We don't need the variables in lit, we can use the capabilities to check
if the utility exists.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61533
llvm-svn: 359926
Summary:
Saves some build times, and they're not part of the usual
developer workflow.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, friss
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60780
llvm-svn: 358528
For some reason I had convinced myself that functions returning by
pointer or reference do not require recording their result. However,
after further considering I don't see how that could work, at least not
with the current implementation. Interestingly enough, the reproducer
instrumentation already (mostly) accounts for this, though the
lldb-instr tool did not.
This patch adds the missing macros and updates the lldb-instr tool.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60178
llvm-svn: 357639
Currently we'd always print the LLDB_REGISTER macro, even if the
LLDB_RECORD macro was already present. This patches changes that to make
it easier to incrementally update the macros.
Note that it's still possible for the RECORD and REGISTER macros to get
out of sync.
llvm-svn: 354400
The test had an implicit constructor for the Foo struct. Also, as the
instrumentation doesn't have to be reproducer specific, I moved the
tests into the lit/tools directory.
llvm-svn: 354294
Jonas Devlieghere