First half of PR40800, this patch adds DAG undef handling to icmp instructions to match the behaviour in llvm::ConstantFoldCompareInstruction and SimplifyICmpInst, this permits constant folding of vector comparisons where some elements had been reduced to UNDEF (by SimplifyDemandedVectorElts etc.).
This involved a lot of tweaking to reduced tests as bugpoint loves to reduce icmp arguments to undef........
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59363
llvm-svn: 356938
We already support 8-bits adds in convertToThreeAddress. But we can also support 8-bit OR if the bits are disjoint. We already do this for 16/32/64.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58863
llvm-svn: 355423
Looking into gcc and objdump behavior more this was overly aggressive. If the register is encoded in the instruction we should print %st(0), if its implicit we should print %st.
I'll be making a more directed change in a future patch.
llvm-svn: 353013
Summary:
When calculating clobbers for MS style inline assembly we fail if the asm clobbers stack top because we print st(0) and try to pass it through the gcc register name check. This was found with when I attempted to make a emms/femms clobber all ST registers. If you use emms/femms in MS inline asm we would try to use st(0) as the clobber name but clang would think that wasn't a valid clobber name.
This also matches what objdump disassembly prints. It's also what is printed by gcc -S.
Reviewers: RKSimon, rnk, efriedma, spatel, andreadb, lebedev.ri
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: eraman, gbedwell, lebedev.ri, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57621
llvm-svn: 352985
I'm hoping we can just replace SETCC_CARRY with SBB. This is another step towards that.
I've explicitly used zero as the input to the setcc to avoid a false dependency that we've had with the SETCC_CARRY. I changed one of the patterns that used NEG to instead use an explicit compare with 0 on the LHS. We needed the zero anyway to avoid the false dependency. The negate would clobber its input register. By using a CMP we can avoid that which could be useful.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55414
llvm-svn: 348959
Enable enableMultipleCopyHints() on X86.
Original Patch by @jonpa:
While enabling the mischeduler for SystemZ, it was discovered that for some reason a test needed one extra seemingly needless COPY (test/CodeGen/SystemZ/call-03.ll). The handling for that is resulted in this patch, which improves the register coalescing by providing not just one copy hint, but a sorted list of copy hints. On SystemZ, this gives ~12500 less register moves on SPEC, as well as marginally less spilling.
Instead of improving just the SystemZ backend, the improvement has been implemented in common-code (calculateSpillWeightAndHint(). This gives a lot of test failures, but since this should be a general improvement I hope that the involved targets will help and review the test updates.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38128
llvm-svn: 342578
Summary: This matches gcc and one cpuid dump I found online. Given that these are considered 7th generation x86 CPU it seems likely they support cmov since cmov was added by Intel in their 6th generation.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51264
llvm-svn: 340706
There is no way in the universe, that doing a full-width division in
software will be faster than doing overflowing multiplication in
software in the first place, especially given that this same full-width
multiplication needs to be done anyway.
This patch replaces the previous implementation with a direct lowering
into an overflowing multiplication algorithm based on half-width
operations.
Correctness of the algorithm was verified by exhaustively checking the
output of this algorithm for overflowing multiplication of 16 bit
integers against an obviously correct widening multiplication. Baring
any oversights introduced by porting the algorithm to DAG, confidence in
correctness of this algorithm is extremely high.
Following table shows the change in both t = runtime and s = space. The
change is expressed as a multiplier of original, so anything under 1 is
“better” and anything above 1 is worse.
+-------+-----------+-----------+-------------+-------------+
| Arch | u64*u64 t | u64*u64 s | u128*u128 t | u128*u128 s |
+-------+-----------+-----------+-------------+-------------+
| X64 | - | - | ~0.5 | ~0.64 |
| i686 | ~0.5 | ~0.6666 | ~0.05 | ~0.9 |
| armv7 | - | ~0.75 | - | ~1.4 |
+-------+-----------+-----------+-------------+-------------+
Performance numbers have been collected by running overflowing
multiplication in a loop under `perf` on two x86_64 (one Intel Haswell,
other AMD Ryzen) based machines. Size numbers have been collected by
looking at the size of function containing an overflowing multiply in
a loop.
