entire framework doesn't
actually build. In order to build the entire framework, you need to actually
build lldb-suite. This abstraction doesn't feel quite right because
lldb-framework truly does depend on lldb-suite (liblldb + related tools).
In this change I want to invert their dependency. This will mean that lldb and
finish_swig will depend on lldb-framework in a framework build, and lldb-suite
otherwise. Instead of adding conditional logic everywhere to handle this, I
introduce LLDB_SUITE_TARGET to handle it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49406
llvm-svn: 337311
Summary:
We weren't using the Info.plist template in resources previously.
When using that template, some of the key's values weren't being populated
because some variables were not being defined. In one case, CMake didn't
like the substring expansion syntax of CFBundleIdentifier so I got rid of that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47792
llvm-svn: 335014
Summary:
In this patch I aim to do the following:
1) Create an lldb-framework target that acts as the target that handles generating LLDB.framework. Previously, liblldb acted as the target for generating the framework in addition to generating the actual lldb library. This made the target feel overloaded.
2) Centralize framework generation as much as it makes sense to do so.
3) Create a target lldb-suite, which depends on every tool and library that makes liblldb fully functional. One result of having this target is it makes tracking dependencies much clearer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48060
llvm-svn: 334968
Stefan Granitz