All in all, it can be seen that both performance and size has improved
except in the case of armv7 where code size has regressed for 128-bit
multiply. u128*u128 overflowing multiply on 32-bit platforms seem to
benefit from this change a lot, taking only 5% of the time compared to
original algorithm to calculate the same thing.
The final benefit of this change is that LLVM is now capable of lowering
the overflowing unsigned multiply for integers of any bit-width as long
as the target is capable of lowering regular multiplication for the same
bit-width. Previously, 128-bit overflowing multiply was the widest
possible.
Patch by Simonas Kazlauskas!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50310
llvm-svn: 339922
This is almost the same as an existing IR canonicalization in instcombine,
so I'm assuming this is a good early generic DAG combine too.
The motivation comes from reduced bit-hacking for select-of-constants in IR
after rL331486. We want to restore that functionality in the DAG as noted in
the commit comments for that change and the llvm-dev discussion here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-July/124433.html
The PPC and AArch tests show that those targets are already doing something
similar. x86 will be neutral in the minimal case and generally better when
this pattern is extended with other ops as shown in the signbit-shift.ll tests.
Note the asymmetry: we don't include the (extend (ifneg X)) transform because
it already exists in SimplifySelectCC(), and that is verified in the later
unchanged tests in the signbit-shift.ll files. Without the 'not' op, the
general transform to use a shift is always a win because that's a single
instruction.
Alive proofs:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/ysli
Name: if pos, get -1
%c = icmp sgt i16 %x, -1
%r = sext i1 %c to i16
=>
%n = xor i16 %x, -1
%r = ashr i16 %n, 15
Name: if pos, get 1
%c = icmp sgt i16 %x, -1
%r = zext i1 %c to i16
=>
%n = xor i16 %x, -1
%r = lshr i16 %n, 15
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48970
llvm-svn: 337130
These test cases show that the "(select (and (x , 0x1) == 0), y, (z ^ y) ) -> (-(and (x , 0x1)) & z ) ^ y" doesn't work if the select condition is changed to (and (x, 0x1) != 1)
llvm-svn: 335389
Atom is the only x86 target that still uses schedule itineraries, if we can remove this then we can begin the work on removing x86 itineraries. I've also found that it will help with PR36550.
I've focussed on matching the existing model as closely as possible (relying on the schedule tests), PR36895 indicated a lot of these were incorrect but we can just as easily fix these after this patch as before. Hopefully we can get llvm-exegesis to help here,
There are a few instructions that rely on itinerary scheduling (mainly push/pop/return) of multiple resource stages, but I don't think any of these are show stoppers.
There are also a few codegen changes that seem related to the post-ra scheduler acting a little differently, I haven't tracked these down but they don't seem critical.
NOTE: I don't have access to any Atom hardware, so this hasn't been tested in the wild.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45486
llvm-svn: 329837
Re-enable commit r323991 now that r325931 has been committed to make
MachineOperand::isRenamable() check more conservative w.r.t. code
changes and opt-in on a per-target basis.
llvm-svn: 326208
This allows us to avoid an opsize prefix. And forcing some move immediates to i32 avoids a length changing prefix on those instructions.
This mostly replaces the existing combine we had for zext/sext+cmov of constants. I left in a case for sign extending a 32 bit cmov of constants to 64 bits.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43327
llvm-svn: 325601
This reverts commit r323991.
This commit breaks target that don't model all the register constraints
in TableGen. So far the workaround was to set the
hasExtraXXXRegAllocReq, but it proves that it doesn't cover all the
cases.
For instance, when mutating an instruction (like in the lowering of
COPYs) the isRenamable flag is not properly updated. The same problem
will happen when attaching machine operand from one instruction to
another.
Geoff Berry is working on a fix in https://reviews.llvm.org/D43042.
llvm-svn: 325421
Summary:
This change extends MachineCopyPropagation to do COPY source forwarding
and adds an additional run of the pass to the default pass pipeline just
after register allocation.
This version of this patch uses the newly added
MachineOperand::isRenamable bit to avoid forwarding registers is such a
way as to violate constraints that aren't captured in the
Machine IR (e.g. ABI or ISA constraints).
This change is a continuation of the work started in D30751.
Reviewers: qcolombet, javed.absar, MatzeB, jonpa, tstellar
Subscribers: tpr, mgorny, mcrosier, nhaehnle, nemanjai, jyknight, hfinkel, arsenm, inouehrs, eraman, sdardis, guyblank, fedor.sergeev, aheejin, dschuff, jfb, myatsina, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41835
llvm-svn: 323991
Discussed here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-January/120320.html
In preparation for adding support for named vregs we are changing the sigil for
physical registers in MIR to '$' from '%'. This will prevent name clashes of
named physical register with named vregs.
llvm-svn: 323922
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format, print
MBB references as '%bb.5'.
The MIR printer prints the IR name of a MBB only for block definitions.
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#" << ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)->getNumber\(\)/" << printMBBReference(*\1)/g'
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#" << ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)\.getNumber\(\)/" << printMBBReference(\1)/g'
* find . \( -name "*.txt" -o -name "*.s" -o -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#([0-9]+)/%bb.\1/g'
* grep -nr 'BB#' and fix
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40422
llvm-svn: 319665
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format,
always print registers as lowercase.
* Only debug printing is affected. It now follows MIR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40417
llvm-svn: 319187
Combine CMOV[i16]<-[SIGN,ZERO,ANY]_EXTEND to [i32,i64] into CMOV[i32,i64].
One example of where it is useful is:
before (20 bytes)
<foo>:
test $0x1,%dil
mov $0x307e,%ax
mov $0xffff,%cx
cmovne %ax,%cx
movzwl %cx,%eax
retq
after (18 bytes)
<foo>:
test $0x1,%dil
mov $0x307e,%ecx
mov $0xffff,%eax
cmovne %ecx,%eax
retq
Reviewers: craig.topper, aaboud, spatel, RKSimon, zvi
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36711
llvm-svn: 313982
Summary:
Subregister liveness tracking is not implemented for X86 backend, so
sometimes the whole super register is said to be live, when only a
subregister is really live. That might happen if the def and the use
are located in different MBBs, see added fixup-bw-isnt.mir test.
However, using knowledge of the specific instructions handled by the
bw-fixup-pass we can get more precise liveness information which this
change does.
Reviewers: MatzeB, DavidKreitzer, ab, andrew.w.kaylor, craig.topper
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: n.bozhenov, myatsina, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Patch by Andrei Elovikov <andrei.elovikov@intel.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37559
llvm-svn: 313524
Summary:
Reverts r311008 to reinstate r310825 with a fix.
Refine alias checking for pseudo vs value to be conservative.
This fixes the original failure in builtbot unittest SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-09-SignedArgs.
Reviewers: hfinkel, nemanjai, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: bjope, mcrosier, nhaehnle, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36900
llvm-svn: 312126
The comment for this code indicated that it should work similar to our
handling of add lowering above: if we see uses of an instruction other
than flag usage and store usage, it tries to avoid the specialized
X86ISD::* nodes that are designed for flag+op modeling and emits an
explicit test.
Problem is, only the add case actually did this. In all the other cases,
the logic was incomplete and inverted. Any time the value was used by
a store, we bailed on the specialized X86ISD node. All of this appears
to have been historical where we had different logic here. =/
Turns out, we have quite a few patterns designed around these nodes. We
should actually form them. I fixed the code to match what we do for add,
and it has quite a positive effect just within some of our test cases.
The only thing close to a regression I see is using:
notl %r
testl %r, %r
instead of:
xorl -1, %r
But we can add a pattern or something to fold that back out. The
improvements seem more than worth this.
I've also worked with Craig to update the comments to no longer be
actively contradicted by the code. =[ Some of this still remains
a mystery to both Craig and myself, but this seems like a large step in
the direction of consistency and slightly more accurate comments.
Many thanks to Craig for help figuring out this nasty stuff.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37096
llvm-svn: 311737
This reverts commit r311038.
Several buildbots are breaking, and at least one appears to be due to
the forwarding of physical regs enabled by this change. Reverting while
I investigate further.
llvm-svn: 311062
This change extends MachineCopyPropagation to do COPY source forwarding.
This change also extends the MachineCopyPropagation pass to be able to
be run during register allocation, after physical registers have been
assigned, but before the virtual registers have been re-written, which
allows it to remove virtual register COPY LiveIntervals that become dead
through the forwarding of all of their uses.
Reviewers: qcolombet, javed.absar, MatzeB, jonpa
Subscribers: jyknight, nemanjai, llvm-commits, nhaehnle, mcrosier, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30751
llvm-svn: 311038
The previous rev (r310208) failed to account for overflow when subtracting the
constants to see if they're suitable for shift/lea. This version add a check
for that and more test were added in r310490.
We can convert any select-of-constants to math ops:
http://rise4fun.com/Alive/d7d
For this patch, I'm enhancing an existing x86 transform that uses fake multiplies
(they always become shl/lea) to avoid cmov or branching. The current code misses
cases where we have a negative constant and a positive constant, so this is just
trying to plug that hole.
The DAGCombiner diff prevents us from hitting a terrible inefficiency: we can start
with a select in IR, create a select DAG node, convert it into a sext, convert it
back into a select, and then lower it to sext machine code.
Some notes about the test diffs:
1. 2010-08-04-MaskedSignedCompare.ll - We were creating control flow that didn't exist in the IR.
2. memcmp.ll - Choose -1 or 1 is the case that got me looking at this again. We could avoid the
push/pop in some cases if we used 'movzbl %al' instead of an xor on a different reg? That's a
post-DAG problem though.
3. mul-constant-result.ll - The trade-off between sbb+not vs. setne+neg could be addressed if
that's a regression, but those would always be nearly equivalent.
4. pr22338.ll and sext-i1.ll - These tests have undef operands, so we don't actually care about these diffs.
5. sbb.ll - This shows a win for what is likely a common case: choose -1 or 0.
6. select.ll - There's another borderline case here: cmp+sbb+or vs. test+set+lea? Also, sbb+not vs. setae+neg shows up again.
7. select_const.ll - These are motivating cases for the enhancement; replace cmov with cheaper ops.
Assembly differences between movzbl and xor to avoid a partial reg stall are caused later by the X86 Fixup SetCC pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35340
llvm-svn: 310717
We can convert any select-of-constants to math ops:
http://rise4fun.com/Alive/d7d
For this patch, I'm enhancing an existing x86 transform that uses fake multiplies
(they always become shl/lea) to avoid cmov or branching. The current code misses
cases where we have a negative constant and a positive constant, so this is just
trying to plug that hole.
The DAGCombiner diff prevents us from hitting a terrible inefficiency: we can start
with a select in IR, create a select DAG node, convert it into a sext, convert it
back into a select, and then lower it to sext machine code.
Some notes about the test diffs:
1. 2010-08-04-MaskedSignedCompare.ll - We were creating control flow that didn't exist in the IR.
2. memcmp.ll - Choose -1 or 1 is the case that got me looking at this again. I
think we could avoid the push/pop in some cases if we used 'movzbl %al' instead of an xor on
a different reg? That's a post-DAG problem though.
3. mul-constant-result.ll - The trade-off between sbb+not vs. setne+neg could be addressed if
that's a regression, but I think those would always be nearly equivalent.
4. pr22338.ll and sext-i1.ll - These tests have undef operands, so I don't think we actually care about these diffs.
5. sbb.ll - This shows a win for what I think is a common case: choose -1 or 0.
6. select.ll - There's another borderline case here: cmp+sbb+or vs. test+set+lea? Also, sbb+not vs. setae+neg shows up again.
7. select_const.ll - These are motivating cases for the enhancement; replace cmov with cheaper ops.
Assembly differences between movzbl and xor to avoid a partial reg stall are caused later by the X86 Fixup SetCC pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35340
llvm-svn: 310208
Convert vector increment or decrement to sub/add with an all-ones constant:
add X, <1, 1...> --> sub X, <-1, -1...>
sub X, <1, 1...> --> add X, <-1, -1...>
The all-ones vector constant can be materialized using a pcmpeq instruction that is
commonly recognized as an idiom (has no register dependency), so that's better than
loading a splat 1 constant.
AVX512 uses 'vpternlogd' for 512-bit vectors because there is apparently no better
way to produce 512 one-bits.
The general advantages of this lowering are:
1. pcmpeq has lower latency than a memop on every uarch I looked at in Agner's tables,
so in theory, this could be better for perf, but...
2. That seems unlikely to affect any OOO implementation, and I can't measure any real
perf difference from this transform on Haswell or Jaguar, but...
3. It doesn't look like it from the diffs, but this is an overall size win because we
eliminate 16 - 64 constant bytes in the case of a vector load. If we're broadcasting
a scalar load (which might itself be a bug), then we're replacing a scalar constant
load + broadcast with a single cheap op, so that should always be smaller/better too.
4. This makes the DAG/isel output more consistent - we use pcmpeq already for padd x, -1
and psub x, -1, so we should use that form for +1 too because we can. If there's some
reason to favor a constant load on some CPU, let's make the reverse transform for all
of these cases (either here in the DAG or in a later machine pass).
This should fix:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33483
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34336
llvm-svn: 306289
We currently generate BUILD_VECTOR as a tree of UNPCKL shuffles of the same type:
e.g. for v4f32:
Step 1: unpcklps 0, 2 ==> X: <?, ?, 2, 0>
: unpcklps 1, 3 ==> Y: <?, ?, 3, 1>
Step 2: unpcklps X, Y ==> <3, 2, 1, 0>
The issue is because we are not placing sequential vector elements together early enough, we fail to recognise many combinable patterns - consecutive scalar loads, extractions etc.
Instead, this patch unpacks progressively larger sequential vector elements together:
e.g. for v4f32:
Step 1: unpcklps 0, 2 ==> X: <?, ?, 1, 0>
: unpcklps 1, 3 ==> Y: <?, ?, 3, 2>
Step 2: unpcklpd X, Y ==> <3, 2, 1, 0>
This does mean that we are creating UNPCKL shuffle of different value types, but the relevant combines that benefit from this are quite capable of handling the additional BITCASTs that are now included in the shuffle tree.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33864
llvm-svn: 304688
Summary: LiveRangeShrink pass moves instruction right after the definition with the same BB if the instruction and its operands all have more than one use. This pass is inexpensive and guarantees optimal live-range within BB.
Reviewers: davidxl, wmi, hfinkel, MatzeB, andreadb
Reviewed By: MatzeB, andreadb
Subscribers: hiraditya, jyknight, sanjoy, skatkov, gberry, jholewinski, qcolombet, javed.absar, krytarowski, atrick, spatel, RKSimon, andreadb, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, mgorny, efriedma, davide, dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32563
llvm-svn: 304371
This also reverts follow-ups r303292 and r303298.
It broke some Chromium tests under MSan, and apparently also internal
tests at Google.
llvm-svn: 303369
Summary: LiveRangeShrink pass moves instruction right after the definition with the same BB if the instruction and its operands all have more than one use. This pass is inexpensive and guarantees optimal live-range within BB.
Reviewers: davidxl, wmi, hfinkel, MatzeB, andreadb
Reviewed By: MatzeB, andreadb
Subscribers: hiraditya, jyknight, sanjoy, skatkov, gberry, jholewinski, qcolombet, javed.absar, krytarowski, atrick, spatel, RKSimon, andreadb, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, mgorny, efriedma, davide, dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32563
llvm-svn: 302938
Currently we only combine shuffle nodes if they have a single user to prevent us from causing code bloat by splitting the shuffles into several different combines.
We don't take into account that in some cases we will already have combined all the users during recursively calling up the shuffle tree.
This patch keeps a list of all the shuffle nodes that have been combined so far and permits combining of further shuffle nodes if all its users are in that list.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29399
llvm-svn: 294183
In r260133, LLVM was changed to no longer extend i8/i16 return values,
as it's not required by the ABI. However, code was found in the wild
that relies on the old behaviour on Darwin, so this commit reverts
back to that old behaviour for Darwin.
On other platforms, it's less likely that code would be depending on
the old behaviour, as GCC and MSVC haven't been extending such return
values.
llvm-svn: 261235
This matches GCC and MSVC's behaviour, and saves on code size.
We were already not extending i1 return values on x86_64 after r127766. This
takes that patch further by applying it to x86 target as well, and also for i8
and i16.
The ABI docs have been unclear about the required behaviour here. The new i386
psABI [1] clearly states (Table 2.4, page 14) that i1, i8, and i16 return
vales do not need to be extended beyond 8 bits. The x86_64 ABI doc is being
updated to say the same [2].
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16907
[1]. https://01.org/sites/default/files/file_attach/intel386-psabi-1.0.pdf
[2]. https://groups.google.com/d/msg/x86-64-abi/E8O33onbnGQ/_RFWw_ixDQAJ
llvm-svn: 260133
QingShan Zhang